NOMINATIONS Re: August 2008 nominations so far
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion
attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
> Kooks, Kookologists, Independent Trolls, and Lurkers who support us (TINU)
> in email!
>
> Thanks to all of you who have contributed to the ballot. There will most
> likely be an election, as there is already a validly seconded candidate
> for Kook of the Month, and the month is only half over yet. The rest of
> the ballot, particularly the core awards, are shaping up nicely. There
> are currently several unseconded candidates and candidates who need
> opponents, so please second and/or find candidates to oppose the
> unnopposed. Nominations will remain open until 23:59:59 EDT on August
> 31st .
>
> Without any further ado, here are the nominations so far, along with the
> nominator, seconder, and status of the nomination. If you know of any
> nominations that were missed, please respond with the message ID of the
> nomination post. Also, one can second nominations listed here or even
> nominate qualified individuals or identifiable groups. Remember, except
> for the FNVWs, including the FNVWE, AUK posters are allowed only one
> nomination or* second per award or office per month.
>
> *exclusive, not inclusive.
>
> KOOK AWARD
> NOMINEE PROPOSER SECONDER STATUS
>
> Bobo Award
>
> We (tinw) should be so lucky.
>
> Kook of the Month
>
> The Stalking Outer Filth of Bobbi Sanchez, Aratzio, Jade,
> awaiting opponent.
Then please allow me to correct this terrible oversight. In honour of his
many bizarre meltdowns of the past two weeks, I, Snarky, do hereby
nominate Bucky Breeder for Kook of the Month.
Seconds?
> Clueless Newbie of the Month
>
> pla of alt.rhode_island, From Field, Pope Snarky,
> awaiting valid opponent.
> Lady Veteran AKA Bobbi Sanchez, Cujo de Sockpuppet, Sneaky P,
> REFUSED (previous winner).
<narrow glance at a certain BB>
> Coward of the Month
>
> Agamemnon of rec.arts.drwho, Pope Snarky, Jade, accepted.
> The Stalking Outer Filth of Bobbi Sanchez, Aratzio, spooge, accepted.
> Victor Victorian, Frogbutt, The Psyko, REFUSED
> (revenge nomination--may be resubmitted by someone other than
> Frogbutt)
Ooh, nice pairing!
> Looney Maroon Award
>
> Agamemnon of rec.arts.drwho, Pope Snarky, Art Deco, accepted.
> Richard "The St00pid" Bullis, Pinku-Sensei, Kadaitcha Man, accepted.
This race is too close to call.
> Golden Killfile
>
> No one so far.
Might I suggest The Mark Morgan Fan Club of rec.radio.amateur.policy?
Indeed, I so move, and call for seconds.
> Joseph Bartlo Memorial Pathetic Anal Pineapple Award
>
> AB Patriot, John Fleming, PV, accepted.
> Bucky Breeder, Pope Snarky, Archie Leach, accepted.
> Lady Veteran AKA Bobbi Sanchez, Pinku-Sensei, Sneaky P, accepted.
> Michael Glasser AKA Snit, Kadaitcha Man, Art Deco, accepted.
My, my, another field filling right up.
> Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker
>
> No one so far.
>
> Palmjob Paddle
>
> Agamemnon of rec.arts.drwho, Pope Snarky, hulahoop, awaiting opponent.
Might I suggest:
<Xns9AFA5220B26B...@216.151.153.44>
<Xns9AFA54055692...@216.151.153.44>
Talk about having it both ways! Posts once in a sock, posts again to
"filter" it.
> Tony Sidaway Drama Queen Award
>
> Michael Patrick Sullivan AKA the Kearsley Curse, Emo Haircut,
> REFUSED (not posted to AUK).
How about Bill "Silly Billy" Cmelak? His latest rant at me about his
poooor widdle reputation seems eminently suitable.
> Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science Award
>
> "Doctor Who Physics" by Agamemnon of rec.arts.drwho, Pope Snarky,
> Ignius Fatuus, evaluating evidence.
>
> Douglas Grant Medal for Historical Revisionism
>
> "All Folk music is modern Irish Pop" and other music history
> revisionism by Agamemnon of rec.arts.drwho, Pope Snarky, Ignis Fatuus,
> evaluating evidence.
>
> George Pickett Memorial Trophy
>
> Bucky Breeder, Pinku-Sensei, Pope Snarky, awaiting opponent.
>
> George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>
> Jamie "Lamie" Baillie, Sneaky P, REFUSED
> (declaration of "VICTOLLY" required).
How about Agamemnon's continuing declarations of "VICTOLLY!" on the "RTD
in a cameo" issue? If you agree, I so move.
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart
>
> No one so far.
Does Bucky seem fitting here? Or perhaps Aggie?
> Tar & Feathers
>
> No one so far.
Has Yads shown enough Terminal Cluelessness for this yet? I know most
radwers would like to run him out on a rail...
> Busted Urinal Award
>
> Bucky Breeder, Pope Snarky, Snuhwolf, awaiting opponent.
I could suggest something here, but I think my fellow Doctor Who fans can
come up with some good ideas on their own.
> Unabomber Surprise
>
> AB Patriot, John Fleming, PV, valid opponent requested.
> Mark Morgan Fan Club, Pope Snarky, Art Deco, REFUSED
> (They have to do more than just post canned screed).
Well, drat. Would Cmelak do? See my ODB nom.
> Goofy Azzed Babboon
>
> Bucky Breeder, Archie Leach, Art Deco, awaiting opponent.
The odds-on fave to win, even against another Twonky.
> 72 Raisins "Crackpot Religion" Award
>
> No one so far.
Say, Aggie, exactly how was the universe created, in your theology?
> Bolo Bullis Foam Duck
>
> No one so far.
<shakes finger at Bucky> <shakes another at Yads>
> Balsa Gavel
>
> We (tinw) should be so lucky.
>
> Order of the Holey Sockpuppet
>
> Bucky Breeder, Pope Snarky, not seconded.
>
> Kenny McCormick Memorial Medal
>
> We (tinw) should be so lucky.
>
> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog-Whistle Award
>
> No one so far.
I would like to nominate Bucky Breeder, as trained by Kadaitcha Man and
Snuhwolf, for the Barbara Woodhouse Memorial "Dog Whistle" Award, due to
his ongoing meltdown over the two of them.
> MERIT AWARD NOMINEE PROPOSER SECONDER STATUS
>
> Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker
>
> "Fake Earthlink Help Request" by Snuhwolf, Kadaitcha Man, Art Deco,
> accepted.
> "The Trolls Among Us" by Matthias Schwartz, Aratzio, Dave Hillstrom,
> accepted.
>
> Hammer of Thor
>
> We (tinw) should be so lucky.
One of these days, we(tinw) just might...A certain ex-porn star just
smacked Cmelak silly with an oversized cluebat.
> Gene Spafford "Usenet Samaritan" Award
>
> We (tinw) should be so lucky.
>
> OFFICE NOMINEE PROPOSER SECONDER STATUS
>
> Office of Darth Bawl
>
> No one so far to challenge Jamie "Lamie" Baillie
On the basis of this post:
<920d6931-6a87-42b0...@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
I do hereby nominate William "Bill" Cmelak for the Office of Darth Bawl.
No need to add a group, he's reading AUK.
> Office of Village Idiot
>
> No one so far to challenge Jamie "Lamie" Baillie
I nominate Bucky Breeder, and call for seconds.
<Xns9AFA5294717BF...@216.151.153.44>
<02ef3ff6$0$26408$c3e...@news.astraweb.com>
<03ffc85e$0$22625$c3e...@news.astraweb.com>
> Kooki Information Minister
>
> No one so far to challenge Alexa Cameron.
If I may, I would like to nominate the FOX News Network for the Mohammed
Saeed al-Sahhaf Kooki Information Minister, and again call for seconds.
> Ministry of Circle Jerks
>
> No one so far to challenge Big-8 Management Board.
Oooh. That's a toughie.<ponders> At the moment, I got nuffin'.
> Office of Illucidus Maximus
>
> No one so far to challenge Jeff Relf.
Hmmm, I think *Bucky Breeder* would also look good here. So moved.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pigfucker In The Universe
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls on rec.arts.drwho
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.
"The most useful tool for dealing with management types is, of course,
an automatic weapon."
"these trolls are frustrated youngsters with serious psychic problems."
-- a web version of Alexa Cameron, named Adrian.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6z5zym
"The fact that you are trying to defend the proselytisation of
homosexuality shows that RTG is making you turn gay step by step,
whereas I have been able to resist his sexual brainwashing. If you watch
series 2 of Torchwood you might even become a fully fledged mincer
yourself, complete with mashed potatoes and gravy." -- Yes, Aggie means
Russell T. "Gayvies". Message-ID:
<tO6dnYP81-E-cATY...@pipex.net>
Official Chung Demon
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:
<jljOe.5348$ZD4....@bignews3.bellsouth.net>
I mourned:
> The Mop Jockey did most oddly state:
>> DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!!
>>
>> the oversized check is in the mail.
>
> Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl shit
> under several of my nyms.
"DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and
cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a
*Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his
own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot
stove. Message-ID: <77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05>
Said I:
> You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence
> who does not and cannot own Hatter.
"[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that
you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't
know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey.
Message-ID: <gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01>
"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:
<45e625dd$0$16280$8826...@free.teranews.com>
"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID: <oorbs2pt3dc6b8t4a...@4ax.com>
"I say you are out of your fucking mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" <exeb...@yanospamhoo.com>, tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:
<ka4lo.3...@news.alt.net>
"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: <1167007805.9...@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks before:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml
"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.
Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner <wfh...@hotmail.com> on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so fucking scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.
"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pigfucker in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.
"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: <1156587081....@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
1159678991.8...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com
"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion
attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:46:20 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
>
>> Kooks, Kookologists, Independent Trolls, and Lurkers who support us
>> (TINU) in email!
Damnitall! <fixes .sig with the Hammer> Terribly sorry about that, RADW.
I am not your Official Overseer until an election has been held (even
then, only if the vote is in my favour), and I was wrong to leave it in
my .sig for so long without correcting it (hadn't used that profile for
days...), as well as being wrong to put it in so soon. Also, apologies to
Cujo and the FNVW.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pigfucker In The Universe
Ignis Fatuus
Confusion
<popesnarky...@verwirren.confused.k00ks.caballista.org> wrote:
Seconded
= IF
The Face of Po
Schmidt of Confusion got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:46:20 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
> > 72 Raisins "Crackpot Religion" Award
> >
> > No one so far.
>
> Say, Aggie, exactly how was the universe created, in your theology?
Will this do?
"GODS!
"Take for example Jehovah. His existence is proven archaeologically since he
was a Hyksos pharaoh of Lower Egypt and Cannan and inscriptions exist of his
name at the time he reigned. Zeus's existence is also proven
archaeologically since both Egyptian and Minoan inscriptions exist of his
name at the time he reigned which was contemporary with Jehovah. Saturn's
existence is also proven archaeologically with Minoan inscriptions. This is
all on top of the historical evidence for all of these Gods existence which
is not and has never been disputed. The Gods has always been described and
accepted as historical kings deified by their peers and descendents because
of the benefits they bestowed upon them."
<TeqdndD6gpd2AdLV...@eclipse.net.uk>
Aggie defines himself as a Hellenic polytheist, making him a member of a
recognised non-crackpot religion. However, his interpretation of
*other people's* belief systems is somewhat creative - I suspect this
counts more towards Historical Revisionism than Crackpot Religion.
"It might interest you to know
that I am a Polytheist. I believe in all the Gods, but my belief system is
founded on rationality. I know that Zeus was a deified Minoan period Greek
king, Dumuzi was a defied Sumerian king, Jehovah was a Phoenician Sea God
who was one of their defied kings and Christ was a deified Jew. [...]
"There is no such thing as Satan."
<bqadnTXu5Zd_5fvY...@pipex.net>
"Even the Christian Church fathers believed that the Gods were deified
ancestors as did every ancient historian and priest because that is what
Gods were."
<gJOdnZGExslR3E7a...@eclipse.net.uk>
"You are the one with the crank views. Every single reputable historian and
historical writer accepts what I have said, including Herodotus, Porphyry,
Philo, Plato, Lynche and Isaac Newton."
<KKednUpBY8URAM7V...@eclipse.net.uk>
"I know 100% that Zeus is real as is Kronos as are all the other Gods since
they are all deified ancestors and documents exist from the time they lived
which name them. The same goes for Jehovah. There were in fact two of them."
<z9ednSJZmpXBhqvV...@eclipse.net.uk>
"BULLSHIT!
"The Biblical flood myth was stolen from the Greeks and Europeans and is
actually the story of the Ogygian Deluge and first Deukalion Flood.
