Any DW Discussions?
The Doctor
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
adric22
and instead more spam and idiotic fighting and insults. It is sad,
really. It seems worse when there are no new Dr.Who episodes coming
out.
The Doctor
Peter J Ross
<adr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You belong to us. You will be like us.
--
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader (v0.9.9): http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator
Mr.Smartypants
> In article <923475b6-6001-42be-8813-97bd1bd0a...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>
> adric22 <adri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Yeah.. every day this newsgroup has less and less Dr.Who discussion
> >and instead more spam and idiotic fighting and insults. It is sad,
> >really. It seems worse when there are no new Dr.Who episodes coming
> >out.
>
> ZZZ!!!
> --
Bugs finally took his meds.
Ayatollah of rock 'n' roller
"adric22" <adr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:923475b6-6001-42be...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
There are still some old episodes being played on some of the obscure
channels, and they remind me just how truly awful the new shows really are.
Soze
> Or all the usenet kooks taking over?:
It`s your fault they`re here. I "mark as read" all those threads
immediately. There have been plenty of threads about Who lately but I`ve
barely seen you in any of them!
Manky Badger
"adric22" <adr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:923475b6-6001-42be...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Agree entirely. After half an hour you'll soon realise who the "twat" is
that is intent on killing this group. If you killfile him and those who play
with him, the group comes a bit more manageable (but not much)
The Doctor
The Doctor
hulahoop
> In article <6hn4saFn1gto...@mid.individual.net>,
Snarky is responsible for you not taking part in any DW discussions?
An interesting suggestion, care to expand a bit on that theory please?
Regards
Ged
John Smith
"hulahoop" <sween...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1990c7d4-e81f-4c18...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Snarky (AKA "The Wolfman") is a troll from another group that has claimed to
be a McCoy fan in the past. He also had a habit of crossposting garbage from
his other groups onto this one.
Benjamin Pavsner
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g94tlr$eku$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
HERE, kiddo.
AsYouLikeIt
David you lied again, you said you had cleanfeed, you must stop your lies
And yes everyone can read headers
The Doctor
hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 28, 3:16 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <6hn4saFn1gto...@mid.individual.net>,
>>
>> Soze <I...@salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> >The Doctor wrote:
>> >> Or all the usenet kooks taking over?:
>>
>> >It`s your fault they`re here. I "mark as read" all those threads
>> >immediately. There have been plenty of threads about Who lately but I`ve
>> >barely seen you in any of them!
>>
>> You can thank the return of Snarky.
>
>
>An interesting suggestion, care to expand a bit on that theory please?
>
>Regards
>
Snarky and co are just trolling for points.
The Doctor
At least the discordian were being DW fans.
The Doctor
The Doctor
This troll brought to you by
uk.media.tv.sf.drwho #62630 (3 more)
Path: news.nk.ca!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.k-dsl.de!feeder.
+ usenet4all.se!reader.usenet4all.se!not-for-mail
From: "AsYouLikeIt" <AsYou...@gads.com>
Newsgroups: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.drwho
References: <g94tlr$eku$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Subject: Re: Any DW Discussions?
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:03:23 -0600
Organization: Outing older gays still in the closet
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <48b720be$0$521$c5fe...@reader.usenet4all.se>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Aug 2008 00:03:43 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: ccefbc9e.reader.usenet4all.se
X-Trace: DXC=>M4=\lN5MSg312d5d\W`>l]=V>ZL5o1]b<moHH[O[>ZjG1F6aOOG_ElZo\NG1CW=hf
+ 2WdNfi=f:UffV4_JiC\dBhHW?^k_<g\;b
X-Complaints-To: ab...@usenet4all.se
Xref: news.nk.ca uk.media.tv.sf.drwho:62630 rec.arts.drwho:238017
Mr.Smartypants
> In article <48b720be$0$521$c5fe3...@reader.usenet4all.se>,
>
>
>
>
>
> AsYouLikeIt <AsYouLik...@gads.com> wrote:
>
> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >news:g94tlr$eku$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >> Or all the usenet kooks taking over?:
> >> --
> >> Member - Liberal International
> >> This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
> >> God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
> >> USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
>
> >David you lied again, you said you had cleanfeed, you must stop your lies
>
> >And yes everyone can read headers
>
> This troll brought to you by
Are you completely RETARDED, Bugs?
