Polanski Busted!
Just Me
even so, one look at the girl involved, taken one year before the
infamous photo shoot over at Jack Nicholson's place . . .
http://download.kataweb.it/mediaweb/image/brand_trovacinema/2008/08/14/1218725588177_13ok.jpg
And what can you say? They should move his Walk of Fame Star into the
spot between Michael Jackson and Fatty Arbuckle? It's always these
guys and gals with a really freaky childhood who develop this libido
of the Humbert Humbert complex. So weird (but telling) that they
should go seeking the places of their lost childhood in the body of a
child. Poor little Michael being whipped out on to the stage as an
adult performer at so early an age, and little Roman Polanski, with
both parents murdered, blowing away in ashes from Nazi death camp
chimneys, while he is lost in the streets of Krakow in flight from the
same fate.
We may still insist that this does not excuse what he does! I agree,
even though I say it as someone never forced to undergo the same
childhood horrors--making me a fine one to talk. A fine one to know,
I am, so coddled and warm as my childhood was. Yes, I am the one who
should know. I am the one to judge. But let us first hear from one of
those orphans who spent time with Roman in the Krakow ditch trembling
at the thud of Nazi boots, wet and freezing beneath their feet in the
Warsaw sewer. THAT is the person to talk, and not me. Let that person
condemn Polanski and I will too.
--
JM http://whosenose.blogspot.com
http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
alejandro de tacobell
"Just Me" <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52778c0b-d4ce-4f21...@p36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
> Much as many of us do greatly appreciate the artist in Roman Polanski,
> even so, one look at the girl involved, taken one year before the
> infamous photo shoot over at Jack Nicholson's place . . .
>
> http://download.kataweb.it/mediaweb/image/brand_trovacinema/2008/08/14/1218725588177_13ok.jpg
>
i would have done her, too!
Just Me
<cerebureaucr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Just Me" <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:52778c0b-d4ce-4f21...@p36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Much as many of us do greatly appreciate the artist in Roman Polanski,
> > even so, one look at the girl involved, taken one year before the
> > infamous photo shoot over at Jack Nicholson's place . . .
>
>
> i would have done her, too!
Jesus Christ. And what sewer or ditch out behind a Taco Bell did YOU
grow up in, Alejandro, my poor man?
Just Me
subject, it's a wonder those posters haven't drowned in their own
drool by now. How much of that outrage is fake? How much of the
reaction against it is civilized and rational? Can we really be
living in a world so crowded with these Morlocks and Martians right
out of a movie by George Pal?
--
Much as many of us do greatly appreciate the artist in Roman Polanski,
even so, one look at the girl involved, as she appeared one year
before the infamous photo shoot over at Jack Nicholson's place . . .
http://download.kataweb.it/mediaweb/image/brand_trovacinema/2008/08/1...
And what can you say? They should move his Walk of Fame Star into the
spot between Michael Jackson and Fatty Arbuckle? Down into the gutter
for the cars to park and drip oil on? It's always these guys and gals
with a really freaky childhood who develop this libido of the Humbert
Humbert complex. So weird (but telling) that they should go seeking
the places of their lost childhood in the body of a child. Poor little
Michael being whipped out on to the stage as an adult performer at so
early an age, and little Roman Polanski, with both parents murdered,
blown away in ashes from Nazi death camp chimneys, while he is lost in
the streets of Krakow in flight from the same fate.
We may still insist that this does not excuse what he does! I agree,
even though I say it as someone never forced to undergo the same
childhood horrors--making me a fine one to talk. A fine one to know, I
am, so coddled and warm as my childhood was. Yes, I am the one who
should know. I am the one to judge. But let us first hear from one of
those orphans who spent time with Roman in the Krakow ditch trembling
at the thud of Nazi boots, wet and freezing beneath their feet in the
Warsaw sewer. THAT is the person to talk, and not me. Let that person
condemn Polanski and I will too.
--
JM
http://jpdavid.blogspot.com/
http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
http://vignettes-mackie.blogspot.com
Captain Infinity
Just Me wrote:
>even so, one look at the girl involved, as she appeared one year
>before the infamous photo shoot over at Jack Nicholson's place . . .
>
>http://download.kataweb.it/mediaweb/image/brand_trovacinema/2008/08/1...
>
>And what can you say?
Can't say much because your link is borked, you nitwit.