"When I dated the Biblical flood I had no idea would coincide with the
Ogygian Deluge or either Deukalion Flood since I didn't know when the either
Ogygian deluge was or the Deukalion Floods were, nor when the Biblical flood
was or the correct date of the Thera Eurruption which is what caused it. I
dated the Biblical flood numerically and statistically using the figures
given in the bible independently of the Ogygian Deluge and Deukalion Floods
whose dating I based solely on statistical analysis of the Generations from
Io and Epaphus down to Cadmus and Europe and a reconstruction of the entire
Theban and Cretan kings lists starting from the traditional date of the
Trojan War which set an absolute limit on when Zeus and Prometheus the
father of Deukalion could have reigned which was accurate to +/- 5 years,
therefore I had no choice but to put the first Deukalion Flood/Ogygian
Deluge in 1625 BC, which was about 5 years after the date I calculated for
the Biblical flood using the figures given in the bible and about 40 years
from the date I calculated for the Biblical flood using a linear regression
which was less accurate. Since I assumed the Thera Erruption was in 1500 BC
+/-50 I thought the biblical dates were fucked from the start and I began to
doubt that there was even a first Deukalion flood. But then when I was
searching for the exact date which I hoped would be 1450 BC to coincide with
the second Deukalion Flood I found out that the old date for the Thera
Erruption was based on completely inaccurate archaeological discoveries and
that the Dendrochronological date for the Thera Erruption was 1628 BC, 3
years before the date I cacludated statisticaly, the Carbon dating was about
1650 BC and the Ice Core date was about 1610 BC, which proved that I was
completely accurate. After that a year later I reconstructed Eusebius,
Argive, Sicyonian and Argive king lists and showed that they fitted my
chronology perfectly and then in the third year after that after spending 3
months translating Jerome's Chronicon from Latin into English I found the
exact date given by Greek historians for the Ogygian Deluge in the years of
the reign of Inachus, and guess what, when I plugged the figure into my
existing list of kings reigns it came to exactly 1627.5 BC, which is withing
6 months of the Dendrochronological date for the Thera Erruption, which
categorically proved I was right, Jerome was right and the bible was right.
Not only that, but last year I discovered The Travels of Noe into Europe and
this proved that I was right about the biblical flood being based on the
Ogygian deluge and reinforced my chronology by dating the flood to 1625.5
BC. The line of kings of Italy from Janus II preserved in German, Spanish
and British historical accounts also corroborates my dating by placing the
flood in 1626.5 BC."
<0_adnat-8ITqIBva...@eclipse.net.uk>
--
Remove caps to communicate more easily.
"I would be a brilliant director." - Agamemnon
<oumdnb_oCPnPfD3V...@eclipse.net.uk>
Warren G. Harding
Seconded.
Bazza
"Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion"
message news:pan.2008.08.16....@teh.usenets.bullie...
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:46:20 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
>
Will you please fuck off and stop boring us with this voting for troll
shit??? Get a fuckin life dude.
Baz
The Doctor
Bazza <bazz...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>"Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion"
><popesnarky...@verwirren.confused.k00ks.caballista.org> wrote in
>message news:pan.2008.08.16....@teh.usenets.bullie...
>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:46:20 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
>>
><snip>
>
Snarky, Get a life? That is asking for much.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
|><\(\(\((@>
> Get a fuckin life dude.
Post your home address. Someone will be along shortly to take yours.
--
Cod Almighty
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
|><\(\(\((@>
news:pan.2008.08.16....@teh.usenets.bullie:
>> Office of Darth Bawl
>>
>> No one so far to challenge Jamie "Lamie" Baillie
>
> On the basis of this post:
> <920d6931-6a87-42b0...@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
> I do hereby nominate William "Bill" Cmelak for the Office of Darth Bawl.
> No need to add a group, he's reading AUK.
Seconded. A worthy nom.
--
Cod Almighty
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Archie Leach
>> The Stalking Outer Filth of Bobbi Sanchez, Aratzio, Jade,
>> awaiting opponent.
>
>Then please allow me to correct this terrible oversight. In honour of his
>many bizarre meltdowns of the past two weeks, I, Snarky, do hereby
>nominate Bucky Breeder for Kook of the Month.
>
>Seconds?
Yesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes.
hones...@centurytel.net
"|><\(\(\((@>" <not...@lid.address> wrote in message
news:mgkcbt$o0e$u...@biz.forsale.grievous-baby's-arm-holding-an-apple.net.peru...
> Bazza wrote in news:U6Lpk.11996$6s4...@newsfe14.ams2:
>
>> Get a fuckin life dude.
>
>
> Post your home address. Someone will be along shortly to take yours.
>
HJ
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion
further by squeaking:
> "Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion" wrote...
>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:46:20 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
>>
> <snip>
>
Request DENIED.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pigfucker In The Universe
Agamemnon
"The Face of Po" <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote in message
news:121891800...@proxy00.news.clara.net...
>I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when Demon Lord
>Henry
> Schmidt of Confusion got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:46:20 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
> [...]
>> > 72 Raisins "Crackpot Religion" Award
>> >
>> > No one so far.
>>
>> Say, Aggie, exactly how was the universe created, in your theology?
>
> Will this do?
So you have nothing better to do all day than colleting and memorising
quotes from other posters. What does that make you. A stalking manic
obsessive troll.
|><\(\(\((@>
"Jehovah...was a Hyksos pharaoh of Lower Egypt and Cannan...".
"Jehovah was a Phoenician Sea God".
So, which is it, mounoxilo?
--
Cod Almighty
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt
I think so, yes. As further supporting evidence for teh Doogie, and as a
basis for the lifetime achievement award of the 72 Raisins. The nomination
is hereby moved, and seconds called.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28; Usenet Ruiner #5
Demon Lord of Confusion; Official Chung Demon; Top Asshole #3
Superfaggot
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is
to speak with me in private.
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
"Atheists are people who have no invisible means of support"
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pretzel_Cabal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel
"A dog in the video I watched fucked a human woman. The dog consented to
it and the woman consented to it. That is like one gay man consenting to
having sex with another. Do you approve of it?" -- Agamemnon watches
bestiality porn and compares it to gay sex. Message-ID:
<A7adnV1ksaSyY_Lb...@eclipse.net.uk>
"I know how you special busboys are.
You're crazy." -- John "special busboy" Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<HMb3k.2413$bh5....@bignews4.bellsouth.net>
"Roe V Wade has zero bearing on my existence other than it affects it
adversely."
-- Johnny Wentzky never had much truck with "logic". Message-ID:
<V6xNe.27650$XM3....@bignews5.bellsouth.net>
"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS
"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@trnddc02>
"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@trnddc02>
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the above k00k
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read?
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
<Xns98355D29419...@69.28.186.121>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken
"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'
"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt
"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark
"Right you are correct. Someone hooked me. I do believe in building
relationships. That is what Christians are required to do. I am amoral.
I am sure you know what that means. So are Scorpios. I am being
'protected' by the Formosa Rule because of my 'mental illness'. I am not
targeting 'teh Mop Jockey'. You are and you are using me as a bait.
Please stop. I have my own fish to reel in. Leave me alone. It is my hope
that I will be able to catch a fish and reel it in for you. Once my
retired bishop thought I was fishing for him and he took the bait, alas
it wasn't me and that spelled the demise of our relationship. Have a
little bit more faith in me. An Eastern Orthodox bishop thought I was
fishing for him and willingly, proudly and defiantly took the bait on
public record, and it wasn't even me. Give me a break." -- Atlanta
Olympiada "Erica" Kane yammered in
Message-ID: <ochc3.a...@news.alt.net>
"It does to a certain extant physically and theoretically
it holds even into the quantum but there observational confirmation is
limited or non existent. That's the problem and the major stumbling
block to field unification. For Dr. Einstein held out that a physical
based field theory should be sought out and not left to quantum
uncertainty of how the universe primly base works. Man made coordinate
systems are fine without knowing from where or what is the base essence
of what the space as deduced field is composed of, but not totally
satisfactory. Anomalies keep space cropping up and scientists have to
keep adjusting for these unexpected events. It's like a blind man that
has memorized his physical surroundings to a point he feels very
comfortable until that one new or unexpected event pops up and he's lost
and fumbling." -- nightbat, in one of his more lucid moments.
Message-ID: <b27b0$45ed14a7$46e3a646$66...@COMTECK.COM>
The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt
> "The Face of Po" wrote...
>>I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when Demon Lord
>>Henry
>> Schmidt of Confusion got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:46:20 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>> Wrangler attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
>> [...]
>>> > 72 Raisins "Crackpot Religion" Award
>>> >
>>> > No one so far.
>>>
>>> Say, Aggie, exactly how was the universe created, in your theology?
>>
>> Will this do?
>
> So you have nothing better to do all day than colleting and memorising
> quotes from other posters. What does that make you. A stalking manic
> obsessive troll.
I believe that is a reasonable acceptance speach for your award
nominations, Aggie.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28; Usenet Ruiner #5
Demon Lord of Confusion; Official Chung Demon; Top Asshole #3
Superfaggot
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the above k00k
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
|><\(\(\((@>
news:pan.2008.08.17...@kooks.worship.me.with.their.every.post:
He can't even line his ducks up enough to agree with himself on Jehovah:
"Jehovah...was a Hyksos pharaoh of Lower Egypt and Cannan...".
"Jehovah was a Phoenician Sea God".
So seconded!
--
Cod Almighty
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
pbo...@aol.com
> "The Face of Po" <gkenning...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote in messagenews:121891800...@proxy00.news.clara.net...
You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
permanently online? Though you've been quiet recently - did you get a
job, or have you just found a lengthy argument on another group to
keep you occupied?
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
>
> >> Aggie defines himself as a Hellenic polytheist, making him a member of a
> >> recognised non-crackpot religion. However, his interpretation of *other
> >> people's* belief systems is somewhat creative - I suspect this counts
> >> more
> >> towards Historical Revisionism than Crackpot Religion.
>
> >> "It might interest you to know
> >> that I am a Polytheist. I believe in all the Gods, but my belief system
> >> is founded on rationality. I know that Zeus was a deified Minoan period
> >> Greek king, Dumuzi was a defied Sumerian king, Jehovah was a Phoenician
> >> Sea God who was one of their defied kings and Christ was a deified Jew.
> >> [...]
>
> >> "There is no such thing as Satan."
>
>
> >> "Even the Christian Church fathers believed that the Gods were deified
> >> ancestors as did every ancient historian and priest because that is what
> >> Gods were."
>
>
> >> "You are the one with the crank views. Every single reputable historian
> >> and historical writer accepts what I have said, including Herodotus,
> >> Porphyry, Philo, Plato, Lynche and Isaac Newton."
>
>
> >> "I know 100% that Zeus is real as is Kronos as are all the other Gods
> >> since they are all deified ancestors and documents exist from the time
> >> they lived which name them. The same goes for Jehovah. There were in
> >> fact
> >> two of them."
>
>
> > I think so, yes. As further supporting evidence for teh Doogie, and as a
> > basis for the lifetime achievement award of the 72 Raisins. The nomination
> > is hereby moved, and seconds called.
>
> He can't even line his ducks up enough to agree with himself on Jehovah:
>
> "Jehovah...was a Hyksos pharaoh of Lower Egypt and Cannan...".
>
> "Jehovah was a Phoenician Sea God".
>
> So seconded!
He does say "There were two of them" - more recently he's claimed
there were seven, all Phoenician kings, including the one who ruled
Canaan. We know he ruled Canaan, not because there is any evidence of
a pharoah or other ruler of that name, but because he gave the land to
the Hebrews - which by Aggylogic means he must have been a landlord
who owned title to the land at the time. The idea of a metaphor is
something Aggy fails to understand to this day - if the Hebrews
believed their god gave them a piece of land, said god must have been
a human who literally had the legal authority to give the land to
them.
Phil
Kadaitcha Man
ye bayed:
> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to
> live permanently online?
I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
permanently online.
--
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
marc_CH
> So you have nothing better to do all day than colleting and memorising
> quotes from other posters. What does that make you. A stalking manic
> obsessive troll.
Wow. Irony personified!
Nice to see some Greek traditions have been kept up recently:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/olympics/athletics/7566017.stm
--
marc
"There are no such things as witches, and homosexuality is a choice of
how to masturbate. -- Aggy"
marc_CH
> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
> permanently online? Though you've been quiet recently - did you get a
> job, or have you just found a lengthy argument on another group to
> keep you occupied?
No. Aggy tends to lapse into silence when he has been spanked utterly
senseless online and then resumes normal operations when he thinks
everyone has 'forgotten' about his previous drivel. He has kept this
pattern up quite consistently.
--
marc
The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt
> pbo...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing, ye
> bayed:
>
>> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
>> permanently online?
>
> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
> permanently online.
Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil. The difference between
"this" and "that" is an *abyss*...;-{P}
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28; Usenet Ruiner #5
Demon Lord of Confusion; Official Chung Demon; Top Asshole #3
Superfaggot
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the above k00k
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
|><\(\(\((@>
news:d5bf046d-2958-4f0f...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com:
> He does say "There were two of them" - more recently he's<BITCHSLAP>
I'm really not interested at all, not one iota. Immediately upon reading
your first post into auk I consigned you to the mental ignore file on the
grounds that you were a boring prat who would not look out of place in a
warehouse full of empty cardboard boxes.
Hmmm... I just looked at some of your your posts. Of the nine I quickly
scanned, seven of them were you directly attempting to ingratiate yourself
with various posters by denigrating Aggy. The other two posts I looked at
that were written by you were 16 & 20KB epics of Jason and the Argonauts
size.
I shall keep my beady-eye on you. I have a knack for sniffing out
well-hidden, camouflaged closet k0oKs. You warrant closer inspection.
If you suspect that I suspect you are a k0oK, your suspicion is justified.
At the very least, there is evidence before me that reeks of mad obsession.
HTH - TTFN
Ignis Fatuus
Schmidt" <popesnark...@statements.like.yours.caballista.org>
wrote:
>On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly state:
>> pbo...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing, ye
>> bayed:
>>
>>> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
>>> permanently online?
>>
>> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
>> permanently online.
>
>Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil. The difference between
>"this" and "that" is an *abyss*...;-{P}
Approximately the distance between a Cat's Arse and RTD's Cock.
= IF
Kadaitcha Man
are not worth another word, else I'd call you knave, ye billowed:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly state:
>> pbo...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing, ye
>> bayed:
>>
>>> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
>>> permanently online?
>>
>> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
>> permanently online.
>
> Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil.
For more reasons than may be obvious. I just fired a warning shot across
his bow.
Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition
Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:
Roughly about that, yes.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! Usenet Ruiner #5; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13
Demon Prince of Absurdity; COOSN-029-06-71069; Official Chung Demon
Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16; AUK Psycho & Felon #21
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
Parrot & Zombie #2; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
"Lola Stonewall Riot" is not part of my email addy.
"For those of you without hope, we have rooms with color TV, cable and
air conditioning"
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"Oftentimes people ask me, 'Why is it that you're so focused on helping
the hungry and diseased in strange parts of the world?'" --George W.
Bush, Washington, D.C., April 18, 2008
Things We(TINW) Didn't Need To Know About Icebreaker, #5:
"I expose myself all the time" Message-ID:
<_S_9k.117$kw3...@newsfe06.lga>
"Hey Theophan, I need your help again. Will you please come assist me
again? aggreen is after me again. He has been after me for a year and
counting now. I want you to destroy his character for me. I can't do
it." -- Olympiada: Not too proud to beg for help when it comes to
character assassination, and Mistress of the Bleeding Obvious.
MID: <45E22F00...@yahoo.com>
"I think we have taken care of the net.KKKopping in alt.gothic. Could
all the kookologists trim alt.gothic from their headers and leave us
alone now? It has gone on long enough. I can take care of myself in there
from here on out. Thanks. I know how to fight off trolls now. Thank you
for the education." -- Olympiada thinks she's had an education, and that
means it's time for those nice kookologists to go away and leave her
sandbox alone now, in MID: <45e330a8$0$16404$8826...@free.teranews.com>
"Who booby-traps a dead end? That's just not right." -- Cordelia
>> Are you the Peter J Ross that I've heard so much about?
>
> Probably. I'm the one who doesn't resort to forgery after losing an
> argument.
"You're the one with the extensive brain damage... okay I see. You're
gonna be easily to own them." -- PorchMonkey4Life: Not aware of too many
things. MID: <bf7xh.834$hH2.64@trnddc02>
At last! See Joxer The Mity Monkey on camera! Watch him freak out!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_WuaENGqz0
"You're just mad that you got tard stomped again fagg0t. You throw
something incredibly lame out there and I ramming it right back down
your throat. And you wonder how I just did what I did to you. You wonder
how I can make something so lame that you tossed out there so gosh darn
amusing when I fling it back at ya.
"Here's the secret: Unlike you, I am *not* retarded. You're tardness
gets in your way every single time, fagboi.
"Are you still crying over your keyboard, c0ckslurper? Is your mouth
wide open and drool falling out. Is your chunky body convulsing as you
think about how you were once again made a fool of? Are yellow boogie
snots running out of your unnaturally large nose down your triple chins?
"Look at what I reduced you too, tard.. I thoroughly enjoy owning and
abusing you.. Thanks for being so tarded and so easy to beat." -- The
PorchMonkey4Life has gone on to re-define red as yellow, black as white,
and being run over by a truck as just a scratch. Message-ID:
<kX3Nh.525$vI1.380@trnddc02>
"And no, I did not have sex with my son. But if I did I certainly
wouldn't tell you. Something so beautiful and precious should be kept
private." -- Kathy L. Mosesian, or possibly not really her, confesses
she may be a liar and committer of incest with her own son, in MID:
<cfcd3f4660694e3a...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
The reporter asked Colin Powell (or George Bush), "What proof do you
have that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction?"
He replied, "We kept the receipts." -- Bill Hicks
Looney Maroon nominee for August 2006 Johnny D Wentzky foamed:
"You never asked someone who goes into areas of the internet that are
only for adults who has an underage id somehow or another if they are a
cop posing as an underage person online?
I guess lots of people just don't watch dateline or read stories much.
Why don;t you go to pervertedjustice,com and see what they do. They are
awash in their self-proclaimed glory after they lied to membners of the
public.
They are awash in their self-proclaimed glory after they posed as an
underage person and agreed to do all sorts of sex acts wioth adult
males, and they are adults posing as teenager themselves. They make
themsleves into liars by falsely impersonating underage persons and by
not fuilfilling the words they tell the victims online in their chats.
Why don't you read it where they tell these victims of their deceit
about how they have been with grown men and such? Why don't you read it
where they say, "That would be cool." after someone makes an advance
towards an adult who is posing as a teenager? And, where they agree to
meet the person, etc.
Lost control, didn't you?
Is that why you feel as if you need to lie so much now? I see where lots
of these false impersonation games are not sticking. They feel as if
they can lie and then order the victims to get counseling in the
gayblade, governmental, pro-choice tax leech counseling centers. They
are doing nothing more than usury and fraud in many cases." -- Wentzky
almost comes out of the closet as a pedo/ephebophile in MID:
<H%%Eg.28916$Uq1....@bignews6.bellsouth.net>
To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a stalker
Snarky
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
Incidentally, Aggie's page on Kookpedia is back up, and in desperate need
of a quote section. Hang on whilst I edit a bit of it...
http://www.kookpedia.net/index.php/Agamemnon
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pretzel_Cabal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
<33km2419sg6fnq3sh...@4ax.com>
"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
<Jvidnfyewe883sjV...@eclipse.net.uk>
"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)
|><\(\(\((@>
news:pan.2008.08.17....@henry.schmidt.smof.lola.stonewall.riot:
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:35:22 +0100, Ignis Fatuus sat in thee Comfee
> Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:
>> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:10:47 GMT, "The God of Odd Statements, Henry
>> Schmidt" wrote:
>>>On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly state:
>>>> pbo...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing,
>>>> ye bayed:
>>>>
>>>>> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
>>>>> permanently online?
>>>>
>>>> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
>>>> permanently online.
>>>
>>>Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil. The difference between
>>>"this" and "that" is an *abyss*...;-{P}
>>
>> Approximately the distance between a Cat's Arse and RTD's Cock.
>
> Roughly about that, yes.
Ok, and how far into the cat's ass is that?
In metric untis of measure, please.
--
Cod Almighty
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Ignis Fatuus
<not...@lid.address> wrote:
>Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote in
>news:pan.2008.08.17....@henry.schmidt.smof.lola.stonewall.riot:
>
>> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:35:22 +0100, Ignis Fatuus sat in thee Comfee
>> Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:
>>> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:10:47 GMT, "The God of Odd Statements, Henry
>>> Schmidt" wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly state:
>>>>> pbo...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing,
>>>>> ye bayed:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
>>>>>> permanently online?
>>>>>
>>>>> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
>>>>> permanently online.
>>>>
>>>>Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil. The difference between
>>>>"this" and "that" is an *abyss*...;-{P}
>>>
>>> Approximately the distance between a Cat's Arse and RTD's Cock.
>>
>> Roughly about that, yes.
>
>
>Ok, and how far into the cat's ass is that?
>
>In metric untis of measure, please.
That's for you to know and us to find out.
= IF
|><\(\(\((@>
Well, in that case, all I can say is...
That poor cat.
pbo...@aol.com
> pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing,
> ye bayed:
>
> > You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to
> > live permanently online?
>
> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
> permanently online.
Heh - wondered if someone might say that, but I spend rather less time
in this universe than it might look. For a start, RADW represents
pretty much all the non-work time I spend online while Aggy, say,
seems to have time to match or exceed my output on this group, AND is
on goodness knows how many others. Secondly, mostly I'm online during
uneventful times at work when I can't get any real work (since my job
doesn't count) done anyway. Hence my weekend contributions being
rather more occasional.
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
I've noticed the way he very quietly acknowledges others are right by
changing his behaviour despite his previous rigid insistence that they
were wrong - look at the way "STUPID IGNORANT" has fallen out of his
vocabulary, say. Next thing you know he'll be talking about guitars
with necks rather than handles.
Phil
Kadaitcha Man
death and lards the lean earth as thee walk along, ye informed:
> On 17 Aug, 10:48, "Kadaitcha Man" <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing,
>> ye bayed:
>> > You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to
>> > live permanently online?
>>
>> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
>> permanently online.
>
> Heh - wondered if someone might say that, but I spend rather less time
> in this universe than it might look.
Oh, no, not at all. It's quite obvious you're not often on this planet.
> For a start, RADW
Apart from ripping your cock and balls off and ramming them down your throat
so that you slowly choke and die of asphyxiation, are you aware of any
methods of indicating complete and utter disinterest to you that work?
Don't answer that. I'm not interested in your reply.
pbo...@aol.com
> pbow...@aol.com wrote innews:d5bf046d-2958-4f0f...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com:
>
> On 17 Aug, 09:36, "|><\\\(\\\(\\\((@>" <not....@lid.address> wrote:
>
> > He can't even line his ducks up enough to agree with himself on Jehovah:
>
> > "Jehovah...was a Hyksos pharaoh of Lower Egypt and Cannan...".
>
> > "Jehovah was a Phoenician Sea God".
>
> > So seconded!
> > He does say "There were two of them" - more recently he's<BITCHSLAP>
>
> I'm really not interested at all, not one iota.
Shame, it can be remarkably amusing.
> Hmmm... I just looked at some of your your posts. Of the nine I quickly
> scanned, seven of them were you directly attempting to ingratiate yourself
> with various posters by denigrating Aggy.
Oh, not a bit of it. Denigrating Aggy is a thoroughly entertaining
hobby in its own right.
> I shall keep my beady-eye on you. I have a knack for sniffing out
> well-hidden, camouflaged closet k0oKs. You warrant closer inspection.
>
> If you suspect that I suspect you are a k0oK, your suspicion is justified.
No, I suspect you don't have a sense of humour. I also suspect my
suspicion is probably justified on those grounds too.
> At the very least, there is evidence before me that reeks of mad obsession.
Really? You've read my posts about frogs, then?
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
> The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt, ye beggarly caterpillar, thoe
> are not worth another word, else I'd call you knave, ye billowed:
>
> > On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly state:
> >> bayed:
>
> >>> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
> >>> permanently online?
>
> >> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
> >> permanently online.
>
> > Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil.
>
> For more reasons than may be obvious. I just fired a warning shot across
> his bow.
If you say so. Hmm, isn't this the sort of attitude that gets
lampooned around here as that of a true k00k?
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
<popesnarky.godof...@statements.like.yours.caballista.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly state:
>
> > bayed:
>
> >> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
> >> permanently online?
>
> > I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
> > permanently online.
>
> Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil.
Oh, I don't know. I thought it was a witty observation - until
Kadaitcha Man revealed a distinct lack of wit. Problem is, these guys
seem used to dealing with k00ks, and the sign of any true k00k is that
they take themselves seriously. Sorta doesn't work when they try and
needle someone and just get the response "Heh - good point. You're
funny."
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
> pbow...@aol.com, ye pernicious shag-haired crafty kern, thou sweats to
> death and lards the lean earth as thee walk along, ye informed:
>
> > On 17 Aug, 10:48, "Kadaitcha Man" <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >> pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing,
> >> ye bayed:
> >> > You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to
> >> > live permanently online?
>
> >> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
> >> permanently online.
>
> > Heh - wondered if someone might say that, but I spend rather less time
> > in this universe than it might look.
>
> Oh, no, not at all. It's quite obvious you're not often on this planet.
:-) Nice comeback.
> > For a start, RADW
>
> Apart from ripping your cock and balls off and ramming them down your throat
> so that you slowly choke and die of asphyxiation, are you aware of any
> methods of indicating complete and utter disinterest to you that work?
Hmm, let's see. How about *not* replying to me with the words "...I
want to know why you live online"? You never know, it could just
work...
> Don't answer that. I'm not interested in your reply.
Not really the point, now, is it? Don't worry, you may catch on
eventually.
Phil
Ignis Fatuus
There's a smug odour of sanctimony around at the moment.
= IF
Snarky
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly state:
>> > pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing,
>> > ye bayed:
>>
>> >> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
>> >> permanently online?
>>
>> > I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you
>> > live permanently online.
>>
>> Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil.
>
> Oh, I don't know. I thought it was a witty observation - until Kadaitcha
> Man revealed a distinct lack of wit. Problem is, these guys seem used to
> dealing with k00ks, and the sign of any true k00k is that they take
> themselves seriously. Sorta doesn't work when they try and needle someone
> and just get the response "Heh - good point. You're funny."
Well, there's the matter of your quote assemblage, among other things.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pretzel_Cabal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
|><\(\(\((@>
news:2651e270-114c-4850...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
> On 17 Aug, 11:27, "|><\\\(\\\(\\\((@>" <not....@lid.address> wrote:
>> pbow...@aol.com wrote
>> innews:d5bf046d-2958-4f0f...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> On 17 Aug, 09:36, "|><\\\(\\\(\\\((@>" <not....@lid.address> wrote:
>>
>> > He can't even line his ducks up enough to agree with himself on
>> > Jehovah:
>>
>> > "Jehovah...was a Hyksos pharaoh of Lower Egypt and Cannan...".
>>
>> > "Jehovah was a Phoenician Sea God".
>>
>> > So seconded!
>> > He does say "There were two of them" - more recently he's<BITCHSLAP>
>>
>> I'm really not interested at all, not one iota.
>
> Shame,
If there is to be any shame here it will all be yours, every last molecule
of it.
> it can be remarkably amusing.
Yes, perhaps it can be, if you're not the patient. However you are now the
patient and I am interested in you and your obsession. The tables have been
turned. I do not find what you are doing to be amusing, indeed I find you,
your behaviour and your mannerisms to be both creepy and disturbing.
Note that "your obsession" refers directly to your obsession, not to the
object of your obsession.
> Oh, not a bit of it. Denigrating Aggy is a thoroughly entertaining
> hobby in its own right.
