Account Options

  1. Sign in
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
CONTEST: High Concept #5 results!
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Dave Van Domelen  
View profile  
 More options Jan 16 2010, 12:37 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.creative
From: dvan...@eyrie.org (Dave Van Domelen)
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:37:50 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Jan 16 2010 12:37 am
Subject: CONTEST: High Concept #5 results!
     It's a tie! (Again)  I let the voting run an extra day to see if it
broke, but nope.  Here's the full results:
     Scott Eiler and Saxon Brenton: 3 votes each
     Tom Russell and Andrew Perron: 1 vote each

     Rather than do the same thing as in the last tie (each winner submit a
concept, writers mix and match however they want), I decided to do something
a little different.  High Concept Mad Libs!

     Scott will email me a reasonably short sentence for a concept, with
blanks for one noun, one verb and one adjective, in any order.  "Reasonably
short" in this case meaning that the blanks will actually be important.
Saxon will email me a noun, a verb and an adjective.  Once this has happened,
I will post the result!

     Dave Van Domelen, was going to write some ASH today, ended up writing
Transformers fic instead.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Andrew Perron  
View profile  
 More options Jan 16 2010, 2:39 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.creative
From: Andrew Perron <pwer...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:39:31 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Jan 16 2010 2:39 am
Subject: Re: CONTEST: High Concept #5 results!

On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:37:50 +0000 (UTC), Dave Van Domelen wrote:
>      Rather than do the same thing as in the last tie (each winner submit a
> concept, writers mix and match however they want), I decided to do something
> a little different.  High Concept Mad Libs!

>      Scott will email me a reasonably short sentence for a concept, with
> blanks for one noun, one verb and one adjective, in any order.  "Reasonably
> short" in this case meaning that the blanks will actually be important.
> Saxon will email me a noun, a verb and an adjective.  Once this has happened,
> I will post the result!

I like it. XD

Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, "uranium" was always my favorite Mad
Libs noun.  I was a weird kid.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Scott Eiler  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2010, 1:37 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.creative
From: Scott Eiler <sei...@eilertech.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:37:26 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Jan 17 2010 1:37 pm
Subject: Re: CONTEST: High Concept #5 results!
On Jan 16, 1:39 am, Andrew Perron <pwer...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:37:50 +0000 (UTC), Dave Van Domelen wrote:
> >      Rather than do the same thing as in the last tie (each winner submit a
> > concept, writers mix and match however they want), I decided to do something
> > a little different.  High Concept Mad Libs!

> >      Scott will email me a reasonably short sentence for a concept, with
> > blanks for one noun, one verb and one adjective, in any order.  "Reasonably
> > short" in this case meaning that the blanks will actually be important.
> > Saxon will email me a noun, a verb and an adjective.  Once this has happened,
> > I will post the result!

> I like it. XD

> Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, "uranium" was always my favorite Mad
> Libs noun.  I was a weird kid.

Wow, sounds like fun, especially if Saxon doesn't get to read the
sentence with the blanks first.  Now, if only someone could just come
up with that sentence, I'd be all set.

(Well, really, I just need a few hours to think about it.  If nothing
else works, I can pick a sentence at random from somewhere and *make*
it have blanks.)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »