His web site is almost finished (within days) and all of it is functioning
except for the "Purchase" page. Take advantage of this preview to get first
shot at one of his original oils. We only sell originals. The website has
not yet been submitted to search engines, so this truly is a unique
opportunity.
Enjoy the art!
David Schiesher
Sales Associate
Elvio Zorzenon Fine Art
The paintings are about the best they could be under such
circumstances.
--
Thur
However, they would look good in a 70s office. Bright and will not
distract anyone from their work.
Have a nice day. Bill
You're right words fail you.
David
"Gloria_Emma Wetzell Moya Mendez" <gloria...@bluewin.ch> wrote in message
news:433005f6$1...@news.bluewin.ch...
Good one Bill. Communist now equates to Jewish? I know a number of
Israelis, among others, who might beg to differ. As of course would
anyone who ever opened a history book (at least one not on the Aryan
Brotherhood approved reading list..) As for Felix Dzerzhinsky, you nit,
he wasn't Jewish; he was born Catholic and in his youth, for a while,
even felt called to the priesthood. FWIW, he wasn't even Russian; he
was born into a family of Polish gentry.
Cheers;
Chris
Regards;
Chris
Have a nice day. Bill.
Bill said in another thread:_
> You're giving Picasso more attention than he deserves. He was a jew
> who spent most of his life sticking his finger in the eye of artists
> better than himself, and trying to denigrate a thousand years of great
> art which focused on the Christian heritage of Europe. Don't look for
> meaning in his doodles. It HAS none! And without the force of his
> ethnic community propping up demand for his work by bogus claims of
> sales at high prices, no one would allow his work to hang on their
> walls. Picasso was good at two things: abusing women and self promotion.
The whole post was an attack of both P.'s art and his morals.
The inclusion of his supposed race can be read in no other
way than that it was an attempt to use the word as a term of
abuse.
If just one clue had been given as to why his supposed race
had to be mentioned, then other possibilities could have hidden
the intentions.
The attack on his morals was pathetic.
Being a "jew" is no different to being a Catalan or a Spaniard.
Picasso's attitude to sex and women and the accepted "morals"
of the day was little different to many other painters both great
and humble.
Most painters of any worth stand apart from their fellows
in some way. Their commentary on life is sharper, their
intensity deeper and their insight painfully attuned to the world
about them.
--
Thur
I agree to a large extent with Biljo (and that's rare, believe me) -
you should be considered more an amusing crackpot than anything else -
except for the fact that as both a political and asthetic conservative
I find your singular ignorance does far more harm than good to the
notion of understanding what went wrong with art 100 years ago, and how
to heal the breach grown between it and the rest of society. Most
distastefully, and as Thur rightly points out, you attempt to use
supposed racial - or even political - characteristics in order to
denigrate an artists work. Do you really think that that washes with
anyone other than complete cultural isolate these days? It's just as
vapidly nihilistic as the arguments of your counterparts on what might
be termed the extreme left of the art world, who try and portray
traditional arts as representative of an oppressive paternalism. I'd
love to see both you and them shooed back to high school until you had
achieved at least a grade 9 or 10 education, but unfortunately I doubt
they'd have you. I suppose the one benefit your existence yields up is
as a reminder to those of us who do have a real interest in art what
becomes of the person who fails to think, and to think tolerantly.
Thanks, at least, for that.
Cheers;
Chris
Thank you for the apology, but I don't expect everyone to like Elvio's work.
I also know that many people do like his work because only six of his
current paintings in the gallery have not been sold yet, which means he sold
13 paintings in about a month. Not bad. I believe that one's appreciation of
artwork is determined by very personal and subjective factors and no one
should be judged according to what they like or don't like.
For instance, in reference to your comments about his work, some people may
like center-focussed compositions or right-leaning arrangements (politics
aside) or unchallenging dynamic ranges of color and tone. I for one, having
not studied art, have no idea what you mean by the latter point. I can't
critically or academically analyze a painting as many of you are able to do.
(I'm a mental health therapist.) But I know, somehow, when I look at a piece
of art whether I like it or not. I like some of Elvio's work and some I
don't like.
As a mental health therapist, I could say much about Bill's critique of the
paintings when he said they were "Rotten, Stupid, Worthless, Talentless,
Hopeless, Childish, and Imbecillic", and then in the same breath says, "Have
a nice day." but my professionalism and compassionate nature prevents me
from doing so. And I've learned how to allow words with such negative energy
to move through and out of me instead of getting stuck inside of me, so that
they leave no lasting impression.
I've never studied Picasso's work either and I really don't care with which
political party or nationality or religion he chooses to align himself. All
I know is that his name is known by the whole world and that his work has
had a huge impact on contemporary art, and for that alone, he deserves
respect.
All the best,
David
"chris" <caldwell...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1127534162....@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Matthew 7:5
--
Thur
Luke 15:24 ? Or perhaps John 8:7?
(I may not be religious, but I did go to a church school...)
Chris
The important thing to remember about criticism is that it has little
weight unless we think the person making isn't an idiot. The
assumption that all criticism has equal weight, because all critics are
equally competent/capable of reasoned, critical thinking, is pretty
absurd. We too often become upset at criticism that we should just
dismiss because the person giving it is simply stupid and/or way off
base.
>Gloria_Emma . . . said, "Bill, thank you for taking
>the time to look at the paintings. I found your comments unhelpful and
>mean.
>I can't imagine you saying what you said to Elvio in person. He's a 66
>year
>old guy who loves to paint and sells almost everything he makes."
Except for the fact that his paintings are run-of-the-mill- nothing.
Not quite as bad as Fox.
>The important thing to remember about criticism is that it has little
>weight unless we think the person making isn't an idiot. The
>assumption that all criticism has equal weight, because all critics are
>equally competent/capable of reasoned, critical thinking, is pretty
>absurd. We too often become upset at criticism that we should just
>dismiss because the person giving it is simply stupid and/or way off
>base.
This guy is a patronizining ass.
If Mani Deli likes your work, STOP PAINTING! Do something else now.
Run for the hills!
If he however hates your work - take heart, you are on the right path.
I can't answer that question because I've never met Bill or Mani and I
refuse to make generalizations about "people like Bill and Mani". There
could be many reasons for posting outrageous, inflammatory statements, and
any that I would mention would be pure speculation, so I won't mention any.
David