Note how your obsession was highlighted and you deflected by minimising it
to a "hobby", whereupon the ring-in hobby was suddenly elevated to
unwarranted high standing. You need to perform your pathetic, self-deceptive
mental sleights of hand with much more finesse and aplomb if you want to get
them past me, Mister Bowles, up and coming official obsesso netk0oK.
> No, I suspect you don't have a sense of humour. I also suspect my
> suspicion is probably justified on those grounds too.
Most netk0oK patients find the trepanning process decidely lacking in humour
so that's hardly a surprising revelation you're having there.
>> At the very least, there is evidence before me that reeks of mad
>> obsession.
> Really? You've read my posts about frogs, then?
How very sneaky. You attempted to deflect attention from your highlighted
mad obsession, neither onto some foreign, distant, unrelated object, nor
onto the accuser, but onto your very own self and its unworthy, unimportant
non-achievements. Exceedingly sneaky. underhanded attention swapping indeed
that, however you got caught doing it so you will have to try harder next
time.
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:59:57 -0700 (PDT), "pbow...@aol.com"
Isn't that what the whole k00k-baiting exercise is all about, though?
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:09:57 -0700, pbow...@aol.com wrote these lies,
> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> obfuscations:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 17 Aug, 11:10, "The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt" wrote:
> >> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly state:
> >> > pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing,
> >> > ye bayed:
>
> >> >> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
> >> >> permanently online?
>
> >> > I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you
> >> > live permanently online.
>
> >> Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil.
>
> > Oh, I don't know. I thought it was a witty observation - until Kadaitcha
> > Man revealed a distinct lack of wit. Problem is, these guys seem used to
> > dealing with k00ks, and the sign of any true k00k is that they take
> > themselves seriously. Sorta doesn't work when they try and needle someone
> > and just get the response "Heh - good point. You're funny."
>
> Well, there's the matter of your quote assemblage, among other things.
Is there? I have a quote assemblage? *blushes* I'm truly flattered.
Phil
|><\(\(\((@>
news:e72c9a9a-e56a-4ef7...@v57g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
You just passed the second k0oK test... calling the kookologist the "true
kook".
HTH
Oh, I almost forgot. You passed the first test earlier by attempting to
deflect your obsession.
--
Cod Almighty
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Snarky
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
>> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:59:57 -0700 (PDT), "pbow...@aol.com" wrote:
>> >On 17 Aug, 11:35, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>> >> The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt, ye beggarly caterpillar,
>> >> thoe are not worth another word, else I'd call you knave, ye
>> >> billowed:
>>
>> >> > On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly
>> >> > state:
>> >> >> pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say
>> >> >> nothing, ye bayed:
>>
>> >> >>> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to
>> >> >>> live permanently online?
>>
>> >> >> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you
>> >> >> live permanently online.
>>
>> >> > Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil.
>>
>> >> For more reasons than may be obvious. I just fired a warning shot
>> >> across his bow.
>>
>> >If you say so. Hmm, isn't this the sort of attitude that gets lampooned
>> >around here as that of a true k00k?
>>
>> There's a smug odour of sanctimony around at the moment.
>
> Isn't that what the whole k00k-baiting exercise is all about, though?
Well, that and the frothy foam. The kookwhine is also very good, too,
quite often.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pretzel_Cabal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
Snarky
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
The assemblage of Aggie quotes, that is. Mind you, I'm not one to go on
about it -- my own assemblage last month veered in the same direction.
BTW, you can generally assume that anyone with "Hammer of Thor" in their
.sig or their header info is very much not a k00k...Especially not ones
named "Kadaitcha Man".;-{P}
pbo...@aol.com
> pbow...@aol.com wrote innews:2651e270-114c-4850...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 17 Aug, 11:27, "|><\\\(\\\(\\\((@>" <not....@lid.address> wrote:
> >> pbow...@aol.com wrote
> >> innews:d5bf046d-2958-4f0f...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> On 17 Aug, 09:36, "|><\\\(\\\(\\\((@>" <not....@lid.address> wrote:
>
> >> > He can't even line his ducks up enough to agree with himself on
> >> > Jehovah:
>
> >> > "Jehovah...was a Hyksos pharaoh of Lower Egypt and Cannan...".
>
> >> > "Jehovah was a Phoenician Sea God".
>
> >> > So seconded!
> >> > He does say "There were two of them" - more recently he's<BITCHSLAP>
>
> >> I'm really not interested at all, not one iota.
>
> > Shame,
>
> If there is to be any shame here it will all be yours, every last molecule
> of it.
Oh dear, sounds like I'll have to commit harikiri.
> > it can be remarkably amusing.
>
> Yes, perhaps it can be, if you're not the patient. However you are now the
> patient
And yet, nonetheless, I find this exercise highly amusing. By not only
failing to get the joke but also insisting on trying to psychoanalyse
it, you're providing a very entertaining diversion for a few minutes.
and I am interested in you and your obsession.
Good for you. Now you know why I find the obsessions of cranks like
Aggy both funny and fascinatingly surreal. Keep this up and you'll
have a nice obsession to call your very own.
The tables have been
> turned. I do not find what you are doing to be amusing,
See what I said about a lack of a sense of humour?
indeed I find you,
> your behaviour and your mannerisms to be both creepy and disturbing.
Well, this is getting encouragingly surreal, to be sure. Please do
elaborate.
> > Oh, not a bit of it. Denigrating Aggy is a thoroughly entertaining
> > hobby in its own right.
>
> Note how your obsession was highlighted and you deflected by minimising it
> to a "hobby", whereupon the ring-in hobby was suddenly elevated to
> unwarranted high standing.
My, you do like the look of your own typeface, don't you? This passage
alone looks as though it warrants inclusion in one of Snarky's sigs.
You need to perform your pathetic, self-deceptive
> mental sleights of hand with much more finesse and aplomb if you want to get
> them past me, Mister Bowles, up and coming official obsesso netk0oK.
Now, again about what I was saying that k00ks have no sense of
humour...
> > No, I suspect you don't have a sense of humour. I also suspect my
> > suspicion is probably justified on those grounds too.
>
> Most netk0oK patients find the trepanning process decidely lacking in humour
> so that's hardly a surprising revelation you're having there.
*sigh* If you want to try playing the "k00kologist", might I ask what
you think the point is, if you aren't doing it for amusement's sake?
I'm quite happy to play along for as long as it's entertaining, but
you actually seem to be under the impression you're trying to do some
sort of serious public service. I just like taking the piss out of
cranks - a much more healthy attitude, I feel.
> >> At the very least, there is evidence before me that reeks of mad
> >> obsession.
> > Really? You've read my posts about frogs, then?
>
> How very sneaky. You attempted to deflect attention from your highlighted
> mad obsession, neither onto some foreign, distant, unrelated object, nor
> onto the accuser, but onto your very own self and its unworthy, unimportant
> non-achievements. Exceedingly sneaky. underhanded attention swapping indeed
> that, however you got caught doing it so you will have to try harder next
> time.
Oh well, if it makes you feel you've accomplished something by "seeing
through" a blatant irreverent aside, be my guest. I'm sure if you look
out of the window you'll make the equally revelatory discovery that
the sky is blue. The Dead Ringers lampoon of Ramara Motswe comes to
mind...
Phil
Ignis Fatuus
Well, I'm a bit dull-witted Sundays (you needn't reply to that), so
I'm sat watching Harry Potter and the Self-Clipping Hedge.
= IF
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:47:32 -0700, pbow...@aol.com wrote these lies,
So the Indecipherable Net Squiggle Formerly Known As ... Um,
Indecipherable Net Squiggle seems to be intent on demonstrating.
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:48:16 -0700, pbow...@aol.com wrote these lies,
Ignis is the one collating the Aggy quotes, I think. I just remember a
few choice ones.
> BTW, you can generally assume that anyone with "Hammer of Thor" in their
> .sig or their header info is very much not a k00k..
Probably very much a nerd, however...
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
Mma Ramotswe that is - sorry. Of "Because I am a detective, I notice
many things..." fame.
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:47:32 -0700 (PDT), "pbow...@aol.com"
>
>
>
>
>
> <pbow...@aol.com> wrote:
> >On 17 Aug, 13:28, Ignis Fatuus <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:59:57 -0700 (PDT), "pbow...@aol.com"
>
> >> <pbow...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >On 17 Aug, 11:35, "Kadaitcha Man" <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >> >> The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt, ye beggarly caterpillar, thoe
> >> >> are not worth another word, else I'd call you knave, ye billowed:
>
> >> >> > On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly state:
> >> >> >> pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing, ye
> >> >> >> bayed:
>
> >> >> >>> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
> >> >> >>> permanently online?
>
> >> >> >> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
> >> >> >> permanently online.
>
> >> >> > Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil.
>
> >> >> For more reasons than may be obvious. I just fired a warning shot across
> >> >> his bow.
>
> >> >If you say so. Hmm, isn't this the sort of attitude that gets
> >> >lampooned around here as that of a true k00k?
>
> >> There's a smug odour of sanctimony around at the moment.
>
> >Isn't that what the whole k00k-baiting exercise is all about, though?
>
> Well, I'm a bit dull-witted Sundays (you needn't reply to that)
Wouldn't dream of it, my dear fellow.
, so
> I'm sat watching Harry Potter and the Self-Clipping Hedge.
That's nothing - I'm taking a break by posting silly comments to bait
uptight self-proclaimed "netkops"...
Phil
Kadaitcha Man
love that's hir'd, ye purred:
My, oh my. What a tangled web ye weave. Let's untangle it, shall we?
> Oh, I don't know. I thought it was a witty observation - until
> Kadaitcha Man revealed a distinct lack of wit.
I made what you saw as "a witty observation", but as soon as it was made
clear that it was my intent to give you the same treatment you've been
giving Aggy, only in hearts, diamonds, clubs and spades, I suddenly became
unwitty.
> Problem is,
Your problem is...
> these guys
Snarky is one of "these guys" (tantg).
> seem
Nothing is ever as it seems.
> used to dealing with k00ks,
Yes, and I have no doubt that should Snarky see fit, he will attest to my
skills in identifying and flushing cockro^h closet-kooks out into the open.
In this instance, you.
> and the sign of any true k00k is that
The k0oK becomes the kookologist and the kookologist becomes the k0oK. Been
there, done that. In fact, you are exhibiting predicted behaviour. Nay!
Required behaviour. The k0oKFAQ expects nothing less of you.
> they take themselves seriously.
Oh? What makes you so sure I'm not sitting here soaked up to the eyeballs in
pools of rapidly freezing, laughter-induced urine?
It must feel really awful for you to get the treatment you've been giving
Aggy, hey.
> Sorta doesn't work
Weak, passive, and obsequious; a transparent and clumsy attempt to cast
yourself as a victim.
> when they
Nebulous and obscure reference to unnamed, multiple persons, even while
being fully aware there is only one person, avoiding direct identification
hence avoiding confrontation; the victim mentality at work and at play.
> try and
Call into question any possible success in ripping off your silk veil and
exposing your eczema-riddled carcass to public scrutiny and ridicule.
"They can try, but this is having no effect On mE WHATSOEVER!!! NO SIR!!!!
INDEED NOT!!!!!1!!!"
Don't worry, dear patient, in no time flat you will be a frothing loon
uttering death threats and intent on wreaking your pathetic revenge by
expressing your deepest desire to dance and piss on my grave. Been there,
done that. Stare your destiny in the eye.
> needle someone
So, it's ok for you to needle Aggy to the point of stalking him, but it's
not ok for anyone to needle you back, yes? And you expect other people to
buy that line of self-decptive delusional bullshit you've sold yourself, do
you?
> and just get the response "Heh - good point. You're
> funny."
Pseudo-nonchalance and pseudo-equanimity; if you are perceived as the
easy-going guy who is completely innocent of any and all accusations then
maybe Snarky will don his shining suit of armour and come to your rescue.
You piss-poor damsel in distress.
So, Philip Bowles, how many years or months has Aggy-poking been your
"remarkably amusing" "hobby"? Hmmm? And how many fleeting moments have you
been my "remarkably amusing" "hobby"? Hmmm? You don't like it one bit, do
you, you stalking scumbag nutjob?
What you've been doing all this time to Aggy is projecting all the contempt
and scorn you know deep down is fully due to you. You have only succeeded in
that endeavour and in avoiding exposure because Aggy is a weaker personality
than you. Your time is up, you stalking, manipulative, controlling netkOoK.
PS: Is there one l or two in your first name?
--
Kadaitcha Man
purse, there is no money in it. Not Hercules could have knocked out thy
brains for thou hast none, ye sent forth:
> On 17 Aug, 12:57, "Kadaitcha Man" <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> pbow...@aol.com, ye pernicious shag-haired crafty kern, thou sweats to
>> death and lards the lean earth as thee walk along, ye informed:
>>
>> > On 17 Aug, 10:48, "Kadaitcha Man" <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> >> pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing,
>> >> ye bayed:
>> >> > You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to
>> >> > live permanently online?
>>
>> >> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you
>> >> live
>> >> permanently online.
>>
>> > Heh - wondered if someone might say that, but I spend rather less time
>> > in this universe than it might look.
>>
>> Oh, no, not at all. It's quite obvious you're not often on this planet.
>
> :-) Nice comeback.
>
>> > For a start, RADW
>>
>> Apart from ripping your cock and balls off and ramming them down your
>> throat
>> so that you slowly choke and die of asphyxiation, are you aware of any
>> methods of indicating complete and utter disinterest to you that work?
>
> H<BITCHSLAP>
I said, and I quote:
>> Don't answer that. I'm not interested in your reply.
Capice?
> Not really the point, now, is it? Don't worry, you may catch on
> eventually.
