Received: by 10.180.91.231 with SMTP id ch7mr1027021wib.1.1348997154501;
        Sun, 30 Sep 2012 02:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Path: q10ni36916378wif.0!nntp.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!npeersf03.am4!fx17.am4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mike Hall <tar...@spam3spam.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
References: <k48ac1$qfe$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <3oKdnXCpKM4QLPrNnZ2dnUVZ7vidnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk> <anim8rfsk-E14043.20184129092012@news.easynews.com> <muKdnaDXwtB-IfrNnZ2dnUVZ8vCdnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk> <k48fm9$b3f$1@dont-email.me>
In-Reply-To: <k48fm9$b3f$1@dont-email.me>
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <BeU9s.131892$pO4.8235@fx17.am4>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 92.233.79.183
X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
X-Trace: 1348997153 92.233.79.183 (Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:25:53 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:25:53 UTC
Organization: virginmedia.com
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 10:25:53 +0100
X-Received-Bytes: 1659
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 30/09/2012 04:52, Arthur Lipscomb wrote:

> I don't recall the original explanation but I thought the weeping angels
> simply looked like statutes.  Now they are saying the angels are taking
> over existing statutes.  Is that a retcon or was that how they
> originally described them?

I'm guessing that it is pretty obvious that the angels replace existing 
statues.  It is not confirmed whether they actually take over the statue 
itself.  The powers of the weeping angels are vast.


Mike Hall