Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Buzzcocks

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Alan Sailsbury

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 7:33:37 PM12/16/09
to
Anyone see Tennant, Cribbins & Tate on Buzzcocks? Any good? Is it
repeated anytime this week?

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 7:47:12 PM12/16/09
to
In article <KuWdnS4Oo5au4bTW...@bt.com>,

Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>Anyone see Tennant, Cribbins & Tate on Buzzcocks? Any good? Is it
>repeated anytime this week?

Desperate trollsbury for you.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630
Merry Christmas 2009 and Happy New Year 2010

Hulahoop

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 11:05:22 PM12/16/09
to
On Dec 17, 11:33 am, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> Anyone see Tennant, Cribbins & Tate on Buzzcocks? Any good? Is it
> repeated anytime this week?

Won't it be on BBC iPlayer?

Regards

Ged

PeterL

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 3:26:13 AM12/17/09
to
"Hulahoop" <sween...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:07688b20-1283-41a7...@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...

Regards

Ged

Not one of my favourite programmes but I watched it anyway.

Tennant was great I thought. Cribbens also played a great part .....

.... BUT what the hell was Catherine Tate on????? I felt she really let
herself down badly. I appreciate this show is a little off the wall by
definition but thought Tate really over the topp (probably in the Green Room
before hand).

PeterL

Alan Sailsbury

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 3:47:13 AM12/17/09
to

Thanks, will look out for it.

Mark Bluemel

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 6:50:54 AM12/17/09
to
On 17 Dec, 00:33, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> Anyone see Tennant, Cribbins & Tate on Buzzcocks? Any good? Is it
> repeated anytime this week?

A bit of a curate's egg - good in parts.

Tennant was great, but Cribbins upstaged him in my opinion - he's very
clever, funny and quick. His interjection on the subject of Kylie
Minogue's bra was inspired.

Catherine Tate came across as completely and utterly barmy. Funny at
times, but occasionally grating for me.

Raymond Daley

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 7:32:12 AM12/17/09
to

"Mark Bluemel" <mark.b...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:75fa0a5b-7f0f-4af4...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

Bernie C was awesome, Catherine Tate came off looking like a complete loon
who'd learnt nothing from her time on Who.


The Doctor

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 7:39:14 AM12/17/09
to
In article <VMOdnahBcb9-crTW...@bt.com>,

I am certain youtube would have it.

Soze

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 7:59:19 AM12/17/09
to

"Raymond Daley" <raymon...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:jzpWm.74252$Jo5....@newsfe24.ams2...

Why should see really? It was just a part for her, she freely admits she`d
had no care for the show before hand and I very much doubt she`ll continue
to tune into it after.


Soze

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 8:01:15 AM12/17/09
to

"Mark Bluemel" <mark.b...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:75fa0a5b-7f0f-4af4...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On 17 Dec, 00:33, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>> Anyone see Tennant, Cribbins & Tate on Buzzcocks? Any good? Is it
>> repeated anytime this week?
>
> A bit of a curate's egg - good in parts.
>
> Tennant was great, but Cribbins upstaged him in my opinion - he's very
> clever, funny and quick. His interjection on the subject of Kylie
> Minogue's bra was inspired.

I often wonder how many of these things are scripted on these shows mind.
Tennant`s comeback didn`t get such a good laugh and he did comment that
Cribbens had got the better lines.

> Catherine Tate came across as completely and utterly barmy. Funny at
> times, but occasionally grating for me.

Yeah that`s probably fair. She looks like the sort of person that would be a
lot of fun to be around for a while...and then would just start to piss you
off! The dancing ood was...odd.


Cradok

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 8:41:10 AM12/17/09
to
Soze wrote:
> I often wonder how many of these things are scripted on these shows mind.
> Tennant`s comeback didn`t get such a good laugh and he did comment that
> Cribbens had got the better lines.

The way I believe these things usually work is that the presenter is
mostly scripted, and everyone knows what's going to be coming up on the
show, so they can prepare material, discussions and one-liners ahead of
time. There's still a fair bit of ad-libbing, though, and they record a
couple of hours of stuff and cut it down.

