Democrats support NAMBLA
The Gay and Lesbian Organizations that fully support NAMBLA
are Democrates because Bill Clinton needed their votes to win.
Check it out, it is on their website,
http://www.nambla.org supports John Kerry!!!!!
--------
Liberals Hate America!
They're doing their job. They busted an AQ cell up in Portland. Poor
Mike Hawash, innocent victim of "profiling" evil Ashcroft bastards.
Turned out to be guilty, imagine that! What were they called, the
Portland 7? You stupid, stupid people. The Left loves to whip people
into frenzies of hatred, which usually result in mass slaughter of
innocent people. Pardon us normal people if we automatically take such
"documentaries" as propoganda at first glance. It will probably save
our lives in the long run.
Yer hilarious!
> --------
> Liberals Hate America!
Could you define what you mean here by "America", specifically?
A bulletin about his local chapter's PAC report. Even the child molesters think
that Bush is a dick.
I guess it's better than being supported by them, for most people.
-Rich
Lefties here, socialists there, of course they're going to find
fault with a capitalist system, aren't they?
>Why won't they admit the truth?
> People hate them because they are assholes--money grubbing assholes. Why
> not just admit this save people a lot of time?
Ok , you first!
> Not only are they assholes,
> but as Michael Moore has correctly pointed out in his last two movies, they
> create an atmosphere of fear with which they can campaign from.
Oh yeah, the 'vast right wing conspiracy' that forced Bill Clinton to get a
snoogling from Monika.
> "The
> terrorists are going to kill us!"
Ahh, dude, they did.
> Where are these terrorist attacks?
Sept 11 2001, New york city.
> I
> remember one three years ago.
Give yourself a gold star.
> By pretending there is a constant terrorist
> threat they get to tell us how successful they are with the "war on terror".
Yeah how about that? No Al Qeada attacks on US soil in three years, good for us.
1. Michael Moore makes his points by leaving footage that contradicts him
on the cutting toom floor.
2. How do you make your living, just out of curiosity. Seems to me that a
lot of liberals that talk about how badly Conservatives screw people out
of their money do quite well themselves.
YEah, and then they turn around and call Conservatives 'Jack-booted
thugs', 'Brownshirts' and 'Nazis'.
As Dave Matthews said, "Look in the Mirror, My Friend..."
HAHAHA! Racial Profiling, indeed! How many would be terrorists have been
brought down by Racial Profiling?
They don't realize you *can't* have a truly free society when you're under
attack. Of course, if it were a Democrat/Liberal in power and 'racial
profiling' were taking place, it would be 'an evil neccessity to ensure
the security of the country'.
Both sides have good and bad points. Liberals don't see the bad of their
party, or the good of the conservatives, and vice versa.
Simple Answer: "I (spineless spinful "Vash") lie a *LOT*!"
Alternative answer: "I read some criticism on the Internet, so the criticism
MUST be true!"
Real answer: "I am a Bushevik troll!"
Vash The Stampede <tri...@2am.cn> wrote:
<snip>
>
> 1. Michael Moore makes his points by leaving footage that
> contradicts him on the cutting toom floor.
>
> 2. How do you make your living, just out of curiosity. Seems to me
> that a lot of liberals that talk about how badly Conservatives
> screw people out of their money do quite well themselves.
--
We don't know if 9/11 could have been stopped--but we do know Dubya
failed to stop it. That's the FACT.
Attack, lie, spin. Dubya's REAL trifecta.
Hate trolls? Want to be free to ignore them more easily? Write
groups-...@google.com and ask for a search parameter for the # of
newsgroups--with the default set to 1. Bye-bye troll cross-posts!
Do you agree that democracy is good and depends on serious discussion
of the issues? If so, don't reply to off topic, ad hominem garbage.
Send it to "The vile spewers of mindless blather thread".
Vash The Stampede <tri...@2am.cn> wrote:
<snip>
>
> YEah, and then they turn around and call Conservatives 'Jack-booted
> thugs', 'Brownshirts' and 'Nazis'.