Tactic: Project unbounded clueless into your attacker, maybe someone other
than yourself will believe it.
Ignis Fatuus
Shall we compete to see which is the most futile pursuit?
= IF
Kadaitcha Man
ye derogated:
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:09:57 -0700, pbo...@aol.com wrote these lies,
> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> obfuscations:
>> On 17 Aug, 11:10, "The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt" wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly state:
>>> > pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing,
>>> > ye bayed:
>>>
>>> >> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
>>> >> permanently online?
>>>
>>> > I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you
>>> > live permanently online.
>>>
>>> Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil.
>>
>> Oh, I don't know. I thought it was a witty observation - until Kadaitcha
>> Man revealed a distinct lack of wit. Problem is, these guys seem used to
>> dealing with k00ks, and the sign of any true k00k is that they take
>> themselves seriously. Sorta doesn't work when they try and needle someone
>> and just get the response "Heh - good point. You're funny."
>
> Well, there's the matter of your quote assemblage, among other things.
Pfft! Thunder stealer!
Ignis Fatuus
<agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>
>"The Face of Po" <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote in message
>news:121891800...@proxy00.news.clara.net...
>>I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when Demon Lord
>>Henry
>> Schmidt of Confusion got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:46:20 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
>> [...]
>>> > 72 Raisins "Crackpot Religion" Award
>>> >
>>> > No one so far.
>>>
>>> Say, Aggie, exactly how was the universe created, in your theology?
>>
>> Will this do?
>
>So you have nothing better to do all day than colleting and memorising
>quotes from other posters. What does that make you. A stalking manic
>obsessive troll.
>
Surely you find it fitting that your wisdom should be preserved and
handed down through the ages for all eternity.
= IF
|><\(\(\((@>
news:pan.2008.08.17....@jm.ck.poee.kothask.dsocpl.eothidiautp.hcnb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi:
Now that you've secured your well-deserved Hammer of Thor you can go
completely batshit k0oKy and there's fuck all anyone other than the
illustrious and most worthy FNVW dictator can do about it. I dare say that
unless there's a complete an unequivocal turn to the dark side, the FNVW is
unlikely to remove the protection it affords. You can k0oK-out with
impunity.
<hint><hint>
:)
> BTW, you can generally assume that anyone with "Hammer of Thor" in their
> .sig or their header info is very much not a k00k...Especially not ones
> named "Kadaitcha Man".;-{P}
lol - what I said above notwithstanding.
--
Cod Almighty
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
pbo...@aol.com
> pbow...@aol.com, ye hairy fairy motion, o slave, of no more trust than
> love that's hir'd, ye purred:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 17 Aug, 11:10, "The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt"
> > <popesnarky.godof...@statements.like.yours.caballista.org> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly state:
>
> >> > pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing,
> >> > ye
> >> > bayed:
>
> >> >> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
> >> >> permanently online?
>
> >> > I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
> >> > permanently online.
>
> >> Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil.
>
> > Oh, I don't know. I thought it was a witty observation - until
> > Kadaitcha Man revealed a distinct lack of wit. Problem is, these guys
> > seem used to dealing with k00ks, and the sign of any true k00k is that
> > they take themselves seriously. Sorta doesn't work when they try and
> > needle someone and just get the response "Heh - good point. You're
> > funny."
>
> My, oh my. What a tangled web ye weave. Let's untangle it, shall we?
Ahem - responding to a couple-liner with a lengthy exposition? Isn't
that pretty much the basis of your conclusion that I'm a kook?
> > Oh, I don't know. I thought it was a witty observation - until
> > Kadaitcha Man revealed a distinct lack of wit.
>
> I made what you saw as "a witty observation", but as soon as it was made
> clear that it was my intent to give you the same treatment you've been
> giving Aggy, only in hearts, diamonds, clubs and spades,
Goodness, is this narcissitic delusional stuff infectious? And if so,
did you get it from Indecipherable Net Squiggle or from me?
I suddenly became
> unwitty.
You became unwitty when it was clear you were intending it as a weak
insult rather than pointing out an irony for the sake of, indeed,
being witty. Bit of a disappointment so far, I have to say.
> > seem
>
> Nothing is ever as it seems.
A lesson you could do well to bear in mind in your somewhat contorted
efforts to psychoanalyse my lighthearted two-liners...
> > used to dealing with k00ks,
>
> Yes, and I have no doubt that should Snarky see fit, he will attest to my
> skills in identifying and flushing cockro^h closet-kooks out into the open.
> In this instance, you.
And I have no doubt that should you ask the appropriate people,
they'll attest to my skills in identifying and flushing out rainforest
frogs. Doesn't imply that I'll always be 100% accurate in my analysis,
though.
> > they take themselves seriously.
>
> Oh? What makes you so sure I'm not sitting here soaked up to the eyeballs in
> pools of rapidly freezing, laughter-induced urine?
Maybe you are; I wasn't suggesting you were the k00k (in this post at
any rate), so it's hardly relevant, now is it? I was pointing out that
your tried-and-tested methods fall flat when misdirected.
> It must feel really awful for you to get the treatment you've been giving
> Aggy, hey.
You really did miss the point of what I just said, didn't you?
> > Sorta doesn't work
>
> Weak, passive, and obsequious; a transparent and clumsy attempt to cast
> yourself as a victim.
Okay, I take it back. Net Squiggle's amateurish efforts at
psychoanalysis might not be that bad after all - so far you're both on
a par. Nil points.
> > when they
>
> Nebulous and obscure reference to unnamed, multiple persons, even while
> being fully aware there is only one person, avoiding direct identification
> hence avoiding confrontation; the victim mentality at work and at play.
Nope, not getting any warmer, I'm afraid.
> > try and
>
> Call into question any possible success in ripping off your silk veil and
> exposing your eczema-riddled carcass to public scrutiny and ridicule.
>
> "They can try, but this is having no effect On mE WHATSOEVER!!! NO SIR!!!!
> INDEED NOT!!!!!1!!!"
>
> Don't worry, dear patient,
Ah, I take it you are Indecipherable Net Squiggle, then?
in no time flat you will be a frothing loon
> uttering death threats and intent on wreaking your pathetic revenge by
> expressing your deepest desire to dance and piss on my grave. Been there,
> done that. Stare your destiny in the eye.
You're really going to try and goad me into taking this seriously?
This will be fun to watch, at least
> > needle someone
>
> So, it's ok for you to needle Aggy to the point of stalking him,
"Stalking him"? Aggy's the only fun nut around here at the moment;
check my posting history and you'll find I'm quite indiscriminate
about taking the piss out of idiots and pricking the egos of self-
important sophists.
but it's
> not ok for anyone to needle you back, yes?
Ah, this is where you're going so badly wrong, you see - chopping the
sentence into individual words and two-word phrases not exactly
helping you to see the context here.
> > and just get the response "Heh - good point. You're
> > funny."
>
> Pseudo-nonchalance and pseudo-equanimity; if you are perceived as the
> easy-going guy who is completely innocent of any and all accusations
I haven't seen so much as a charge sheet yet...
then
> maybe Snarky will don his shining suit of armour and come to your rescue.
I really think you should look me up in a bit more detail. Or not; you
might not be as funny.
> So, Philip Bowles, how many years or months has Aggy-poking been your
> "remarkably amusing" "hobby"?
Pretty on and off since I got here, I think - actually it started out
as an objection to his pseudo-intellectual gibberings, before I
realised quite how funny he could be. Sadly, this place isn't as good
for nutcases as rec.games.miniatures.warhammer used to be, or even
sci.bio.paleontology. John Shocked was a fun diversion during my brief
spell on the Battlestar Galactica group, though.
Hmmm? And how many fleeting moments have you
> been my "remarkably amusing" "hobby"? Hmmm? You don't like it one bit, do
> you, you stalking scumbag nutjob?
It's getting better all the time. Keep up the good work.
> What you've been doing all this time to Aggy is projecting all the contempt
> and scorn you know deep down is fully due to you.
"contempt and scorn"? I never fail to be bewildered by the way people
ascribe emotional judgments to behaviour. And fascinated - do people
really invest emotion in everything they say and do? As far as I'm
concerned Aggy may as well not exist - silly posts, whoever they come
from, are just a vehicle for me to make comments I find funny; if
other people do as well that's an added bonus, but any effect on the
target is incidental and as far as I'm concerned immaterial - if they
don't take it in a light-hearted spirit or realise I'm taking the piss
I put that down to thin skin on their part.
Phil
Ignis Fatuus
Jesus, I know it's Sunday but did you have to provoke Aggie's camp
follower into delivering a fool-blown lace-edged Sermon? You do
realise I'll have to read all this shite if I want to know what's
going on, and I'm still busy putting off cutting the hedge 'till next
Sunday...
Why isn't the Dinner ready yet? Do you think there's time for a Pint?
= IF
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 06:50:48 -0700 (PDT), "pbow...@aol.com"
Well, so far this afternoon it seems I've been elevated to the status
of "stalking, manipulative, controlling netk00k", if you want to count
that as a measure of productivity. It's nice to have the attention.
From someone who accuses me of "projecting unbounded clueless into
[my] attacker", which rates pretty close to "LEAR TO READ ENGLISH!"
and "GET AND EDUCATION!" on the irony meter.
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 07:32:27 -0700 (PDT), "pbow...@aol.com"
Hey, it's my afternoon off. Surely I'm allowed a bit of fun after
spending the weekend writing research proposals?
You do
> realise I'll have to read all this shite if I want to know what's
> going on,
It has its moments, but I kindly summarised it for you in my last
post. Aren't I thoughtful?
and I'm still busy putting off cutting the hedge 'till next
> Sunday...
And I'm trying to put off writing grant proposals. Give me a hedge
trimmer any day...
> Why isn't the Dinner ready yet?
Because I've been on the internet, darling.
Do you think there's time for a Pint?
Yeah, why not.
Phil
Ignis Fatuus
That seems far too energetic for the day I reserve exclusively for
being unable to make up my mind. I've even watched Gridlock because I
can't be bothered to reach for the remote.
= IF
Ignis Fatuus
If you've the energy for all that on a Sunday, you can't have had
enough to drink on the Saturday Night.
= IF
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 07:54:32 -0700 (PDT), "pbow...@aol.com"
Ah, but the great thing is, I didn't need to do a thing. Kadaitcha
Squiggle went into a frothing rage and leapt to entertainingly off-the-
wall conclusions based entirely on one two line post and, as he
related it, digging up and not reading nine of my Aggy-related posts
(which apparently represents obsessive stalking from someone with
posts in the thousands). Hooray for an open mind!
I've even watched Gridlock because I
> can't be bothered to reach for the remote.
Look on the bright side - at least it wasn't Fear Her.
Phil
Ignis Fatuus
Yes, I know just what it's like to have someone ding the frothing for
you on a Sunday. There's a full-blown head of steam building up in the
kitchen as we speak. I'm quietly reminiscing about medieval times
when they had iron masks with metal protrusions to control the tongue.
I've tried the volume control on the handset but it doesn't have the
desired effect (after forking out forty quid for a multi-function
thinguby - should I sue?)
> I've even watched Gridlock because I
>> can't be bothered to reach for the remote.
>
>Look on the bright side - at least it wasn't Fear Her.
>
If that's the one with moaning myrtle and the paving slab then it was
on earlier. We've also had Potter with Tennant and identity-changing
potions and two-man tents that are huge inside... must've been that
glass of mineral water somebody gave me last night.
= IF
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 08:11:31 -0700 (PDT), "pbow...@aol.com"
Love & Monsters; the one before Fear Her and the terminal decline in
season 2 quality it represented. And it must be bad if you think of
the actors in terms of Harry Potter characters...
We've also had Potter with Tennant and identity-changing
> potions and two-man tents that are huge inside...
Not sure I remember that one. Damn! I'll have to watch the wretched
things again before the one that comes on later this year, and only
the first and third ones were any good.
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 08:11:31 -0700 (PDT), "pbow...@aol.com"
Oops, I was going to reply to this bit too - that's what comes from
responding to posts from the bottom up...
I'm quite enjoying the frothing; it has the same 'weird logic' appeal
as "Roe v Wade has no bearing on my life, except that it affects it
adversely". Weird logic, unsupported assumptions and self-important
pomposity - all the classic ingredients are there.
Phil.
Ignis Fatuus
I don't think on Sundays - myrtle was paving slab girl in Who.
> We've also had Potter with Tennant and identity-changing
>> potions and two-man tents that are huge inside...
>
>Not sure I remember that one. Damn! I'll have to watch the wretched
>things again before the one that comes on later this year, and only
>the first and third ones were any good.
>
>Phil
= IF
Ignis Fatuus
Plus the Internet comes with an Off button.
= IF
Ignis Fatuus
Now I'm doing it too - must be infectious. The Powers That Be have
decreed that we must watch them all at least twice before the new one
appears. Fortunately I enjoy them, and they're packed with actors who
were famous in my youth - so I can resort to 'we must watch him (or
her) in...' when things get too much. It's a wonderful line - just
like a magic wand it makes everybody disappear.
= IF
Aratzio
"Agamemnon" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> got double secret probation
for writing:
>
>"The Face of Po" <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote in message
>news:121891800...@proxy00.news.clara.net...
>>I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when Demon Lord
>>Henry
>> Schmidt of Confusion got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:46:20 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
>> [...]
>>> > 72 Raisins "Crackpot Religion" Award
>>> >
>>> > No one so far.
>>>
>>> Say, Aggie, exactly how was the universe created, in your theology?
>>
>> Will this do?
>
>So you have nothing better to do all day than colleting and memorising
>quotes from other posters. What does that make you. A stalking manic
>obsessive troll.
