Captain Marvel/Quasar
BLACKMYSTECH RANGER
Time to be evil!!
Let's Rock!!!
Kitty Pryde/ShadowCat is HOT!!!
Badness is cool!!!
Kenneth M. Lin
"BLACKMYSTECH RANGER" <SUPREM...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:15818-494...@storefull-3212.bay.webtv.net...
> Gayness is queer!!!
teepee
"BLACKMYSTECH RANGER" <SUPREM...@webtv.net> wrote
> Why not have them return as one being, what ya think?
And make her a girl. And a lesbian.
Oh now I've gone too far. Sorry.
Errrr...hang on
OM
<kennet...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>Which Captain Marvel?
...Ken, Blacklipstickranger is a retarded troll. Don't reply to him.
Just killfile him and put him out of our misery.
Thanks!
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[
grinningdemon
wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:01:36 -0800, "Kenneth M. Lin"
><kennet...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>Which Captain Marvel?
>
>...Ken, Blacklipstickranger is a retarded troll. Don't reply to him.
>Just killfile him and put him out of our misery.
>
>Thanks!
>
> OM
What did this poor guy ever do to you? What does it matter if other
people choose to reply to him or not? And what good does it do for
you to killfile him anyway if you always end up joining the threads he
starts?
I think he comes up with some pretty odd topics but he's basically
harmless and those odd topics occasionally even spark some decent
discussions...so deal with it.
SteveZim1017
unforgivable. I've put up with you until this point but now you've
crossed the line.
now if you'll excuse me I'll be huddled in my room with all my issues
of Quasar strewn about me, quietly weeping
Wayne S Garmil
Why, Billy Batson of course!! It would be the new Access, a character
shared by both DC and Marvel. Off on his own Earth where it is
perpetually 1950 so the flavor of the character is kept right.
Ressurect C.C. Beck to draw him again and you've got a winner on your
hands.
--
_ __ _ __ | I see the girls walk by dressed in
' ) / // / / ) / | their summer clothes; I have to turn
/ / / o // __/ / __. __ __/ | my head until my darkness goes...
(_(_/ <_</_(_/ (__/ (_/|_/ (_(_/_ | -Rolling Stones, "Paint It Black"
OM
<grinni...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>I think he comes up with some pretty odd topics but he's basically
>harmless and those odd topics occasionally even spark some decent
>discussions...so deal with it.
...Actually, you're not far from joining him in Killfile Hell. Your
refusal to trim your quotes is becoming really annoying, quoting
entire nested quotes and then adding one or two lines of comment is a
waste of bandwidth.
...That being said, I've dealt with Blacklipstickranger the same way I
deal with any troll: I killfile the bastard, then advise anyone who
replies to him to cease replies and killfile him as well. Eventually
he'll go away and we'll have put him out of our misery fo good.
FSogol
> Your refusal to trim your quotes is becoming really annoying, quoting
> entire nested quotes and then adding one or two lines of comment is a
> waste of bandwidth.
How much bandwidth do you waste by preaching this sermon everyday?
--
FSogol
Ty...@webtv.net
amusing, but sometime I agree with OM. I've been around awhile, 10 years
Feb., and while I don't post often I always make good posts. I do think
we could be better served with actual trivia questions rather than
pointless vs. posts.
Dan McEwen
news:4979-494...@storefull-3131.bay.webtv.net:
According to some, you're probably a troll simply because you have a
webtv address.
I have also been around here a long time, something like 13 or 14
years. There are real trolls out there. One of them was named
Omar. He made things miserable. At best, blackmystechranger is
mildly annoying. He's not a troll.
grinningdemon
wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:41:33 -0600, grinningdemon
><grinni...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>I think he comes up with some pretty odd topics but he's basically
>>harmless and those odd topics occasionally even spark some decent
>>discussions...so deal with it.
>
>...Actually, you're not far from joining him in Killfile Hell. Your
>refusal to trim your quotes is becoming really annoying, quoting
>entire nested quotes and then adding one or two lines of comment is a
>waste of bandwidth.
I suppose we're even then since your juvenile nicknames, constant
name-dropping, and incessant whining about trimming quotes drive me
crazy.
That said, I'm not so quick to killfile people because there really
aren't a whole hell of a lot left posting in these groups and, if
you'd really killfile someone over something so trivial, I'd say
you're soon to be left talking to yourself.
BLACKMYSTECH RANGER
Group: rec.arts.comics.marvel.universe Date: Wed, Dec 17, 2008, 12:50pm
From: om@all_trolls_must_DIE.com (OM)
Just cause you dont like what I post, does not mean everyone doesnt it,
also go ahead killfile me, cause I am not leaving TROLL BOY, so you can
either killfile me or shut the fuck up!
OM
wrote:
>How much bandwidth do you waste by preaching this sermon everyday?
...As long as it takes to get the poinit across. Deal with it.
OM
<grinni...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>I suppose we're even then since your juvenile nicknames, constant
>name-dropping, and incessant whining about trimming quotes drive me
>crazy.
