Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Minicomp survey results
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
David Fisher  
View profile  
 More options Oct 25 2008, 4:19 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
From: "David Fisher" <davidfis...@australiaonline.net.au>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:19:27 +1100
Local: Sat, Oct 25 2008 4:19 pm
Subject: Minicomp survey results
(This is in reference to the two recent surveys about
minicomps, one aimed at authors and one for players).

GamePlayComp and EnvComp were ranked highly by both
authors and players, so they will both be included.

Where there was a major conflict between player and author
votes, authors were preferred. This means that RoFLComp
(voted low by players but top by authors) will be included,
and the "time" competition won't be (voted top by players;
I probably shouldn't have included it in the original list,
but it's still interesting to see what people voted).

That left three more to select. AnimalComp was voted low
by both, and all the rest had 5 author votes each (excluding
"not likely to enter" voters). The top two player votes
for the competitions were for NPCComp and AbilityComp,
so they are in.

MultiPathComp, SenseComp and MultiComp (for multiple,
swappable PCs) all had a similar number of player votes.
SenseComp had the most "previously entered a minicomp"
author votes, so it seems the most likely one to have
more entries. It also seems a bit more finishable in
three months.

So the final list is:

* RoFLComp (simulation)
* EnvComp (unusual setting)
* AbilityComp (PC with a special ability)
* NPCComp (convincing NPCs)
* SenseComp (PC whose main sense is not sight)
* GamePlayComp (non standard gameplay)

Here are the proposed dates; if anyone is pretty sure they will enter
one of these but the date is a problem for them, please let me know
so I can change things around:

Nov 1 RoFLComp
Dec 15 EnvComp
Feb 1 AbilityComp (RoFLComp ends)
Mar 15 NPCComp (EnvComp ends)
May 1 SenseComp (AbilityComp ends)
Jun 15 GameplayComp (NPCComp ends)
Aug 1 (SenseComp ends)
Sep 15 (GameplayComp ends)

These dates are not "official" yet , though -- there will be a proper
announcement when they are all finalised.

It's hard to know in advance how many entries there will actually be,
but it is an interesting experiment anyway.

Thanks to everyone who voted!

David Fisher


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Fisher  
View profile  
 More options Oct 25 2008, 4:33 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
From: "David Fisher" <davidfis...@australiaonline.net.au>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:33:56 +1100
Local: Sat, Oct 25 2008 4:33 pm
Subject: Re: Minicomp survey results
"David Fisher" <davidfis...@australiaonline.net.au> wrote in message

news:1224965962.642540@kangaroo.ozonline.com.au...

> So the final list is:

> * RoFLComp (simulation)
> * EnvComp (unusual setting)
> * AbilityComp (PC with a special ability)
> * NPCComp (convincing NPCs)
> * SenseComp (PC whose main sense is not sight)
> * GamePlayComp (non standard gameplay)

I just realised how different this looks to the one I sent in the "Playing
IF minicomps" thread ...

The main reason is because I am excluding votes from authors who said that
they were unlikely to enter. (If anyone is really interested in the details,
mail me and I'll send them to you).

David Fisher


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
George Oliver  
View profile  
 More options Oct 27 2008, 4:12 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
From: George Oliver <georgeolive...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Oct 27 2008 4:12 pm
Subject: Re: Minicomp survey results
On Oct 25, 1:19 pm, "David Fisher"

<davidfis...@australiaonline.net.au> wrote:
> Nov 1 RoFLComp
> Dec 15 EnvComp
> Feb 1 AbilityComp (RoFLComp ends)
> Mar 15 NPCComp (EnvComp ends)
> May 1 SenseComp (AbilityComp ends)
> Jun 15 GameplayComp (NPCComp ends)
> Aug 1 (SenseComp ends)
> Sep 15 (GameplayComp ends)

This looks good to me. I like the idea of a series quite a bit.

It would be cool to be able to build on previous entries, both with
plot, setting and so on and with libraries, or do you think it'd be
better to focus exclusively on each theme and each theme only?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Fisher  
View profile  
 More options Oct 27 2008, 4:40 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
From: "David Fisher" <davidfis...@australiaonline.net.au>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:40:18 +1100
Local: Mon, Oct 27 2008 4:40 pm
Subject: Re: Minicomp survey results
"George Oliver" <georgeolive...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:8a3ee646-63b2-48d2-9dd4-c44ab190066c@v16g2000prc.googlegroups.com...

Well, if someone wants to enter more than one of them and
make their games connected, that would be interesting --
but the general idea was to have a list of independent themes
so that people could have a few different ones to choose from.

David Fisher


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google