Your Weekend Smile :)
John Fleming
Had a friend e-mail this to me.
* * * * * * * * * *
ATTENTION
ALIENS ARE COMING TO ABDUCT ALL THE GOOD LOOKING AND SEXY
PEOPLE.
YOU WILL BE SAFE, I'M JUST EMAILING TO SAY GOODBYE.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
Sharx35
"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:ckjeg5d2d8uehjco8...@4ax.com...
>
> Had a friend e-mail this to me.
>
> * * * * * * * * * *
>
> ATTENTION
>
> ALIENS ARE COMING TO ABDUCT ALL THE GOOD LOOKING AND SEXY
> PEOPLE.
>
> YOU WILL BE SAFE, I'M JUST EMAILING TO SAY GOODBYE.
What will happen to the Meadowlark Mansion?
John Fleming
the scriptorium "Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $news:ckjeg5d2d8uehjco8...@4ax.com...
> $>
> $> Had a friend e-mail this to me.
> $>
> $> * * * * * * * * * *
> $>
> $> ATTENTION
> $>
> $> ALIENS ARE COMING TO ABDUCT ALL THE GOOD LOOKING AND SEXY
> $> PEOPLE.
> $>
> $> YOU WILL BE SAFE, I'M JUST EMAILING TO SAY GOODBYE.
> $
> $What will happen to the Meadowlark Mansion?
It will become the property of someone less sexy and good
looking than me. ;)
The Doctor
One for the TM books.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630
Merry Christmas 2009 and Happy New Year 2010
The Doctor
Cats mights invade it.
Mr.Smartypants
Yads and Guppy can have it.
John Fleming
desk in the scriptorium "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
> $On Nov 20, 8:39�pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:03:27 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium "Sharx35" <shar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $> > $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $> > $news:ckjeg5d2d8uehjco8...@4ax.com...
> $> > $>
> $> > $> Had a friend e-mail this to me.
> $> > $>
> $> > $> * * * * * * * * * *
> $> > $>
> $> > $> ATTENTION
> $> > $>
> $> > $> ALIENS ARE COMING TO ABDUCT ALL THE GOOD LOOKING AND SEXY
> $> > $>
> $> > $> YOU WILL BE SAFE, I'M JUST EMAILING TO SAY GOODBYE.
> $> > $
> $> > $What will happen to the Meadowlark Mansion?
> $> It will become the property of someone less sexy and good
> $> looking than me. �;)
> $
> $Yads and Guppy can have it.
<grin>
The problem with it is this. They wouldn't know what to do
with the pool and the tennis courts.
The Doctor
Mr.Smartypants
or the hot tub, the extensive wine cellar, the master bedroom with the
mirrored ceiling.
There's a whole lotta things those two wouldn't know what to do with.
> --
>
> John Fleming
> Edmonton, Canada
>
> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
John Fleming
desk in the scriptorium "Mr.Smartypants"
> $On Nov 22, 4:43�pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:34:44 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
> $> desk in the scriptorium "Mr.Smartypants"
> $> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
> $> > $On Nov 20, 8:39�pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $> > $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:03:27 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> > $> the scriptorium "Sharx35" <shar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $> > $> > $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $> > $> > $news:ckjeg5d2d8uehjco8...@4ax.com...
> $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> Had a friend e-mail this to me.
> $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> * * * * * * * * * *
> $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> ATTENTION
> $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> ALIENS ARE COMING TO ABDUCT ALL THE GOOD LOOKING AND SEXY
> $> > $> > $>
> $> > $> > $> YOU WILL BE SAFE, I'M JUST EMAILING TO SAY GOODBYE.
> $> > $> > $
> $> > $> > $What will happen to the Meadowlark Mansion?
> $> > $>
> $> > $> It will become the property of someone less sexy and good
> $> > $
> $> > $Yads and Guppy can have it.
> $> <grin>
> $>
> $> The problem with it is this. �They wouldn't know what to do
> $> with the pool and the tennis courts.
> $
> $or the hot tub, the extensive wine cellar, the master bedroom with the
> $mirrored ceiling.
> $
> $There's a whole lotta things those two wouldn't know what to do with.
I think sharx could probably figure out what to do with the
hot tub and the mirrored ceiling. The doctor, on the other
hand . . ..
The Doctor
Sharx35
"Mr.Smartypants" <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:2c69def1-e0f8-45b5...@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
I'd know better than to invite Arab terrorists to be tenants--something that
Mr. Shitty Pants would do.
Sharx35
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:hefboq$sft$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
With NO mortgage or other encumbrance, eh?
The Doctor
Talk to Fleming about that.
Mr.Smartypants
true.........although it would only be days until Heidi took it over
and Guppy was living in a dumpster.
> --
>
> John Fleming
> Edmonton, Canada
>
> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Loaf of Bread
> In article <vtbmg590onqeh9enrkik4o96dpib066...@4ax.com>,
> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> >On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:10:40 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
> >desk in the scriptorium "Mr.Smartypants"
> Hence why Sharx can have it.
We know. Your pastor says its a sin to have a pool, tennis courts and
a mirrored ceiling in the master bedroom.
peachy ashie passion
I think that mirrored ceiling idea is a bad one, honestly.
Loaf of Bread
wrote:
That doesn't give the doctor's pastor the right to tell him having one
is a sin.
To paraphrase Pierre Elliot Trudeau, former Liberal PM of Canada, "the
church has no business in the bedroom decore of the nation".
peachy ashie passion
Well, I think I disagree. The Doctor's pastor has the right to tell
him what's a sin.
He just hasn't any right to tell you that you must change your
behavior - or home decor - based on their opinion of sin.
The Doc is a grown man, going to his pastor for spiritual guidance.
It's not out of line for the Pastor to then give it.
Now me? I don't want their opinions. Not the Pastor's, not the
Doctor's.
But I still think the mirror on the ceiling is just a bad idea.
pandora
"Loaf of Bread" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:33dcecff-2a82-4421...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
***ESPECIALLY the mirrored ceiling in the master bedroom.
:-)
The Doctor
The Doctor
The Doctor
PV
Bingo!
Absolutely right regarding the Doc's guiding his life according to the
tenets of his church
Mirrored ceilings are also a bad idea, at least in my book.
--
PV
Stupidity is a condition
Ignorance is a choice
peachy ashie passion
I get too busy watching what I'm doing in the mirror to concentrate
on doing what I'm doing. I find my performance suffers.
John Fleming
in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
<exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $Loaf of Bread wrote:
> $> On Nov 23, 6:09 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> $>> In article <vtbmg590onqeh9enrkik4o96dpib066...@4ax.com>,
> $>> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:10:40 -0800 (PST), while chained to a> $>>>> $On Nov 22, 4:43 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>>>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:34:44 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
> $>>>> $> desk in the scriptorium "Mr.Smartypants"
> $>>>> $> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
> $>>>> $> > $On Nov 20, 8:39 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>>>> $> > $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:03:27 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>>>> $> > $> the scriptorium "Sharx35" <shar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>>> $> > $> > $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $>>>> $> > $> > $news:ckjeg5d2d8uehjco8...@4ax.com...
> $>>>> $> > $> > $>
> $>>>> $> > $> > $> Had a friend e-mail this to me.
> $>>>> $> > $> > $>
> $>>>> $> > $> > $> * * * * * * * * * *
> $>>>> $> > $> > $>
> $>>>> $> > $> > $> ATTENTION
> $>>>> $> > $> > $>
> $>>>> $> > $> > $> ALIENS ARE COMING TO ABDUCT ALL THE GOOD LOOKING AND SEXY
> $>>>> $> > $> > $>
> $>>>> $> > $> > $> YOU WILL BE SAFE, I'M JUST EMAILING TO SAY GOODBYE.
> $>>>> $> > $> > $
> $>>>> $> > $>
> $>>>> $> > $> It will become the property of someone less sexy and good
> $>>>> $> > $
> $>>>> $> > $Yads and Guppy can have it.