Monsieur Tabernac

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 9:03:10 AM12/17/09
to

I downloaded and watched this show. Being Canadian and all, I'd never
seen "Buzzcocks" before. I have to say that anyone who says that
British television is far more sophisticated than US television has
never seen this show. I don't think I've seen much worse than
this.... IMHO, of course.

Soze

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 10:36:27 AM12/17/09
to

"Monsieur Tabernac" <mtab...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0eeki55mtl3n0r6h6...@4ax.com...

Popular British television hasn`t been very sophisticated in my lifetime.
Especially nowadays, most of the best watched stuff is absolute tosh.
Although in fairness a good deal of it is re-workings of crappy American
shows.

Buzzcocks possibly doesn`t translate well overseas, it`s fairly typical
British humour and a reasonably popular show. Likewise I find the vast bulk
of American comedy to be shit...God knows what you`d make of The Mighty
Boosh...the comedy series that lead captain Noel Fielding writes and stars
in.


Monsieur Tabernac

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 10:46:06 AM12/17/09
to

I understand British comedy quite well (and really like "The Mighty
Boosh"), however IMO my dislike of this Buzzcocks show isn't because
of the comedy not translating, rather that there wasn't any real
comedy, just "celebrities" mugging and telling lame jokes (and
thinking they're funny) -- are you sure this is typical British
humour? I hope not.

Soze

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 10:52:01 AM12/17/09
to

"Monsieur Tabernac" <mtab...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sdkki5991ns54bl2h...@4ax.com...

Well, as ever with this sort of show it depends on who you`ve got on. Some
weeks it can be really funny, others not so. It`s something I watch if I
stumble upon it rather than look out for but there are a lot of this sort of
thing about.


Alan Sailsbury

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 11:08:23 AM12/17/09
to

Rob Brydon spoofed that type of show perfectly. Yes, it is pretty lame
and forgettable humour.

john smith

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 11:15:24 AM12/17/09
to

"Monsieur Tabernac" <mtab...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0eeki55mtl3n0r6h6...@4ax.com...

Oh, there's *far* worse crap comedy on British TV!


The Doctor

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 4:49:26 PM12/17/09
to

Doctor and Donna Noble works for me.

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 4:50:19 PM12/17/09
to
In article <0eeki55mtl3n0r6h6...@4ax.com>,

Hopefully a Canadian station picks it up.

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 4:52:56 PM12/17/09
to
In article <7ov1fgF...@mid.individual.net>,

Is it better than Little Britain? That sucks!!

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 4:53:37 PM12/17/09
to
In article <sdkki5991ns54bl2h...@4ax.com>,

Worst type of UK humour: Little Britain.

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 4:55:51 PM12/17/09
to
In article <7ov2cnF...@mid.individual.net>,

IT could be viewed as trashy and tasteless as Little Britain.

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 4:57:31 PM12/17/09
to
In article <cpWdnffbwePUyrfW...@bt.com>,

Sounds Little Britainish.

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 4:59:08 PM12/17/09
to
In article <sOsWm.40804$IZ1....@newsfe19.ams2>,

Little Britain.

john smith

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 10:43:03 PM12/17/09
to

"Monsieur Tabernac" <mtab...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sdkki5991ns54bl2h...@4ax.com...


Is there even such a thing as "typical British humour"?

>shrug<

I dunno.

Maybe humour's more regional?


Agamemnon

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 2:51:55 AM12/18/09
to

"Mark Bluemel" <mark.b...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:75fa0a5b-7f0f-4af4...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On 17 Dec, 00:33, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>> Anyone see Tennant, Cribbins & Tate on Buzzcocks? Any good? Is it
>> repeated anytime this week?
>
> A bit of a curate's egg - good in parts.
>
> Tennant was great, but Cribbins upstaged him in my opinion - he's very

What was the Barrowman stuff all about. Did the two of them have a bet on
how many times Tennant could introduce gay and sexual references into the
programme?

pbo...@aol.com

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 5:00:14 AM12/18/09
to
On 17 Dec, 14:03, Monsieur Tabernac <mtaber...@NOSPAMhotmail.com>
wrote:

I saw a special they did once (can't remember the subject of the
special), and it was utter drivel. I'm not surprised it never made it
out of the country. I think the stereotype that British TV is more
sophisticated than US TV dates from the '70s, which with a couple of
exceptions (nature docs aside) pretty much *was* the last time we
produced quality TV.