...In order:
1) This coming from someone who calls himself "grinningdemon".
Hypocrisy, thou hast been named.
2) You want "name-dropping", you should have been here 20 years ago.
Some of the regulars were actually sleeping with creators in the
industry, and a couple actually married them. Another had an obsessive
homoerotic obsession with Harlan Ellison and made more "name-drops" in
a week than most gossip writers did. So what few names I've "dropped"
pale by comparison.
3) Then trim your goddamn quotes and you won't have to put up with my
bitching. Seriously, can't you see how fucking annoying it is to see
300 lines of quoted text - most of it unreadable because of all the
>'s indenting the text to illegibility - and then see only *one*
*fucking* *line* of babble that half the time doesn't even add to the
conversation at hand?
Are you that fucking ignorant, or are you just goddamn lazy when it
comes to trimming quotes?
OM
<ferr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>One of them was named Omar. He made things miserable.
...I had thankfully forgotten about that dipshit. He was also a
multi-aliased troll on Newsarama back before Mikey went off on his
ill-fated adventure as Jemas' best pal, and there was sufficient
evidence he was also "renaud".
>At best, blackmystechranger is mildly annoying. He's not a troll.
...No, he's a troll of the most base kind. Starting bullshit "hoo'd
win" threads is trolling if all they do is post the question without
contributing any sort of logical conclusion of their own.
Blacklipstickranger's guilty of that more times than most of us would
care to count, and once is more than sufficient to be branded a troll.
grinningdemon
wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:39:36 -0600, grinningdemon
><grinni...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>I suppose we're even then since your juvenile nicknames, constant
>>name-dropping, and incessant whining about trimming quotes drive me
>>crazy.
>
>...In order:
>
>1) This coming from someone who calls himself "grinningdemon".
>Hypocrisy, thou hast been named.
Yes...I have a screen name...a single name I came up with about 10
years ago...I think you're stretching a bit to label me a hypocrite
based solely on that but believe what you want...I certainly don't go
around making up "clever" nicknames for every creator and story I
don't like and then passing them off as though they were somehow the
accepted terms...it's largely an issue of attitude.
>
>2) You want "name-dropping", you should have been here 20 years ago.
>Some of the regulars were actually sleeping with creators in the
>industry, and a couple actually married them. Another had an obsessive
>homoerotic obsession with Harlan Ellison and made more "name-drops" in
>a week than most gossip writers did. So what few names I've "dropped"
>pale by comparison.
Then I suppose 20 years ago you would have fit right in...as it stands
now, it comes off as obnoxious self-promotion...and I probably would
have thought the same back then.
>
>3) Then trim your goddamn quotes and you won't have to put up with my
>bitching. Seriously, can't you see how fucking annoying it is to see
>300 lines of quoted text - most of it unreadable because of all the
>>'s indenting the text to illegibility - and then see only *one*
>*fucking* *line* of babble that half the time doesn't even add to the
>conversation at hand?
>
>Are you that fucking ignorant, or are you just goddamn lazy when it
>comes to trimming quotes?
I do trim my quotes when I think about it but, honestly, it often
doesn't occur to me because I don't think it's all that difficult to
scroll down looking for the new text that tends to stand out
anyway...and apparently it's not such a big fucking deal or you
wouldn't be the only one with a bug up his ass about it.
SteveZim1017
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:39:36 -0600, grinningdemon
>
> >I suppose we're even then since your juvenile nicknames, constant
> >name-dropping, and incessant whining about trimming quotes drive me
> >crazy.
>
> ...In order:
>
> 1) This coming from someone who calls himself "grinningdemon".
> Hypocrisy, thou hast been named.
>
> 2) You want "name-dropping", you should have been here 20 years ago.
> Some of the regulars were actually sleeping with creators in the
> industry, and a couple actually married them. Another had an obsessive
> homoerotic obsession with Harlan Ellison and made more "name-drops" in
> a week than most gossip writers did. So what few names I've "dropped"
> pale by comparison.
>
> 3) Then trim your goddamn quotes and you won't have to put up with my
> bitching. Seriously, can't you see how fucking annoying it is to see
> 300 lines of quoted text - most of it unreadable because of all the>'s indenting the text to illegibility - and then see only *one*
>
> *fucking* *line* of babble that half the time doesn't even add to the
> conversation at hand?
>
> Are you that fucking ignorant, or are you just goddamn lazy when it
> comes to trimming quotes?
>
> OM
> --
> ]=====================================[
> ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
> ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
> ]=====================================[
Grr.... I've been here the longest, obey all my commands!! Only post
comments about topics I approve and in the format I approve them in!!
Grr
...oh and get off my lawn too!
Seriously, OM... usually love your posts but you are really starting
to get a case of grumpy old man syndrome here. I mean we ARE just
talking about comic books.
OM
<SteveZ...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Seriously, OM... usually love your posts but you are really starting
>to get a case of grumpy old man syndrome here. I mean we ARE just
>talking about comic books.