>
> As Dave Matthews said, "Look in the Mirror, My Friend..."
>
> HAHAHA! Racial Profiling, indeed! How many would be terrorists have
> been brought down by Racial Profiling?
>
> They don't realize you *can't* have a truly free society when
> you're under attack. Of course, if it were a Democrat/Liberal in
> power and 'racial profiling' were taking place, it would be 'an
> evil neccessity to ensure the security of the country'.
>
> Both sides have good and bad points. Liberals don't see the bad of
> their party, or the good of the conservatives, and vice versa.
--
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:38:12 +0000, trotsky wrote:
>
>> Last time I checked, there were three documentaries playing in the Chicago
>> area that made the Bushies look bad: one on the "war" in Iraq, one about the
>> Fox News Channel, and F9/11. To hear the Republicans tell it, they're just
>> sweet, innocent, god fearin' folks, not rotten bastards as the documentaries
>> and protests all across the globe proclaim. Why won't they admit the truth?
>> People hate them because they are assholes--money grubbing assholes. Why
>> not just admit this save people a lot of time? Not only are they assholes,
>> but as Michael Moore has correctly pointed out in his last two movies, they
>> create an atmosphere of fear with which they can campaign from. "The
>> terrorists are going to kill us!" Where are these terrorist attacks? I
>> remember one three years ago. By pretending there is a constant terrorist
>> threat they get to tell us how successful they are with the "war on terror".
>
>
> 1. Michael Moore makes his points by leaving footage that contradicts him
> on the cutting toom floor.
Proof?
> 2. How do you make your living, just out of curiosity. Seems to me that a
> lot of liberals that talk about how badly Conservatives screw people out
> of their money do quite well themselves.
I haven't had a paycheck in over a year. I'm one of those that makes the
Bush comparison to Herbert Hoover particularly apt.
> Mike Hawash, innocent victim of "profiling" evil Ashcroft bastards.
> Turned out to be guilty, imagine that! What were they called, the
> Portland 7? You stupid, stupid people. The Left loves to whip people
> into frenzies of hatred, which usually result in mass slaughter of
> innocent people.
Oh, so there are a lot of examples, then?
>in article pan.2004.09.03....@2am.cn, Vash The Stampede at
>tri...@2am.cn wrote on 9/3/04 7:13 PM:
>
>> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:38:12 +0000, trotsky wrote:
>>
>>> Last time I checked, there were three documentaries playing in the Chicago
>>> area that made the Bushies look bad: one on the "war" in Iraq, one about the
>>> Fox News Channel, and F9/11. To hear the Republicans tell it, they're just
>>> sweet, innocent, god fearin' folks, not rotten bastards as the documentaries
>>> and protests all across the globe proclaim. Why won't they admit the truth?
>>> People hate them because they are assholes--money grubbing assholes. Why
>>> not just admit this save people a lot of time? Not only are they assholes,
>>> but as Michael Moore has correctly pointed out in his last two movies, they
>>> create an atmosphere of fear with which they can campaign from. "The
>>> terrorists are going to kill us!" Where are these terrorist attacks? I
>>> remember one three years ago. By pretending there is a constant terrorist
>>> threat they get to tell us how successful they are with the "war on terror".
>>
>>
>> 1. Michael Moore makes his points by leaving footage that contradicts him
>> on the cutting toom floor.
>
>
>Proof?
>
>
I think it's long established and you enjoy playing coy.
-Rich
> in article pan.2004.09.03....@2am.cn, Vash The Stampede at
> tri...@2am.cn wrote on 9/3/04 7:13 PM:
>
>> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:38:12 +0000, trotsky wrote:
>>
>>> Last time I checked, there were three documentaries playing in the Chicago
>>> area that made the Bushies look bad: one on the "war" in Iraq, one about the
>>> Fox News Channel, and F9/11. To hear the Republicans tell it, they're just
>>> sweet, innocent, god fearin' folks, not rotten bastards as the documentaries
>>> and protests all across the globe proclaim. Why won't they admit the truth?