Phil

pbo...@aol.com

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 5:01:03 AM12/18/09
to
On 17 Dec, 15:46, Monsieur Tabernac <mtaber...@NOSPAMhotmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:36:27 -0000, "Soze"
>
>
>
>
>
> <I...@salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >"Monsieur Tabernac" <mtaber...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:0eeki55mtl3n0r6h6...@4ax.com...

It's typical Catherine Tate humour...

Phil

pbo...@aol.com

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 5:03:09 AM12/18/09
to
On 17 Dec, 15:52, "Soze" <I...@salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> "Monsieur Tabernac" <mtaber...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:sdkki5991ns54bl2h...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:36:27 -0000, "Soze"
> > <I...@salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >>"Monsieur Tabernac" <mtaber...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:0eeki55mtl3n0r6h6...@4ax.com...

For years now the only panel shows worth 'watching' in the UK have
been on radio... And even the News Quiz has had a bad run for a few
years now - which still makes it infinitely better than Have I Got
News For You has been since, oh, its second year.

Phil

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 11:14:09 AM12/18/09
to
In article <8TCWm.136692$cf1....@newsfe03.ams2>,

Monty Python's Flying Circus

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 11:46:55 AM12/18/09
to
In article <lJSdneAzht8SqbbW...@eclipse.net.uk>,

Yuck!!

Alan Sailsbury

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 12:10:50 PM12/18/09
to
Agamemnon wrote:
>
> "Mark Bluemel" <mark.b...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> news:75fa0a5b-7f0f-4af4...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>> On 17 Dec, 00:33, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>>> Anyone see Tennant, Cribbins & Tate on Buzzcocks? Any good? Is it
>>> repeated anytime this week?
>>
>> A bit of a curate's egg - good in parts.
>>
>> Tennant was great, but Cribbins upstaged him in my opinion - he's very
>
> What was the Barrowman stuff all about. Did the two of them have a bet
> on how many times Tennant could introduce gay and sexual references into
> the programme?
>

Might have. Might not. Solely to wind you up.

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 12:30:51 PM12/18/09
to
In article <SImdnSwMHIvwKrbW...@bt.com>,

TRollsbury trolls again.

pbo...@aol.com

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 1:15:37 PM12/18/09
to
On 18 Dec, 17:10, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> Agamemnon wrote:
>
> > "Mark Bluemel" <mark.blue...@googlemail.com> wrote in message

Could hardly be worse than a Have I Got News For You episode I caught
recently (it's unfortunate what I get subjected to while other people
are in the house...) which seemed to consist entirely of the panelists
making the same joke about a union leader again and again in the hopes
that it would suddenly become more than mildly amusing.

Phil

Alan Sailsbury

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 1:25:08 PM12/18/09
to

Or hoping the union leader would blow his top. (No Aggy, that's not an
oral sex reference. Down boy.)

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 7:02:45 PM12/18/09
to
In article <d5ac9ada-1c6c-4e3a...@y24g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,

I hope this is better than Little Britain.

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 7:03:07 PM12/18/09
to
In article <V--dnXdSPbpKVbbW...@bt.com>,

TRoll on Trollsbury.

Peter J Ross

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 3:25:13 PM12/24/09
to
In rec.arts.drwho on Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:33:37 +0000, Alan Sailsbury
<al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:

> Anyone see Tennant, Cribbins & Tate on Buzzcocks? Any good? Is it
> repeated anytime this week?

Tate is a nutter.

Cribbins is a god.

Tennant is quite entertaining.

The bloke off the Boosh and the miniature jazzman are harmless, and
Phill Jupitus is a decent bloke.

And Jo Whiley is about as hot as it's possible for a woman to be. I
swear that the desk in front of her was steaming whenever her sexy
fingers touched it.