What in the *HELL* is the point in posting a message header that
anyone who wants can look up on their own.
>
> uk.media.tv.sf.drwho #62630 (3 more)
> Path: news.nk.ca!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.k-dsl.de!feeder.
> + usenet4all.se!reader.usenet4all.se!not-for-mail
> From: "AsYouLikeIt" <AsYouLik...@gads.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.drwho
> References: <g94tlr$eku$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>
> Subject: Re: Any DW Discussions?
> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:03:23 -0600
> Organization: Outing older gays still in the closet
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
> Lines: 15
> Message-ID: <48b720be$0$521$c5fe...@reader.usenet4all.se>
> NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Aug 2008 00:03:43 CEST
> NNTP-Posting-Host: ccefbc9e.reader.usenet4all.se
> X-Trace: DXC=>M4=\lN5MSg312d5d\W`>l]=V>ZL5o1]b<moHH[O[>ZjG1F6aOOG_ElZo\NG1CW=hf
> + 2WdNfi=f:UffV4_JiC\dBhHW?^k_<g\;b
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@usenet4all.se
> Xref: news.nk.ca uk.media.tv.sf.drwho:62630 rec.arts.drwho:238017
> --
> Member - Liberal International
> This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
> God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
> USA petition for dissolution of your nation!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
The Doctor
Mr.Smartypants <bc...@canada.com> wrote:
>On Aug 28, 5:12=A0pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <48b720be$0$521$c5fe3...@reader.usenet4all.se>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> AsYouLikeIt <AsYouLik...@gads.com> wrote:
>>
>> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> >news:g94tlr$eku$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >> Or all the usenet kooks taking over?:
>> >> --
>> >> Member - Liberal International
>> >> This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>> >> God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
>> >> USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
>>
>s
>>
>> >And yes everyone can read headers
>>
>> This troll brought to you by
>
>
>
>Are you completely RETARDED, Bugs?
>
>What in the *HELL* is the point in posting a message header that
>anyone who wants can look up on their own.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> uk.media.tv.sf.drwho #62630 (3 more)
>er.
>> + =A0 =A0 usenet4all.se!reader.usenet4all.se!not-for-mail
>> From: "AsYouLikeIt" <AsYouLik...@gads.com>
>> Newsgroups: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.drwho
>> References: <g94tlr$eku$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>
>> Subject: Re: Any DW Discussions?
>> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:03:23 -0600
>> Organization: Outing older gays still in the closet
>> X-Priority: 3
>> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
>> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
>> Lines: 15
>> Message-ID: <48b720be$0$521$c5fe...@reader.usenet4all.se>
>> NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Aug 2008 00:03:43 CEST
>> NNTP-Posting-Host: ccefbc9e.reader.usenet4all.se
>lZo\NG1CW=3Dhf
>> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02WdNfi=3Df:UffV4_JiC\dBhHW?^k_<g\;b
>> X-Complaints-To: ab...@usenet4all.se
>> Xref: news.nk.ca uk.media.tv.sf.drwho:62630 rec.arts.drwho:238017 =A0
>> --
>> Member - Liberal International =A0
>> This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca =A0 =A0Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>> God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! =A0
>> USA petition for dissolution of your nation!- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
This troll brought to you by
uk.media.tv.sf.drwho #62641 (2 more)
Path: news.nk.ca!feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.
+ com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!1g2000pre.googlegroups.com!
+ not-for-mail
From: "Mr.Smartypants" <bc...@canada.com>
Newsgroups: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Any DW Discussions?