...Well, maybe I *am* a grumpy old man. Hell, I turned 47 last month,
so I'm entitled to bitch when I see something retarded going on that
could easily be prevented. Trimming quotes is one of them, especially
when they remove .sigs which shouldn't be quoted in any case. Today's
newsreaders - especially if you're using Google Groups - for some
reason don't recognize the "--" as the flag to not quote anything
following that line, which is why those who have *any* consideration
for bandwidth usage should at least make sure the .sigs are gone from
whatever they're quoting.
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
Billy Bissette
news:o97lk4d5m7krvt5od...@4ax.com:
> Today's
> newsreaders - especially if you're using Google Groups - for some
> reason don't recognize the "--" as the flag to not quote anything
> following that line, which is why those who have *any* consideration
> for bandwidth usage should at least make sure the .sigs are gone from
> whatever they're quoting.
Uhm, you appear obsessively concerned about bandwidth usage, but use
a five line sig to advertise a half-line web address?
OM
<bai...@coastalnet.com> wrote:
> Uhm, you appear obsessively concerned about bandwidth usage, but use
>a five line sig to advertise a half-line web address?
...Five lines is acceptable, Billy. Above six and you're pushing it.
Billy Bissette
news:8mgmk41eb8q2evh6c...@4ax.com:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:48:41 -0600, Billy Bissette
> <bai...@coastalnet.com> wrote:
>
>> Uhm, you appear obsessively concerned about bandwidth usage, but use
>>a five line sig to advertise a half-line web address?
>
> ...Five lines is acceptable, Billy. Above six and you're pushing it.
The old standard for Usenet was four lines, back when people really
did care about bandwidth.
My point though was that you were making a big issue about saving
bandwidth while simultaneously having one of the larger sigs on the
group. (Indeed, sigs in general aren't as popular as they used to be.)
FSogol
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:48:41 -0600, Billy Bissette
> <bai...@coastalnet.com> wrote:
>
>> Uhm, you appear obsessively concerned about bandwidth usage, but use
>> a five line sig to advertise a half-line web address?
>
> ...Five lines is acceptable, Billy. Above six and you're pushing it.
>
I thought the standard was 2-3 lines. Also in google groups your sig
will work properly if you add a space after the "--" as in "-- "
--
FSogol
OM
wrote:
>I thought the standard was 2-3 lines.
...Nope. Four was considered the standard, and five was the max
tolerated. I could trim it down to three, but so far I really have no
inclination to do mod my .sig in any way. However:
> Also in google groups your sig
>will work properly if you add a space after the "--" as in "-- "
...After checking my .sig, I find that there *is* a space after the
"--". Which takes us back to schmucks not trimming their quotes just
to be schmucks.
Stephen O'Connell
> OM <om@all_trolls_must_DIE.com> wrote in
> news:8mgmk41eb8q2evh6c...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:48:41 -0600, Billy Bissette
>> <bai...@coastalnet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Uhm, you appear obsessively concerned about bandwidth usage, but use
>>> a five line sig to advertise a half-line web address?
>>
>> ...Five lines is acceptable, Billy. Above six and you're pushing it.
>
> The old standard for Usenet was four lines, back when people really
> did care about bandwidth.
For me, four was too much. Two lines was plenty.
> My point though was that you were making a big issue about saving
> bandwidth while simultaneously having one of the larger sigs on the
> group. (Indeed, sigs in general aren't as popular as they used to
> be.)
Sigs are a waste of time and egotistical. Does anyone really read sig lines
nowadays anyway?
Billy Bissette
news:giip12$j4u$1...@news.motzarella.org:
When I was a kid, I used a sig. Probably four lines. That makes
it look more like a sig than just some kind of postscript. It was a
bit egotistical and a bit because everyone else used them.
When I was older, and came back to Usenet, I don't know that I
ever bothered to set up another. If I did, I eventually removed it.
On message boards, when I did bother to set up a sig at all, it was
a short quote from a Terry Brooks book, "Help is a gift that one must
never grow to expect." I found it quite a relevant reminder to readers
of certain boards, where posters would sometimes demand immediate
direct answers as if it were some kind of right. I doubt many even
noticed the sig though, as these were also the kind of people who
wouldn't even read existing threads before posting a question that had
already been answered ten or twenty times.
Anim8rFSK
Yep.
--
Bad Reboot's 'Crap Trek' 2009: "No Shat, No Show"
Marcovaldo
news:gibe1q$rr3$1...@pcls6.std.com...
> In article <QCU1l.9199$D32....@flpi146.ffdc.sbc.com>,
> Kenneth M. Lin <kennet...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>Which Captain Marvel?
>
> Why, Billy Batson of course!! It would be the new Access, a character
> shared by both DC and Marvel. Off on his own Earth where it is
> perpetually 1950 so the flavor of the character is kept right.
> Ressurect C.C. Beck to draw him again and you've got a winner on your
> hands.
Well, if we're doing a 50s theme, then a better merger would be between
Billy Batson and Quasar's antecedant, Marvel Boy.
There you go, Blackmystech Ranger. The story practically writes itself.