> $>>>> $>
> $>>>> $> <grin>
> $>>>> $>
> $>>>> $> The problem with it is this. They wouldn't know what to do
> $>>>> $
> $>>>> $or the hot tub, the extensive wine cellar, the master bedroom with the
> $>>>> $
> $>>>> $There's a whole lotta things those two wouldn't know what to do with.
> $>>> hot tub and the mirrored ceiling. The doctor, on the other
> $>>> hand . . ..
> $>
> $>> Hence why Sharx can have it.
> $>
> $> We know. Your pastor says its a sin to have a pool, tennis courts and
> $> a mirrored ceiling in the master bedroom.
> $
> $ I think that mirrored ceiling idea is a bad one, honestly.
Not my first choice in bedroom ceilings either.
John Fleming
desk in the scriptorium Loaf of Bread <john...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> $On Nov 24, 2:28�pm, peachy ashie passion <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>
> $wrote:
> $> Loaf of Bread wrote:
> $> > On Nov 23, 6:09 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> $> >> In article <vtbmg590onqeh9enrkik4o96dpib066...@4ax.com>,
> $> >>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:10:40 -0800 (PST), while chained to a> $> >>>> $On Nov 22, 4:43 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $> >>>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:34:44 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
> $> >>>> $> desk in the scriptorium "Mr.Smartypants"
> $> >>>> $> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
> $> >>>> $> > $On Nov 20, 8:39 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $> >>>> $> > $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:03:27 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> >>>> $> > $> the scriptorium "Sharx35" <shar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $news:ckjeg5d2d8uehjco8...@4ax.com...
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $>
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $> Had a friend e-mail this to me.
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $>
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $> * * * * * * * * * *
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $>
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $> ATTENTION
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $>
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $> ALIENS ARE COMING TO ABDUCT ALL THE GOOD LOOKING AND SEXY
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $>
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $> YOU WILL BE SAFE, I'M JUST EMAILING TO SAY GOODBYE.
> $> >>>> $> > $> > $
> $> >>>> $> > $>
> $> >>>> $> > $> It will become the property of someone less sexy and good
> $> >>>> $> > $
> $> >>>> $> > $Yads and Guppy can have it.
> $> >>>> $>
> $> >>>> $> <grin>
> $> >>>> $>
> $> >>>> $> The problem with it is this. �They wouldn't know what to do
> $> >>>> $
> $> >>>> $or the hot tub, the extensive wine cellar, the master bedroom with the
> $> >>>> $
> $> >>> hot tub and the mirrored ceiling. �The doctor, on the other
> $> >>> hand . . ..
> $>
> $>
> $> > We know. �Your pastor says its a sin to have a pool, tennis courts and
> $> > a mirrored ceiling in the master bedroom.
> $>
> $> � �I think that mirrored ceiling idea is a bad one, honestly.
> $
> $That doesn't give the doctor's pastor the right to tell him having one
> $is a sin.
> $
> $To paraphrase Pierre Elliot Trudeau, former Liberal PM of Canada, "the
> $church has no business in the bedroom decore of the nation".
That's a deliberate misquote, Loaf, not a paraphrase.
John Fleming
in the scriptorium "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> $"Loaf of Bread" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> $news:33dcecff-2a82-4421...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> $On Nov 23, 6:09 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> $> In article <vtbmg590onqeh9enrkik4o96dpib066...@4ax.com>,
> $> >On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:10:40 -0800 (PST), while chained to a> $> >> $On Nov 22, 4:43 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $> >> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:34:44 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
> $> >> $> desk in the scriptorium "Mr.Smartypants"
> $> >> $> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
> $> >> $> > $On Nov 20, 8:39 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $> >> $> > $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:03:27 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> >> $> > $> the scriptorium "Sharx35" <shar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $> >> $> > $> > $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $> >> $> > $> > $news:ckjeg5d2d8uehjco8...@4ax.com...
> $> >> $> > $> > $>
> $> >> $> > $> > $> Had a friend e-mail this to me.
> $> >> $> > $> > $>
> $> >> $> > $> > $> * * * * * * * * * *
> $> >> $> > $> > $>
> $> >> $> > $> > $> ATTENTION
> $> >> $> > $> > $>
> $> >> $> > $> > $> ALIENS ARE COMING TO ABDUCT ALL THE GOOD LOOKING AND SEXY
> $> >> $> > $> > $>
> $> >> $> > $> > $> YOU WILL BE SAFE, I'M JUST EMAILING TO SAY GOODBYE.
> $> >> $> > $> > $
> $> >> $> > $>
> $> >> $> > $> It will become the property of someone less sexy and good
> $> >> $> > $
> $> >> $> > $Yads and Guppy can have it.
> $> >> $>
> $> >> $> <grin>
> $> >> $>
> $> >> $> The problem with it is this. They wouldn't know what to do
> $> >> $
> $> >> $or the hot tub, the extensive wine cellar, the master bedroom with the
> $> >> $
> $> >I think sharx could probably figure out what to do with the
> $> >hot tub and the mirrored ceiling. The doctor, on the other
> $> >hand . . ..
> $
> $
> $We know. Your pastor says its a sin to have a pool, tennis courts and
> $a mirrored ceiling in the master bedroom.
> $
> $***ESPECIALLY the mirrored ceiling in the master bedroom.
> $
> $:-)
Absolutely!!
The doctor would see a man and a woman (or a man and a man)
naked in bed, and that just wouldn't do.
The Doctor
"The Great One"
"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message news:ba2pg5tvge8jkkp2p...@4ax.com...
> seeing myself (on bottom) receiving a good & stiff pounding
> from by boy-friend Bruce
> --
>
> John Fleming
> Edmonton, Canada
You're right as nobody would want to see your Gay self being pounded by Bruce !!
--
John C.
Diane L.
Also, certain viewpoints don't work nearly as well as one would have
imagined
they would. And "Do I really look like that from that angle?" isn't what you
want to be thinking at the crucial moment.
Diane L.
The Doctor
peachy ashie passion
Yes. That can be distracting too.
And not in a good way.
The Doctor
Mr.Smartypants
> In article <het2sb21...@news4.newsguy.com>,
> peachy ashie passion <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >Diane L. wrote:
> >> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> >>> The Doctor wrote:
FO you stupid troll. You don't even know what they're talking about.
The Doctor
Mr.Smartypants <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>On Nov 29, 5:51=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <het2sb21...@news4.newsguy.com>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >Diane L. wrote:
>> >> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>> >>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>> In article <hehj2g12...@news4.newsguy.com>,
>> >>>>> Loaf of Bread wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Nov 23, 6:09 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> >>>>>>> In article <vtbmg590onqeh9enrkik4o96dpib066...@4ax.com>,
>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:10:40 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
>> >>>>>>>> desk in the scriptorium "Mr.Smartypants"
>> >>>>>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> $On Nov 22, 4:43 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:34:44 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
>> >>>>>>>>> $> desk in the scriptorium "Mr.Smartypants"
>> >>>>>>>>> $> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $On Nov 20, 8:39 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: $> > $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:03:27 GMT, while chained
>> >>>>>>>>> to a desk in $> > $> the scriptorium "Sharx35"
>> >>>>>>>>> <shar...@hotmail.com> wrote: $> > $> > $"John Fleming"
>> >>>>>>>>> <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message $> > $> >
>>
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> > $> Had a friend e-mail this to me.
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> > $>
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> > $> * * * * * * * * * *
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> > $>
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> > $> ATTENTION
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> > $>
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> > $> ALIENS ARE COMING TO ABDUCT ALL THE GOOD LOOKING
>> >>>>>>>>> AND SEXY $> > $> > $> PEOPLE.
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> > $>
>.
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> > $
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> > $What will happen to the Meadowlark Mansion?
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> It will become the property of someone less sexy and
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $Yads and Guppy can have it.
>> >>>>>>>>> $>
>> >>>>>>>>> $> <grin>
>> >>>>>>>>> $>
>o
>> >>>>>>>>> $> with the pool and the tennis courts.