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <2ec2148c-3e16-4a75...@1g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
References: <g94tlr$eku$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca> <48b720be$0$521$c5fe31e7@reader.
+ usenet4all.se>
+ <g97bd7$kuu$5...@gallifrey.nk.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.31.216.62
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1219977010 13773 127.0.0.1 (29 Aug 2008 02:30:10
+ GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:30:10 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: 1g2000pre.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.31.216.62;
posting-account=gP4t7wkAAACPRChr9WNHOkA0S2dvm8qb
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT
+ 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: news.nk.ca uk.media.tv.sf.drwho:62641 rec.arts.drwho:238046
Mr.Smartypants
> In article <2ec2148c-3e16-4a75-a528-8edadb1f3...@1g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
> >> Subject: Re: Any DW Discussions?
> >> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:03:23 -0600
> >> Organization: Outing older gays still in the closet
> >> X-Priority: 3
> >> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
> >> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
> >> Lines: 15
> >> NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Aug 2008 00:03:43 CEST
> >> NNTP-Posting-Host: ccefbc9e.reader.usenet4all.se
> >> X-Trace: DXC=3D>M4=3D\lN5MSg312d5d\W`>l]=3DV>ZL5o1]b<moHH[O[>ZjG1F6aOOG_E=
> >lZo\NG1CW=3Dhf
> >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02WdNfi=3Df:UffV4_JiC\dBhHW?^k_<g\;b
> >> X-Complaints-To: ab...@usenet4all.se
> >> Xref: news.nk.ca uk.media.tv.sf.drwho:62630 rec.arts.drwho:238017 =A0
> >> --
> >> Member - Liberal International =A0
> >> This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca =A0 =A0Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
> >> God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! =A0
> >> USA petition for dissolution of your nation!- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> This troll brought to you by
>
> uk.media.tv.sf.drwho #62641 (2 more)
> Path: news.nk.ca!feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.
> + com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!1g2000pre.googlegroups.com!
> + not-for-mail
> Newsgroups: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.drwho
> Subject: Re: Any DW Discussions?
> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
> Organization:http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 70
> References: <g94tlr$ek...@gallifrey.nk.ca> <48b720be$0$521$c5fe31e7@reader.
> + usenet4all.se>
> + <g97bd7$ku...@gallifrey.nk.ca>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.31.216.62
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1219977010 13773 127.0.0.1 (29 Aug 2008 02:30:10
> + GMT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:30:10 +0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: 1g2000pre.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.31.216.62;
> posting-account=gP4t7wkAAACPRChr9WNHOkA0S2dvm8qb
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT
> + 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
> Xref: news.nk.ca uk.media.tv.sf.drwho:62641 rec.arts.drwho:238046
> --
> Member - Liberal International
> This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
> God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
>
> - Show quoted text -
Right on cue Bugs posts proof that he's mentally retarded.
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <253gdu.odc.1...@news.alt.net>, John Smith <Smith@Home> wrote:
>
> >"hulahoop" <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ah... a desperate attempt to claim that you're not a troll because
you're a Doctor Who fan.
Doesn't stand up I'm afraid, you're obviously a troll.
The Doctor
The Doctor
Thus trolled Tom80s, not knowing what good Snarky was for this
group at one point.
hulahoop
> "hulahoop" <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Maybe you misinterpreted what I was asking (or I phrased it poorly -
entirely possible) or I misunderstood your answer.
As I read it, Yads was saying that he had not contributed to any of
the DW related threads here because of Snarky and I wondered how
Snarky was stopping him from doing so?
Regards
Ged
The Doctor
hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 28, 7:30 pm, "John Smith" <Smith@Home> wrote:
>> "hulahoop" <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1990c7d4-e81f-4c18...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> On Aug 28, 3:16 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > In article <6hn4saFn1gto...@mid.individual.net>,
>>
>> > Soze <I...@salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> > >The Doctor wrote:
>> > >> Or all the usenet kooks taking over?:
>>
>> > >It`s your fault they`re here. I "mark as read" all those threads
>> > >immediately. There have been plenty of threads about Who lately but I`ve
>> > >barely seen you in any of them!