>
More of a collector of oddities and bizarre quantum fluctuations of
the illucid kook.
HTH
--
A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz
Accept No Substitute
Ignis Fatuus
<bazz...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>"Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion"
><popesnarky...@verwirren.confused.k00ks.caballista.org> wrote in
>message news:pan.2008.08.16....@teh.usenets.bullie...
>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:46:20 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
>>
><snip>
>
>Will you please fuck off and stop boring us with this voting for troll
>shit??? Get a fuckin life dude.
>
OOh, somebody got out of bed the wrong side this morning...
= IF
Ignis Fatuus
>On 17 Aug, 13:47, "|><\\\(\\\(\\\((@>" <not....@lid.address> wrote:
>> pbow...@aol.com wrote innews:2651e270-114c-4850...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 17 Aug, 11:27, "|><\\\(\\\(\\\((@>" <not....@lid.address> wrote:
>> >> pbow...@aol.com wrote
>> >> innews:d5bf046d-2958-4f0f...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> >> On 17 Aug, 09:36, "|><\\\(\\\(\\\((@>" <not....@lid.address> wrote:
>>
>> >> > He can't even line his ducks up enough to agree with himself on
>> >> > Jehovah:
>>
>> >> > "Jehovah...was a Hyksos pharaoh of Lower Egypt and Cannan...".
>>
>> >> > "Jehovah was a Phoenician Sea God".
>>
>> >> > So seconded!
>> >> > He does say "There were two of them" - more recently he's<BITCHSLAP>
>>
>> >> I'm really not interested at all, not one iota.
>>
>> > Shame,
>>
>> If there is to be any shame here it will all be yours, every last molecule
>> of it.
>
>Oh dear, sounds like I'll have to commit harikiri.
>
>> > it can be remarkably amusing.
>>
>> Yes, perhaps it can be, if you're not the patient. However you are now the
>> patient
>
>And yet, nonetheless, I find this exercise highly amusing. By not only
>failing to get the joke but also insisting on trying to psychoanalyse
>it, you're providing a very entertaining diversion for a few minutes.
>
>and I am interested in you and your obsession.
>
>Good for you. Now you know why I find the obsessions of cranks like
>Aggy both funny and fascinatingly surreal. Keep this up and you'll
>have a nice obsession to call your very own.
>
>The tables have been
>> turned. I do not find what you are doing to be amusing,
>
>See what I said about a lack of a sense of humour?
>
>indeed I find you,
>> your behaviour and your mannerisms to be both creepy and disturbing.
>
>Well, this is getting encouragingly surreal, to be sure. Please do
>elaborate.
>
>> > Oh, not a bit of it. Denigrating Aggy is a thoroughly entertaining
>> > hobby in its own right.
>>
>> Note how your obsession was highlighted and you deflected by minimising it
>> to a "hobby", whereupon the ring-in hobby was suddenly elevated to
>> unwarranted high standing.
>
>My, you do like the look of your own typeface, don't you? This passage
>alone looks as though it warrants inclusion in one of Snarky's sigs.
>
>You need to perform your pathetic, self-deceptive
>> mental sleights of hand with much more finesse and aplomb if you want to get
>> them past me, Mister Bowles, up and coming official obsesso netk0oK.
>
>Now, again about what I was saying that k00ks have no sense of
>humour...
>
>> > No, I suspect you don't have a sense of humour. I also suspect my
>> > suspicion is probably justified on those grounds too.
>>
>> Most netk0oK patients find the trepanning process decidely lacking in humour
>> so that's hardly a surprising revelation you're having there.
>
>*sigh* If you want to try playing the "k00kologist", might I ask what
>you think the point is, if you aren't doing it for amusement's sake?
>I'm quite happy to play along for as long as it's entertaining, but
>you actually seem to be under the impression you're trying to do some
>sort of serious public service. I just like taking the piss out of
>cranks - a much more healthy attitude, I feel.
>
>> >> At the very least, there is evidence before me that reeks of mad
>> >> obsession.
>> > Really? You've read my posts about frogs, then?
>>
>> How very sneaky. You attempted to deflect attention from your highlighted
>> mad obsession, neither onto some foreign, distant, unrelated object, nor
>> onto the accuser, but onto your very own self and its unworthy, unimportant
>> non-achievements. Exceedingly sneaky. underhanded attention swapping indeed
>> that, however you got caught doing it so you will have to try harder next
>> time.
>
>Oh well, if it makes you feel you've accomplished something by "seeing
>through" a blatant irreverent aside, be my guest. I'm sure if you look
>out of the window you'll make the equally revelatory discovery that
>the sky is blue. The Dead Ringers lampoon of Ramara Motswe comes to
>mind...
>
Watch it, or you'll have him spitting his hammer out.
= IF
Snarky
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
>> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:47:32 -0700, pbow...@aol.com wrote these lies,
>> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
>> obfuscations:
>> >> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:59:57 -0700 (PDT), "pbow...@aol.com" wrote:
>> >> >On 17 Aug, 11:35, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>> >> >> The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt, ye beggarly caterpillar,
>> >> >> thoe are not worth another word, else I'd call you knave, ye
>> >> >> billowed:
>>
>> >> >> > On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly
>> >> >> > state:
>> >> >> >> pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say
>> >> >> >> nothing, ye bayed:
>>
>> >> >> >>> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to
>> >> >> >>> live permanently online?
>>
>> >> >> >> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why
>> >> >> >> you live permanently online.
>>
>> >> >> > Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil.
>>
>> >> >> For more reasons than may be obvious. I just fired a warning shot
>> >> >> across his bow.
>>
>> >> >If you say so. Hmm, isn't this the sort of attitude that gets
>> >> >lampooned around here as that of a true k00k?
>>
>> >> There's a smug odour of sanctimony around at the moment.
>>
>> > Isn't that what the whole k00k-baiting exercise is all about, though?
>>
>> quite often.
>
> So the Indecipherable Net Squiggle Formerly Known As ... Um,
> Indecipherable Net Squiggle seems to be intent on demonstrating.
That's a Cod. Check out his MID...
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pretzel_Cabal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008
"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
<33km2419sg6fnq3sh...@4ax.com>
"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
<Jvidnfyewe883sjV...@eclipse.net.uk>
"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)
The Face of Po
> "The Face of Po" <gkenn...@claIrVOYaNT.coLD.DuCk> wrote in message
> news:121891800...@proxy00.news.clara.net...
> >I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when Demon Lord Henry
> > Schmidt of Confusion got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> >> attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
> >> > 72 Raisins "Crackpot Religion" Award
> >> >
> >> > No one so far.
> >>
> >> Say, Aggie, exactly how was the universe created, in your theology?
> >
> > Will this do?
>
> So you have nothing better to do all day than colleting and memorising
> quotes from other posters. What does that make you. A stalking manic
> obsessive troll.
I'm only obsessive enough to collect *my own* posting history, meaning I
can glance through it for old threads in which I took part. It took a
few minutes with google groups (search for 'defied ancestors') and the
clipboard to dig out the rest.
--
Remove caps to communicate more easily.
Happiness will prevail
Snarky
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
>> > used to dealing with k00ks,
>>
>> Yes, and I have no doubt that should Snarky see fit, he will attest to
>> my skills in identifying and flushing cockro^h closet-kooks out into the
>> open. In this instance, you.
>
> And I have no doubt that should you ask the appropriate people, they'll
> attest to my skills in identifying and flushing out rainforest frogs.
> Doesn't imply that I'll always be 100% accurate in my analysis, though.
Well, it's true -- he is. I made the observation sometime last year, IIRC,
around the time he was nominated for the Hammer of Thor, or perhaps when
he won the thing. It's one of his specialities, and he's _very_ good at
it. We've been colleagues in kookology for close to three years, and I've
had lots of opportunity to observe his efforts in that area.
The Demon of Mockery & Silliness
were a Deep One...blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, bloody,
bloody, blub...", and then randomly typed out:
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 08:14:40 +0100, "Agamemnon" wrote:
>>"The Face of Po" wrote...
>>>I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when Demon Lord
>>>Henry
>>> Schmidt of Confusion got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:46:20 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>>> Wrangler attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
>>> [...]
>>>> > 72 Raisins "Crackpot Religion" Award
>>>> >
>>>> > No one so far.
>>>>
>>>> Say, Aggie, exactly how was the universe created, in your theology?
>>>
>>> Will this do?
>>
>>So you have nothing better to do all day than colleting and memorising
>>quotes from other posters. What does that make you. A stalking manic
>>obsessive troll.
>>
> Surely you find it fitting that your wisdom should be preserved and
> handed down through the ages for all eternity.
I do! Kookpedia needs you, Ignis, specifically Aggie's page...
http://www.kookpedia.net/index.php/Agamemnon
But not anonymously. Anonymous contributors get blocked and their changes
reverted. Joiiiiiinnnnnnnn uuuuuuuuusssssss... Jooooooooiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnn
uuuuuuuuussssssssssssssssss...</Kandarian demon>
The Demon of Mockery & Silliness
were a Deep One...blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, bloody,
bloody, blub...", and then randomly typed out:
Beware! You hace been targeted by Teh Ghod Trole, a usenet veteran from
the '80's turned pro kookologist, and he is one of the best. He _does_
have a sense of humour, but when he targets someone, they tend to be the
fun. If he thinks you're a k00k, he will do his level best to draw out
your inner k00k. Maintain a light touch, and you may come through this
trial by fire without winning awards of the sort Aggie has. So far, you've
only shown a couple of k00ksigns, which isn't enough for a nomination.
Refrain from showing more, and one day, you might get your own
HoT...However, if you can't resist giving off more such signs, then
that's your own look-out. Be AUK's fun, if it suits you. I just
figured you for a kookologist in the making, especially because of
that whole "taking the piss out of cranks" thing.
--
Ignis Fatuus
At the moment he's coming across like Aggie giving a history lesson -
converting idle speculation into Absolute Certainties with a surfeit
of self-justification, and issuing commands like visiting royalty.
Perhaps he should add on old Italian proverb to his sig-
L'ospite è come il peche,
Doppo tre giorni - Puzza.
= IF
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 09:20:49 -0700 (PDT), "pbow...@aol.com"
It does? So *that's* where I've been going wrong all this time...
Phil
peachyashiepassion
> pbo...@aol.com, ye pernicious shag-haired crafty kern, thou sweats to
> death and lards the lean earth as thee walk along, ye informed:
>
>> On 17 Aug, 10:48, "Kadaitcha Man" <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>> pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say nothing,
>>> ye bayed:
>
>>>> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to
>>>> live permanently online?
>>> I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you live
>>> permanently online.
>> in this universe than it might look.
>
> Oh, no, not at all. It's quite obvious you're not often on this planet.
>
>> For a start, RADW
>
> Apart from ripping your cock and balls off and ramming them down your throat
> so that you slowly choke and die of asphyxiation, are you aware of any
> methods of indicating complete and utter disinterest to you that work?
>
> Don't answer that. I'm not interested in your reply.
>
*gigglesnort*
Just as a thought, often other people indicate complete disinterest
by not continuing a conversation that they aren't interested in?
You could, you know, if you were _actually_ disinterested, just not
reply?
But this way is more funny, so full steam ahead.
pbo...@aol.com
<lola.stonewall.riot.popesna...@meow.empire> wrote:
> Hail Eris! On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 06:40:17 -0700, pbow...@aol.com sang, "If I
He seems remarkably easy to wind up for someone having the fun. And
for the moment I'm quite enjoying a new toy now Aggy's got stale and
more-or-less silent. This seems to be one of his 'Trole' days, though
- I feel sure I've seen some of his posts that make a bit more sense
than "The only posts of yours I've seen are ones on threads posted to
AUK because of Aggy's kookiness, where you're coming down on Aggy for
being kooky, and therefore I conclude you have an obsession with
stalking Aggy". Still, as I say, weird logic has his charms.
If he thinks you're a k00k, he will do his level best to draw out
> your inner k00k.
Well, as I've said to him, good luck with that. Not sure how revealing
his inner k00k is meant to achieve that, however...
Maintain a light touch, and you may come through this
> trial by fire without winning awards of the sort Aggie has. So far, you've
> only shown a couple of k00ksigns, which isn't enough for a nomination.
Real ones, or Kadaitcha's amateurish psycho-posturing? Wonder what
peachie would make of his efforts...
> Refrain from showing more, and one day, you might get your own
> HoT...However, if you can't resist giving off more such signs, then
> that's your own look-out. Be AUK's fun, if it suits you. I just
> figured you for a kookologist in the making, especially because of
> that whole "taking the piss out of cranks" thing.
"in the making", eh? I've been winding up cranks for 15-odd years now,
and run into a few choice ones in my time (though I tended to ignore
Jean-Paul Turcaud on the paleontology group - while his babble about
"the true gogology" was fun for those not in the know, when he turned
out to be a rabidly anti-Semitic, xenophobic nutcase he became rather
less amusing. Wasted a fair bit of time on Jabriol back in the day,
though).
Phil
peachyashiepassion
It's all a lie. There is no off button - and why should there be?
Who would ever want to leave the net?
pbo...@aol.com
Hold on, I've cracked it. This is some sort of induction test, right?
Kadaitcha's impressions of various usenuts is an exam to see how much
of the k00kery I pick up on? Blatant giveaways like "Project a sense
of clueless into your attacker" ("LEAR TO SPEAK ENGLISH!",
Kadaitcha!), gleeful snips from context, logic so faulty it must be
deliberate and the Porch Monkey delusions of grandeur are all pretty
big clues - if that were Kadaitcha's normal modus operandi it's hard
to see any AUKers sticking up for him as anything but a classic k00k.