>> >>>>>>>>> $
>> >>>>>>>>> $or the hot tub, the extensive wine cellar, the master bedroom
>> >>>>>>>>> with the $mirrored ceiling.
>> >>>>>>>>> $
>> >>>>>>>>> $There's a whole lotta things those two wouldn't know what to
>> >>>>>>>>> do with.
>> >>>>>>>> I think sharx could probably figure out what to do with the
>> >>>>>>>> hand . . ..
>> >>>>>>> Hence why Sharx can have it.
>ts
>> >>>>>> and a mirrored ceiling in the master bedroom.
>>
>>
>> >>>> Why?
>>
>> >>> =A0 I get too busy watching what I'm doing in the mirror to concentra=
>te
>> >>> on doing what I'm doing. =A0I find my performance suffers.
>>
>> >> Also, certain viewpoints don't work nearly as well as one would have
>> >> imagined
>at
>> >> you
>> >> want to be thinking at the crucial moment.
>>
>> >> Diane L.
>>
>>
>> > =A0And not in a good way.
>>
>> Ouch come to mind.
>> --
>
>
>
Step aside trolling pants, adults are talking here.
John Fleming
desk in the scriptorium "Mr.Smartypants"
> $On Nov 29, 5:51�am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
[snip]
> $> Ouch come to mind.
> $
> $FO you stupid troll. You don't even know what they're talking about.
He'd know what he was responding to if he took some time to
read the posts he was responding to.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
snowman
>>
>
> Step aside trolling pants, adults are talking here.
So why are you here then?
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
"It's the customer's privilege to burst their own f*cking yolk."
-Gordon Ramsey
John Fleming
in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $The Doctor wrote:
> $
> $> Step aside trolling pants, adults are talking here.
> $
> $So why are you here then?
Good question snowman.
Hulahoop
>
> He'd know what he was responding to if he took some time to
> read the posts he was responding to.
NFC
Regards
Ged
The Doctor
John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:32:40 -0700, while chained to a desk
>in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
>> $The Doctor wrote:
>> $
>> $> Step aside trolling pants, adults are talking here.
>> $
>> $So why are you here then?
>
>Good question snowman.
>
Snowman is a 100th degree troll.
snowman
> In article <m319h511pus85fhou...@4ax.com>,
> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:32:40 -0700, while chained to a desk
>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
>>> $The Doctor wrote:
>>> $
>>> $> Step aside trolling pants, adults are talking here.
>>> $
>>> $So why are you here then?
>> Good question snowman.
>>
>
> Snowman is a 100th degree troll.
You still haven't answered the question, child. Why are you here?
John Fleming
in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $The Doctor wrote:
> $> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:32:40 -0700, while chained to a desk
> $>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>>> $
> $>>> $> Step aside trolling pants, adults are talking here.
> $>>> $
> $>>> $So why are you here then?
> $>>
> $>
> $> Snowman is a 100th degree troll.
> $
> $You still haven't answered the question, child. Why are you here?
I doubt he will.
The Doctor
John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:16:28 -0700, while chained to a desk
>in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
>> $The Doctor wrote:
>> $> In article <m319h511pus85fhou...@4ax.com>,
>> $> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> $>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:32:40 -0700, while chained to a desk
>> $>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
>> $>>> $The Doctor wrote:
>> $>>> $
>> $>>> $> Step aside trolling pants, adults are talking here.
>> $>>> $
>> $>>> $So why are you here then?
>> $>> Good question snowman.
>> $>>
>> $>
>> $> Snowman is a 100th degree troll.
>> $
>> $You still haven't answered the question, child. Why are you here?
>
>I doubt he will.
>
Rarely do I answer abusive trolls like PV, a Loaof of Bread nor snowman.
PV
> In article <1iebh595v0plp2ind...@4ax.com>,
> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:16:28 -0700, while chained to a desk
>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
>>> $The Doctor wrote:
>>> $> In article <m319h511pus85fhou...@4ax.com>,
>>> $> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>>> $>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:32:40 -0700, while chained to a desk
>>> $>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
>>> $>>> $The Doctor wrote:
>>> $>>> $
>>> $>>> $> Step aside trolling pants, adults are talking here.
>>> $>>> $
>>> $>>> $So why are you here then?
>>> $>> Good question snowman.
>>> $>>
>>> $>
>>> $> Snowman is a 100th degree troll.
>>> $
>>> $You still haven't answered the question, child. Why are you here?
>>
>> I doubt he will.
>>
>
> Rarely do I answer abusive trolls like PV, a Loaof of Bread nor
> snowman.
Rarely do you ever answer any question, at least with any meaning.
Never do you employ a spell checker
John Fleming
the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>>> $> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>>> $>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:32:40 -0700, while chained to a desk
> $>>> $>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $>>> $>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>>> $>>> $
> $>>> $>>> $
> $>>> $>>> $So why are you here then?
> $>>> $>>
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $> Snowman is a 100th degree troll.
> $>>> $
> $>>> $You still haven't answered the question, child. Why are you here?
> $>> I doubt he will.
> $>>
> $>
> $> Rarely do I answer abusive trolls like PV, a Loaof of Bread nor
> $> snowman.
> $
> $Rarely do you ever answer any question, at least with any meaning.
Isn't that the truth.
If he at least gave some rudimentary answers, it would
suggest he's given at least some thought to what he
believes, and why.
> $Never do you employ a spell checker
Such a simple tool to us as well.
The Doctor
REquote: Rarely do I answer abusive trolls like PV, a Loaof of Bread nor
snowman
>
> REquote: Rarely do I answer abusive trolls like PV, a Loaof of Bread nor
> snowman.
Of course not. That would require you do 1) think of something
intelligent, 2) use words that are more than 2 syllables, and 3) spell
it all correctly.
Don't get me wrong, I for one would very much like to have an
intelligent debate with you here on the various posts that arise. But I
am constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who disagrees with your
pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling and insults. That in
itself would be tolerable if you had something else intelligent to add
to the conversation, but name calling is the only thing that you *EVER*
add. And lets not forget your advocation of violence against those who
are homosexual. The private lives of these folks is their business, yet
you use it as an excuse to advocate violence. Pretty disgusting.
Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder why other
posters express such antagonism at your garbage.
PV
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>>
>> REquote: Rarely do I answer abusive trolls like PV, a Loaof of Bread
>> nor snowman.
>
>
> Of course not. That would require you do 1) think of something
> intelligent, 2) use words that are more than 2 syllables, and 3) spell
> it all correctly.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I for one would very much like to have an
> intelligent debate with you here on the various posts that arise. But I am
> constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who disagrees
> with your pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling and insults.
> That in itself would be tolerable if you had something else
> intelligent to add to the conversation, but name calling is the only
> thing that you *EVER* add. And lets not forget your advocation of
> violence against those who are homosexual. The private lives of
> these folks is their business, yet you use it as an excuse to
> advocate violence. Pretty disgusting.
> Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder why other
> posters express such antagonism at your garbage.
Well said Snowman, well said
Alan Sailsbury
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>>
>> REquote: Rarely do I answer abusive trolls like PV, a Loaof of Bread nor
>> snowman.
>
>
> Of course not. That would require you do 1) think of something
> intelligent, 2) use words that are more than 2 syllables, and 3) spell
> it all correctly.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I for one would very much like to have an
> intelligent debate with you here on the various posts that arise. But I
> am constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who disagrees with your
> pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling and insults. That in
> itself would be tolerable if you had something else intelligent to add
> to the conversation, but name calling is the only thing that you *EVER*
> add. And lets not forget your advocation of violence against those who
> are homosexual. The private lives of these folks is their business, yet
> you use it as an excuse to advocate violence. Pretty disgusting.
>
> Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder why other
> posters express such antagonism at your garbage.
>
Well said! I can see why Yads won't debate with you. You hit the nail on
the head and he'd have no room for maneuver.
The Doctor
snowman
>>
>
> 2 TRolls setting a group on fire.
