Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion EVANSKOL: What happened to Ellis?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Synsidar  
View profile  
 More options May 26 1995, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.marvel.universe
From: synsi...@aol.com (Synsidar)
Date: 1995/05/26
Subject: Re: EVANSKOL: What happened to Ellis?

i...@bookworm.demon.co.uk (Ian Glover) wrote:
>>So, why? What, in your [INSERT:  Marie Javins] professional opinion,
>>would Warren Ellis have brought to Doctor Strange that David Quinn
>>didn't/couldn't?
>>This isn't a flame, I'm seriously interested, because I _liked_ what
David
>>did to Dr Strange.

In a general sense, one could expect Warren Ellis to restore a sense of
the
mystical to the series.  Quinn's stories were more superhero-oriented;
the issues of DR. STRANGE featuring Polaris and the Hulk, if merely
padding
in plotting terms, had better characterization than the "regular" stories
did.
In recent issues, the subplot showing the effects of the War on Dormammu's
dimension has been a mistake, I think, because it turns the "Dark
Dimension"
into another run-of-the-mill fantasy setting with less mysticism--even
if Quinn and Skolnick were more comfortable with that approach.

One might also expect Ellis to show more attention to detail and depth in
his characterization.  Quinn's Salome was much more of a plot device to
get
"elemental magick" into the series than a serious opponent.  There was a
severe lack of motivation and character background.  As for detail:  Well,
to cite two examples:  Quinn continued to have Strange use the Orb of
Agamotto
when he shouldn't have even had it, much less been able to use it; Quinn
also
gave Dormammu a physical body when it had been established years ago that
Dormammu's body was pure flame.  It's possible to go into more detail on
Quinn's plotting/characterization weaknesses (I have in other venues) but
there would be little point to that now.

Steven R. Stahl


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google