>>
>> > You can thank the return of Snarky.
>>
>>
>> An interesting suggestion, care to expand a bit on that theory please?
>>
>> Snarky (AKA "The Wolfman") is a troll from another group that has claimed to
>> be a McCoy fan in the past. He also had a habit of crossposting garbage from
>> his other groups onto this one.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Maybe you misinterpreted what I was asking (or I phrased it poorly -
>entirely possible) or I misunderstood your answer.
>
>As I read it, Yads was saying that he had not contributed to any of
>the DW related threads here because of Snarky and I wondered how
>Snarky was stopping him from doing so?
>
Snarkwit has not stopped me.
John Smith
Yes, this is a small misunderstanding. I should have answered each post
individually but a lot of the people in this thread are in the killfile. One
poster mentioned "Or all the usenet kooks taking over?" Another person said
"It`s your fault they`re here." And another reply appeared to be blaming
Snarky for the usenet kooks being here. Having Snarky, Yads, and their
friends crosspost their garbage to this group can be a real pain. When the
group gets filled with that garbage, they basically hamper the efforts of
all Doctor Who fans at this group from taking part in Doctor Who related
discussions. It gets bothersome when you come here to talk about Doctor Who
and you see a bunch of junk from another group. Not everybody wants to go
through all that just to find something related about Doctor Who.
hulahoop
>
> - Show quoted text -
My enjoyment of radw is currently lower than when we had all that
hipcrime flooding that Yads denied being responsible for
Regards
Ged
The Doctor
Basis: What I said was that Snarky is trolling with a lot of
non-DW posts in the drwho groups.
The Doctor
Prove to us that I am hipcrime related.
Your acussation is baseless!!!
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <6155eb6b-e06b-478f-8243-3506ce61b...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
No, it's not baseless. I agree with him.
solar penguin
You want some Doctor Who discussion? Ok...
On two separate occasions (July 1966 and again in February 1968) there
were DW episodes where soldiers are defeated by robotic adversaries
armed with smoke guns in a warehouse near Covent Garden.
Do you think the re-use of this very specific trope, less than two
years after its first appearance, means that DW was running out of
ideas in the late sixties?
The Doctor
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
I wouldn't say so much that they were running out of ideas, as much
as
that they'd found a niche for those kind of stories, or if you
prefer,
the makers had become more conservative. They'd mastered the art in
terms of atmosphere and in drawing characters that are believable and
worth caring about, particularly in Web of Fear and Evil of the
Daleks.
I think the worrying sign was in the early 80's with the focus on
continuity (Arc of Infinity, Warriors of the Deep, Attack of the
Cybermen) and introspectiveness (Kinda, Twin Dilemma, Ghostlight) to
a
degree that was seriously detrimental to the character of the Doctor
as he became emotionally weak and pathetically prone to incompetence
and madness. It's when a show starts going introspective and starts
internalising itself (which happened to Red Dwarf and Buffy when they
started going downhill) that the series is not only running out of
ideas, but can't even sustain a reliable, tried and trusted repeated
idea.
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <14fcea1a-b59a-4c24-a7b4-41a284471...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
No, you still haven't addressed the fact that at least two people,
myself and Ged think you're guilty of the hipcrime postings. Therefore
the verdict is guilty. Calling the jury 'trolls' doesn't help your
case.
The Doctor
You are no jury. You are investigators. The jury will decide.
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <6c0beb11-0334-4bde-bd7e-8623590f8...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>,
We're jury and investigators, we're good at multitasking.
The Doctor
I doubt Scotland Yard would hire you.
hulahoop
wrote:
Yes (but don't tell IF)
Regards
Ged
John Smith
My enjoyment of radw is currently lower than when we had all that
hipcrime flooding that Yads denied being responsible for
I agree with you. With all the garbage, how can anybody not notice the
stink? Do you think Yads was responsible? I've got a feeling that all his
crossposting just drew more attention to the group and that is part of the
reason why this group got hit.
