Should Thor get ThunderStrike Mace
BLACKMYSTECH RANGER
Time to be evil!!
Let's Rock!!!
Kitty Pryde/ShadowCat is HOT!!!
Badness is cool!!!
Lilith
(BLACKMYSTECH RANGER) wrote:
>What ya think?
Think it sux!
>Time to bedevil!!
>Let's cRock!!!
>Kitty Pryde/ShadowsCat is sHOT!!!
>Baldness is cool!!!
--
Lilith
vo...@webtv.net
for an inferior weapon? That would be like Rambo trading in his combat
knife for a butter knife or James Bond trading in his PPK for a nerf
gun.
grinningdemon
He doesn't want him to trade...he wants him to have both...Ranger is
all about combining things...magical items, alternate versions of
characters, and silly shit like that...he wants all the characters to
be uber-powerful so the stories can be really short and boring.
Scott Eiler
Yeah, that's probably what he meant. But the question as originally
posted is actually reasonable. There's a Thunderstrike mace out there
somewhere, and Thor probably ought to check that it hasn't fallen into
the wrong hands.
Lilith
Then Thor can also take possession of Stormbringer and learn to hurl
three weapons at once using his foot to throw the third weapon.
--
Lilith
Unknown
"Lilith" <lili...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:tttuj59m3mlcferk2...@4ax.com...
Or he could learn to juggle.
Wouter Valentijn
Or inject him with Spidey's blood so he could, with some extra mutation,
sprout six extra arms.
--
Wouter Valentijn www.j3v.net
http://www.nksf.scifics.com/startrek.html
Buffy: This is the Initiative Xander. Military guys and scientists do not
make out with each other.
Xander: Well maybe that's what's wrong with the world. Ever think about
that?
'Buffy the Vampire Slayer 4x14: Goodbye Iowa'
liam=mail
Garbin
news:6911e62f-ec2c-4051...@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 2, 3:35 am, grinningdemon <grinningde...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:38:52 -0600, vo...@webtv.net wrote:
>> >Wrong board, stupid ass question! Why the fuck would he trade Mjoiner in
>> >for an inferior weapon? That would be like Rambo trading in his combat
>> >knife for a butter knife or James Bond trading in his PPK for a nerf
>> >gun.
"Mjoiner" wtf is that? Some kind of Asgardian adhesive??
Lilith
Beware! I am Paste Pot Petroklase. Thou art soon to be beheld to yon
pavement on which thou art standing, ne'er to stray anon.
Or something like that.
--
Lilith
OM
wrote:
>On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 23:32:04 -0600, SUPREM...@webtv.net
>(BLACKMYSTECH RANGER) wrote:
>
>>What ya think?
>
>Think it sux!
...Lil, *everything* the pathetic little misanthrope posts "sux". He's
a troll, and a retarded one at that. Forgive me for yelling, but WHY
THE FRACK DO YOU RESPOND TO HIM??? For God/Yahweh/Roddenberry's sake,
why encourage him to keep babbling by replying to him?
Please, please, PLEASE, would everyone just killfile the miserable
little bastard? This group isn't *that* desperate enough for traffic
to tolerate the babblings of someone too mentally defective to even
qualifiy for village idiot protection status...
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[
Scott Eiler
> Please, please, PLEASE, would everyone just killfile the miserable
> little bastard? This group isn't *that* desperate enough for traffic
> to tolerate the babblings of someone too mentally defective to even
> qualifiy for village idiot protection status...
Sorry, but I respect my village idiots. Also, I operate under an oath
to read and respond to anything I #%^&ing well feel like.
grinningdemon
wrote:
>On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:58:10 -0600, Lilith <lili...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 23:32:04 -0600, SUPREM...@webtv.net
>>(BLACKMYSTECH RANGER) wrote:
>>
>>>What ya think?
>>
>>Think it sux!
>
>...Lil, *everything* the pathetic little misanthrope posts "sux". He's
>a troll, and a retarded one at that. Forgive me for yelling, but WHY
>THE FRACK DO YOU RESPOND TO HIM??? For God/Yahweh/Roddenberry's sake,
>why encourage him to keep babbling by replying to him?
>
>Please, please, PLEASE, would everyone just killfile the miserable
>little bastard? This group isn't *that* desperate enough for traffic
>to tolerate the babblings of someone too mentally defective to even
>qualifiy for village idiot protection status...
>
>
> OM
Man, let it go...yes, Ranger's posts usually lame, but they are often
amusing at a glance and they sometimes spin off decent discussions on
other topics.
