Torchwood S2E4 - Adam Review with a bit of spoilers
The Doctor
This writer is good!
Yes you see Gwen and Rhys but then you wonder who is this Adam?
Looks like an alien infiltrator.
Adam faked his acceptance wiping out Gwen's memories of Rhys.
This is a must see!! Mystery and intrigue, and boy you suddenly
see how vunerable Torchwood Cardiff can get without proper checks and balances.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
Soze
> 7.75/10
>
> This writer is good!
>
> Yes you see Gwen and Rhys but then you wonder who is this Adam?
>
> Looks like an alien infiltrator.
>
> Adam faked his acceptance wiping out Gwen's memories of Rhys.
>
> This is a must see!! Mystery and intrigue, and boy you suddenly
> see how vunerable Torchwood Cardiff can get without proper checks and balances.
Well, after all the bashing you`ve given this series over the last
couple years you certainly seem to have come round on it. I`m not as
impressed with s2 as you are ( although you`re actual ratings seem low
compared to your glowing mini reviews... ) but it was definately a big
improvement.
The Doctor
peachy ashie passion
> In article <6i2gjaF...@mid.individual.net>,
> Soze <I...@salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> 7.75/10
>>>
>>> This writer is good!
>>>
>>> Yes you see Gwen and Rhys but then you wonder who is this Adam?
>>>
>>> Looks like an alien infiltrator.
>>>
>>> Adam faked his acceptance wiping out Gwen's memories of Rhys.
>>>
>>> This is a must see!! Mystery and intrigue, and boy you suddenly
>>> see how vunerable Torchwood Cardiff can get without proper checks and
>> balances.
>>
>> Well, after all the bashing you`ve given this series over the last
>> couple years you certainly seem to have come round on it. I`m not as
>> impressed with s2 as you are ( although you`re actual ratings seem low
>> compared to your glowing mini reviews... ) but it was definately a big
>> improvement.
>>
>
> TWS1 is a perverse joke!
How on earth do you like S2 - that started with the ultimate
snogfest between Jack and John?
The Master
>> TWS1 is a perverse joke!
>
> How on earth do you like S2 - that started with the ultimate snogfest
> between Jack and John?
I don't know about Yads, but I thought that worked... I don't like
"throwing sex at it" just the sake of having sex in it. If it advances
the plot/story/character, then it's welcomed. If it's there "just to
shock the viewer", then what you get is the furthest thing you can from
"edgy adult drama". Rather, "sex for sake of having it" makes it teenage
drama.
The Jack/John snog was funny, only due to the fist fight that went along
with it. A bit of a love/hate relationship perhaps? In that respect, it
had an actual use in the story line.
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9h0na$n5$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
The Doctor
I gave that one low marks.
The Doctor
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9h4vo$4b8$3...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Peter J Ross
<doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <6AWuk.232$jE1.8@trnddc03>,
> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <6i2gjaF...@mid.individual.net>,
>>> Soze <I...@salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> balances.
>>>>
>>>> Well, after all the bashing you`ve given this series over the last
>>>> couple years you certainly seem to have come round on it. I`m not as
>>>> impressed with s2 as you are ( although you`re actual ratings seem low
>>>> compared to your glowing mini reviews... ) but it was definately a big
>>>> improvement.
>>>>
>>>
>>> TWS1 is a perverse joke!
>>
>> How on earth do you like S2 - that started with the ultimate
>>snogfest between Jack and John?
>
> I gave that one low marks.
Why did you give that episode low marks?
--
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader (v0.9.9): http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9hjpr$5sl$4...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9hjs4$5sl$7...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
The Doctor
Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 1 Sep 2008 20:37:15 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> In article <6AWuk.232$jE1.8@trnddc03>,
>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <6i2gjaF...@mid.individual.net>,
>>>> Soze <I...@salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> balances.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, after all the bashing you`ve given this series over the last
>>>>> couple years you certainly seem to have come round on it. I`m not as
>>>>> impressed with s2 as you are ( although you`re actual ratings seem low
>>>>> compared to your glowing mini reviews... ) but it was definately a big
>>>>> improvement.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> TWS1 is a perverse joke!
>>>
>>> How on earth do you like S2 - that started with the ultimate
>>>snogfest between Jack and John?
>>
>> I gave that one low marks.
>
>Why did you give that episode low marks?
