Sky View #1: http://www.techno-impressionist.com/skypano1.htm
Sky View #1 is the latest in a series of "Views" by Tony Karp. This is
part of an experiment in a new way of viewing art on the Internet.
This image is larger than your browser. To properly view it, maximize
your browser window to fill the monitor screen. Scroll the image by
using the arrows on the browser's scrollbars. This will move the
image across the screen under your control.
Some Views are vertical, and some are horizontal. Some are bigger in
both dimensions. You will have to explore each one to discover what is
hidden within.
To see all of the Views in the Techno-Impressionist Museum, look here:
http://www.techno-impressionist.com/viewindex1.htm
For more information about this new way of viewing art on the
Internet, please contact the Techno-Impressionist Museum.
Tony Karp, Curator, Techno-Impressionist Museum -
tk...@techno-impressionist.com
Techno-Impressionist Museum: http://www.techno-impressionist.com
>For more information about this new way of viewing art on the
>Internet, please contact the Techno-Impressionist Museum.
Ummmmm-what's new to you is old hat
to anyone with a digital camera and
"stitching" software. Yours generally
does a poor job of stitching, btw.
A good combination of camera/software
should leave a seamless transition
between frames.
One problem that arises when stitching is that
lighting is going to affect the auto-settings
of your camera so that each frame may
have different exposure times, making
it very difficult to get a clean transition.
For example: you may be shooting into the
sun in one frame and away from it in
subsequent frames and your camera is not
capable of making intelligent exposure
compensations with the thought of stitching
the frames together later.
>Ummmmm-what's new to you is old hat
>to anyone with a digital camera and
>"stitching" software. Yours generally
>does a poor job of stitching, btw.
>A good combination of camera/software
>should leave a seamless transition
>between frames.
>
>One problem that arises when stitching is that
>lighting is going to affect the auto-settings
>of your camera so that each frame may
>have different exposure times, making
>it very difficult to get a clean transition.
>
>For example: you may be shooting into the
>sun in one frame and away from it in
>subsequent frames and your camera is not
>capable of making intelligent exposure
>compensations with the thought of stitching
>the frames together later.
Sorry, but Sky View #1 was a single photograph. As are many others in
this series.
What's new here is the way they're displayed.
>Sorry, but Sky View #1 was a single photograph. As are many others in
>this series.
>
>What's new here is the way they're displayed.
I'm sorry but I still don't get it.
I see nothing new in what you've done.
Maybe someone else will offer comment
and I can then understand what it is
that I'm missing in your presentation???
>I'm sorry but I still don't get it.
>I see nothing new in what you've done.
>Maybe someone else will offer comment
>and I can then understand what it is
>that I'm missing in your presentation???
Okay, Mayo, I will take you at your word.
Go here:
http://www.techno-impressionist.com/viewindex1.htm
and look at the pictures indexed there.
And not just one or two.
Then come back here and list three or four other sites that you feel are
doing the same thing. And an analysis of why you believe this.
I'm curious to see how good your perception really is.
Tony Karp, Curator, Techno-Impressionist Museum -
tk...@techno-impressionist.com
Visit the museum:
Techno-Impressionist Museum: http://www.techno-impressionist.com
>Then come back here and list three or four other sites that you feel are
>doing the same thing. And an analysis of why you believe this.
I'm not going to waste my time on your
education, but here is ONE web site that
has a MUCH MORE interesting way of presenting
panoramic imagery:
http://www-ce.uta.edu/wrinkle2k/cont.html
As for images too large to fit on someone's
monitor, what's the "trick" and why are
you making claims for being unique? I see
nothing new or unique in any of your images
aside from the fact I have to scroll my
monitor both horizontally and vertically.
Tony, I have no idea what your
monitor size is, but it took me
all of five minutes to put this
in place for your viewing. If you
have less than a 21 inch monitor,
you'll have to use the scroll bars
in order to see the entire image.
Or you can just increase the size of your monitor's resolution.
What's the highest now? 800 x 600, 1024 x something...
=====================
Naked Angel Art
http://www.rcip.com/nerdgerl
"Welcome To Heaven"
Host Name Lookup Failed
The Proxomitron couldn't find the site named...
www-ce.uta.edu
Check that the name is correct. If so, the site may have changed or may
no longer exist.
>Tony, I have no idea what your
>monitor size is, but it took me
>all of five minutes to put this
>in place for your viewing. If you
>have less than a 21 inch monitor,
>you'll have to use the scroll bars
>in order to see the entire image.
Mayo, not exactly sure what my name in large letters is supposed to
show, so it looks like you don't understand what I'm up to. But that's
okay. Some will get it and some won't, so don't feel bad.
Also, what does the physical size of the monitor have to do with whether
or not I can see the whole image at one time? It's related to the
monitor's resolution, not size. Mine is 1280 x 1024. It's only a 17 inch
(LCD), but I can see the whole image.
Thanks for the education. I hereby appoint you as my official Louis
Leroy.
Tony Karp, Curator, Techno-Impressionist Museum -
tk...@techno-impressionist.com
Techno-Impressionist Museum: http://www.techno-impressionist.com
>>http://www-ce.uta.edu/wrinkle2k/cont.html
>
>Host Name Lookup Failed
I have no trouble accessing it so try again
another time. If you continue to have trouble
with that site, try this alternative page which
lists mirror sites for "wrinkle":
http://www.hotspotshawaii.com/wrinkleintime/mirrors.html
And if all else fails, do a GOOGLE on
"wrinkle" and "qtvr" and "apple quick time 4"