Michael Wood
Thank you Scott for that erudite reply. ; )
Methinks there is something in there about pots and black kettles.
Michael Wood
OM
<grinni...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>Man, let it go...yes, Ranger's posts usually lame, but they are often
>amusing at a glance and they sometimes spin off decent discussions on
>other topics.
...Name *one*. So far, all I've seen is one or two replies to his
babblings, and no real threads of consequence resulting. He's a troll,
and unworthy of any sort of VI protections.
OM
wrote:
>> Sorry, but I respect my village idiots. Also, I operate under an oath
>> to read and respond to anything I #%^&ing well feel like.
...He's not a village idiot. He's a troll. Different scum, different
rules.
>Methinks there is something in there about pots and black kettles.
...Not in this case. Sorry. Deal with it.
Michael Wood
"OM" <om@all_trolls_must_DIE.com> wrote in message
news:qt93k51ih5a9peb8t...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:58:16 +1000, "Michael Wood" <no-...@home.comj>
> wrote:
>
>>> Sorry, but I respect my village idiots. Also, I operate under an oath
>>> to read and respond to anything I #%^&ing well feel like.
>
> ...He's not a village idiot. He's a troll. Different scum, different
> rules.
>
>>Methinks there is something in there about pots and black kettles.
>
> ...Not in this case. Sorry. Deal with it.
>
>
> OM
> --
You know I have a personal distate for the word troll in this context - just
because Americans can't spell or pronounce trawl correctly doesn't mean that
they should impose it on the rest of the English-speaking world.
You trawl the waters, not troll them. You Troll the ancient Yule tide carol,
bizarre an image as that may be.
If it's a troll, expose it to sunlight and turn it to stone!
Michael Wood :)
whoswhoz
wrote:
>
>"OM" <om@all_trolls_must_DIE.com> wrote in message
>news:qt93k51ih5a9peb8t...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:58:16 +1000, "Michael Wood" <no-...@home.comj>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Sorry, but I respect my village idiots. Also, I operate under an oath
>>>> to read and respond to anything I #%^&ing well feel like.
>>
>> ...He's not a village idiot. He's a troll. Different scum, different
>> rules.
>>
>>>Methinks there is something in there about pots and black kettles.
>>
>> ...Not in this case. Sorry. Deal with it.
>>
>>
>> OM
>> --
>
>You know I have a personal distate for the word troll in this context - just
>because Americans can't spell or pronounce trawl correctly doesn't mean that
>they should impose it on the rest of the English-speaking world.
>
>You trawl the waters, not troll them. You Troll the ancient Yule tide carol,
>bizarre an image as that may be.
>
>If it's a troll, expose it to sunlight and turn it to stone!
>
>Michael Wood :)
>
He's not a troll anyway. Trolls are malignant. He's just a 10 year
old comic fan. Or pretending to be .
grinningdemon
wrote:
>On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:07:18 -0600, grinningdemon
><grinni...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>Man, let it go...yes, Ranger's posts usually lame, but they are often
>>amusing at a glance and they sometimes spin off decent discussions on
>>other topics.
>
>...Name *one*. So far, all I've seen is one or two replies to his
>babblings, and no real threads of consequence resulting. He's a troll,
>and unworthy of any sort of VI protections.
With all the goofy shit he posts, you want me to remember just one? I
know there have been lengthy discussions that have started from one of
his odd posts...of course, they usually have little to do with his
original post (which is why I can't remember them) but that's neither
here nor there...hell, this thread alone has received far more than
just one or two replies...what is it about Ranger that bothers you so
much that you not only killfile him but devote what seems like the
majority of your posts to telling others to do the same? Why do you
care so damn much if people want to reply to him?
OM
<grinni...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>Why do you care so damn much if people want to reply to him?
...Because when they do, it defeats the killfile, and those who are
stupid enough to reply to the little retard haven't done anything else
worthy of being killfiled themselves.
...This particular retard is typical of what WebTV and AOL brought to
usenet, and has helped turn a network dedicated to intellectual
discourse into a babblefest for maladroits, misanthropes and other
social rejects, and helped run off a lot of the normal regulars around
here. He doesn't contribute to other discussions, he just throws out
his retarded comments and insane ideas, and sits back to jack off
while people get suckered into replying to his drivel.