>
Because of the gayness of it.
The Master
> Both Adam and Meat are great!
Adam was interesting, but Meat was just idiotic. A mutated space whale
that regrows it's own flesh over night, so it's harvested by a criminal
meat packing facility? Torchwood is called to a car accident because one
of them has a chunck of boneless meat?
I've seen episodes of Sponge Bob that made more sense...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9hla9$5sl$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
The Master
>>> How on earth do you like S2 - that started with the ultimate
>>> snogfest between Jack and John?
>>
>> I gave that one low marks.
>
> Why did you give that episode low marks?
Because he is in the closet, and doesn't like episodes that challange his
view of himself.
.
.
.
Peter J Ross
<doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <slrngbole...@pjr.motzarella.org>,
> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 1 Sep 2008 20:37:15 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
>><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <6AWuk.232$jE1.8@trnddc03>,
>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> How on earth do you like S2 - that started with the ultimate
>>>>snogfest between Jack and John?
>>>
>>> I gave that one low marks.
>>
>>Why did you give that episode low marks?
>>
>
> Because of the gayness of it.
If you weren't prejudiced against homosexuality, what marks would you
have given that episode?
The Doctor
The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
And what about the Rhys angle in Meat?
The Doctor
The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
I am a declared antihomosexual.
The Doctor
Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 1 Sep 2008 21:03:05 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> In article <slrngbole...@pjr.motzarella.org>,
>> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 1 Sep 2008 20:37:15 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
>>><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <6AWuk.232$jE1.8@trnddc03>,
>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> How on earth do you like S2 - that started with the ultimate
>>>>>snogfest between Jack and John?
>>>>
>>>> I gave that one low marks.
>>>
>>>Why did you give that episode low marks?
>>>
>>
>> Because of the gayness of it.
>
>If you weren't prejudiced against homosexuality, what marks would you
>have given that episode?
>
Torchwood for the most part is crap writing.
john smith
> In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.08...@sdf.lonestar.org>,
> The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
>>On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Peter J Ross wrote:
>>
>>>>> How on earth do you like S2 - that started with the ultimate
>>>>> snogfest between Jack and John?
>>>>
>>>> I gave that one low marks.
>>>
>>> Why did you give that episode low marks?
>>
>>Because he is in the closet, and doesn't like episodes that challange his
>>view of himself.
>>
>>.
>>.
>>.
>>
>
> I am a declared antihomosexual.
Or a latent homosexual...
The Doctor
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>news:g9htp7$clq$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.08...@sdf.lonestar.org>,
>> The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
>>>On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Peter J Ross wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> How on earth do you like S2 - that started with the ultimate
>>>>>> snogfest between Jack and John?
>>>>>
>>>>> I gave that one low marks.
>>>>
>>>> Why did you give that episode low marks?
>>>
>>>Because he is in the closet, and doesn't like episodes that challange his
>>>view of himself.
>>>
>>>.
>>>.
>>>.
>>>
>>
>> I am a declared antihomosexual.
>Or a latent homosexual...
Dreaming again I see.
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9htq1$clq$3...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9htnj$clq$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9htp7$clq$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9ii86$ovd$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
The Master
>> Because he is in the closet, and doesn't like episodes that challange his
>> view of himself.
>
> I am a declared antihomosexual.
I agree that you have "declared" yourself to be anti-homosexual. The
problem is that historical trends indicate that the more hate a person has
for homosexuals, the more likely it is that they are in fact homosexual
themself. They fight so hard, in such a vile and disgusting way, because
they see the signs in themself and they don't like it. Their rabid hate
is infact a way to try to "convince themself" not to be gay.
It's ok to accept yourself Yads, you don't have to hate yourself.
The Doctor
The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
I do not hate myself.
The Master
>>> I am a declared antihomosexual.
<<snip>>
>> It's ok to accept yourself Yads, you don't have to hate yourself.
>
> I do not hate myself.
Thus stated the self hater... I'm telling you, you are among friends...
Well, not really, but we are sci-fi geeks that you will never meet in real
life, so our opinions don't really matter to you now do they? You don't
have to hide who you really are with us.
Mr.Smartypants
> In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.0809021447400.13...@sdf.lonestar.org>,
> The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, The Doctor wrote:
>
> >>> Because he is in the closet, and doesn't like episodes that challange his
> >>> view of himself.
>
> >> I am a declared antihomosexual.
>
> >I agree that you have "declared" yourself to be anti-homosexual. The
> >problem is that historical trends indicate that the more hate a person has
> >for homosexuals, the more likely it is that they are in fact homosexual
> >themself. They fight so hard, in such a vile and disgusting way, because
> >they see the signs in themself and they don't like it. Their rabid hate
> >is infact a way to try to "convince themself" not to be gay.
>
> >It's ok to accept yourself Yads, you don't have to hate yourself.
>
> I do not hate myself.
> --
Of course you don't hate yourself. You hate pretending to be
antihomosexual.
Instead of standing in the closet with the door wide open, why not
take the big step and COME OUT?
It won't make any difference to the rest of us but you will have a
burden lifted from yourself.
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9jkva$lpi$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
I don't think that'll work. I've been trying to get him to come out
the closet as a troll for ages now. It's impossible, he just won't do
it. So imagine how much more impossible it'll be to get him to come
out the closet as a homosexual?
peachy ashie passion
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, peachy ashie passion wrote:
>
>>> TWS1 is a perverse joke!
>>
>> snogfest between Jack and John?
>
> "throwing sex at it" just the sake of having sex in it. If it advances
> "edgy adult drama". Rather, "sex for sake of having it" makes it
> teenage drama.
>
> The Jack/John snog was funny, only due to the fist fight that went along
> with it. A bit of a love/hate relationship perhaps? In that respect,
> it had an actual use in the story line.
>
The fight was good, the establishment of their intimacy made it make
sense for Jack to trust him - and even more sense for the others to
trust him. They know he was intimate with, coworkers with, Jack, whom
they have trusted. He is them, only different. And if he and Jack are
fighting, well... who among them isn't angry with Jack right then? They
understand fighting with Jack.
So they trust John.
It is what makes the story work. And the betrayal of that, that
really gives the story depth. That John feels so sorry for killing
Jack, that really gets me, every time. Murder rehab may not have worked
exactly, but there is real emotion there. When John says he loves Jack,
he means it.
The Doctor
The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
Ever tried applied logic in your life?
The Doctor
The Doctor
What is your tune you 2:
Trolling, TRolling, TRolling down the road?
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <e379e6a2-4d61-4e19-a1b5-a84b4d0fa...@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
Oi! Don't you dare interrupt my discussion with the Master. Show some
respect, troll!
The Master
> Ever tried applied logic in your life?
Considering how you still worship a magic man that was nailed to a large
lower case "T" almost 2,000 years ago, I'll take your accusation as a
compliment.
The Doctor
The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
Well Apply Logic to the Holy Bible.
The Master
>>> Ever tried applied logic in your life?
>>
>> Considering how you still worship a magic man that was nailed to a large
>> lower case "T" almost 2,000 years ago, I'll take your accusation as a
>> compliment.
>
> Well Apply Logic to the Holy Bible.
If Noah really did build the Ark, what did the lions and tigers eat? Prey
animals, like deer, would not have the numbers to support preditors for
quite some time.
If it really did rain enough for all the land to be covered with water,
where did it all go? Even taking into account for the ice, this planet
needs FIVE TIMES more water then what we have.
If Noah really did have to load a pair of every animal in existance in
the time frame given, how was he able to load 50 pairs a second? How was
he able to get animals like polar bears?
Gee Yads, looks like the bible fails logic...
The Doctor
The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
Sounds like Elephants are pink from Destiny of the Daleks.
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9kgav$mu4$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9kgdn$mu4$4...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9kght$mu4$8...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9ki8l$mu4$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9klcd$uq$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
tom...@yahoo.co.uk
> In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.0809022357220.3...@sdf.lonestar.org>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
Elephants aren't pink, ever, so stop lying you filthy troll. The Lord
hates the lying tongue.
hulahoop
> Of course you don't hate yourself. You hate pretending to be
> antihomosexual.
>
> Instead of standing in the closet with the door wide open, why not
> take the big step and COME OUT?
>
> It won't make any difference to the rest of us
True I will still think he is an irritating little boil on the arse of
humanity!
Regards
Ged
The Doctor
The Doctor
The Face of Po
The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.08...@sdf.lonestar.org>,
> The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
> >On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >>>> Ever tried applied logic in your life?
