> Part B
>..show the dynamic vigor of shape..<
>..their spatial extension..<
>..reveals the dynamic movements of their mass in three-dimensional
> space.< etc.
Without a glossary here there can be no common understanding.
> Part C
>" the vertical
> growth of a tree or plant, or the downward pull of gravity--the
> vertical line opposed by the horizontal line,
The downward pull of gravity? Are we in a Physics lesson here, or
trying to interpret what we see?
I think poetry should take a back seat when discussing such
practicalities.
I do not deny that there are lines and points (and many other features)
which can be used and highlighted or extended upon for use in artistic
interpretation, but given the above, we could all make whatever we
wanted from it.
Thanks for the quotes, which caught my attention.
My preference is to hear a spade called a spade.
Thur
Where you are concerned, this is true.
>
> > Part C
> >" the vertical
> > growth of a tree or plant, or the downward pull of gravity--the
> > vertical line opposed by the horizontal line,
> The downward pull of gravity? Are we in a Physics lesson here, or
> trying to interpret what we see?
> I think poetry should take a back seat when discussing such
> practicalities.
Then how did you recognize them as practicalities, or are you just
complaining about writing style?
...given the above, we could all make whatever we
> wanted from it.
Yes, and the great artists did exactly that, which is exactly the
point.
> My preference is to hear a spade called a spade.
And mine is to call a geek a geek.
Dilettante
--
take care: Keith
The eye should not be lead where there is nothing to see.
Robert Henri - The Art Spirit
"Dilettante" <hu...@myself.com> wrote in message
news:ba63903f.03121...@posting.google.com...
and mine is that most artschool babble is of no practical value.
"Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are
conservative." -John Stuart Mill
Tired of Modern Art? check
http://www3.sympatico.ca/manideli/
And mine is to call a dweeb a dweeb.