Phil
marc_CH
>> No. Aggy tends to lapse into silence when he has been spanked utterly
>> senseless online and then resumes normal operations when he thinks
>> everyone has 'forgotten' about his previous drivel. He has kept this
>> pattern up quite consistently.
>
> I've noticed the way he very quietly acknowledges others are right by
> changing his behaviour despite his previous rigid insistence that they
> were wrong - look at the way "STUPID IGNORANT" has fallen out of his
> vocabulary, say. Next thing you know he'll be talking about guitars
> with necks rather than handles.
Yes. Of course he might also be relatively quiet right now because /yet/
/another/ Greek athlete has been caught out as being a drug cheat.
--
marc
Dana DelMonte
My 8th grade class has been doing a summer grant research project on
Internet social interactions and the general lack of civility on usenet as a
whole as it seems to correlate to a general breakdown of civility in real
life, especially with our "younger" generation. While FPS-type gaming seems
to have some impact, newsgroup participants seem to have higher rates of
arrest, conviction, and recidivism as well as profoundly higher mortality
and disease rates at much younger ages than do the control populations
observed. Additionally, some upstate and lower Canadian insane asylums are
teaching usenet participation as avoidance therapy and anger management in
order to meet more stringent budget guidelines and continue to appear to be
providing services.
Prior to submitting our findings for publication and our "Honors
Research College Credit" we were allowed to submit our findings to the
entire student body who voted by secret ballot on various catagories defined
within the study groups. The student commission felt your groups might be
interested in these results, thus we are providing them for your review and
contemplation. We hope you find this sampling helpful. Eastmont HS Class
of 2012.
Biggest arrogant snot-faced jerk nobody likes - "Mike Easter"
Biggest back-stabbing closeted gay - "Penn...@DerryMaine.gov"
Biggest and probably fattest definite gay - "§ñühwØ£f", "Mr. Arnold",
"Leythos"
Biggest poser, cowardly communicator and "luzer" - "Archie Leach",
"catchme"
Biggest waste of resources on Planet Earth - "|><\(\(\((@> ", "Kadaitcha
Man"
Most obviously retarded calling others retarded - "Archie Leach", "Snarky"
Most obviously retarded kooks calling others kooks - "Archie Leach",
"Snarky"
Most sock-puppets or alternate IDs/sources - approximately 20-way tie,
statistically moot
Gayest - "§ñühwØ£f"
Stupidest - "§ñühwØ£f", "Lookout"
Probably ugliest - "§ñühwØ£f"
Probably academically slowest, or never graduated - "§ñühwØ£f"
Most likely had abusive or no father - approximately 20-way tie,
statistically moot
Most likely had abusive or opressive mother - "§ñühwØ£f"
Probably eats cat food - "VanguardLH", "§ñühwØ£f", "Mr. Arnold", "Leythos",
"Archie Leach", "catchme"
Almost surely eats his own soiled diapers - "§ñühwØ£f", "Archie Leach"
Additionally, a group of 27 "gays" objected to using "gay" or its
variations to label these usenet characters because they strongly felt it
gave all gays a bad name.
Again additionally, a group of 14 special education students objected to
using "retard" or its variations to describe usenet characters because they
strongly felt, as express by and through their counselor, that this gave all
the retards a bad name.
All but 2 of 1139 students thought that "Snarky" was both retarded and gay.
The other 2 were excused on hall passes for water fountain. And the same
numerical ratio thought that "§ñühwØ£f" and "Archie Leach" were escaped
either from prison or from mental institutions. Those 2 were excused on
office passes for emergent personal communications regarding personal
business.
All 1139 students agreed that "Snarky" could NOT find his "pope" with a
magnifying glass and tweezers and that's the reason he is so mean and
probably takes medications for mental disorders, bladder disorders, heart
disorders, and personality disorders and then drinks too much as well!
--
"Snarky" <popes...@caballista.organ> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.08.17....@jm.ck.poee.kothask.dsocpl.eothidiautp.hcnb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi...
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 07:32:27 -0700, pbo...@aol.com wrote these lies,
> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> obfuscations:
>
Dana DelMonte
Archie.
Archie Leach is gay and retarded, aren't you, you big-fat homo jizz-bucket?
--
"Archie Leach" <le...@spam.antiham> wrote in message
news:751fa41rjv929mgbm...@4ax.com...
>
> Yesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes.
Archie Leach
<delm...@somewhere.else.please.forward.your.spam.to.someone.who.likes.to.read.the.spam.thanks.net>
wrote:
DING!
> Biggest waste of resources on Planet Earth - "|><\(\(\((@> ", "Kadaitcha
>Man"
>
> Most obviously retarded calling others retarded - "Archie Leach", "Snarky"
DING!
> Most obviously retarded kooks calling others kooks - "Archie Leach",
>"Snarky"
DING!
> Most sock-puppets or alternate IDs/sources - approximately 20-way tie,
>statistically moot
>
> Gayest - "§ñühwØ£f"
>
> Stupidest - "§ñühwØ£f", "Lookout"
>
> Probably ugliest - "§ñühwØ£f"
>
> Probably academically slowest, or never graduated - "§ñühwØ£f"
>
> Most likely had abusive or no father - approximately 20-way tie,
>statistically moot
>
> Most likely had abusive or opressive mother - "§ñühwØ£f"
>
> Probably eats cat food - "VanguardLH", "§ñühwØ£f", "Mr. Arnold", "Leythos",
> "Archie Leach", "catchme"
DING!
> Almost surely eats his own soiled diapers - "§ñühwØ£f", "Archie Leach"
DING!
> Additionally, a group of 27 "gays" objected to using "gay" or its
>variations to label these usenet characters because they strongly felt it
>gave all gays a bad name.
>
> Again additionally, a group of 14 special education students objected to
>using "retard" or its variations to describe usenet characters because they
>strongly felt, as express by and through their counselor, that this gave all
>the retards a bad name.
>
> All but 2 of 1139 students thought that "Snarky" was both retarded and gay.
>The other 2 were excused on hall passes for water fountain. And the same
>numerical ratio thought that "§ñühwØ£f" and "Archie Leach" were escaped
DING!
>either from prison or from mental institutions. Those 2 were excused on
>office passes for emergent personal communications regarding personal
>business.
>
> All 1139 students agreed that "Snarky" could NOT find his "pope" with a
>magnifying glass and tweezers and that's the reason he is so mean and
>probably takes medications for mental disorders, bladder disorders, heart
>disorders, and personality disorders and then drinks too much as well!
This lits is APPROVED!!!!!!!!!!
Ignis Fatuus
My Goodness!! You did have fun!
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:26:47 -0500, "Dana DelMonte"
<delm...@somewhere.else.please.forward.your.spam.to.someone.who.likes.to.read.the.spam.thanks.net>
wrote:
= IF
|><\(\(\((@>
news:pan.2008.08.17....@jm.ck.poee.kothask.dsocpl.eothidiautp.hcnb.ggghd.bcb.cem.fi:
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 07:32:27 -0700, pbo...@aol.com wrote these lies,
> denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
> obfuscations:
>
>>> > used to dealing with k00ks,
>>>
>>> Yes, and I have no doubt that should Snarky see fit, he will attest to
>>> my skills in identifying and flushing cockro^h closet-kooks out into the
>>> open. In this instance, you.
>>
>> And I have no doubt that should you ask the appropriate people, they'll
>> attest to my skills in identifying and flushing out rainforest frogs.
>> Doesn't imply that I'll always be 100% accurate in my analysis, though.
>
> Well, it's true -- he is. I made the observation sometime last year, IIRC,
> around the time he was nominated for the Hammer of Thor, or perhaps when
> he won the thing. It's one of his specialities, and he's _very_ good at
> it. We've been colleagues in kookology for close to three years, and I've
> had lots of opportunity to observe his efforts in that area.
The cheque's in the mail.
--
Cod Almighty
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Snarky
denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or
obfuscations:
> Hello fellow netizens.
*DING*
> Most obviously retarded kooks calling others kooks - "Archie Leach",
> "Snarky"
*DING*
> Most sock-puppets or alternate IDs/sources - approximately 20-way tie,
> statistically moot
>
> Gayest - "§ñühwØ£f"
>
> Stupidest - "§ñühwØ£f", "Lookout"
>
> Probably ugliest - "§ñühwØ£f"
>
> Probably academically slowest, or never graduated - "§ñühwØ£f"
>
> Most likely had abusive or no father - approximately 20-way tie,
> statistically moot
>
> Most likely had abusive or opressive mother - "§ñühwØ£f"
>
> Probably eats cat food - "VanguardLH", "§ñühwØ£f", "Mr. Arnold",
> "Leythos", "Archie Leach", "catchme"
>
> Almost surely eats his own soiled diapers - "§ñühwØ£f", "Archie
> Leach"
>
> Additionally, a group of 27 "gays" objected to using "gay" or its
> variations to label these usenet characters because they strongly felt it
> gave all gays a bad name.
>
> Again additionally, a group of 14 special education students objected to
> using "retard" or its variations to describe usenet characters because
> they strongly felt, as express by and through their counselor, that this
> gave all the retards a bad name.
>
> All but 2 of 1139 students thought that "Snarky" was both retarded and
> gay.
*DING*
> The other 2 were excused on hall passes for water fountain. And the same
> numerical ratio thought that "§ñühwØ£f" and "Archie Leach" were
> escaped either from prison or from mental institutions. Those 2 were
> excused on office passes for emergent personal communications regarding
> personal business.
>
> All 1139 students agreed that "Snarky" could NOT find his "pope" with a
> magnifying glass and tweezers and that's the reason he is so mean and
> probably takes medications for mental disorders, bladder disorders, heart
> disorders, and personality disorders and then drinks too much as well!
*DING*
Well, I take vitamin supplements. Anyway: Four UV points! The above litses
are APPROVED! Also, Bucky Breeder is now one of my k00ks, shared with
Archie, Snuhwolf, and K-Man. Pleace to be having your brain
shrink-wrapped before FedExing it to me.
Kadaitcha Man
patience, ye expectorated:
Yes, but as a kookologist I am duty bound to force the netk0oK to accept as
fact that I am unquestionably 100% disinterested in their blitherings whilst
continuing to respond to said blitherings.
It does their heads in no end.
> You could, you know, if you were _actually_ disinterested, just not
> reply?
>
> But this way is more funny, so full steam ahead.
:)
--
Kadaitcha Man
halting off, and now is the whole man governed with one, ye rasped:
*DING*
> "Kadaitcha Man"
*DING*
--
|><\(\(\((@>
news:737193d8-fcf9-47e4...@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
> On 17 Aug, 13:47, "|><\\\(\\\(\\\((@>" <not....@lid.address> wrote:
>> pbow...@aol.com wrote
>> innews:2651e270-114c-4850...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
>> > Shame,
>>
>> If there is to be any shame here it will all be yours, every last
>> molecule
>> of it.
>
> Oh dear, sounds like I'll have to commit harikiri.
Hopefully you are serious. Please arrange for someone to post gifs of your
ripped open bowels. Thank you in advance.
>> > it can be remarkably amusing.
>>
>> Yes, perhaps it can be, if you're not the patient. However you are now
>> the
>> patient
>
> And yet, nonetheless, I find this exercise highly amusing. By not only
> failing to get the joke but also insisting on trying to psychoanalyse
> it, you're providing a very entertaining diversion for a few minutes.
Tactic: If in doubt, make wild and unfounded accusations.
Do you suppose that any of your flailing accusations wrt alleged
cluelessness, not getting the joke, not comprehending irony, lacking wit and
lacking a SOH, et al, will stick?
Do you suppose that anyone other than yourself really believes that you
believe all this is "a very entertaining diversion"?
> and I am interested in you and your obsession.
The trepanning hooks are set. I own your head.
> Good for you. Now you know why I find the obsessions of cranks like
> Aggy both funny and fascinatingly surreal. Keep this up and you'll
> have a nice obsession to call your very own.
Tactic: Squirm and divert at all costs.
Please do try to keep up, netK0oK. This is not about why you find the
obsessions of cranks like Aggy both funny and fascinatingly surreal. It is
about your obsession and your being a crank like Aggy.
>> The tables have been
>> turned. I do not find what you are doing to be amusing,
>
> See what I said about a lack of a sense of humour?
Tactic: If in doubt, make wild and unfounded accusations.
You've already tried that one several times, and failed. Try something
different.
>> indeed I find you,
>> your behaviour and your mannerisms to be both creepy and disturbing.
>
> Well, this is getting encouragingly surreal, to be sure. Please do
> elaborate.
Tactic: Feign interest, perhaps it will all be forgotten.
>> > Oh, not a bit of it. Denigrating Aggy is a thoroughly entertaining
>> > hobby in its own right.
>>
>> Note how your obsession was highlighted and you deflected by minimising
>> it
>> to a "hobby", whereupon the ring-in hobby was suddenly elevated to
>> unwarranted high standing.
>
> My, you do like the look of your own typeface, don't you?
Tactic: Write complete gibberish in the vain hope that the gibberish will
get the attention instead of yourself.
> This passage
> alone looks as though it warrants inclusion in one of Snarky's sigs.
Tacit: Drop names and appeal to others.
>> You need to perform your pathetic, self-deceptive
>> mental sleights of hand with much more finesse and aplomb if you want to
>> get
>> them past me, Mister Bowles, up and coming official obsesso netk0oK.
>
> Now, again about what I was saying that k00ks have no sense of
> humour...
Tactic: Rinse, repeat.
>> > No, I suspect you don't have a sense of humour. I also suspect my
>> > suspicion is probably justified on those grounds too.
>>
>> Most netk0oK patients find the trepanning process decidely lacking in
>> humour
>> so that's hardly a surprising revelation you're having there.
>
> *sigh* If you want to try playing the "k00kologist",
Tactic: Call any and all credentials into question.
> might I ask
No, you may not.
> what
> you think the point is, if you aren't doing it for amusement's sake?
tactic: Ask if you can ask and if you're told you can't ask, ask anyway.
> I'm quite happy to play along for as long as it's entertaining,
Tactic: Lay the foundation for a hasty "you are boring" exit.
> but
Tactic: Pretend you weren't going to say it and say it anyway.
> you actually seem to be under the impression
Tactic: Make stuff up.
> you're trying to do some
> sort of serious public service. I just like taking the piss out of
> cranks - a much more healthy attitude, I feel.
Tactic: Separate yourself (the chaff) from the wheat.
>> >> At the very least, there is evidence before me that reeks of mad
>> >> obsession.
>> > Really? You've read my posts about frogs, then?
>>
>> How very sneaky. You attempted to deflect attention from your highlighted
>> mad obsession, neither onto some foreign, distant, unrelated object, nor
>> onto the accuser, but onto your very own self and its unworthy,
>> unimportant
>> non-achievements. Exceedingly sneaky. underhanded attention swapping
>> indeed
>> that, however you got caught doing it so you will have to try harder next
>> time.
>
> Oh well,
Tactic: Feign disinterest, again and again and...
> if it makes you feel you've accomplished something
Tactic: Divert attention away from yourself and onto your detractor at all
costs.
> by "seeing
> through" a blatant irreverent aside, be my guest.
Tactic: Write more gibberish that makes sense only to you.
> I'm sure
Tactic: Elevate your worthless opinion over that of your detractor and hope
nobody noticies.
> if you look out of the window
Tactic: Try to get your detractor to do your bidding instead of you doing
theirs.
> you'll make the equally revelatory discovery that
> the sky is blue. The Dead Ringers lampoon of Ramara Motswe comes to
> mind...
Tactic: If all else fails try Zen or Feng Shui.
> Phil
--
Cod Almighty
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Kadaitcha Man
crow a pudding one of these days, ye bleated:
> On 17 Aug, 14:52, "Kadaitcha Man" <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> pbow...@aol.com, ye hairy fairy motion, o slave, of no more trust than
>> love that's hir'd, ye purred:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 17 Aug, 11:10, "The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt"
>> > <popesnarky.godof...@statements.like.yours.caballista.org> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:48:44 -1200, Kadaitcha Man did most oddly
>> >> state:
>>
>> >> > pbow...@aol.com, ye froward frantic fool, ye speak yet ye say
>> >> > nothing,
>> >> > ye
>> >> > bayed:
>>
>> >> >> You don't think this is a bit rich from someone who appears to live
>> >> >> permanently online?
>>
>> >> > I might think that is a bit rich, but first I want to know why you
>> >> > live
>> >> > permanently online.
>>
>> >> Y'gotta watch yerself around my colleagues, Phil.
>>
>> > Oh, I don't know. I thought it was a witty observation - until
>> > Kadaitcha Man revealed a distinct lack of wit. Problem is, these guys
>> > seem used to dealing with k00ks, and the sign of any true k00k is that
>> > they take themselves seriously. Sorta doesn't work when they try and
>> > needle someone and just get the response "Heh - good point. You're
>> > funny."
>>
>> My, oh my. What a tangled web ye weave. Let's untangle it, shall we?
>
> Ahem - responding to a couple-liner with a lengthy exposition? Isn't
> that pretty much the basis of your conclusion that I'm a kook?
No, it is not. I know you are a k0oK. No other basis for the conclusion is
required.
>> > Oh, I don't know. I thought it was a witty observation - until
>> > Kadaitcha Man revealed a distinct lack of wit.
>>
>> I made what you saw as "a witty observation", but as soon as it was made
>> clear that it was my intent to give you the same treatment you've been
>> giving Aggy, only in hearts, diamonds, clubs and spades,
>
> Goodness, is this narcissitic delusional stuff infectious?
Tactic: When being psychoanalysed, psychoanalyse.
> And if so,
> did you get it from Indecipherable Net Squiggle or from me?
Tactic: Invoke the names of others.
You need new tactics, k0oKy. You're wearing all your toys out.
>> I suddenly became
>> unwitty.
>
> You became unwitty
Tactic: Desperate times call for desperate measures so try agreeing and
disagreeing at the same time.
> when it was clear you were intending it as a weak
> insult
Tactic: Make stuff up.
Oh hum...
> rather than pointing out an irony for the sake of,
Tactic: If all else fails, cast doubts on your detractor's ability to detect
irony, even if it appears the detractor is just stringing you along.
> indeed,
Tactic: Add an extra dash of damnation by using absolutes.
> being witty. Bit of a disappointment so far, I have to say.
Tactic: Express disappointment in your detractor.
>> > seem
>>
>> Nothing is ever as it seems.
>
> A lesson you could do well to bear in mind
Tactic: Try schoolyard taunts such as, "I'm rubber! You're glue! everything
you say bounces off me and sticks to you!"
> in your somewhat contorted
> efforts to psychoanalyse my lighthearted two-liners...
Tactic: Minimise. Minimise. Minimise.
>> > used to dealing with k00ks,
>>
>> Yes, and I have no doubt that should Snarky see fit, he will attest to my
>> skills in identifying and flushing cockro^h closet-kooks out into the
>> open.
>> In this instance, you.
>
> And I have no doubt that should you ask the appropriate people,
Tactic: Try, at all costs, to make it at least appear that you are capabble
of reaching the dizzying heights from where your detractor pisses upon your
head with impunity.
> they'll attest to my skills in identifying and flushing out rainforest
> frogs. Doesn't imply that I'll always be 100% accurate in my analysis,
> though.
Tactic: Try and get away with pretending to elevate yourself to the same
superior level that your detractor stands on.
>> > they take themselves seriously.
>>
>> Oh? What makes you so sure I'm not sitting here soaked up to the eyeballs
>> in
>> pools of rapidly freezing, laughter-induced urine?
>
> Maybe you are; I wasn't suggesting you were the k00k (in this post at
> any rate), so it's hardly relevant, now is it? I was pointing out that
> your tried-and-tested methods fall flat when misdirected.
Tactic: Ignore any and all possible jokes; get serious. Works best if
immediately followed up by yet more accusations that your detractor didn't
get the joke, the idea, the point or the irony.
>> It must feel really awful for you to get the treatment you've been giving
>> Aggy, hey.
>
> You really did miss the point of what I just said, didn't you?
*DING*
I can read you like a book.
>> > Sorta doesn't work
>>
>> Weak, passive, and obsequious; a transparent and clumsy attempt to cast
>> yourself as a victim.
>
> Okay, I take it back.
Tactic: Feign, parry, riposte.
> Net Squiggle's amateurish efforts at
> psychoanalysis might not be that bad after all - so far you're both on
> a par. Nil points.
Tactic: Rinse, repeat.
>> > when they
>>
>> Nebulous and obscure reference to unnamed, multiple persons, even while
>> being fully aware there is only one person, avoiding direct
>> identification
>> hence avoiding confrontation; the victim mentality at work and at play.
>
> Nope, not getting any warmer, I'm afraid.
Tactic: Accuse your detractor of more cluelessness. Rinse, repeat.
>> > try and
>>
>> Call into question any possible success in ripping off your silk veil and
>> exposing your eczema-riddled carcass to public scrutiny and ridicule.
>>
>> "They can try, but this is having no effect On mE WHATSOEVER!!! NO
>> SIR!!!!
>> INDEED NOT!!!!!1!!!"
>>
>> Don't worry, dear patient,
>
> Ah, I take it you are Indecipherable Net Squiggle, then?
Tactic: Try more meaningless gibberish. Rinse, repeat.
> in no time flat you will be a frothing loon
>> uttering death threats and intent on wreaking your pathetic revenge by
>> expressing your deepest desire to dance and piss on my grave. Been there,
>> done that. Stare your destiny in the eye.
>
> You're really going to try and goad me into taking this seriously?
> This will be fun to watch, at least
Tactic: Rinse, repeat until boring.
>> > needle someone
>>
>> So, it's ok for you to needle Aggy to the point of stalking him,
>
> "Stalking him"? Aggy's the only fun nut around here at the moment;
> check my posting history and you'll find I'm quite indiscriminate
> about taking the piss out of idiots and pricking the egos of self-
> important sophists.
Tactic: When the focus is on your obsession, always try to move the focus to
the object of your obsession.
>> but it's
>> not ok for anyone to needle you back, yes?
>
> Ah, this is where you're going so badly wrong, you see
Tactic: Rinse, repeat.
> - chopping the
> sentence into individual words and two-word phrases not exactly
> helping you to see the context here.
Tactic: Cry foul.
>> > and just get the response "Heh - good point. You're
>> > funny."
>>
>> Pseudo-nonchalance and pseudo-equanimity; if you are perceived as the
>> easy-going guy who is completely innocent of any and all accusations
>
> I haven't seen so much as a charge sheet yet...
Tactic: Pretend not to notice.
>> then
>> maybe Snarky will don his shining suit of armour and come to your rescue.
>
> I really think you should look me up in a bit more detail. Or not; you
> might not be as funny.
Tactic: When accused of being a stalker, try to get your accuser to do the
stalking.
>> So, Philip Bowles, how many years or months has Aggy-poking been your
>> "remarkably amusing" "hobby"?
>
> Pretty on and off since I got here, I think - actually it started out
> as an objection to his pseudo-intellectual gibberings, before I
> realised quite how funny he could be. Sadly, this place isn't as good
> for nutcases as rec.games.miniatures.warhammer used to be, or even
> sci.bio.paleontology. John Shocked was a fun diversion during my brief
> spell on the Battlestar Galactica group, though.
Tactic: Create a high pedestal for yourself and try to mount it.
>> Hmmm? And how many fleeting moments have you
>> been my "remarkably amusing" "hobby"? Hmmm? You don't like it one bit, do
>> you, you stalking scumbag nutjob?
>
> It's getting better all the time. Keep up the good work.
Tactic: Try mockery.
>> What you've been doing all this time to Aggy is projecting all the
>> contempt
>> and scorn you know deep down is fully due to you.
>
> "contempt and scorn"? I never fail to be bewildered by the way people
> ascribe emotional judgments to behaviour. And fascinated - do people
> really invest emotion in everything they say and do? As far as I'm
> concerned Aggy may as well not exist - silly posts, whoever they come
> from, are just a vehicle for me to make comments I find funny; if
> other people do as well that's an added bonus, but any effect on the
> target is incidental and as far as I'm concerned immaterial - if they
> don't take it in a light-hearted spirit or realise I'm taking the piss
> I put that down to thin skin on their part.
Tactic: Deny any and all emotional involvement with the object of your
obsession whilst ranting and frothing emotionally about the object of your
obsession.
You, Philip Bowles, are a netk0oK.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Member of:
Usenet Ruiner List
Top Assholes on the Net List
Most hated usenetizens of all time List
Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List
Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E
Join me for dinner. I'm cooking stale hobo's nose hairs and strawberry
vinaigrette in fearful chipmunk rectum, arranged in a cooling saucepan
brimming with dog-eared particles of carrot in dog pee, a side of grains
and a cup of hot meerkat serum.
<p>sychotic <c>hicken
<737193d8-fcf9-47e4...@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, it
appeared "pbo...@aol.com" <pbo...@aol.com> had made a clean getaway:
>My, you do like the look of your own typeface, don't you? This passage
>alone looks as though it warrants inclusion in one of Snarky's sigs.
>
>> mental sleights of hand with much more finesse and aplomb if you want to get
>> them past me, Mister Bowles, up and coming official obsesso netk0oK.
>
>Now, again about what I was saying that k00ks have no sense of
>humour...
I got a joke from 1976.
Q: What do you line the back of a wheelchair with ?
A: Sticky back spastic.
Sadly since Political Correctness took over jokes like that don't get
heard much these days.
It's OK folks ... you can all act terribly shocked if you so wish.
--
<p>sychotic <c>hicken
http://crass.on.ru/bin/upload/files/mp3/Trashmen-Surfin::Bird.mp3
Friends intervene on Friends.
Work in Progress: uk.media.sf.tv.drwho
<p>sychotic <c>hicken
it appeared Kadaitcha Man <inv...@invalid.invalid> had made a clean
getaway:
>pbo...@aol.com, ye cheese-filled loathsome leper, thou'll yield the
>crow a pudding one of these days, ye bleated:
>
>
>Tactic: Deny any and all emotional involvement with the object of your
>obsession whilst ranting and frothing emotionally about the object of your
>obsession.
>
>You, Philip Bowles, are a netk0oK.
>
Is he now?
Thanks for the heads up.
Hope you don't mind me snipping the screed?
|><\(\(\((@>
> Lurching erratically into the sunlight holding
> <5fampr$0hm$x...@alt.dumpster.mind-bogglingly-stupid-novice.com.uruguay>, it
> appeared Kadaitcha Man <inv...@invalid.invalid> had made a clean getaway:
>>pbo...@aol.com, ye cheese-filled loathsome leper, thou'll yield the
>>crow a pudding one of these days, ye bleated:
>>
> <snip>
>>
>>Tactic: Deny any and all emotional involvement with the object of your
>>obsession whilst ranting and frothing emotionally about the object of your
>>obsession.
>>
>>You, Philip Bowles, are a netk0oK.
>>
>
> Is he now?
>
> Thanks for the heads up.
You misspelled off.
> Hope you don't mind me snipping the screed?
Thank you for bringing yourself to my attention.
--
Cod Almighty
pbo...@aol.com
> My Goodness!! You did have fun!
It's a novel approach, to be sure.
Phil