**
Captain Infinity
Just Me
wrote:
It's up there in the first posting of this post, genius. You need I
should take you by the hand and lead you back up there? Forget it. I
could be accused of something awful--how old are you anyway, that your
manners should be so Third Grade, your demeanor so sweet and
pleasing? Here. Go for it . . .
http://download.kataweb.it/mediaweb/image/brand_trovacinema/2008/08/14/1218725588177_13ok.jpg
Patok
> Much as many of us do greatly appreciate the artist in Roman Polanski,
> even so, one look at the girl involved, taken one year before the
> infamous photo shoot over at Jack Nicholson's place . . .
>
> http://download.kataweb.it/mediaweb/image/brand_trovacinema/2008/08/14/1218725588177_13ok.jpg
What can one say, but "it's been more than 30 fracking years". What
is wrong with you people? Even behind the Iron Curtain, the statute of
limitations we had was 20 years - for murder! True, there was no
sentence longer than 20 years - the maximum was 20 years, then death -
no 'life' mockery - but still!
Who the bloody fracking hell cares - does the victim? no! Again the
same blood-curdling vindictiveness like in the Lockerbie case! Apart
from the fact that the very concept of "statutory rape" should be
banished, and its supporters sentenced to 20 lashes on the town square.
--
You'd be crazy to e-mail me with the crazy. But leave the div alone.
Just Me
> Just Me wrote:
> > Much as many of us do greatly appreciate the artist in Roman Polanski,
> > even so, one look at the girl involved, taken one year before the
> > infamous photo shoot over at Jack Nicholson's place . . .
>
>
> What can one say, but "it's been more than 30 fracking years".
Yeah, okay, and she's like totally what you might call an "old lady"
by now . . .
What is she, "one foot out of the grave" at 45 years old for the
godsakes? Even at my age of 63, I look at a woman of her age and I
think, "How did she make it past 44 without having to go to a
taxidermist? Or maybe an Egyptian mummy maker?"
> What
> is wrong with you people? Even behind the Iron Curtain, the statute of
> limitations we had was 20 years - for murder!
Yeah, but that's your whole sort of Euro-Asian way of looking at
things. Over here we know that the only thing worse than murder is
sex.
> True, there was no
> sentence longer than 20 years - the maximum was 20 years, then death -
> no 'life' mockery - but still!
Well, wait a minute. Are you saying that in the Communist world you
could get off with 20 years for like, sex and murder but if they
caught you trying to sell something for a profit, like sex and murder,
or peaches and potatos you could get death? Is that the way it
worked? What if you were caught going around in a tee-shirt that
said, "Leon Trotsky was da Bomb"? What would be the statute of
limitations on that?
> Who the bloody fracking hell cares - does the victim? no!
You do have a point there. She is being very hip and cool about it.
She's a regular goddam saint if you ask me.
> Again the
> same blood-curdling vindictiveness like in the Lockerbie case!
Right. I agreed with you on that one, remember?
> Apart
> from the fact that the very concept of "statutory rape" should be
> banished, and its supporters sentenced to 20 lashes on the town square.
Well now that one right there is a whole lot more liberal than I can
get to, but then to my eyes anything in a female younger than 44 looks
like jail-bait to me, so who am I to decide? In fact, I'm kind of
partial to older women. You take that Barbara Walters, or that Martha
Stewart for example? Yum-Yum is what I say to that stuff. Or, give me
some of that Emmy Lou Harris or Dolly Parton any old time.
By and large, I can say that I see your point, insofar as I see
extenuating circumstances in Polanski's case. I mean, what if you
came home one night to find that Sadie Mae Glutz had cut your
beautiful wife and unborn baby to ribbons--is that going to weird you
out for the rest of your life? I mean, stack all those bloody bodies
on your Beverly Hills or Bel-Air carpet on top of your Mom and Dad out
there on the bone heap at Mauthausen and Auschwitz, add in those years
you spent starving, ducking and hiding to survive the same fate, and
then tell me it's just something a man can take in stride without his
libido and his psyche getting all in a twist over it? Or is somebody
going to suppose that a person with the past of a Roman Polanski is
going to come out of it all just as normal and average and boring as
the banker's son down the street who never had to face anything worse
in his life than a flat tire on Rodeo Drive?
But as you can see, I am not looking at sex with barely pubescent
girls as something normal. I'm saying it takes a man badly bruised by
life to develop such an erotic taste as that. It takes somebody whose
affections have been so fucked with and brutalized that an image of
purity and innocence (in a pretty underage girl) just becomes for him
something he wants to debauch; he wants to wake it up, all virginal
purity in the world to the hard, throbbing facts of life as they have
been taught to him. He becomes the Night and the darkness of it that
wants to fuck the burning daylights out of the light.
It's a sad, perverse place to be, and there doesn't seem to be much
help for it anymore now that the only medicine good to treat it,
Freudian psychoanalysis is altogether so suspect as Polansky himself.
It's stupid, dark world of growing superstition we're living in, and
it's getting darker, dumber and more barbaric every day.
Patok
> On Sep 27, 11:10 pm, Patok <crazy.div.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What
>> is wrong with you people? Even behind the Iron Curtain, the statute of
>> limitations we had was 20 years - for murder!
>
> Yeah, but that's your whole sort of Euro-Asian way of looking at
> things. Over here we know that the only thing worse than murder is
> sex.
Heheh, yes. One can't help but notice that.
>
>> True, there was no
>> sentence longer than 20 years - the maximum was 20 years, then death -
>> no 'life' mockery - but still!
>
> Well, wait a minute. Are you saying that in the Communist world you
> could get off with 20 years for like, sex and murder but if they
> caught you trying to sell something for a profit, like sex and murder,
> or peaches and potatos you could get death? Is that the way it
> worked?
Not exactly like that, but you kinda get the point. :)
Seriously, there was one case that I remember where they sentenced the
guy to death, where even I, opposing the death penalty on principle,
couldn't find myself objecting. He was a serial rapist - kinda - he was
apparently quite persuasive, and his victims didn't really struggle. It
was more like forced sex - something that probably would get him
sentenced for rape over here, but then maybe not, depending on the
quality of the defense. What the asshole did, inexcusably, was that he
killed all of them, after the act, at the point when they were not
really complaining or anything; some of them were talking of meeting him
again. I remember how I was particularly disturbed by one of the
instances, where after the sex they went to have a smoke and sat on the
rim of a park fountain, and he grabbed and held her head under water
until she drowned.
Justice was swift, however; we learned about the case after he had
been executed.
>> Apart
>> from the fact that the very concept of "statutory rape" should be
>> banished, and its supporters sentenced to 20 lashes on the town square.
>
> Well now that one right there is a whole lot more liberal than I can
> get to, but then to my eyes anything in a female younger than 44 looks
> like jail-bait to me, so who am I to decide? In fact, I'm kind of
> partial to older women. You take that Barbara Walters, or that Martha
> Stewart for example? Yum-Yum is what I say to that stuff. Or, give me
> some of that Emmy Lou Harris or Dolly Parton any old time.
>
> By and large, I can say that I see your point, insofar as I see
> extenuating circumstances in Polanski's case.
Maybe not my point, as far as I don't base it on extenuating
circumstances, and not even on the Polanski case. What I mean is, that
having a blanket "statutory rape" law, based on absolute age (or age
difference) is ridiculous and has no real-world justification. Usually,
the distinction between consenting sex and rape is quite clear; rape is
rape, regardless of age, and so is sex. To say that sex is rape, because
of some arbitrary age limit, is at least unfair. /I/ consider it not
only unfair, but a crime against human nature; hence my comment about
the 20 lashes.
As to the Polanski case, maybe it was rape, but not because of the
age of the participants, but because of how it happened, and should be
judged by this criterion alone. The age of the girl is irrelevant, as
long as she was old enough to be able to have consenting sex (as she
clearly was, in this case).
I hope it is clear what the role of a statute of limitations rule
normally is, and why it should have been applied in this case, even if
it had really been a rape to begin with.
Just Me
sticky little fingers into MY address lines, as I have authored them.
This topic is not intended for in-breeding, for intercourse between
the cousins of just one newsgroup. The purpose is not to produce a
progeny of inbred idiots, two-headed morons, armless, legless MW
imbeciles. There is some nice, normal, healthy cross-pollination
intended for this subject header, so . . .
LEAVE IT THAT WAY, GOD DAMMIT!
On Sep 27, 1:04 pm, "alejandro de tacobell"
<cerebureaucr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Just Me" <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:52778c0b-d4ce-4f21...@p36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Much as many of us do greatly appreciate the artist in Roman Polanski,
> > even so, one look at the girl involved, taken one year before the
> > infamous photo shoot over at Jack Nicholson's place . . .