It's pretty sad that you won't even listen to a bit of constructive
criticism. Put your pride aside for a few minutes and just listen to
yourself. It's pretty disgusting.
John Fleming
in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $The Doctor wrote:
> $
> $> snowman.
> $
> $Of course not. That would require you do 1) think of something
> $intelligent, 2) use words that are more than 2 syllables, and 3) spell
> $it all correctly.
That would be a start.
> $Don't get me wrong, I for one would very much like to have an
> $intelligent debate with you here on the various posts that arise. But I
> $am constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who disagrees with your
> $pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling and insults.
As am I. I have better things to do with my time than
respond to someone whose best seems to be hurling childish
insults.
> $That in
> $itself would be tolerable if you had something else intelligent to add
> $to the conversation, but name calling is the only thing that you *EVER*
> $add.
I wouldn't even go so far as to say that would make the name
calling tolerable.
Good debaters don't need to resort to name calling to prove
their points. They have evidence at hand to back up their
assertions. And they have done enough homework to have an
understanding of their opponents' positions and ability to
exploit the weaknesses in their opponents' arguments.
> $And lets not forget your advocation of violence against those who
> $are homosexual. The private lives of these folks is their business, yet
> $you use it as an excuse to advocate violence. Pretty disgusting.
Agreed. I can't put it better snowman.
> $Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder why other
> $posters express such antagonism at your garbage.
That would require him to do a little self examination. And
as others have pointed out, self examination isn't one of
the doctor's strong suits.
John Fleming
desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:
> $In article <I-qdnQAPHYwM54TW...@bt.com>,
> $Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $>snowman wrote:
> $>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>>
> $>>> REquote: Rarely do I answer abusive trolls like PV, a Loaof of Bread nor
> $>>> snowman.
> $>>
> $>> Of course not. That would require you do 1) think of something
> $>> intelligent, 2) use words that are more than 2 syllables, and 3) spell
> $>> it all correctly.
> $>>
> $>> Don't get me wrong, I for one would very much like to have an
> $>> intelligent debate with you here on the various posts that arise. But I
> $>> am constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who disagrees with your
> $>> pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling and insults. That in
> $>> itself would be tolerable if you had something else intelligent to add
> $>> to the conversation, but name calling is the only thing that you *EVER*
> $>> add. And lets not forget your advocation of violence against those who
> $>> are homosexual. The private lives of these folks is their business, yet
> $>> you use it as an excuse to advocate violence. Pretty disgusting.
> $>>
> $>> Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder why other
> $>> posters express such antagonism at your garbage.
> $>
> $>Well said! I can see why Yads won't debate with you. You hit the nail on
> $>the head and he'd have no room for maneuver.
> $
> $2 TRolls setting a group on fire.
Doctor, snowman didn't post to preach to the converted.
If you stepped back for a minute, took a look at yourself,
and took a good hard look at the kind of person you present
yourself as, you'd realize snowman is absolutely, 100%,
correct.
The Doctor
The trolling of snowman is not impressive.
He makes Honest John look like an amateur.
The Doctor
Mr.Smartypants
> In article <t6ijh5hrme0bl31l9eqso67vvigs361...@4ax.com>,
> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:42:54 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a
> >desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
> >Doctor) wrote:
He's correct about YOU.
Laugh that one off.
The Doctor
Mr.Smartypants <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>On Dec 5, 5:45=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <t6ijh5hrme0bl31l9eqso67vvigs361...@4ax.com>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:42:54 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a
>> >desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
>> >Doctor) wrote:
>> >> $In article <I-qdnQAPHYwM54TWnZ2dnUVZ8khi4...@bt.com>,
>> >> $>snowman wrote:
>> >> $>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >> $>>
>ead nor
>> >> $>>> snowman.
>> >> $>>
>> >> $>> intelligent, 2) use words that are more than 2 syllables, and 3) s=
>pell
>> >> $>> it all correctly.
>> >> $>>
>> >> $>> Don't get me wrong, I for one would very much like to have an
>=A0But I
>> >> $>> am constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who disagrees with=
> your
>> >> $>> pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling and insults. That in
> add
>> >> $>> to the conversation, but name calling is the only thing that you *=
>EVER*
>> >> $>> add. =A0And lets not forget your advocation of violence against th=
>ose who
>> >> $>> are homosexual. =A0The private lives of these folks is their busin=
>ess, yet
>> >> $>> you use it as an excuse to advocate violence. =A0Pretty disgusting=
>.
>> >> $>>
>> >> $>> Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder why oth=
>er
>> >> $>> posters express such antagonism at your garbage.
>> >> $>
>l on
>> >> $>the head and he'd have no room for maneuver.
>> >> $
>> >> $2 TRolls setting a group on fire.
>>
>> >Doctor, snowman didn't post to preach to the converted.
>>
>> >If you stepped back for a minute, took a look at yourself,
>> >and took a good hard look at the kind of person you present
>> >yourself as, you'd realize snowman is absolutely, 100%,
>> >correct.
>>
>> >--
>>
>> >John Fleming
>> >Edmonton, Canada
>>
>> > =A0 =A0 And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
>> > =A0 =A0 With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
>> > =A0 =A0 Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
>> > =A0 =A0 Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
>>
>> snowman ever correct?? LOL!!
>> --
>
>
>He's correct about YOU.
>
>Laugh that one off.
>
>
Said chronic liar Ron Hamilton.
snowman
> In article <t6ijh5hrme0bl31l9...@4ax.com>,
> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> Doctor, snowman didn't post to preach to the converted.
>>
>> If you stepped back for a minute, took a look at yourself,
>> and took a good hard look at the kind of person you present
>> yourself as, you'd realize snowman is absolutely, 100%,
>> correct.
>>
>
> snowman ever correct?? LOL!!
Step back and look at yourself for a second. What do you ever add to
the conversation? What facts to you ever present? All we ever get out
of you is nonsensical one word replies or insults. I might take my fair
share of shots at you, but you have to understand, that is the only
thing that you seem to understand. Just try once to add something other
than garbage or degrading replies. Maybe you should begin by posting an
apology for advocating violence against homosexuals. That would at
least show that you have one ounce of integrity. Show us at least that
much of a beginning.
snowman
posters that the Doctor would get the message. I guess it truly must be
easier to get blood from a stone.
snowman
See, there you go again. All I'm offering up to you is a bit of
constructive criticism and yet the best you can do is deny your
wrongdoings. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
Alan Sailsbury
>
>>
> One would think that since the message comes from so many different
> posters that the Doctor would get the message. I guess it truly must be
> easier to get blood from a stone.
>
It's sheer arrogance on his part. I've never known anyone to be so
arrogant. Yads cannot or will not accept being wrong on ANYTHING because
he believes God made him perfect. Therefore he's 100% convinced that
everyone else must be wrong if they criticize his behaviour. There's no
getting through to someone who believes God is on his side
It must be a blissful existence to live in such ignorance but not
accepting it. Imagine; Yads moves through life 100% convinced he's never
wrong and that he has a perfect personality. It's remarkable.
Alan Sailsbury
One interesting point; he's just admitted "Honest John" is a troll!
Double standards from Yadallee yet again.
The Doctor
The Doctor
I never said anything of the sort. Thus trolls liar troll TRolsbury.
John Fleming
> $Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $>snowman wrote:
> $>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>>>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>>>>> $
> $>>>>> $> REquote: Rarely do I answer abusive trolls like PV, a Loaof of
> $>>>>> $> snowman.
> $>>>>> $
> $>>>>> $Of course not. That would require you do 1) think of something
> $>>>>> spell $it all correctly.
> $>>>> That would be a start.
> $>>>>
> $>>>>> $Don't get me wrong, I for one would very much like to have an
> $>>>>> $intelligent debate with you here on the various posts that arise.
> $>>>>> But I $am constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who disagrees
> $>>>>> with your $pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling and insults.
> $>>>> As am I. I have better things to do with my time than
> $>>>> respond to someone whose best seems to be hurling childish
> $>>>> insults.
