Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
2012 finale: timey-wimey twaddle overload
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
BW  
View profile  
 More options Oct 7 2012, 3:50 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: BW <bruc...@topmail.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 00:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 3:50 am
Subject: 2012 finale: timey-wimey twaddle overload
1. River babbles on about "time distortions", then the TARDIS can't
materialise. I bounces off 1938.
Then he needs a "landing beacon" to lock onto. Well, that was novel.

2. Amy has often complained about the Doctor not visting them for
ages. Also events of episode 4
spanned a long time, so "now" for Amy must have crept up to 2015 or
so. But they were in NY in 2012.

3. When Amy sacrifices herself to the graveyard angel, the Doctor
warns her that he can never visit
her.  What is the rule to prevent this?  There has been plenty of
crossing timelines before.
Moffat is just making up bollocks on the run. I had expected the
ending would involve Amy saying
"I can call you on my phone, then you can come get us!"  Then she
arrives in 1930s and finds she
will have to wait about 50 years until a compatible battery charger is
produced.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
The Doctor  
View profile  
 More options Oct 7 2012, 8:14 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 12:14:37 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 8:14 am
Subject: Re: 2012 finale: timey-wimey twaddle overload
In article <3b9e0f00-5ebd-4737-8c10-3138c014e...@pz10g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,

BW  <bruc...@topmail.co.nz> wrote:
>1. River babbles on about "time distortions", then the TARDIS can't
>materialise. I bounces off 1938.
>Then he needs a "landing beacon" to lock onto. Well, that was novel.

IT somehow worked.

>2. Amy has often complained about the Doctor not visting them for
>ages. Also events of episode 4
>spanned a long time, so "now" for Amy must have crept up to 2015 or
>so. But they were in NY in 2012.

Good point.

>3. When Amy sacrifices herself to the graveyard angel, the Doctor
>warns her that he can never visit
>her.  What is the rule to prevent this?  There has been plenty of
>crossing timelines before.
>Moffat is just making up bollocks on the run. I had expected the
>ending would involve Amy saying
>"I can call you on my phone, then you can come get us!"  Then she
>arrives in 1930s and finds she
>will have to wait about 50 years until a compatible battery charger is
>produced.

The paradoxes that NYC could not survive.
--
Member - Liberal International  This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k  
USA petition to dissolve the Republic and vote to disoolve it in November 2012

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »