Thanks for reading,
Kevin
Mojo wrote:
> http://www.corona.bc.ca/films/details/spiderman.html
>
> Better version here!
Cool, but I can't help wondering about all the griping about the
organic vs. mechanical web-shooters. So Parker shouldn't be some genius
who can create stuff like web-shooters and the webbing fluid but somehow
*can* whip up a cool costume that in the real world takes a number of
professional costumers and specialized technicians to put together?
Viva la Hollywood! ;)
Ciao,
Terrafamilia
Other than that, i think it's good that they're sticking to the original
design.
It will read better on film. Perhaps you need to look back to the Spiderman TV
movie or old electric company episodes to see how graphically dull the actual
costume with printed lines only can actually look.
It is still a highly enhanced photograph, more a painting than an actual photo.
But it works at letting us see the texture. It is too easy to have someone look
goofy in this costume in real life. as experience should tell us.
This "first real photo" hype brings to mind the oprahs head on Ann Margareets
Body TV guide cover, that people though was all sorts of high tech computer
trickery. It was a watercolor painting.. Not even good photorealism at that.
--cut and paste to adopt this sig file---
Make Deja a useful Usenet Archive again!
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Click here for Free Video!!
http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/
Terrafamilia <terr...@fgi.net> wrote in message
news:3A5F2F9B...@fgi.net...
I always thought that was pretty ironic