The Doctor
Hipcrime cares lees abut Internet let alone USEnet.
hulahoop
> "hulahoop" <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
To be fair to myself I only said that Yads denied being responsible
for the hipcrime. I did not say that I was accusing him of being
responsible for all that hipcrime flooding
We will never prove if Yads was responsible will we?
Regards
Ged
The Doctor
hulahoop
> In article <a199622f-3873-4497-8457-bfe7133c5...@79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hmm. That hardly puts you out of the running then :-)
Regards
Ged
The Doctor
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <1caba9b0-d0e5-432c-9642-a838815da...@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
No, the onus is on you to *disprove* it!
You're guilty until proved innocent, as you've been for a long time.
The Doctor
Care to audit everything here. No hipcrime allowed here!
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <40329a5d-32c0-42a4-b960-b42cee24b...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
No, don't point the finger at me- you prove your innocence first, you
stand accused of serious crimes, troll.
The Doctor
hulahoop
>
> - Show quoted text -
So how does that stop you contributing with on topic material?
Regards
Ged
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9h0si$n5$8...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
The Doctor
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
latest cross posting that started in Edmonton general
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9h1ds$n5$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9h6co$4b8$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9hjt3$5sl$8...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <339d4a1c-5da4-4ab6-b61f-db47b7f78...@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Well prove it then, troll!
Peter J Ross
tom...@yahoo.co.uk <tom...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> No, don't point the finger at me- you prove your innocence first, you
> stand accused of serious crimes, troll.
The perpetrator of the HipCrime floods was a poster from Ukraine known
as "Bloxy's", "Nukleus", "Librarian" and various other aliases.
Hundreds of newsgroups were affected, not only RADW. Hundreds of other
newsgroups have been affected in the past. The target was Usenet as
whole, not this newsgroup specifically.
--
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader (v0.9.9): http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:slrngboqg...@pjr.motzarella.org...
The Doctor
Care to be nominated for a Kook Award?
Space Cowboy
Well, this will narrow down my location to the rest...
Happy that New Who new season will still be on the CBC come this
September but still ticked that Torchwood is on "Space"...could that
be because of the TWs 65 minute length discussed elsewhere here?
When I got into home theatre PCs a while back, and free HD...I burned
my bridges with Cogeco cable and only have Over-The-Air reception but
still get 16 digital channels and when you add the CDN analogue I get
32 channels total on a small omnidirectional antennae...so will
probably have to wait until TW season 2 DVDs are released. :-(
[popping my head in after a long absence]
--
Origin: "Battle Beyond The Stars"[1980,George Peppard,actor.Roger
Corman,producer,low budget but fun to watch]
See "The Magnificent Seven" & The Seven Samurai"...
"Classic" Trekker and presently, a Browncoat!
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9htqr$clq$4...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <71b51649-b6fa-4954-8a21-db3a2bf70...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
Trolls aren't allowed to nominate other people.
The Doctor
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <b524087c-3080-4486-8696-670512e4c...@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Prove it the, because you're guilty until proven innocent.
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9jh87$ki6$3...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
John Smith
Was Yads behavior directly responsible for the hipcrime? Probably not. Was
his crossposting behavior leading to congestion at when those same groups
kept posting their garbage here? There is a good chance of that. Yads may
not be trying to harm this group, but the end result is that he attracts
trolls and others that wish to attack him because of his incoherent posts
flooding other groups. He does not need to draw the attention of trolls at
other groups. He needs to learn how to keep a low profile.
hulahoop
>
> Was Yads behavior directly responsible for the hipcrime? Probably not. Was
> his crossposting behavior leading to congestion at when those same groups
> kept posting their garbage here? There is a good chance of that. Yads may
> not be trying to harm this group, but the end result is that he attracts
> trolls and others that wish to attack him because of his incoherent posts
> flooding other groups. He does not need to draw the attention of trolls at
> other groups. He needs to learn how to keep a low profile.