>>> People hate them because they are assholes--money grubbing assholes. Why
>>> not just admit this save people a lot of time? Not only are they assholes,
>>> but as Michael Moore has correctly pointed out in his last two movies, they
>>> create an atmosphere of fear with which they can campaign from. "The
>>> terrorists are going to kill us!" Where are these terrorist attacks? I
>>> remember one three years ago. By pretending there is a constant terrorist
>>> threat they get to tell us how successful they are with the "war on terror".
>>
>>
>> 1. Michael Moore makes his points by leaving footage that contradicts him
>> on the cutting toom floor.
>
>
> Proof?
Interview with George Stephanopolous about 6 weeks ago. Even showed two of
the clips in question. Transcripts are available.
>
>
>> 2. How do you make your living, just out of curiosity. Seems to me that a
>> lot of liberals that talk about how badly Conservatives screw people out
>> of their money do quite well themselves.
>
>
> I haven't had a paycheck in over a year. I'm one of those that makes the
> Bush comparison to Herbert Hoover particularly apt.
You must be doing *something* ! When I was in a similar situation I worked
for myself under the table for a few months. As I said in another post, I
made *my* money on the backs of the rich who could afford to pay for my
services. Then I got a most excellent job with GE. Unfortunately, thanks
to CLINTON (two can play that game...) we were *outsourced* (yes, back in
1999, *before* Bush's policies had any effect on outsourcing) and I was
pounding the pavement again.
> Actual issue was anti-Dubya documentaries, which produced this off-the-wall,
> but typical Bushevik troll response. And *WHY* are the Busheviks too rude to
> check the spelling of their posts?
For someone so concerned with details, you sure do provide few yourself...
And *I* didn't change the topic, only responding to the change. But, as
one troll to another, we just have to keep picking on each other.
> On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 01:47:27 +0000, trotsky wrote:
>> I haven't had a paycheck in over a year. I'm one of those that makes the
>> Bush comparison to Herbert Hoover particularly apt.
>
> You must be doing *something* !
Yeah, I'm refinancing my house and waiting for a new President.
When I was in a similar situation I worked
> for myself under the table for a few months. As I said in another post, I
> made *my* money on the backs of the rich who could afford to pay for my
> services. Then I got a most excellent job with GE. Unfortunately, thanks
> to CLINTON (two can play that game...) we were *outsourced* (yes, back in
> 1999, *before* Bush's policies had any effect on outsourcing) and I was
> pounding the pavement again.
That may have been a trend that started under Clinton, but clearly Bush
hasn't done a fucking thing about American jobs in any capacity. I really
think people back him up because they feel sorry for how stupid he is.
That's interesting, because I have yet to see you say a fucking thing about
Bush's military record, or anything else of consequence for that matter.
Any comments on the relationship between him and "Bandar Bush", for example?
At least face facts, Republicans are basically pussies that don't want to
discuss the facts or issues.
>in article pan.2004.09.04....@2am.cn, Vash The Stampede at
>tri...@2am.cn wrote on 9/4/04 7:46 AM:
>
>> On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 01:47:27 +0000, trotsky wrote:
>
>>> I haven't had a paycheck in over a year. I'm one of those that makes the
>>> Bush comparison to Herbert Hoover particularly apt.
>>
>> You must be doing *something* !
>
>
>Yeah, I'm refinancing my house and waiting for a new President.
President pixie, who'll somehow reverse World economic trends?
> When I was in a similar situation I worked
>> for myself under the table for a few months. As I said in another post, I
>> made *my* money on the backs of the rich who could afford to pay for my
>> services. Then I got a most excellent job with GE. Unfortunately, thanks
>> to CLINTON (two can play that game...) we were *outsourced* (yes, back in
>> 1999, *before* Bush's policies had any effect on outsourcing) and I was
>> pounding the pavement again.
>
>
>That may have been a trend that started under Clinton, but clearly Bush
>hasn't done a fucking thing about American jobs in any capacity. I really
>think people back him up because they feel sorry for how stupid he is.
