fine art nude (really beautiful)
Susan
I've found this photographer's gallery today which I really like. Just wish
to share...
Susy
sarpedon
you have labelled this work as fine art, which it is not. It is
commercial magazine cheesecake, not fine art.
the sarp
John Ng
> you have labelled this work as fine art, which it is not. It is
> commercial magazine cheesecake, not fine art.
Yeah, I agree. Not too much difference between these and Picasso's
nudes. Probably Picasso's is a lot more commercial. Definitely, both
are not fine art.
John Ng
Advocates an art renewal and the return to sensible art
Leave graffiti to the scoundrels
http://community.webshots.com/user/pigsmayfly
sarpedon
Not too much difference between these and Picasso's
> nudes. Probably Picasso's is a lot more commercial. Definitely, both
> are not fine art.
>
>
> John Ng
Not true at all. Get a book of Picasso and study the paintings
seriously.
In his cubist neo-classical, constructionist, periods, if not
others, Picasso took tremendous chances with the figure and depiction
of still life.
Look at how he depicted human, goat and cow skulls in his still lifes.
Look at how he broke up the planes of round objects like vases. Look
at how he depicted candle light.
He distorted figures but could not have been commercial because he
was not imiitating anyone else. He made tremendous experimental
advances in how to describe the emotions of human figures by
distorting their physical appearance.
At the same time his use of color was very careful and he applied
principles of color theory in many paintings.
the sarp