> >>>
> >>> Considering how you still worship a magic man that was nailed to a large
> >>> lower case "T" almost 2,000 years ago, I'll take your accusation as a
> >>> compliment.
> >>
> >> Well Apply Logic to the Holy Bible.
> >
> >If Noah really did build the Ark, what did the lions and tigers eat? Prey
> >animals, like deer, would not have the numbers to support preditors for
> >quite some time.
> >
> >If it really did rain enough for all the land to be covered with water,
> >where did it all go? Even taking into account for the ice, this planet
> >needs FIVE TIMES more water then what we have.
> >
> >If Noah really did have to load a pair of every animal in existance in
> >the time frame given, how was he able to load 50 pairs a second? How was
> >he able to get animals like polar bears?
> >
> >Gee Yads, looks like the bible fails logic...
>
> Sounds like Elephants are pink from Destiny of the Daleks.
No, "Destiny of the Daleks" states that elephants *aren't* pink, and
that taking the contrary viewpoint and adding logic can lead to an
irrelevant conclusion about Nellie.
How does this relate to The Master's analysis of the story of the Ark?
--
Remove caps to communicate more easily.
Happiness will prevail
The Master
>>> Well Apply Logic to the Holy Bible.
>>
>> If Noah really did build the Ark, what did the lions and tigers eat? Prey
>> animals, like deer, would not have the numbers to support preditors for
>> quite some time.
>>
>> If it really did rain enough for all the land to be covered with water,
>> where did it all go? Even taking into account for the ice, this planet
>> needs FIVE TIMES more water then what we have.
>>
>> If Noah really did have to load a pair of every animal in existance in
>> the time frame given, how was he able to load 50 pairs a second? How was
>> he able to get animals like polar bears?
>>
>> Gee Yads, looks like the bible fails logic...
>
> Sounds like Elephants are pink from Destiny of the Daleks.
WTF are you talking about now? You can't answer those questions, can you?
You might even think that such events are illogical. So rather then
address the doubt you now have, you shut down and turn even more stupid
then you were... Change the subject to someone moronic won't save you my
friend.
The FACT is, the bible is illogical, and modern christianity is based on
biblical Paul rather then biblical Jesus.
.
.
.
.
Andrew
> It is a book of fairy tales
That doesn't mention fairies. And doesn't present itself as a
collection of fairy tales. And doesn't actually resemble a book of
fairy tales in any way. Given those caveats I'd agree.
The Doctor
The Doctor
The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
The basis of Modern Christianity is that Jesus is alive.
Last I checked, Paul is ddead.
The Doctor
Top Poster is a fairy.
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9lua8$aft$5...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9lubt$aft$6...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9n942$qik$3...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9n9el$qik$5...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9naon$qik$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
peachy ashie passion
Holy Hannah! Where'd you get THAT ?
The Doctor
Any animal scarifices pre-flood?
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9nfg9$qik$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
peachy ashie passion
Genesis 4:4
And even if the answer were no, that wouldn't mean that Tigers were
vegetarian.
The Face of Po
The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
Last time you were trying to tell us that Jesus is alive because nobody
can produce his body. Can you produce Paul's body?
The Doctor
But Abel brought fat portions from some of the firstborn of his flock. The LORD looked with favor on Abel and his offering,
Conceded, but that was a Thanks Offering.
The Doctor
The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
Time to look that one up as well as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
The Master
>> The FACT is, the bible is illogical, and modern christianity is based on
>> biblical Paul rather then biblical Jesus.
>
> The basis of Modern Christianity is that Jesus is alive.
> Last I checked, Paul is ddead.
CORE IDEA: Jesus saved us freed us from the law of Moses
WHO SAID IT: Paul
WHO DIDN'T SAY IT: Jesus
CORE IDEA: Salvation is based on faith and faith alone
WHO SAID IT: Paul
WHO DIDN'T SAY IT: Jesus
Paulist...
The Master
>> The basis of Modern Christianity is that Jesus is alive.
>> Last I checked, Paul is ddead.
>
> Last time you were trying to tell us that Jesus is alive because nobody
> can produce his body. Can you produce Paul's body?
FANTASTIC point... Yes Yads, where is Paul's body?
.
.
.
.
hulahoop
> In article <822ca82b-b7e1-42f6-bd05-17e38b6c8...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>
> hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 2, 5:46 pm, "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
> >> Of course you don't hate yourself. You hate pretending to be
> >> antihomosexual.