...We had someone just like Ranger years ago who'd switch from posting
these insane "What If?" babblings to speaking Yiddish. As she was
using a CUNY account, we couldn't get an admin there to shut her up to
save our skins for months, at least not until a couple of backbone
admins got involved and threatened to cut CUNY off of the backbone if
they didn't remove her access. Come to find out, she was the mentally
retarded wife of a CUNY student who'd take her to the CUNY library and
taught her how to (ab)use usenet all day long as a babysitter while he
attended classes! When she was finally kicked off, it was determined
that during the course of one day, she could troll and harass up to
three hundred separate groups a day!
I see Ranger as the same sort of mental defective. One who has AbZero
reason to be allowed usenet access. He's not here for anything other
than to babble and disrupt. That makes him a troll, not to mention a
retarded one.
grinningdemon
wrote:
I still think you're overreacting...he doesn't post nearly as much or
as often as the example you mention...and I don't see you contributing
all that much to intellectual discourse around here lately
either...almost all you do anymore is insult Ranger and tell people
not to respond to him...you're being more disruptive than he is.
Scott Eiler
> ...This particular retard is typical of what WebTV and AOL brought to
> usenet, and has helped turn a network dedicated to intellectual
> discourse into a babblefest for maladroits, misanthropes and other
> social rejects, and helped run off a lot of the normal regulars around
> here.
Time was, people would say that about having *any* comic book fandom
at games or science fiction conventions.
Michael Wood
"OM" <om@all_trolls_must_DIE.com> wrote in message
>
> ...This particular retard is typical of what WebTV and AOL brought to
> usenet, and has helped turn a network dedicated to intellectual
> discourse into a babblefest for maladroits, misanthropes and other
> social rejects, and helped run off a lot of the normal regulars around
> here.
The internet was a network dedicated to intellectual discourse?!
Bwah-ha-ha-ha. Do you know nothing about the development of shared
computing.
As soon as it was created, university geeks were trying to use it to play
Zork and Dungeons and Dragons, and discuss how hot Uhura was.
And by the way; comic fan = SF geek = maths PhD = misanthropes = maladroits
We're all here because they won't let us into nightclubs because of terminal
lack of cool. Present company excepted of course. You are apparently walking
amongst the damned seeking to spread a slim sliver of hope of redemption
back to the heights of intellectual glory.
BTW I've always thought that there was some sort of kinship between the very
intelligent and the mentally challenged. There is a sort of shared confusion
that the world doesn't seem to make any sense - people don't do what you
expect them to do, and angry, vicious brutes who attack you for no reason
are always shocking.
[snip]
>
> I see Ranger as the same sort of mental defective. One who has AbZero
> reason to be allowed usenet access. He's not here for anything other
> than to babble and disrupt. That makes him a troll, not to mention a
> retarded one.
>
>
> OM
Allowed Usenet access? It is the opiate of the masses. Oh sorry, that's
Facebook.
I don't notice a lot of cultural research, sociopolticial analysis, quantum
chemistry, molecular biology or particle physics discussed here (except
where applicable to discussions of Superman's powers).
Why not sterilise everyone under the IQ of 150? (based upon white, middle
class, protestant, American cultural biases of course). Fix the world in a
generation. But then there would be no-one left who could look after
themselves after the TV dinners ran out.
Ah, uniformity, lack of diversity - and the lion shall lay down with the
lamb.
HOLD EVERYTHING!
I just realised WHY this offends me sensibilities.
We're SUPER-HEROES damn it! We protect the weak, the innocent, the
defenseless and sometimes the weak-minded.
We don't hurt people. This isn't us.
Damn it, Omega Man. You're better than this.
Remember when you and Starlight Suzie saved that space-bus full of alien
slug children?
The rest of us were humbled by your heroism.
Michael Wood
Anlatt the Builder
Ranger says a lot of dumb things, and I rarely read his posts. But
he's not actually willfully obnoxious, so there's that.
OM
<sei...@eilertech.com> wrote:
>Time was, people would say that about having *any* comic book fandom
>at games or science fiction conventions.
...I'd be curious as to what time frame you're talking about.
Considering that guys like Mort Weisinger, Otto Binder, Edmund
Hamilton, John Broome and quite a few of the National Comics (Pre-DC)
staffers responsible for the sci-fi comics were also respected sci-fi
writers, such bigotry at SF cons isn't something I've heard of or
expected. Gaming geeks have always been against anything extra that
might take up meeting rooms where games can he played in a bit more
privacy than in the usual large game rooms.
OM
wrote:
>The internet was a network dedicated to intellectual discourse?!
>Bwah-ha-ha-ha. Do you know nothing about the development of shared
>computing.
