Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"Avatar" marketing must be worth $80M

0 views
Skip to first unread message

RichA

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:05:35 PM11/24/09
to
That movie is turning up everywhere. Boy, are they terrified.

moviePig

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:21:15 PM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 1:05 pm, RichA <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That movie is turning up everywhere.  Boy, are they terrified.

Umm... *making* a huge investment, and *protecting* a huge
investment. When, outside of Bellevue or risk-addiction, have those
ever been divorced?

--

- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com

trotsky

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:55:05 PM11/24/09
to
RichA wrote:
> That movie is turning up everywhere. Boy, are they terrified.


A big budget movie with a marketing campaign is a sign of terror? When
did the Jews in Hollywood become so generous?

trotsky

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:57:42 PM11/24/09
to
moviePig wrote:
> On Nov 24, 1:05 pm, RichA <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That movie is turning up everywhere. Boy, are they terrified.
>
> Umm... *making* a huge investment, and *protecting* a huge
> investment. When, outside of Bellevue or risk-addiction, have those
> ever been divorced?

Well, we know that Rich hasn't amounted to anything in life, because
most people with any mind toward business whatsoever know there's always
a risk vs. reward quotient.

RichA

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 4:13:22 PM11/24/09
to

moviePig wrote:
> On Nov 24, 1:05 pm, RichA <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That movie is turning up everywhere.  Boy, are they terrified.
>
> Umm... *making* a huge investment, and *protecting* a huge
> investment. When, outside of Bellevue or risk-addiction, have those
> ever been divorced?
>

Easy. They could show one ad for the upcoming "The Hobbit" movie a
week before it opens and it will make $1B. "Avatar" is no sure bet
and they are pulling out all the stops. I've even seen them
shoehorning it onto talk shows the way no movie has ever been. It's
not protection, it's desperation.

moviePig

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 4:16:03 PM11/24/09
to

It's fear, and it's expected.

Michael

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 5:09:03 PM11/24/09
to
Actually, I am quite excited about watching a 3-d movie. I have never seen
one, you see. I keep wondering if 3-d is a devlopment that will draw more
people to the cimema in future, and thus save the industry from the loss
coming of home movies and file sharing. But you are right about being
supscious about overmarketing.

"RichA" <rande...@gmail.com> skrev i melding
news:d1b1b14b-f5d9-4c77...@o31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...

RichA

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 7:38:52 PM11/24/09
to

Michael wrote:
> Actually, I am quite excited about watching a 3-d movie. I have never seen
> one, you see. I keep wondering if 3-d is a devlopment that will draw more
> people to the cimema in future, and thus save the industry from the loss
> coming of home movies and file sharing.

3D is interesting, but it's "not there yet" and can't compete with a
2D image from a good projector on a good screen. You go more for the
effect (of course) than overall quality. Peter Jackson said that he
thought it made sense to go with 3D but that the image was dull, like
looking at a regular image through sunglasses. I'm sure 3D IMAX
(which I've yet to see) is pretty amazing.

jessica_smith_nyc

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 11:24:45 PM11/24/09
to
Yeah........sounds like a bust already.......

--
http://www.moviesitearchive.com

BroTHeR zAcHaRy

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 12:20:38 AM11/25/09
to
On Nov 24, 4:38 pm, RichA <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > Actually, I am quite excited about watching a 3-d movie. I have never seen
> > one, you see. I keep wondering if 3-d is a devlopment that will draw more
> > people to the cimema in future, and thus save the industry from the loss
> > coming of home movies and file sharing.
>
> 3D is interesting, but it's "not there yet"

The point of Avatar is that it _is_ there now, or at least it will be
in a month. But we will see...

TBerk

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 1:42:24 AM11/25/09
to
On Nov 24, 10:05 am, RichA <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That movie is turning up everywhere.  Boy, are they terrified.

What is really the matter? Really.


berk

moviePig

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 9:35:22 AM11/25/09
to
On Nov 25, 12:20 am, BroTHeR zAcHaRy <victortheclea...@gmail.com>
wrote:

3D-Imax is indeed 'there now' with AVATAR, just as it was with
BEOWULF, and has been since POLAR EXPRESS. However, the Real-3D of
the multiplexes is, in some ways, visibly inferior to the '50s
(...even though digital-projection has its upside)..

Fraser Johnston

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 1:18:50 AM11/27/09
to

"Michael" <michae...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b0c5857$0$12416$a926...@news.buzzardnews.com...

> Actually, I am quite excited about watching a 3-d movie. I have never seen
> one, you see. I keep wondering if 3-d is a devlopment that will draw more
> people to the cimema in future, and thus save the industry from the loss
> coming of home movies and file sharing. But you are right about being
> supscious about overmarketing.


I think it is. I resent what movies cost to see but see it as being more
worthwhile for a 3d movie mainly because I don't have the technology at home to
see it in 3d, whereas my home theatre is generally as good or better than
seeing a normal film at the movies.

Fraser


rochrist

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 12:44:09 AM12/22/09
to

It's going to kill you when it tops 1 billion, isn't it?

0 new messages