>
> >> Instead of standing in the closet with the door wide open, why not
> >> take the big step and COME OUT?
>
> >> It won't make any difference to the rest of us
>
> >True I will still think he is an irritating little boil on the arse of
> >humanity!
>
> Said a boil talking to a troll.
> --
> Member - Liberal International
> This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
> God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
> USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
Whoo, I've been called a troll by Yads
Sincerest apologies, I promise never to moan about your inane, off-
topic postings which are presumably only posted to up your posting
count and are not meant to actually contribute anything to the
discussion
Oh yes, you've told me you have
You can feel really proud of a job well done putting me in my place.
<Tugs forelock> Thank you kindly good sir, I know my place
Ged
The Face of Po
The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> In article <122050982...@proxy02.news.clara.net>,
> The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
> >I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
> >The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> >> The basis of Modern Christianity is that Jesus is alive.
> >> Last I checked, Paul is ddead.
> >
> >Last time you were trying to tell us that Jesus is alive because nobody
> >can produce his body. Can you produce Paul's body?
>
> Time to look that one up as well as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
Go and look them up, then. Don't forget to post your findings.
--
Remove caps to communicate more easily.
"[Worshipping the Holy Trinity is] polytheism. When I worship Zeus or
Jehovah, I worship them by their own names as individuals. That's
monotheism. One God at a time." - Agamemnon
<JrqdnWstX8T...@eclipse.net.uk>
The Face of Po
hulahoop got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> On Sep 3, 1:02 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> > In article <822ca82b-b7e1-42f6-bd05-17e38b6c8...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >On Sep 2, 5:46 pm, "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> Of course you don't hate yourself. You hate pretending to be
> > >> antihomosexual.
> >
> > >> Instead of standing in the closet with the door wide open, why not
> > >> take the big step and COME OUT?
> >
> > >> It won't make any difference to the rest of us
> >
> > >True I will still think he is an irritating little boil on the arse of
> > >humanity!
> >
> > Said a boil talking to a troll.
>
Actually, he called you a boil. Don't go getting ideas above your
station.
Peter J Ross
<gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
> I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
> The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>> In article <122050982...@proxy02.news.clara.net>,
>> The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>> >I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>> >The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> [...]
>> >> The basis of Modern Christianity is that Jesus is alive.
>> >> Last I checked, Paul is ddead.
>> >
>> >Last time you were trying to tell us that Jesus is alive because nobody
>> >can produce his body. Can you produce Paul's body?
>>
>> Time to look that one up as well as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
>
> Go and look them up, then. Don't forget to post your findings.
According to Roman Catholics and others, don't bits of those people's
dead bodies still exist as relics?
Btw, and massively off topic: how's slrn 0.9.9 working out for you?
--
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader (v0.9.9): http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator
peachy ashie passion
And again, nothing of that states that either Abel, Cain, or the
wolves were vegetarian.
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9oqkm$svg$3...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9oqna$svg$5...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
hulahoop
wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
My apologies let me retype:
Whoo, I've been called a boil by Yads
Sincerest apologies, I promise never to moan about your inane, off-
topic postings which are presumably only posted to up your posting
count and are not meant to actually contribute anything to the
discussion
Oh yes, you've told me you have
You can feel really proud of a job well done putting me in my place.
<Tugs forelock> Thank you kindly good sir, I know my place
Ged
Cheers FoP
Regards
Ged
The Doctor
The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
I am the truth and the Way and the Light -Jesus.
The Doctor
The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
And the other disciples? I wonder how they marked graves in Roman times.
The Doctor
The Doctor
The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>> In article <122050982...@proxy02.news.clara.net>,
>> The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>> >I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>> >The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>[...]
>> >> The basis of Modern Christianity is that Jesus is alive.
>> >> Last I checked, Paul is ddead.
>> >
>> >Last time you were trying to tell us that Jesus is alive because nobody
>> >can produce his body. Can you produce Paul's body?
>>
>> Time to look that one up as well as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
>
>Go and look them up, then. Don't forget to post your findings.
>
Archeologists please.
The Doctor
The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>hulahoop got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>> On Sep 3, 1:02 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> > In article
><822ca82b-b7e1-42f6-bd05-17e38b6c8...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>> >
>> > hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > >On Sep 2, 5:46 pm, "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >> Of course you don't hate yourself. You hate pretending to be
>> > >> antihomosexual.