...I've been here since the waning days of BITNET Relay and ARPAnet,
kid, as well as the founding days of Usenet. Those were all founded as
networks dedicated to intellectual discourse. The Internet itself
originally started out that way, but got corrupted as the only way to
expand it outside of academia and keep it funded was to turn it loose
on the masses. This sadly included the idiots, trolls, and retards.
Like Ranger and his ilk.
...I've ignored the rest of your attempts at humor because this
situation's a bit serious for me. Any other time I'd roll with the
gag, but not this time.
OM
wrote:
...On the other hand, this one had to be addressed:
>And by the way; comic fan = SF geek = maths PhD = misanthropes = maladroits
...Since Ranger is too retarded to be a maths PhuD, but is a
misanthrope and a maladroit, your equation does not work.
Anlatt the Builder
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:36:57 +1000, "Michael Wood" <no-...@home.comj>
> wrote:
>
> ...On the other hand, this one had to be addressed:
>
> >And by the way; comic fan = SF geek = maths PhD = misanthropes = maladroits
>
> ...Since Ranger is too retarded to be a maths PhuD, but is a
> misanthrope and a maladroit, your equation does not work.
>
Judging from his posts, Ranger is by no means a misanthrope. He asks
very silly questions and may be a bot; I'm not sure he could pass the
Turing Test. But there is nothing misanthropic about him, unless you
project intentions on him that he shows no signs of having.
But if you want to meet a misanthrope, just read the posts or the sig
of:
> OM
> --
> ]=====================================[
> ] OMBlog -http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
> ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
> ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
> ]=====================================[
Despite his odd fixations, Ranger is not a bully, a bigot, or a
coward, and he doesn't go around telling everybody ELSE who they
should killfile, who they should respond to, and precisely what name
they deserve (idiot, moron, skank, etc.) for not living up to his
standards, forged in the very depths of time at the beginning of the
Internet itself. I consider these facts about Ranger to be positive
traits.
Kenneth M. Lin
pretty blond?
"BLACKMYSTECH RANGER" <SUPREM...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:27848-4B3...@storefull-3173.bay.webtv.net...
> What ya think?
>
> Time to be evil!!
> Let's Rock!!!
> Kitty Pryde/ShadowCat is HOT!!!
> Badness is cool!!!
>
Michael Wood
"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:92aaa8e6-2df0-4efb...@s3g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
----
Thank you for your support both for myself and the Ranger, oh Mighty Anlatt.
I gave up on the "don't pick on other people" line of endeavour.
There are obviously something other issues at play here, and after all, this
is only comic books.
Michael Wood
BLACKMYSTECH RANGER
crazy, but sometimes crazy works! I am a comic book fan too but I feel
its time to break some rules, like as example Gl Rings 24 hr power
limit!
grinningdemon
The 24 hour time limit went away with the intro of Kyle Rayner back in
the 90s...if not earlier.
Wouter Valentijn
<snip>
> Kitty Pryde/ShadowCat is HOT!!!
She really is! :-)
OM
wrote:
>I consider these facts about Ranger to be positive traits.
...No, the only reason you're supporting the retard is just to side
against me and pretend you're scoring a moral "victory" for the
"oppressed". Which makes your kind just as bad as Ranger's ilk.
Bottom line: the little bastard is a retarded maladroit troll, and the
sooner he's run outta here, the better.
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
OM
wrote:
>Thank you for your support both for myself and the Ranger, oh Mighty Anlatt.
...Ah. Accepting the support of a catamite. Figures.
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
Anlatt the Builder
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 17:45:54 +1000, "Michael Wood" <no-...@home.comj>
> wrote:
>
> >Thank you for your support both for myself and the Ranger, oh Mighty Anlatt.
>
> ...Ah. Accepting the support of a catamite. Figures.
>
>
Catamite??!? Wow, that's highly literate reaching! Am I supposed to be
insulted, or just bemused that OM has demonstrated his bigotry once
more?
(Interesting note: OM's got me killfiled, but he has no hesitation
about making nasty comments cocerning things I write when he sees them
quoted in other people's posts. That is, he says ugly things about me,
but because he hides behind the shield of the killfile he never has to
read anything I say in response. That's one of the reasons I consider
him a coward.)
Anlatt the Builder
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 17:45:54 +1000, "Michael Wood" <no-...@home.comj>
> wrote:
>
> >I consider these facts about Ranger to be positive traits.
>
> ...No, the only reason you're supporting the retard is just to side
> against me and pretend you're scoring a moral "victory" for the
> "oppressed". Which makes your kind just as bad as Ranger's ilk.
