She males continued
Blazin' Tommy D.
I was compelled to make further comment on the following
message I responded to as is posted below
FURTHER COMMENT:
From my own experience, sexual attraction is something that's
learned and developed. For people my age "Playboy" magazine
was the most accessible "masturbatory material" -i.e., comprised of nice
pictures of beautiful woman with their genitalia covered.
But I never met a person that learned how to masturbate
themselves. I didn't. My cousin told me you make your fingers like an okay
sign and rub it over your cock until you cum. When I finally
got the hang of it - mutilations, deformities and brushburn scars later - I
didn't
think about anything, when I did it, except how great cumming was
going to feel. Too bad the guy that showed my cousin forgot to tell him
about
"K-Y" Jelly, or else my cousin forgot to tell me.
"Pumping off" as my cousin called it, to magazines, came much
later after someone explained to me that it "heightened the sensation"
The earliest turn-on I can remember is seeing the nice curve
of a smooth skinned ass and I doubt it mattered whether it was on a
hairless man or a woman as long as it was nice enough to put me into that
stoned
like dreamy feeling.
A person could probably jack-off to pics of Richard Nixon
and cum. Perhaps over time, seeing Richard Nixon on television would
make them hard?
My point is, part of the phenomenon of she males may have been
born from censors covering woman's genitalia in "Playboy" pics confusing
us young whackers.
After all, if you're nice enough to excite yourself by looking in the
mirror, why buy a magazine?
BTD
Dear group
COMMENTS INSERTED BELOW:
Eric Dew <ed...@netcom.com> wrote in article <rame.956598018p957@bash>...
> In article <rame.956427613p1925@bash>, Humevesne <hume...@aol.com>
wrote:
> >honeyb...@aol.com writes:
ONE PERSON SAID:
"If porn keeps on going the way its going . . ."
"Remember boys, plastic surgery and modern medical
science can work wonders which combined with society's
ever evolving social mores . . . "
ANOTHER PERSON RESPONDED:
"Whether or not shemales become more mainstream depends on how well the
she/hes
involved can approximate the look of an attractive woman who just happens
to
have a dick.
The trouble with she-males is that so many of them look unattractive and,
frankly, freakish. Only a small minority of them look like beautiful women
with a cock.
But if you get a series of beautiful she-males who have the
charisma of a female porn star with a cock added to the mix, people might
find them more appealing".
COMMENTS: physicality is one way of looking at it. 1st, a woman has a
wider shoulder
and pelvic angle than a man. This is obvious in the angle from the hips to
the
knees, and in a sort of cliche maneuver - zippering up a dress, yourself.
2nd, women have
a much smaller rib cage and waist, so first off you're not going to find a
brick shithouse TV.
Other peculiarities of men are receding hairlines, "Adam's apple" and a
larger jaw. I think
a large majority of men don't actually recognize these things and are so
used to seeing men
with hair, that if they saw a shaven man of slight build with nice legs and
feet they might get
fooled and require a double take. The tease and attraction is certainly
part of it.
But physicality is only one way of looking at it. The art of impersonation
is impressionism,
a man "dressed" creating the impression of the feminine. This might be done
in a "camp" fashion
or a serious fashion. I think the challenge to such impressionist is
captured in the lyric of a David
Bowie song on "Hunkey Dory", if I recall correctly, "Bippity Boppity Hat .
.. . Oh Lord I could
do better than that".
I think that the people that are turned on by this are men that see a
woman and think, Geez,
her legs with a little work could look better than that and then see a guy
really killing himself to do
everything he can to look the best that he can as a woman, and the
curiosity/appreciation develops
from that aspect. Either there is an interest there or there never will be.
The only thing that will change
is that over time more men will admit to themselves, at least, that they do
have such an attraction and
what they do with it from there is their own business. Obviously there is a
demand. I think that's what
makes the whole thing interesting.
BTD
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ** rec.arts.movies.erotica FAQ at http://www.rame.net/faq **
> ** internet adult film database at http://www.iafd.com **
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
** rec.arts.movies.erotica FAQ at http://www.rame.net/faq **
** internet adult film database at http://www.iafd.com **
---------------------------------------------------------------------
** rec.arts.movies.erotica FAQ at http://www.rame.net/faq **
** internet adult film database at http://www.iafd.com **
FrankSimns
>But I never met a person that learned how to masturbate
>themselves. I didn't.
Not that it matters, but I did. When I was 12 years old and curious about
things, I started rubbing my dick against my pillows. (I had some vague
ideas
about sex, but not a lot of knlowledge.) When the time came, all I knew was
that I was rock hard and thought I really had to piss. I grabbed the end
of my
dick real hard to keep it in, ran to the toilet, and was extremely surprised
(and pleased) by what happened.
Frank