Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: U.S. PEDIATRICIAN FACING SEX, DRUG CHARGES IS OUT OF JAIL

2 views
Skip to first unread message

and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 5:39:00 PM12/16/09
to
But if someone does ask the question, the response
I suggest is, "That is why."

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

In article <4b29115e$0$5320$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net>,
"harmony" <a...@hotmail.com> posted:
>
> people have now stopped asking "how can a church going man do this?"
>
>
> Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > Pediatrician Facing Sex, Drug Charges Is Out of Jail
> >
> > WKRC
> > Cincinnati
> > Tuesday, December 15, 2009
> >
> > [Caption] Scott Blankenburg
> >
> > A Fairfield pediatrician charged with abusing former patients, is now free
> > on bond.
> >
> > Doctor Scott Blankenburg was indicted last week on new charges of
> > unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, bribery, complicity to obtain
> > dangerous drugs, and complicity to possession of heroin. Blankenburg
> > was already facing dozens of similar charges, for which he is to go
> > on trial in April.
> >
> > Today, a judge set a new bond for Blankenburg at $250,000 but allowed
> > him to be released for 10 percent of that amount. Blankenburg must
> > wear an electronic monitor and report to a "pretrial services
> > officer" once a week.
> >
> > Scott's twin brother Mark Blankenburg was convicted in October of
> > molesting former patients, drug trafficking and money laundering.
> >
> > More at:
> >
> http://www.local12.com/news/local/story/Pediatrician-Facing-Sex-Drug-Charges-
> Is-Out-of/LS7p--mOXEyPD9o1UTQYlg.cspx
> >
> > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > Om Shanti
> >
> > o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the
> > educational
> > purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may
> > not
> > have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
> > poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
> > fair use of copyrighted works.
> > o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
> > considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,
> > current
> > e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
> > o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others
> > are
> > not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the
> > article.
> >
> > FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
> > which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
> > owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
> > understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
> > democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
> > that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
> > provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
> > Title
> > 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
> > profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
> > included
> > information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
> > subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more
> > information
> > go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
> > If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
> > your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
> > copyright owner.
> >
> > Since newsgroup posts are being removed
> > by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
> > this post may be reposted several times.
>
>

0 new messages