> $>>>>
> $>>>>> $That in $itself would be tolerable if you had something else
> $>>>>> intelligent to add $to the conversation, but name calling is the
> $>>>>> only thing that you *EVER* $add.
> $>>>> I wouldn't even go so far as to say that would make the name
> $>>>> calling tolerable.
> $>>>>
> $>>>> Good debaters don't need to resort to name calling to prove
> $>>>> their points. They have evidence at hand to back up their
> $>>>> assertions. And they have done enough homework to have an
> $>>>> understanding of their opponents' positions and ability to
> $>>>> exploit the weaknesses in their opponents' arguments.
> $>>>>
> $>>>>> $And lets not forget your advocation of violence against those who
> $>>>>> $are homosexual. The private lives of these folks is their
> $>>>>> business, yet $you use it as an excuse to advocate violence. Pretty
> $>>>>> disgusting.
> $>>>> Agreed. I can't put it better snowman.
> $>>>>
> $>>>>> $Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder why
> $>>>>> other $posters express such antagonism at your garbage.
> $>>>> That would require him to do a little self examination. And
> $>>>> as others have pointed out, self examination isn't one of
> $>>>> the doctor's strong suits.
> $>>>>
> $>>>
> $>>> The trolling of snowman is not impressive.
> $>>>
> $>>> He makes Honest John look like an amateur.
> $>>
> $>>
> $>> See, there you go again. All I'm offering up to you is a bit of
> $>> constructive criticism and yet the best you can do is deny your
> $>> wrongdoings. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
> $>>
> $>
> $>One interesting point; he's just admitted "Honest John" is a troll!
> $>Double standards from Yadallee yet again.
> $>
> $
> $I never said anything of the sort. Thus trolls liar troll TRolsbury.
Go back and read what you posted two messages back.
That is exactly what you said. To wit, "The tolling of
snowman is not impressive. He makes Honest John look like
an amatuer."
Not only are you saying Honest John is a troll, you are
saying he is a lousy one at that.
John Fleming
in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>>> $
> $>>> $> REquote: Rarely do I answer abusive trolls like PV, a Loaof of Bread nor
> $>>> $
> $>>> $Of course not. That would require you do 1) think of something
> $>>> $it all correctly.
> $>> That would be a start.
> $>>
> $>>> $Don't get me wrong, I for one would very much like to have an
> $>>> $intelligent debate with you here on the various posts that arise. But I
> $>>> $am constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who disagrees with your
> $>>> $pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling and insults.
> $>> respond to someone whose best seems to be hurling childish
> $>> insults.
> $>>
> $>>> $That in
> $>>> $to the conversation, but name calling is the only thing that you *EVER*
> $>>> $add.
> $>> calling tolerable.
> $>>
> $>> their points. They have evidence at hand to back up their
> $>> assertions. And they have done enough homework to have an
> $>> understanding of their opponents' positions and ability to
> $>> exploit the weaknesses in their opponents' arguments.
> $>>
> $>>> $And lets not forget your advocation of violence against those who
> $>>> $are homosexual. The private lives of these folks is their business, yet
> $>>> $you use it as an excuse to advocate violence. Pretty disgusting.
> $>> Agreed. I can't put it better snowman.
> $>>
> $>>> $Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder why other
> $>>> $posters express such antagonism at your garbage.
> $>> That would require him to do a little self examination. And
> $>> as others have pointed out, self examination isn't one of
> $>> the doctor's strong suits.
> $>>
> $>
> $> The trolling of snowman is not impressive.
> $>
> $> He makes Honest John look like an amateur.
> $
> $
> $See, there you go again. All I'm offering up to you is a bit of
> $constructive criticism and yet the best you can do is deny your
> $wrongdoings. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
You and Alan are both right. He can't accept criticism.
John Fleming
in the scriptorium Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $snowman wrote:
> $>
> $> One would think that since the message comes from so many different
> $> posters that the Doctor would get the message. I guess it truly must be
> $> easier to get blood from a stone.
Maybe he also thinks he's God's gift to women. Which would
be another reason why he is still a virgin at 40.
> $It's sheer arrogance on his part. I've never known anyone to be so
> $arrogant. Yads cannot or will not accept being wrong on ANYTHING because
> $he believes God made him perfect. Therefore he's 100% convinced that
> $everyone else must be wrong if they criticize his behaviour. There's no
> $getting through to someone who believes God is on his side
> $
> $It must be a blissful existence to live in such ignorance but not
> $accepting it. Imagine; Yads moves through life 100% convinced he's never
> $wrong and that he has a perfect personality. It's remarkable.
snowman
> In article <7L2dnRCIObzL2oHW...@bt.com>,
> Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>> snowman wrote:
>>> One would think that since the message comes from so many different
>>> posters that the Doctor would get the message. I guess it truly must be
>>> easier to get blood from a stone.
>>>
>> It's sheer arrogance on his part. I've never known anyone to be so
>> arrogant. Yads cannot or will not accept being wrong on ANYTHING because
>> he believes God made him perfect. Therefore he's 100% convinced that
>> everyone else must be wrong if they criticize his behaviour. There's no
>> getting through to someone who believes God is on his side
>>
>> It must be a blissful existence to live in such ignorance but not
>> accepting it. Imagine; Yads moves through life 100% convinced he's never
>> wrong and that he has a perfect personality. It's remarkable.
>
> Forgot to look in the mirror again Trollsbury?
You really should take your own advice on this one. Really. Just try
it, for once. Please.
snowman
Boy, I'll say. It's truly amazing how much pride has infected him like
a virus.
Alan Sailsbury
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:08:42 +0000, while chained to a desk
> in the scriptorium Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>> $snowman wrote:
>> $>
>> $> One would think that since the message comes from so many different
>> $> posters that the Doctor would get the message. I guess it truly must be
>> $> easier to get blood from a stone.
>
> Maybe he also thinks he's God's gift to women. Which would
> be another reason why he is still a virgin at 40.
>
Yes I'm sure his arrogance covers that too. He thinks he's perfect.
Jeez, the guy even thinks he can walk on water. What a catch for a
"lady". ;-)
Alan Sailsbury
He makes Honest John look like an amateur." - Dave Yadallee
Hulahoop
Little Britain's Emily from Stow on the Wold springs to mind, she's a
Lady
Regards
Ged
Hulahoop
> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:01:42 -0700, while chained to a desk
> in the scriptorium snowman <x...@x.x> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > $The Doctor wrote:
> > $> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> > $>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:03:26 -0700, while chained to a desk
>
> - Show quoted text -
He is completely and utterly myopic in the face of criticism.
Or in Douglas Adams' terms, which he might have some semblance of
recognition of, it's an SEP*
Regards
Ged
* SEP = Somebody Else Problem. When an SEP field is placed about an
object the eye of the beholder ignores it as it is SEP. This was
probably the inspiration (or plagiarism) used for the TARDIS key based
perception filter used in SOD and LOTTL
(I'll get my coat)
Further Regards
Ged
The Doctor
The Doctor
0/10 JFl. You gave me good pointers at the TM meeting.
snowman and Sailsbury are high grade trolls.
The Doctor
The Doctor
Alan Sailsbury
No, you said "He makes Honest John look like an amateur". At what exactly?
Alan Sailsbury
You can't wriggle out of it now. You said snowman made HJ look like an
amateur regarding trolling. Therefore you KNOW HJ is a troll. Your own
words Yads. Your own words.
The Doctor
Alan Sailsbury
So you're saying that if it wasn't for snowman HJ wouldn't look a very
good netposter?
The Doctor
Mr.Smartypants
> In article <I4idnSGT_MA3qIDWnZ2dnUVZ8lNi4...@bt.com>,
> Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >The Doctor wrote:
> >> Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> >>> The Doctor wrote:
> >>>> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:36:02 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a
> >>>>> desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
> >>>>> Doctor) wrote:
> >>>>>> $Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> >>>>>> $>snowman wrote:
> >>>>>> $>> The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>>> $>>> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> $>>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:03:26 -0700, while chained to a desk
WHOOSH! WHOOSH!! WHOOSH!!!