Well, if you can think of any president who was able to buck economic
evolution, I'd like to hear about him. What people don't seem to
realize is that the stock market crash precipitated by the Clinton
administration's idiotic approach to the rampant stock speculation and
the fake "high tech" boom of the 1990s was nearly as bad for the
United States as was the real estate speculation boom and crash in
Japan and the rest of the Orient back in the 1980s, which they NEVER
fully recovered from. When was the last time Japan's unemployment
rate was back down to 2%, like it was all through the 1970s and 1980s?
I really doubt you could do much of anything about outsourcing short
of instituting a completely closed economy, which might mean you could
keep certain jobs but would mean a vastly lower standard of living
for people as a whole. But look at it this way, all those nasty
polluting industries that the Liberals always cried about are now more
or less gone! Now it's the Chinese who have them.
-Rich
LMAO. Do a Google search on Shannon Jacobs and read some of his posts. Then
come back and talk to me about Democrats not wanting to discuss issues.
--
"The trouble with our liberal friends isn't that they're ignorant; its just
that they know so much that isn't so". - Ronald Reagan
"If liberals were prevented from ever again calling Republicans dumb, they
would be robbed of half their arguments. To be sure, they would still have
"racist," "fascist," "homophobe," "ugly," and a few other highly nuanced
arguments in the quiver. But the loss of "dumb" would nearly cripple
them." - Ann Coulter
excerpted from Living by faith Ministries website
--------------------------------------
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt,
they have done abominable works,
there is none that doeth good. Psalms 14:1
"Atheism is the death of hope, the suicide of the soul....." Anonymous
"Atheism is rather in the lip than in the heart of man....." Sir
Francis Bacon
"An atheist is a man who looks through a telescope and tries to
explain what he can't see....."
O.A. Battista : Power to Influence People c.1959
"Atheism is a theoretical formulation of the discouraged life....."
Harry Emerson Fosdick
"There are no atheist in foxholes....." William T.Cummings:
Sermons on Bataan, March 1942
"Only in Atheism does the spring rise higher than the source, the
effect exist without the cause, life come from a stone, blood from a
turnip, a silk purse from a sow's ear, a Beethoven Symphony or a Bach
Fugue from a kitten walking across the keys....." James M. Gillis
"Few men are so obstinate in their atheism, that a pressing danger
will not compel them to acknowledgment of a divine power....." Plato
"Atheism is a disease of the soul before it becomes an error of
understanding....." Plato
"No one ever dies an atheist....." Plato
"The religion of the atheist has a God-shaped blank at it's
heart....." H.G. Wells
"By night,an atheist half-believes in God....." Edward Young: Night
Thoughts
"The atheists are for the most part imprudent and misguided scholars
who reason badly who, not being able to understand the Creation, the
origin of evil, and other difficulties, have recourse to the
hypothesis the eternity of things and of inevitability....." Voltaire:
Philosophical Dictionary
"Atheists put on false courage in the midst of their darkness and
misaprehensions, like children who, when they fear to go in the
dark,will sing or whistle to keep their courage...." Alexander Pope
"An atheist's most embarrassing moment is when he feels profoundly
thankful for something,but can't think of anyone to thank for it...."
Mary Anne Vincent
Go here for famous quotes by scoffers
--------------------------------------
| Eternal Life | Hell is Real | The Gospel According to John |
| My Testimony |Why I Read the Authorized KJV Bible|
| The Hymnal | Messianic Prophecies Fulfilled by Jesus Christ |
| Epistle Dedicatory to the Authorized King James of 1611 |
-----------------------------------
--
Access Research Network
http://www.arn.org/
American Scientific Affiliation
http://www.asa3.org/
Answers in Genesis
http://www.answersingenesis.org/
Associates for Biblical Research
http://www.ChristianAnswers.net/abr/abrhome.html
Association of Christian Astronomers International
http://www.christian-astronomers.org/
Affiliation of Christian Geologists
http://www.wheaton.edu/ACG/
Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences
http://www.ctns.org/
Christian Geology Ministry
http://www.kjvbible.org/
Creatia
http://www.creatia.org/page.asp?page=1
Creation Research Society
http://www.creationresearch.org/
Creation Science Evangelism
http://www.drdino.com/
Creation World View
http://www.creationworldview.org/Index.htm
Discovery Institute
http://www.discovery.org/
Center for Renewal of Science & Culture
http://www.discovery.org/crsc/
--
Access Research Network
http://www.arn.org/
American Scientific Affiliation
http://www.asa3.org/
Answers in Genesis
http://www.answersingenesis.org/
Associates for Biblical Research
http://www.ChristianAnswers.net/abr/abrhome.html
Association of Christian Astronomers International
http://www.christian-astronomers.org/
Affiliation of Christian Geologists
http://www.wheaton.edu/ACG/
Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences
http://www.ctns.org/
Christian Geology Ministry
http://www.kjvbible.org/
Creatia
http://www.creatia.org/page.asp?page=1
Creation Research Society
http://www.creationresearch.org/
Creation Science Evangelism
http://www.drdino.com/
Creation World View
http://www.creationworldview.org/Index.htm
Discovery Institute
http://www.discovery.org/
Center for Renewal of Science & Culture
http://www.discovery.org/crsc/
thats cause you sit on your fat ass and do nothing all day, you lazy cunt.
move dat tub o lard, ya lard ass
> LMAO. Do a Google search on Shannon Jacobs and read some of his posts. Then
> come back and talk to me about Democrats not wanting to discuss issues.
And your proof that one person is somehow indicative of a trend in Democrats
is what, exactly?
> On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 15:13:11 GMT, trotsky <gms...@email.com> wrote:
>
>> in article pan.2004.09.04....@2am.cn, Vash The Stampede at
>> tri...@2am.cn wrote on 9/4/04 7:46 AM:
>>
>>> On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 01:47:27 +0000, trotsky wrote:
>>
>>>> I haven't had a paycheck in over a year. I'm one of those that makes the
>>>> Bush comparison to Herbert Hoover particularly apt.
>>>
>>> You must be doing *something* !
>>
>>
>> Yeah, I'm refinancing my house and waiting for a new President.
>
> President pixie, who'll somehow reverse World economic trends?
A trained monkey couldn't do any worse. Actually, by definition, a trained
monkey would do the same.
>> When I was in a similar situation I worked
>>> for myself under the table for a few months. As I said in another post, I
>>> made *my* money on the backs of the rich who could afford to pay for my
>>> services. Then I got a most excellent job with GE. Unfortunately, thanks
>>> to CLINTON (two can play that game...) we were *outsourced* (yes, back in
>>> 1999, *before* Bush's policies had any effect on outsourcing) and I was
>>> pounding the pavement again.
>>
>>
>> That may have been a trend that started under Clinton, but clearly Bush
>> hasn't done a fucking thing about American jobs in any capacity. I really
>> think people back him up because they feel sorry for how stupid he is.
>
> Well, if you can think of any president who was able to buck economic
> evolution, I'd like to hear about him. What people don't seem to
> realize is that the stock market crash precipitated by the Clinton
> administration's idiotic approach to the rampant stock speculation and
> the fake "high tech" boom of the 1990s was nearly as bad for the
> United States as was the real estate speculation boom and crash in
> Japan and the rest of the Orient back in the 1980s, which they NEVER
> fully recovered from. When was the last time Japan's unemployment
> rate was back down to 2%, like it was all through the 1970s and 1980s?
Japan is directly comparable to the U.S. in terms of economic conditions.