>> >
>> > >> Instead of standing in the closet with the door wide open, why not
>> > >> take the big step and COME OUT?
>> >
>> > >> It won't make any difference to the rest of us
>> >
>> > >True I will still think he is an irritating little boil on the arse of
>> > >humanity!
>> >
>> > Said a boil talking to a troll.
>>
>> Whoo, I've been called a troll by Yads
>
>Actually, he called you a boil. Don't go getting ideas above your
>station.
>
Crossing paths are we?
The Doctor
Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>In rec.arts.drwho on Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:42:47 +0100, The Face of Po
><gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>
>> I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>> The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>>> In article <122050982...@proxy02.news.clara.net>,
>>> The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
>>> >I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>>> >The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>> [...]
>>> >> The basis of Modern Christianity is that Jesus is alive.
>>> >> Last I checked, Paul is ddead.
>>> >
>>> >Last time you were trying to tell us that Jesus is alive because nobody
>>> >can produce his body. Can you produce Paul's body?
>>>
>>> Time to look that one up as well as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
>>
>> Go and look them up, then. Don't forget to post your findings.
>
>According to Roman Catholics and others, don't bits of those people's
>dead bodies still exist as relics?
>
As in the Knights Templar?
>
>Btw, and massively off topic: how's slrn 0.9.9 working out for you?
>
I will stick with TRN.
The Doctor
Did they eat the offering?
The Doctor
The Master
>> Paulist...
>
> I am the truth and the Way and the Light -Jesus.
"I see dead people" - Paul
The Master
>>> Last time you were trying to tell us that Jesus is alive because nobody
>>> can produce his body. Can you produce Paul's body?
>>
>> FANTASTIC point... Yes Yads, where is Paul's body?
>
> And the other disciples? I wonder how they marked graves in Roman times.
If you can't show us the body, by your own words Paul must still be alive.
Show us the exact body of Paul.
.
.
.
The Face of Po
> In rec.arts.drwho on Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:42:47 +0100, The Face of Po
> <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
> > I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
> > The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> >> In article <122050982...@proxy02.news.clara.net>,
> >> The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
> >> >I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
> >> >The Doctor got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> > [...]
> >> >> The basis of Modern Christianity is that Jesus is alive.
> >> >> Last I checked, Paul is ddead.
> >> >
> >> >Last time you were trying to tell us that Jesus is alive because nobody
> >> >can produce his body. Can you produce Paul's body?
> >>
> >> Time to look that one up as well as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
> >
> > Go and look them up, then. Don't forget to post your findings.
>
> According to Roman Catholics and others, don't bits of those people's
> dead bodies still exist as relics?
"I thought they only came in boxes of ten!"
> Btw, and massively off topic: how's slrn 0.9.9 working out for you?
Not a lot to report, really, but I haven't yet looked through all the
new features in detail.
The biggest difference for me, and the reason I upgraded, is that it
copes with non-us-ascii characters in the headers, instead of sending
<xx> and screwing up the thread indentation.
And the only annoyance so far has been a netiquette warning that doesn't
mentioning what rule I'm breaking and posts anyway after half a
second... I think it's to do with the X-Face, but it's the sort of thing
I'll investigate and bugreport properly one of these wet afternoons.
solar penguin
> Last I checked, Paul is ddead.
Yes, that's why he wasn't wearing any shoes on Abbey Road.
peachy ashie passion
Since it doesn't say, it gives us no knowledge on the situation.
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9plla$bvr$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9plmh$bvr$3...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9plod$bvr$5...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article
<c1b6ec33-c4e8-4655...@25g2000prz.googlegroups.com>,
> hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 3, 1:02 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> >> In article
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9plp5$bvr$6...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <122055016...@proxy01.news.clara.net>,
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9plqn$bvr$8...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <122055026...@proxy01.news.clara.net>,
> The Face of Po <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote:
> >I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
> >hulahoop got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9plt9$bvr$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <slrngc09d...@pjr.motzarella.org>,
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9plu0$bvr$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Poster .@poster.com Top Poster.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
.
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g9plv7$bvr$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article
<eef6f926-bd7d-4984...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>,
> hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 4, 6:44 pm, The Face of Po <gkenning...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk>
> >wrote:
> >> I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
The Doctor
The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
Which movie?