They're just *flying* past you, Yads.
john smith
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:hfj7hj$1kt$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Why not follow them and be a bit less of a dick then?
The Doctor
Mr.Smartypants <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>On Dec 7, 10:13=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <I4idnSGT_MA3qIDWnZ2dnUVZ8lNi4...@bt.com>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >The Doctor wrote:
>> >> In article <SYSdnVGJUKE1t4DWnZ2dnUVZ8uadn...@bt.com>,
>> >>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>> In article <5rpoh5taid6krtbh82pkbfp5n2kh47d...@4ax.com>,
>> >>>>> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:36:02 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a
>> >>>>> desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
>> >>>>> Doctor) wrote:
>> >>>>>> $In article <7L2dnROIObxS2oHWnZ2dnUVZ8umdn...@bt.com>,
>> >>>>>> $>snowman wrote:
>> >>>>>> $>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>> $>>> In article <p4hjh590q1bct1mfq18tvgo0ka1q7hu...@4ax.com>,
>> >>>>>> $>>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:03:26 -0700, while chained to a desk
>> >>>>>> $>>>> in the scriptorium snowman <x...@x.x> wrote:
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> $
>aof of
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> Bread nor
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> $> snowman.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> $
>mething
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> $intelligent, 2) use words that are more than 2 syllables, =
>and 3)
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> spell $it all correctly.
>> >>>>>> $>>>> That would be a start.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>
> an
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> $intelligent debate with you here on the various posts that=
> arise. =A0
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> But I $am constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who =
>disagrees
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> with your $pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling an=
>d insults.
>> >>>>>> $>>>> As am I. =A0I have better things to do with my time than
>> >>>>>> $>>>> respond to someone whose best seems to be hurling childish
>> >>>>>> $>>>> insults.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>
>se
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> intelligent to add $to the conversation, but name calling i=
>s the
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> only thing that you *EVER* $add. =A0
>> >>>>>> $>>>> I wouldn't even go so far as to say that would make the name
>> >>>>>> $>>>> calling tolerable.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>
>> >>>>>> $>>>> Good debaters don't need to resort to name calling to prove
>> >>>>>> $>>>> assertions. =A0And they have done enough homework to have an
>> >>>>>> $>>>> understanding of their opponents' positions and ability to
>> >>>>>> $>>>> exploit the weaknesses in their opponents' arguments.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>
>ose who
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> $are homosexual. =A0The private lives of these folks is the=
>ir
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> business, yet $you use it as an excuse to advocate violence=
>. =A0Pretty
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> disgusting.
>> >>>>>> $>>>> Agreed. =A0I can't put it better snowman.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> $Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder=
> why
>> >>>>>> $>>>>> other $posters express such antagonism at your garbage.
>nd
>> >>>>>> $>>>> as others have pointed out, self examination isn't one of
>> >>>>>> $>>>> the doctor's strong suits.
>> >>>>>> $>>>>
>> >>>>>> $>>>
>> >>>>>> $>>> The trolling of snowman is not impressive.
>> >>>>>> $>>>
>> >>>>>> $>>> He makes Honest John look like an amateur.
>> >>>>>> $>>
>> >>>>>> $>>
>t of
>> >>>>>> $>> constructive criticism and yet the best you can do is deny you=
>r
>> >>>>>> $>> wrongdoings. =A0I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
>> >>>>>> $>>
>> >>>>>> $>
>> >>>>>> $>One interesting point; he's just admitted "Honest John" is a tro=
>ll!
>> >>>>>> $>Double standards from Yadallee yet again.
>> >>>>>> $>
>> >>>>>> $
>sbury.
>> >>>>> Go back and read what you posted two messages back.
>>
>> >>>>> snowman is not impressive. =A0He makes Honest John look like
>> >>>>> an amatuer."
>>
>> >>>>> Not only are you saying Honest John is a troll, you are
>> >>>>> saying he is a lousy one at that.
>>
>> >>>> I was saying HJ >> snowman.
>ctly?
>>
>> >> Snowman make HJ looks good as a netposter.
>>
>> >So you're saying that if it wasn't for snowman HJ wouldn't look a very
>> >good netposter?
>>
>> --
>
>
>WHOOSH! WHOOSH!! WHOOSH!!!
>
>They're just *flying* past you, Yads.
Said chronic liar Ron Hamilton.
The Doctor
Take your own advice.
John Fleming
in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $The Doctor wrote:
> $> Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $>> snowman wrote:
> $>>> posters that the Doctor would get the message. I guess it truly must be
> $>>> easier to get blood from a stone.
> $>>>
> $>> It's sheer arrogance on his part. I've never known anyone to be so
> $>> arrogant. Yads cannot or will not accept being wrong on ANYTHING because
> $>> he believes God made him perfect. Therefore he's 100% convinced that
> $>> everyone else must be wrong if they criticize his behaviour. There's no
> $>> getting through to someone who believes God is on his side
> $>>
> $>> It must be a blissful existence to live in such ignorance but not
> $>> accepting it. Imagine; Yads moves through life 100% convinced he's never
> $>> wrong and that he has a perfect personality. It's remarkable.
> $>
> $> Forgot to look in the mirror again Trollsbury?
> $
> $You really should take your own advice on this one. Really. Just try
> $it, for once. Please.
I doubt very seriously that he will, even though it would do
him a world of good.
John Fleming
in the scriptorium Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:08:42 +0000, while chained to a desk
> $> in the scriptorium Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $>> $snowman wrote:
> $>> $>
> $>> $> easier to get blood from a stone.
> $>
> $> Maybe he also thinks he's God's gift to women. Which would
> $> be another reason why he is still a virgin at 40.
> $
> $Yes I'm sure his arrogance covers that too. He thinks he's perfect.
> $Jeez, the guy even thinks he can walk on water. What a catch for a
> $"lady". ;-)
I figure most women would decide they had better prospects
than a throwback to Victorian England.
John Fleming
in the scriptorium Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $The Doctor wrote:
> $> In article <5rpoh5taid6krtbh8...@4ax.com>,> $>> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:36:02 +0000 (UTC), while chained to a
> $>> desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
> $>> Doctor) wrote:
> $>>> $In article <7L2dnROIObxS2oHW...@bt.com>,
> $>>> $Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $>>> $>snowman wrote:
> $>>> $>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>>> $>>> In article <p4hjh590q1bct1mfq...@4ax.com>,
> $>>> $>>> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>>> $>>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:03:26 -0700, while chained to a desk
> $>>> $>>>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $>>> $>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>>> $>>>>> $
> $>>> $>>>>> Bread nor
> $>>> $>>>>> $> snowman.
> $>>> $>>>>> $
> $>>> $>>>>> $Of course not. That would require you do 1) think of something
> $>>> $>>>>> spell $it all correctly.
> $>>> $>>>> That would be a start.
> $>>> $>>>>
> $>>> $>>>>> $Don't get me wrong, I for one would very much like to have an
> $>>> $>>>>> But I $am constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who disagrees
> $>>> $>>>>> with your $pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling and insults.
> $>>> $>>>> As am I. I have better things to do with my time than
> $>>> $>>>> respond to someone whose best seems to be hurling childish
> $>>> $>>>> insults.
> $>>> $>>>>
> $>>> $>>>>> $That in $itself would be tolerable if you had something else
> $>>> $>>>>> only thing that you *EVER* $add.
> $>>> $>>>> I wouldn't even go so far as to say that would make the name
> $>>> $>>>> calling tolerable.
> $>>> $>>>>
> $>>> $>>>> Good debaters don't need to resort to name calling to prove
> $>>> $>>>> assertions. And they have done enough homework to have an
> $>>> $>>>> understanding of their opponents' positions and ability to
> $>>> $>>>> exploit the weaknesses in their opponents' arguments.
> $>>> $>>>>
> $>>> $>>>>> $And lets not forget your advocation of violence against those who
> $>>> $>>>>> business, yet $you use it as an excuse to advocate violence. Pretty
> $>>> $>>>>> disgusting.