There are too many variables. Moreover, what you say doesn't have a grain
of truth in it. If the stock market situation was so vile under Clinton's
watch why didn't unemployment take a sharp rise? No, this was is all Bush:
after 9/11, instead of "talking tough" and lying about getting guys "dead or
alive" the stupid chimp bastard should've realized the economic problems
suffered by the airline industry caused a ripple effect through the rest of
the economy. Not enough was done to counteract this. The airlines dodged
the bullets of bankruptcy, but that isn't the same as them doing business as
usual. As for outsourcing, that was a trend that should've been
counteracted too. The truth really hit home when I heard the Republican
party used call centers in India to handle donations. These are really sick
people.
> I really doubt you could do much of anything about outsourcing short
> of instituting a completely closed economy, which might mean you could
> keep certain jobs but would mean a vastly lower standard of living
> for people as a whole.
Bullshit. If tariffs hadn't been instituted, American car companies would
be out of business. There is no reason extra taxes couldn't be levied on
jobs that are outsourced. If it cost companies more to move a job out of
the country there is no reason for them to do it. This is all about putting
the bean counters on a short leash where they belong.
But look at it this way, all those nasty
> polluting industries that the Liberals always cried about are now more
> or less gone! Now it's the Chinese who have them.
Whatever that means.
LOL!
That was just an example of one liberal. Do you really want me to post a
bunch more?
> "trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
> news:BD5FA434.C9D6%gms...@email.com...
>> in article u_n_c.2703$5Y6.2422@trnddc07, Phil Trevorrow at
>> phil...@hotmail.com wrote on 9/4/04 1:40 PM:
>>
>>
>>> LMAO. Do a Google search on Shannon Jacobs and read some of his posts.
> Then
>>> come back and talk to me about Democrats not wanting to discuss issues.
>>
>>
>> And your proof that one person is somehow indicative of a trend in
> Democrats
>> is what, exactly?
>
> That was just an example of one liberal. Do you really want me to post a
> bunch more?
Uh, yeah. Otherwise just admit to the group you were being a pompous ass
when you posted "LMAO". Don't you guys ever admit when you've shot yourself
in the dick?
ROFLOL, ignorance is truly bliss. Ok, since you either only read this one
thread or are a glutton for punishment, here we go:
Four More Months!
Chuck Martin
George Washington Hayduke
Jake M
Yang AthD h.c
Yang AthD (h.c) - His attempt to get a post in since everyone has him
plonked.
Mr. Smith
zepp
Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello
George W Fuckup
Now to be fair, there are some conservatives that do the same thing. I don't
subscribe to that tactic. I don't instantly insult anyone or call them names
whenever someone jumps down my throat. Why? Because I prefer honest debate
over hate-filled rhetoric but don't let that stop you as evidenced by your
remarks.
How could he? You've cornered the pompous ass market around here Trots.
Vash The Stampede <tri...@2am.cn> wrote:
<snip>
> For someone so concerned with details, you sure do provide few
> yourself...
>
> And *I* didn't change the topic, only responding to the change.
> But, as one troll to another, we just have to keep picking on each
> other.
<snip>
I guess you don't understand the words that are coming out of my keyboard.
What do a few anonymous dudes on a newsgroup have to do with the real world?
Do you have the mental capacity to distinguish between the two?
> Now to be fair, there are some conservatives that do the same thing. I don't
> subscribe to that tactic. I don't instantly insult anyone or call them names
> whenever someone jumps down my throat.
"LMAO" is insulting to most people that aren't lacking in mental capacity.
Hypocrite.
True, that would require having a dick first.
Trotsky's famous for calling everyone who disagrees with him, names. The
guy attracts trolls like a flys attracted to wallpaper.
It's pointless 'debating' anything with him.
This is what Trotsky snipped....
**********************************************************
How could he? You've cornered the pompous ass market around here Trots.
***********************************************************
As you can plainly see he lacks both the intellect and the balls to
deal with the conversation in context.
Is anyone really surprised?
We were talking about newsgoup posters here last time I checked.
> > Now to be fair, there are some conservatives that do the same thing. I
don't
> > subscribe to that tactic. I don't instantly insult anyone or call them
names
> > whenever someone jumps down my throat.
>
>
> "LMAO" is insulting to most people that aren't lacking in mental capacity.