*And* she's a DW fan! Jo Whiley for the next companion! The campaign
starts here!

--
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader v0.9.9p1: http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator

Peter J Ross

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 3:35:56 PM12/24/09
to
In rec.arts.drwho on Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:50:54 -0800 (PST), Mark
Bluemel <mark.b...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On 17 Dec, 00:33, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>> Anyone see Tennant, Cribbins & Tate on Buzzcocks? Any good? Is it
>> repeated anytime this week?
>

> A bit of a curate's egg - good in parts.
>
> Tennant was great, but Cribbins upstaged him in my opinion - he's very

> clever, funny and quick. His interjection on the subject of Kylie
> Minogue's bra was inspired.

Cribbins is turning into a possible replacement for Humphrey
Lyttelton as "Most Wonderful Human Being".

> Catherine Tate came across as completely and utterly barmy. Funny at
> times, but occasionally grating for me.

She behaved very oddly, but she was just being herself. if you visited
me and laughed helplessly for a few minutes about a running joke, I
expect I'd join in. The difference in CT's case is that she was
sitting behind a desk on the TV, so her laughter wasn't infectious.

pbo...@aol.com

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 4:07:50 PM12/24/09
to
On 24 Dec, 20:35, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
> In rec.arts.drwho on Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:50:54 -0800 (PST), Mark
>
> Bluemel <mark.blue...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On 17 Dec, 00:33, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> >> Anyone see Tennant, Cribbins & Tate on Buzzcocks? Any good? Is it
> >> repeated anytime this week?
>
> > A bit of a curate's egg - good in parts.
>
> > Tennant was great, but Cribbins upstaged him in my opinion - he's very
> > clever, funny and quick. His interjection on the subject of Kylie
> > Minogue's bra was inspired.
>
> Cribbins is turning into a possible replacement for Humphrey
> Lyttelton as "Most Wonderful Human Being".

Perhaps he should chair I'm Sorry I Haven't A Clue from now on, since
they insist on carrying on with it. For a while I refused to listen
after Humph's death since there seemed no way anyone else could carry
the show - then I listened last week for the first time and discovered
just how right I was.

> > Catherine Tate came across as completely and utterly barmy. Funny at
> > times, but occasionally grating for me.
>
> She behaved very oddly, but she was just being herself. if you visited
> me and laughed helplessly for a few minutes about a running joke, I
> expect I'd join in. The difference in CT's case is that she was
> sitting behind a desk on the TV, so her laughter wasn't infectious.

Her interview in RT made me feel rather sorry for her - I hadn't known
she'd intended to go into acting originally and was more-or-less
drafted into comedy instead. It's abundantly clear that acting is
where her greater talents lie, so it's a shame she's wound up
pigeonholed.

Phil

Alan Sailsbury

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 6:38:14 PM12/24/09
to
Peter J Ross wrote:
> In rec.arts.drwho on Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:50:54 -0800 (PST), Mark
> Bluemel <mark.b...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 17 Dec, 00:33, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>>> Anyone see Tennant, Cribbins & Tate on Buzzcocks? Any good? Is it
>>> repeated anytime this week?
>> A bit of a curate's egg - good in parts.
>>
>> Tennant was great, but Cribbins upstaged him in my opinion - he's very
>> clever, funny and quick. His interjection on the subject of Kylie
>> Minogue's bra was inspired.
>
> Cribbins is turning into a possible replacement for Humphrey
> Lyttelton as "Most Wonderful Human Being".
>
>> Catherine Tate came across as completely and utterly barmy. Funny at
>> times, but occasionally grating for me.
>
> She behaved very oddly, but she was just being herself. if you visited
> me and laughed helplessly for a few minutes about a running joke, I
> expect I'd join in. The difference in CT's case is that she was
> sitting behind a desk on the TV, so her laughter wasn't infectious.
>

Come on guys. It was a setup. She was DELIBERATELY EXAGGERATING being a
dense character for laughs.

Worked for me. She was funny.

The Doctor

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 1:19:47 AM12/25/09
to
In article <QJCdnU9u7v6gZq7W...@bt.com>,

Sad sack troll Sailsbury says ..

0 new messages