> $>>> $>>>> Agreed. I can't put it better snowman.
> $>>> $>>>>
> $>>> $>>>>> $Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder why
> $>>> $>>>> That would require him to do a little self examination. And
> $>>> $>>>> as others have pointed out, self examination isn't one of
> $>>> $>>>> the doctor's strong suits.
> $>>> $>>>>
> $>>> $>>>
> $>>> $>>> The trolling of snowman is not impressive.
> $>>> $>>>
> $>>> $>>> He makes Honest John look like an amateur.
> $>>> $>>
> $>>> $>> wrongdoings. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
> $>>> $>>
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $>One interesting point; he's just admitted "Honest John" is a troll!
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $
> $>>> $I never said anything of the sort. Thus trolls liar troll TRolsbury.
> $>>
> $>> That is exactly what you said. To wit, "The tolling of
> $>> snowman is not impressive. He makes Honest John look like
> $>> an amatuer."
> $>>
> $>> Not only are you saying Honest John is a troll, you are
> $>> saying he is a lousy one at that.
> $>>
> $>
> $> I was saying HJ >> snowman.
> $
> $No, you said "He makes Honest John look like an amateur". At what exactly?
The context logically implies "being a troll".
John Fleming
in the scriptorium Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $> In article <SYSdnVGJUKE1t4DW...@bt.com>,
> $> Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>>>> desk in the scriptorium doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
> $>>>> Doctor) wrote:
> $>>>>> $In article <7L2dnROIObxS2oHW...@bt.com>,
> $>>>>> $>snowman wrote:
> $>>>>> $>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>>>>> $>>> In article <p4hjh590q1bct1mfq...@4ax.com>,
> $>>>>> $>>> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>>>>> $>>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:03:26 -0700, while chained to a desk
> $>>>>> $>>>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $>>>>> $>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>>>>> $>>>>> $
> $>>>>> $>>>>> Bread nor
> $>>>>> $>>>>> $> snowman.
> $>>>>> $>>>>> $
> $>>>>> $>>>>> $Of course not. That would require you do 1) think of something
> $>>>>> $>>>>> spell $it all correctly.
> $>>>>> $>>>> That would be a start.
> $>>>>> $>>>>
> $>>>>> $>>>>> $Don't get me wrong, I for one would very much like to have an
> $>>>>> $>>>>> But I $am constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who disagrees
> $>>>>> $>>>>> with your $pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling and insults.
> $>>>>> $>>>> As am I. I have better things to do with my time than
> $>>>>> $>>>> respond to someone whose best seems to be hurling childish
> $>>>>> $>>>> insults.
> $>>>>> $>>>>
> $>>>>> $>>>>> $That in $itself would be tolerable if you had something else
> $>>>>> $>>>>> only thing that you *EVER* $add.
> $>>>>> $>>>> I wouldn't even go so far as to say that would make the name
> $>>>>> $>>>> calling tolerable.
> $>>>>> $>>>>
> $>>>>> $>>>> Good debaters don't need to resort to name calling to prove
> $>>>>> $>>>> assertions. And they have done enough homework to have an
> $>>>>> $>>>> understanding of their opponents' positions and ability to
> $>>>>> $>>>> exploit the weaknesses in their opponents' arguments.
> $>>>>> $>>>>
> $>>>>> $>>>>> $And lets not forget your advocation of violence against those who
> $>>>>> $>>>>> business, yet $you use it as an excuse to advocate violence. Pretty
> $>>>>> $>>>>> disgusting.
> $>>>>> $>>>> Agreed. I can't put it better snowman.
> $>>>>> $>>>>
> $>>>>> $>>>>> $Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder why
> $>>>>> $>>>> That would require him to do a little self examination. And
> $>>>>> $>>>> as others have pointed out, self examination isn't one of
> $>>>>> $>>>> the doctor's strong suits.
> $>>>>> $>>>>
> $>>>>> $>>>
> $>>>>> $>>> The trolling of snowman is not impressive.
> $>>>>> $>>>
> $>>>>> $>>> He makes Honest John look like an amateur.
> $>>>>> $>>
> $>>>>> $>> wrongdoings. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
> $>>>>> $>>
> $>>>>> $>
> $>>>>> $>One interesting point; he's just admitted "Honest John" is a troll!
> $>>>>> $>
> $>>>>> $
> $>>>>> $I never said anything of the sort. Thus trolls liar troll TRolsbury.
> $>>>>
> $>>>> That is exactly what you said. To wit, "The tolling of
> $>>>> snowman is not impressive. He makes Honest John look like
> $>>>> an amatuer."
> $>>>>
> $>>>> saying he is a lousy one at that.
> $>>>>
> $>>> I was saying HJ >> snowman.
> $>> No, you said "He makes Honest John look like an amateur". At what exactly?
> $>
> $> Snowman make HJ looks good as a netposter.
> $
> $So you're saying that if it wasn't for snowman HJ wouldn't look a very
> $good netposter?
Well, let's take that at face value. The doctor, methinks,
doesn't have a very high opionion of snowman as a netposter,
and by extension, if snowman is making HJ look like an
amateur, that doesn't say much about HJ's skills as a
netposter now, does it?
John Fleming
> $Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $>The Doctor wrote:
> $>> Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $>>>> The Doctor wrote:
> $>>>>>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $>>>>>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>>>>>>> $
> $>>>>>>> $> REquote: Rarely do I answer abusive trolls like PV, a Loaof of
> $>>>>>>> $> snowman.
> $>>>>>>> $
> $>>>>>>> $Of course not. That would require you do 1) think of something
> $>>>>>>
> $>>>>>>> $Don't get me wrong, I for one would very much like to have an
> $>>>>>>> $intelligent debate with you here on the various posts that arise.
> $>>>>>>> But I $am constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who disagrees
> $>>>>>>> with your $pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling and insults.
> $>>>>>> As am I. I have better things to do with my time than
> $>>>>>> respond to someone whose best seems to be hurling childish
> $>>>>>> insults.
> $>>>>>>
> $>>>>>>> $That in $itself would be tolerable if you had something else
> $>>>>>>> intelligent to add $to the conversation, but name calling is the
> $>>>>>>> only thing that you *EVER* $add.
> $>>>>>> I wouldn't even go so far as to say that would make the name
> $>>>>>> calling tolerable.
> $>>>>>>
> $>>>>>> Good debaters don't need to resort to name calling to prove
> $>>>>>> their points. They have evidence at hand to back up their
> $>>>>>> assertions. And they have done enough homework to have an
> $>>>>>> understanding of their opponents' positions and ability to
> $>>>>>> exploit the weaknesses in their opponents' arguments.
> $>>>>>>
> $>>>>>>> $And lets not forget your advocation of violence against those who
> $>>>>>>> $are homosexual. The private lives of these folks is their
> $>>>>>>> business, yet $you use it as an excuse to advocate violence. Pretty
> $>>>>>>> disgusting.
> $>>>>>> Agreed. I can't put it better snowman.
> $>>>>>>
> $>>>>>>> $Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder why
> $>>>>>>> other $posters express such antagonism at your garbage.
> $>>>>>> That would require him to do a little self examination. And
> $>>>>>> as others have pointed out, self examination isn't one of
> $>>>>>> the doctor's strong suits.
> $>>>>>>
> $>>>>> The trolling of snowman is not impressive.
> $>>>>>
> $>>>>> He makes Honest John look like an amateur.
> $>>>>
> $>>>> See, there you go again. All I'm offering up to you is a bit of
> $>>>> constructive criticism and yet the best you can do is deny your
> $>>>> wrongdoings. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
> $>>>>
> $>>> One interesting point; he's just admitted "Honest John" is a troll!
> $>>> Double standards from Yadallee yet again.
> $>>>
> $>>
> $>> I never said anything of the sort. Thus trolls liar troll TRolsbury.
> $>
> $>"The trolling of snowman is not impressive.