COuldn't have summed it up better myself but there's fat chance of
Yads learning to keep a low profile
Regards
Ged
PS Why do fat chance and slim chance mean the same thing?
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
>
> PS Why do fat chance and slim chance mean the same thing?
lol! That is a good question actually....
The Doctor
The Doctor
I beieve Peter has that answer.
The Doctor
Already have a high profile even before arriving at USEnet.
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <9560245f-0c8c-41aa-8549-16ca5be84...@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
Now you're being racist. You disgusting troll!
The Face of Po
tom...@yahoo.co.uk got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> On Sep 2, 9:19 pm, hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > PS Why do fat chance and slim chance mean the same thing?
>
> lol! That is a good question actually....
The answer is that one of them's sarcastic and the other isn't.
--
Remove caps to communicate more easily.
Happiness will prevail
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9kgej$mu4$5...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9kgd3$mu4$3...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9kgfo$mu4$6...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
The Doctor
The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>tom...@yahoo.co.uk got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>> On Sep 2, 9:19 pm, hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > PS Why do fat chance and slim chance mean the same thing?
>>
>> lol! That is a good question actually....
>
>The answer is that one of them's sarcastic and the other isn't.
We figure out the rest from here.
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <1220402422.1851...@proxy01.news.clara.net>,
> The Face of Po <gkenning...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>
> >I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
> >tom...@yahoo.co.uk got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> >> On Sep 2, 9:19 pm, hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > PS Why do fat chance and slim chance mean the same thing?
>
> >> lol! That is a good question actually....
>
> >The answer is that one of them's sarcastic and the other isn't.
>
> We figure out the rest from here.
> --
> Member - Liberal International
> This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
> God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
> USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
He wasn't talking to you troll, so stop bothering other people when
you're not wanted! Who do you think you are?
John Smith
PS Why do fat chance and slim chance mean the same thing?
If Yads gave a damn about this group or his fellow Doctor Who fans that post
here, then he would not be trying to attract trolls from other groups.
Sadly, it is apparent that Yads does not give a shit.
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> If Yads gave a damn about this group or his fellow Doctor Who fans that post
> here, then he would not be trying to attract trolls from other groups.
> Sadly, it is apparent that Yads does not give a shit.
Yeah, that's pretty much why I've been trying my damndest to get rid
of him, trying to chase him off forum. The group would just be so much
better without him.
The Face of Po
tom...@yahoo.co.uk got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
It doesn't look like you're going to succeed where so many people have
failed before - and your own posts targeted at him are nearly as boring
and repetitive as all his "thus trolled tom80s" responses.
Andy Leighton
I would agree with that. I also firmly believe in carrot and stick.
When Yads makes reasonable posts he shouldn't be piled on as it only
encourages him to make the usual inane replies.
--
Andy Leighton => an...@azaal.plus.com
"The Lord is my shepherd, but we still lost the sheep dog trials"
- Robert Rankin, _They Came And Ate Us_
The Doctor
Thus spoke anti-social troll Tom80s.
The Doctor
I do not attrqact trolls.
All lies snipped.
The Doctor
<tom...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>On Sep 3, 3:49 am, "John Smith" <Smith@Home> wrote:
>> If Yads gave a damn about this group or his fellow Doctor Who fans that post
>> here, then he would not be trying to attract trolls from other groups.
>
>of him, trying to chase him off forum. The group would just be so much
>better without him.
Thus saidstalkingtroll Tom80s.
The Doctor
The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>tom...@yahoo.co.uk got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>>
>> of him, trying to chase him off forum. The group would just be so much
>> better without him.
>
>It doesn't look like you're going to succeed where so many people have
>failed before - and your own posts targeted at him are nearly as boring
>and repetitive as all his "thus trolled tom80s" responses.
>
>--
>Remove caps to communicate more easily.
