-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
Hi there,
I was intrigued by your plea for information on alkyds. So, I looked up the
subject in my three reference books on painting mediums. You are right, there
seems to be no information or opinion on this medium beyond a questioning of its
durability. All three books state, however, that alkyd paints don't crack.
I shall watch this space with interest!
Petra Rawlence
The alkyds in my hardware store are all pure liquid and much too thin
for my use. I like to mix just as muchg alkyd as I want into my tube
paint. Also the tube paint has more intense cvolor and no filler-not
true of hardware store paint, which is full of non-pigment filler. It
is not just a question of permanence but also of the character of the
painting process. If you compare the result of alkyd based artist
grade oil white as made by roberson with oil base artist grade Old
Holland Titanium it is night and day. How much more so would store
paint be-midnight and day?
Sincerely,
Gabriel
That aside, on the question at hand, I'd say that high quality hardware
store paints are mostly designed to be applied to hard surfaces, and
that the surface should be well primed to isolate the substrate from the
paint. These paints come in a pretty liquid state so they wouldn't
allow much flexibility in painting method. It would probably be nearly
impossible to build them up to a frosting like impasto effect. I'd
suspect that color fastness would vary widely from color to color, and
that mixing even the aparent primary colors would result in some strange
and unpredictable results.
Whether you choose to embark in such experiments or not doesn't really
matter to me, (and probably to most people), but you have to accept the
responsibility for the results of your experiments. Are you prepared to
stand behind the work twenty years from now? Do you want to be written
as someone who like Ryder and Schnable, (and others), who had nearly
complete disdain for archival considerations?
My personal feeling on this is that it matters not what the artist
of today uses by way of materials. So many artists have used
non-archival materials in their work that it has become accepted
practice, even among the 'elite.' Ryder and Rothko come instantly
to mind when thinking of 'elite' artists whose works have suffered
severe changes from when they were first completed.
I see in a recent issue of Art News a review of works by artists
who acknowledge the use of hardware store paints in their works.
I believe it is purely a matter of manipulation and personal
preference by/for the artist. If YOU like using thin enamels,
then use the. I remember a retired commercial artist I once met
who went about town doing quick portraits of people on the street
and he always had little bottles of hardware store enamels with
which he did the portraits. I still have the one he did of me
somewhere. You would refer to him as a 'quick sketch' artist,
I suppose, in spite of his using enamels for his sketches.
Cheers, T'bird.
Most people buy artwork because they like what they see and not because the
artist used a certain paint brush or a brand of paint.
I worked in exotic woods and did my best to finish them to last as long as
they could. Several times the woods dramatically changed colors which I
did not anticipate but people seemed to love the works in spite of it. No
one ever asked me or anyone that I knew about the archial quality of their
work
When I was in college thirty years ago, several instructors I had would
judge the work of the students based on the type and brand of paint the
students used which I never understood because I always thought if you had
nothing to say what difference did it make what paint you used.