Message from discussion
CHRONICLE (no spoilers)
Received: by 10.68.213.68 with SMTP id nq4mr14374098pbc.2.1328628895096;
Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:34:55 -0800 (PST)
Path: lh20ni270906pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!t5g2000yqk.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <pwall...@moviepig.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: CHRONICLE (no spoilers)
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 07:21:28 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <70cf2cff-d90d-4679-bed0-ab6ccc67927c@t5g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
References: <5464df3b-6903-460b-86d7-8e4a42b95630@s7g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <a7e0e02b-5ea2-4ccf-a2f0-ff59bab000b1@y10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.49.127.115
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1328628894 1230 127.0.0.1 (7 Feb 2012 15:34:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:34:54 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: t5g2000yqk.googlegroups.com; posting-host=108.49.127.115; posting-account=PxE_9wkAAABGTDOSCTXjmijrUyU6von6
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6)
Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Feb 7, 9:23=A0am, nick <nickmacpherso...@AOL.com> wrote:
> On Feb 3, 4:27=A0pm, moviePig <pwall...@moviepig.com> wrote:> In the cate=
gory of one-of-a-kind movies, how about a sciFi horror
> > fantasy for and about teens that profits from substantial adult
> > restraint? =A0CHRONICLE is yet another "found footage" (well,
> > *assembled* footage) flick that proves the efficiency of this
> > narrative style. =A0It's reminiscent of lots of other movies, but a
> > spoiler-free one I can mention is TROLLHUNTER, for its nonchalance
> > about some fairly creative f/x work. =A0For all those reasons, CHRONICL=
E
> > strays enough from the beaten path to wind up as a winter
> > release ...but, in comparison, e.g., the "big" spring and summer
> > trailers with it left me cold. =A0Especially for being smarter than it
> > had to, CHRONICLE is solidly recommended.
>
> Did you know Chronicle was written by Max Landis, John's son? =A0I knew
> that going in and kept eyes open for any Landis touches and counted
> three, including the stucture of Chronicle (small to big to really
> big). =A0A couple things to add to what you said: =A0this is the most ope=
n-
> ended franchise beginner ever. =A0There's going to be Chronicle movies,
> TV shows, cartoons, comic books for decades to come. =A0Wait and see.
> Even if it suffers the usual found footage rapid decline in box office
> (not likely). =A0Speaking of the found footage style . . . I couldn't
> tell if the framing was too tight, making a lot of the visuals too
> closed in, or if it was being screened wrong in my theater because it
> looked like information was being cut off the top. =A0 I tried to Google
> any possible discussions of the technical aspects of Chronicle to see
> if anyone was talking about it but all I got was hundreds of sites
> offering me the chance to watch Chronicle for free.
>
> So when you're referring to the "big" spring and summer trailers,
> you're surely not including The Three Stooges in the bigness
> category? =A0I've seen that twice now and if I see it again I might
> start having nightmares.
(Wasn't Sean Penn once attached to tTS? ...as the only thing that gave
the project credibility?) Not just tTS, but also THE AVENGERS ...as a
measure of how miniature is my interest in superheroes, and how
miraculous is CHRONICLE's intelligent approach to the matter. I
almost look forward to maybe one(!) sequel. Fwiw, here's a reviewer
who goes elbows-up; and even if he's a bit overboard, I'll still
empathize with his enthusiasm at finding a movie in this genre this
good this early:
http://www.themovieboy.com/reviews/c/12_chronicle.htm (and NOT to
be read before viewing!)
Apart from the videocam look, I experienced no visual disconnect.
(Fwiw, I think the sequel would err in sticking with 'found-
footage' ...though I thought it -- again -- very effective here.)
And, though I only read later about Landis's kid, during the flick I
did think often of Brian De Palma...
--
- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com