>
>Happiness will prevail
Spoken truly.
The Doctor
Andy Leighton <an...@azaal.plus.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:21:37 +0100,
> The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>> I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>> tom...@yahoo.co.uk got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>>>
>>> of him, trying to chase him off forum. The group would just be so much
>>> better without him.
>>
>> It doesn't look like you're going to succeed where so many people have
>> failed before - and your own posts targeted at him are nearly as boring
>> and repetitive as all his "thus trolled tom80s" responses.
>
>I would agree with that. I also firmly believe in carrot and stick.
>When Yads makes reasonable posts he shouldn't be piled on as it only
>encourages him to make the usual inane replies.
>
>--
>Andy Leighton => an...@azaal.plus.com
>"The Lord is my shepherd, but we still lost the sheep dog trials"
> - Robert Rankin, _They Came And Ate Us_
Paradox.
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9lu7h$aft$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <122040242...@proxy01.news.clara.net>,
> The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
> >I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
> >tom...@yahoo.co.uk got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9n9nq$qik$6...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9n9nq$qik$6...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9na17$qik$7...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9na5h$qik$8...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9na9b$qik$9...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9nacu$qik$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
The Face of Po
> In article <122046969...@proxy01.news.clara.net>,
> The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
> >I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
> >tom...@yahoo.co.uk got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> >>
> >> Yeah, that's pretty much why I've been trying my damndest to get rid
> >> of him, trying to chase him off forum. The group would just be so much
> >> better without him.
> >
> >It doesn't look like you're going to succeed where so many people have
> >failed before - and your own posts targeted at him are nearly as boring
> >and repetitive as all his "thus trolled tom80s" responses.
>
Did you see the word "nearly" up there?
Andy Leighton
The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <slrngbtuso...@azaal.plus.com>,
> Andy Leighton <an...@azaal.plus.com> wrote:
>>On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:21:37 +0100,
>> The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>>> I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>>> tom...@yahoo.co.uk got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, that's pretty much why I've been trying my damndest to get rid
>>>> of him, trying to chase him off forum. The group would just be so much
>>>> better without him.
>>>
>>> It doesn't look like you're going to succeed where so many people have
>>> failed before - and your own posts targeted at him are nearly as boring
>>> and repetitive as all his "thus trolled tom80s" responses.
>>
>>I would agree with that. I also firmly believe in carrot and stick.
>>When Yads makes reasonable posts he shouldn't be piled on as it only
>>encourages him to make the usual inane replies.
>>
>>--
>>Andy Leighton => an...@azaal.plus.com
>>"The Lord is my shepherd, but we still lost the sheep dog trials"
>> - Robert Rankin, _They Came And Ate Us_
>
> Paradox.
It is these type of replies (including not snipping sigs - you should
know that you are supposed to do that after a dozen or more years using
Usenet) that give you your bad name. Cut them out and you cut out a
lot of the ire - and you might stop attracting quite as many 'stalkers'.
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <e3251b21-65d1-47ee-8212-ab8d2f66f...@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
Aw, poor little victim!
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <25ja5g.6t1.1...@news.alt.net>, John Smith <Smith@Home> wrote:
>
> >"hulahoop" <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Now no-one's going to believe that Yads. Just give it up and confess
to everything.
Now.
The Doctor
The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>> In article <122046969...@proxy01.news.clara.net>,
>> The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>> >I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>> >tom...@yahoo.co.uk got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, that's pretty much why I've been trying my damndest to get rid
>> >> of him, trying to chase him off forum. The group would just be so much
>> >> better without him.
>> >
>> >It doesn't look like you're going to succeed where so many people have
>> >failed before - and your own posts targeted at him are nearly as boring
>> >and repetitive as all his "thus trolled tom80s" responses.
>>
>> Spoken truly.
>
>Did you see the word "nearly" up there?
Trolls are a bore. Still spoken truly.
The Doctor
But then again wher is the encouragement for contribution?