> $>He makes Honest John look like an amateur." - Dave Yadallee
> $>
> $
> $Implying HJ >> snowman in all areas.
Including being a troll.
John Fleming
> $John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:01:42 -0700, while chained to a desk
> $>in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $>> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>> $> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:03:26 -0700, while chained to a desk
> $>> $>> in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $>> $>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>>> $> snowman.
> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>>> $Of course not. That would require you do 1) think of something
> $>> $>>> $it all correctly.
> $>> $>> That would be a start.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>>> $Don't get me wrong, I for one would very much like to have an
> $>> $>>> $am constantly disgusted at how you treat anyone who disagrees with your
> $>> $>>> $pro-Liberal views with a dose of name calling and insults.
> $>> $>> As am I. I have better things to do with my time than
> $>> $>> respond to someone whose best seems to be hurling childish
> $>> $>> insults.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>>> $That in
> $>> $>>> $itself would be tolerable if you had something else intelligent to add
> $>> $>>> $to the conversation, but name calling is the only thing that you *EVER*
> $>> $>>> $add.
> $>> $>> I wouldn't even go so far as to say that would make the name
> $>> $>> calling tolerable.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> Good debaters don't need to resort to name calling to prove
> $>> $>> assertions. And they have done enough homework to have an
> $>> $>> understanding of their opponents' positions and ability to
> $>> $>> exploit the weaknesses in their opponents' arguments.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>>> $And lets not forget your advocation of violence against those who
> $>> $>>> $you use it as an excuse to advocate violence. Pretty disgusting.
> $>> $>> Agreed. I can't put it better snowman.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>>> $Maybe you should keep those points in mind when you wonder why other
> $>> $>> That would require him to do a little self examination. And
> $>> $>> as others have pointed out, self examination isn't one of
> $>> $>> the doctor's strong suits.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>
> $>> $>
> $>> $> He makes Honest John look like an amateur.
> $>> $
> $>> $See, there you go again. All I'm offering up to you is a bit of
> $>> $wrongdoings. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
> $>
> $>You and Alan are both right. He can't accept criticism.
> $>
> $
> $0/10 JFl. You gave me good pointers at the TM meeting.
Pointer which, I might add, you don't seem to be putting
into practice.
> $snowman and Sailsbury are high grade trolls.
--
John Fleming
in the scriptorium "john smith" <the_jo...@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
> $"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> $news:hfj7hj$1kt$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> $> 0/10 JFl. You gave me good pointers at the TM meeting.
> $
> $Why not follow them and be a bit less of a dick then?
I think the reasons have already been pointed out in this
thread.
snowman
I'm sorry Herr Doktor, but trying to understand your babble is like
extracting a tooth with a pipe wrench. It is truly a painful experience.
John Fleming
in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
[crap snipped]
> $I'm sorry Herr Doktor, but trying to understand your babble is like
> $extracting a tooth with a pipe wrench. It is truly a painful experience.
But one that can be enjoyed by the person weilding the pipe
wrench. :)
snowman
Yes he did. And he is correct. Your pride is like a festering sore,
Herr Doktor. Just try for once to put it aside and really listen to
yourself.
snowman
I suspect that the Doctor doesn't like me since I have nothing good to
say about his Liberal Party, and I have been very vocal about their past
transgressions, graft and ineptitude.
> and by extension, if snowman is making HJ look like an
> amateur, that doesn't say much about HJ's skills as a
> netposter now, does it?
I'm not even sure who HJ is. But if the Doctor thinks that he is in a
position to judge all the other posters, not just in edm.general or RADW
but in so many other newgroups, then he really needs to get a life.
John Fleming
in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $John Fleming wrote:
> $> in the scriptorium Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $
> $>> $So you're saying that if it wasn't for snowman HJ wouldn't look a very
> $>
> $> Well, let's take that at face value. The doctor, methinks,
> $> doesn't have a very high opionion of snowman as a netposter,
> $
> $I suspect that the Doctor doesn't like me since I have nothing good to
> $say about his Liberal Party, and I have been very vocal about their past
> $transgressions, graft and ineptitude.
And just when Liberals thought it was safe to go back in the
political waters <Jaws theme>
Liberal Senator set to stand trial
Raymond Lavigne's office at stake as Chr�tien appointee
faces charges of misusing public funds
Daniel Leblanc
Ottawa � From Monday's Globe and Mail
Published on Sunday, Dec. 06, 2009 7:22PM EST
Last updated on Monday, Dec. 07, 2009 3:48AM EST
Liberal Senator Raymond Lavigne hasn't cast a vote in
the Senate since he was charged with fraud 27 months
ago, but he kept his $130,000 annual salary and the
keys to his office.
These taxpayer-funded perks will be on the line when
Mr. Lavigne's trial, scheduled to begin in Ottawa
today, gets under way. He has pleaded not guilty to
charges related to the allegations of misappropriation
of Senate funds and obstruction of justice.
The trial is scheduled to last two weeks. If he is
acquitted, Mr. Lavigne will be able to end his leave of
absence and return to the Senate.
If convicted, he could lose the annual pay and the
office, but start receiving an indexed parliamentary
pension. [There is something sick about this - JF]
Mr. Lavigne has more than the minimum six years of
service in the Senate and would be entitled to a
pension under the Members of Parliament Retiring
Allowances Act, even in the event of a conviction,
according to Senate spokeswoman Karen Schwinghamer.
The Canadian Taxpayers Federation said that Mr. Lavigne
would be eligible for a combined pension of $80,700 a
year after nine years as a Liberal MP and seven years
as a senator.
�He could take it in prison,� CTF spokesman Kevin
Gaudet said. �Not bad for 16 years.� Mr. Lavigne
appeared in court last year for a preliminary hearing
that was to have several witnesses. However, it lasted
only half a day because Mr. Lavigne's lawyer agreed to
go to trial.
Law-enforcement officials were critical of the legal
tactic, which delayed the start of the trial and
allowed Mr. Lavigne to stay on the Senate payroll for a
potentially longer period.
Mr. Lavigne was a Liberal MP from 1993 to 2002, when
then-prime-minister Jean Chr�tien named him to the
Senate to make way for former Quebec provincial
minister Liza Frulla to enter the House of Commons.
�An energetic and dedicated MP, he has been an
effective and persuasive voice for his constituents
within caucus and in public,� the press release
announcing Mr. Lavigne's appointment said.
In 2006, a Senate committee alleged that Mr. Lavigne
misused nearly $24,000 in Senate funds and sent a staff
member to cut down trees with a chainsaw at his Quebec
cottage in the Gatineau Hills.
Mr. Lavigne was removed from the Liberal caucus at that
point, but he continues to identify himself as a
Liberal senator, as is his prerogative.
In a statement in August, 2007, the RCMP alleged that
Mr. Lavigne misappropriated Senate funds and instructed
one of his employees �to carry out tasks unrelated to
Senate duties.�
�The charges were in connection with Lavigne's alleged
use of Senate resources for personal gain,� the
statement said.
The obstruction of justice charge stems from Mr.
Lavigne's conduct when the Senate started investigating
his activities in 2006.
�It is alleged that he asked his employees to make
false statements before and after the Senate started
its investigation,� RCMP Sergeant Monique Beauchamp
said.
A spokeswoman for the Mounties said the charges carry
maximum penalties of 14 years in jail.
The court is expected to deal with motions today and
tomorrow, and start hearing witnesses on Wednesday.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/liberal-senator-set-to-stand-trial/article1390641/
> $> and by extension, if snowman is making HJ look like an
> $> amateur, that doesn't say much about HJ's skills as a
> $> netposter now, does it?
> $
> $I'm not even sure who HJ is. But if the Doctor thinks that he is in a
> $position to judge all the other posters, not just in edm.general or RADW
> $but in so many other newgroups, then he really needs to get a life.
He was posting to edm.general and RADW for a bit recently
under the moniker, "The Great One".
The way he went about labelling everyone a homosexual, I'm
sure the closet door was wide open and everybody was just
waiting for him to come out and admit the obvious.