> Hypocrite.
LMAO isn't insulting. Calling someone stupid is. Just because your arguments
make me laugh doesn't mean I'm insulting you.
He hasn't even come close to cornering me. He asked for names and I provided
a whole list of them. Hardly what one would consider being cornered.
And who is the one hurling insults and petty name calling? Hint: It isn't
me. So I guess my original statement about Democrats here is not only
correct but reinforced by every post you make.
Yup, the Left believes using racial profiling to find criminals
is somehow evil but at the same time, believes blatant racism is
perfectly acceptable when it comes to granting college admissions....
Guess the name above sums the subject line.
> Thank you for your typically rude and mindless contribution:
And who came at me with the rudeness first?
Who's been posting mindless contributions since long before I came on the
scene?
Pot...Kettle...Black.
You asked for it, Ace.
Maybe if you kept your node in the stars where it belonged and stayed out
of things that don't concern you you'd be left alone.
If you care what happens to this country why don't you live here?
And articles say you have a great method for dealing with Trolls. Where is
it. It *can't* be this. I've seen 5th graders come up with better methods...
Educated idiot.
You're an idiot.
Ahhh, you mean the ones that Trotsky makes, eh?
He's a Troll but he's fun to smack around and he keeps coming back
for more like a cuban welterweigh.
There you go, insult me again. Do you feel better? Perhaps superior for
having done it? Having done it, do you believe that you've won any argument?
> "trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
> news:BD61F8B1.CFA2%gms...@email.com...
>> in article aoN_c.1219$Q44.1027@trnddc09, Phil Trevorrow at
>> phil...@hotmail.com wrote on 9/5/04 6:34 PM:
>>
>>>>
>>>> "LMAO" is insulting to most people that aren't lacking in mental
> capacity.
>>>> Hypocrite.
>>>
>>> LMAO isn't insulting.
>>
>>
>> You're an idiot.
>
> There you go, insult me again.
I'm not insulting you--"You're an idiot" is on par with "LMAO"!
I don't know why, but it never ceases to amaze me to encounters dudes with
heads full of swiss cheese like you. And I don't mean that in the insulting
way.
You see? He isn't interested in debate, he wants to disrupt anger and confuse
so that debate isn't possible.
He would lose at debate you see, so he'll try to make it impossible.
He's a monkey with a computer and internet access, he can throw feces,
and that's full extent of his talents.
No, I think "Phil" might actually something to say, but he's too lost in the
windmills of his mind to say it. LMAO!
I say it over and over only your knees are jerking to hard so you can't
understand. Here, I'll type slowly for you this time: Act like an adult and
you'll be treated like an adult.
PS - Have a nice day :-)
<insert insults and petty name calling here>
> "trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
> news:BD646264.D2DA%gms...@email.com...
>> No, I think "Phil" might actually something to say, but he's too lost in
> the
>> windmills of his mind to say it. LMAO!
>
> I say it over and over only your knees are jerking to hard so you can't
> understand. Here, I'll type slowly for you this time: Act like an adult and
> you'll be treated like an adult.
Phil, I can't say this any more clearly: telling somebody you're laughing
your ass off at him is as childish as it gets. You're a hypocrite of the
highest order, and by flogging this dead horse it stands to reason that you
really lack intelligence, too.
Or, to put it in official Dick Cheney terms, go fuck yourself.
^ have? ^
> windmills of his mind to say it. LMAO!
Seems you have your own windmills to deal with.
Really now, even your insults are growing stale and tiresome.
Remeber back when we had an issue?
I.E; Where are all these scathing indictments coming from?
I think all the 'scathing indictments' might become from a reluctance
to deal with real issues.
Like why are so many Americans growing so fat?
Why is that Graig?
I think the answer is simple, because we have food, and it's good!
I'm having NY strip steak tonight, with a baked potato and sting beans.
Yeah that's good baby. I'm going to wash it down with a local micro brew.
( maybe two)
Damn it now I'm hungry and a have an hour left to go.