>
>
OM can read minds and knows why everybody does things. (Oddly enough,
the contents of other people's minds always support his derogatory
opinions.) One wonders why, with such a talent, he uses it here to
snipe at people rather than doing some good - or at least making some
fast cash and impressing the rubes - in the wider world.
grinningdemon
Well, allow me to give OM a view of your response then...I'm probably
one of the only people left in the group he hasn't killfiled for some
idiotic reason or other...I kind of feel left out.
OM
<grinni...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>>(Interesting note: OM's got me killfiled, but he has no hesitation
>>about making nasty comments cocerning things I write when he sees them
>>quoted in other people's posts. That is, he says ugly things about me,
>>but because he hides behind the shield of the killfile he never has to
>>read anything I say in response. That's one of the reasons I consider
>>him a coward.)
...Anlatt, you're a pathetic, catamitic douchebag who attempted to
twist my comments not totally out of context to fit your rather sick
agenda. That's why you're in Killfile Hell, and why I advise everyone
to put you there as well. And note that I don't go out of my way to
flame the living shit out of you by hunting down posts where people
are stupid enough to quote you. If it just so happens you're quoted,
and as usual you demonstrate how much of a douche you are, you get
flamed. There's actually times where you're just babbling, and those
quotes just get trimmed.
...As for my being a "coward", even missing a leg I can still beat the
living shit out of you. That's not a vow of a coward, it's a promise
from someone who simply doesn't tolerate schmucks, douchebags and
trolls like you.
>Well, allow me to give OM a view of your response then...I'm probably
>one of the only people left in the group he hasn't killfiled for some
>idiotic reason or other...I kind of feel left out.
...Because you're actually an intelligent poster? Ever stop to think
for a minute that might be the reason?
Anlatt the Builder
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 02:17:41 -0600, grinningdemon
>
> >>(Interesting note: OM's got me killfiled, but he has no hesitation
> >>about making nasty comments cocerning things I write when he sees them
> >>quoted in other people's posts. That is, he says ugly things about me,
> >>but because he hides behind the shield of the killfile he never has to
> >>read anything I say in response. That's one of the reasons I consider
> >>him a coward.)
>
> ...Anlatt, you're a pathetic, catamitic douchebag who attempted to
> twist my comments not totally out of context to fit your rather sick
> agenda. That's why you're in Killfile Hell, and why I advise everyone
> to put you there as well. And note that I don't go out of my way to
> flame the living shit out of you by hunting down posts where people
> are stupid enough to quote you. If it just so happens you're quoted,
> and as usual you demonstrate how much of a douche you are, you get
> flamed. There's actually times where you're just babbling, and those
> quotes just get trimmed.
>
> ...As for my being a "coward", even missing a leg I can still beat the
> living shit out of you. That's not a vow of a coward, it's a promise
> from someone who simply doesn't tolerate schmucks, douchebags and
> trolls like you.
>
>
Oh, good. Now we're up to the threat of physical violence. Doesn't
take long.
The funny thing is, I have no great opinion of Ranger. I find him
silly and repetitive, and I don't have much time for silly and
repetitive. Normally I just ignore the threads he starts, and, if he
stopped posting tomorrow, I wouldn't miss his posts for a minute.
But I would take his aimless foolishness over OM's mean-spirited,
deliberately obnoxious, name-calling bullying any day of the week.
That kind of stuff really stinks up a newgroup.
plausible prose man
> ...As for my being a "coward", even missing a leg I can still beat the
> living shit out of you.
I bet you can't, actually, and anyway issuing threats you'll never
have to make good on from behind the safety of a usenet account is,
well, cowardly.
> That's not a vow of a coward,
It's not so much the vow of a coward as the braggadocchio of a
coward.
>it's a promise
> from someone who simply doesn't tolerate schmucks, douchebags and
> trolls like you.
And yet, is an amazing shmuck of a douchebag who's every post is a
troll.
>
> >Well, allow me to give OM a view of your response then...I'm probably
> >one of the only people left in the group he hasn't killfiled for some
> >idiotic reason or other...I kind of feel left out.
>
> ...Because you're actually an intelligent poster?
No, I don't think that's it. I'm an intelligent poster, and OM
killfiled me because I didn't accept one of his little anecdotes as
gospel, you know, since we intelligent posters are skeptical of naked
assertions.
grinningdemon
wrote:
>>Well, allow me to give OM a view of your response then...I'm probably
>>one of the only people left in the group he hasn't killfiled for some
>>idiotic reason or other...I kind of feel left out.
>
>...Because you're actually an intelligent poster? Ever stop to think
>for a minute that might be the reason?
Nah...that couldn't be it...still, I suppose I should be honored to
meet your criteria for who should be allowed on usenet.
grinningdemon
Guess I'll be the go-between again.
OM
<grinni...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:29:29 -0600, OM <om@all_trolls_must_DIE.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>Well, allow me to give OM a view of your response then...I'm probably
>>>one of the only people left in the group he hasn't killfiled for some
>>>idiotic reason or other...I kind of feel left out.
>>
>>...Because you're actually an intelligent poster? Ever stop to think
>>for a minute that might be the reason?
>
>Nah...that couldn't be it...
...No, seriously. I'm not bullshitting you. I happen to enjoy reading
your posts, and even tho we don't always agree, you don't come across
like a pompous, ego-tripping wannabee net.god. We had a pair of
dipshits like that ruining the group back in the 80's, which is why I
have AbZero tolerance for their ilk. Anlatt and Sewell aren't as bad
as Tyg and Chuqi the Hutt were, but they're bad enough to get
killfiled.
>still, I suppose I should be honored to
>meet your criteria for who should be allowed on usenet.
...Nonono, don't take it like that. Just keep up the good work posting
intelligently, and not acting like you've got a ten foot corn cob
rammed up your ass then acting like anyone calling you down for it is
a "bigot".
OM
<grinni...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>Guess I'll be the go-between again.
...Don't waste either of our time. I've seen Anlatt's bullshit form of
attack before, and fully expected it. Condemn someone by calling them
a coward, then when they make it clear just how nonexistent their
cowardice is, pretend to take the high road and act all innocent and
superior a victim can be. Or, to put it another way:
Anlatt: "Bullies are cowards. All you need to do is stand up to them."
OM: "I'm neither a bully or a coward, but it appears you need a
serious attitude adjustment either way."
Anlatt: "Oh no, you're a bully and a coward, you big bully, you."
[SFX: Baseball bat impacting with Anlatt's pimpled face]
Anlatt: "MOMMYYYYY! HE HIT ME! AND I DIDN'T DO NUTHIN' TO HIM!!!"
Yeah, typical wuss tactics. Just more proof he's a limp-wristed pansie
worthy of a killfile if not a bitchslap...
grinningdemon
wrote:
Fair enough...I still think you could stand to lighten up a bit here,
though...we don't exactly have a wealth of posters in the group these
days so it would take quite a bit to get me to killfile someone who
can contribute to discussions...as I've said, even Ranger occasionally
offers something of value...even if it's only mild amusement.
Anlatt the Builder
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:32:41 -0600, grinningdemon
>
> >Guess I'll be the go-between again.
>
> ...Don't waste either of our time. I've seen Anlatt's bullshit form of
> attack before, and fully expected it. Condemn someone by calling them
> a coward, then when they make it clear just how nonexistent their
> cowardice is, pretend to take the high road and act all innocent and
> superior a victim can be. Or, to put it another way:
>
> Anlatt: "Bullies are cowards. All you need to do is stand up to them."
>
> OM: "I'm neither a bully or a coward, but it appears you need a
> serious attitude adjustment either way."
>
> Anlatt: "Oh no, you're a bully and a coward, you big bully, you."
>
> [SFX: Baseball bat impacting with Anlatt's pimpled face]
>
> Anlatt: "MOMMYYYYY! HE HIT ME! AND I DIDN'T DO NUTHIN' TO HIM!!!"
>
> Yeah, typical wuss tactics. Just more proof he's a limp-wristed pansie
> worthy of a killfile if not a bitchslap...
>
>
Wow. I mean... wow. What a self-absorbed fantasy life OM has. Like his
threat to beat me up - over the Internet and behind his screen name -
would do anything but indicate that he has the maturity of a 12-year-
old. Albeit a 12-year-old with a broad vocabulary.
And the names he calls me! Limp-wristed pansie! Catamite! I suppose
I'm supposed to be insulted, but really, I can only think of what a
rude jerk and a bigot he is.
By the way: catamite: "a boy or youth who is in a sexual relationship
with a man." Just for reference's sake: I am not now, nor have I ever
been. I didn't come out until I was 28, so I sort of missed the
window. OM uses fancy words, but he does not use them correctly.
("Catamite" is a variation on the name Ganymede, the mortal male youth
who Zeus loved so much that he made him a god. I was never that
pretty.)