>
> >http://download.kataweb.it/mediaweb/image/brand_trovacinema/2008/08/1...
>
> i would have done her, too!
At this point in the discussion, a certain inbred from MW came into
the discussion to ironically suggest that Alejandro underwent a
"horrible childhood" too, that if "childhood horrors" serve to "excuse
one" should not such terrors "excuse all"?
Did you miss this part . . .
"What if you came home one night to find that Sadie Mae Glutz had cut
your wife and unborn baby to ribbons--is that going to weird you out--
but good? I mean, stack all those bloody bodies on top of your mother
and father out there on the bone heap at Mauthausen and Auschwitz--or
maybe that means nothing to you? Shouldn't affect a person? Okay, add
in those years you spent starving, ducking and hiding to survive the
same fate, and then tell me it's just something a man can take in
stride, that a person with the past of a Roman Polanski is going to
come out of it all just as normal and average and boring as the
banker's son down the street who never had to face anything worse in
his life than a flat tire on Rodeo Drive?"
--
Nobody is talking "excuses". There is no excuse for what Polanski did
to that girl. But, what's your excuse for refusing to look at the
causes for a perversion like that? Why is your mind closed? Does your
blind, emotional need for retribution twist and pervert and weird you
out that badly? Why does the question not occur to you, why he (or
some female middle school teacher in Texas) wants to mess with
underage booty and the other person does not? What's anybody's excuse
for extreme, irrational behavior on either side of the law? There is
no damned excuse for not wanting to understand the differences and the
causes. None whatsoever. People like you should be taken out and
locked in a pillory to be tomatoed in the face for a few days, until
you are heard to scream, "Stop! I do want to understand!"
"As you can see, I am not looking at sex obsessively pursued with
barely pubescent girls as something normal. I'm saying it takes a man
monstrously molested by life to develop such an erotic taste as that.
And I mean for those who indulge it compulsively. It takes somebody
whose affections have been so fucked with and brutalized that an image
of purity and innocence (in a pretty underage girl) just becomes for
him something he wants to debauch; he wants to wake it up, all
virginal purity in the world to the hard, throbbing facts of life as
they have been taught to him. He becomes the Night and the darkness of
it that wants to fuck the burning daylights out of the Day."
It's not "excuses" that are wanted here, but mercy. You got any of
that in you, babe? Can you acknowledge that not everybody's had it so
sweet and cushy as you in this life? Or does it make you envious to
think there are considerations that apply to somebody else and not to
you? Let's hear from you talking about "excuses" after you've picked
the bones of your mother off a smoking pile at Auschwitz; your wife
and unborn child cut to ribbons up off the bloody Bel-Air floor? Who
the Bloody Hell are you or anybody else to talk about "excuses"? If I
were Polanski and had the button at hand to blow up the whole God
damned world, I would need NO excuse to push it.
God damn baby-face bourgeois bullshit.
Just Me
"Koolchi...@smurfsareus.xxx-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------"
<john.kulczy...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> So why would you show Polanski mercy and yet you decry the prophet for
> having a young wife? Because of Auschwitz?
What "prophet"? There was no such 'prophet'. There was a dirty little
desert brigand making a Profit on the plunder and rapine of murdered
fellow Arabs and Jews--600 years after Christ came into the world to
show men the way uncool unhipness of that. So just leave Joshua out of
it. Young wife? She was a child of eight years old, was it? It is
Jesus you want to compare to Mohammad, not Polanski. Last I checked he
had no mass murders to his credit to add to the pedophilia. And you
have your ironical little joke about Auschwitz? Send it to your pal
Ahmadinejad for the kind of laugh you'll want for that. Civilized
people got NO sense of irony about Auschwitz.
--
JM
http://whosenose.blogspot.com
http://jesusexegesis.blogspot.com
Just Me
So I just gotta post it all over again . . .
On Sep 29, 5:32 am,
"Koolchi...@smurfsareus.xxx-----------------------------------------------------------
------------------------"
<john.kulczy...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hey, you put Auschwitz on the table as a crutch for Polanski to lean
> on. No me.
Yep, between you and Ahmadinejad there is no daylight to be seen,
whether it's you talking "a crutch" or him with his "pretext". The
Madman of Iran denies it ever happened, to the dead, while you deny it
makes any difference to the living. Which denial is worse? God forbid
you should have your day at the table of Sadie Mae Glutz. She would
open your eyes for you, many bleeding little eyes through which to see
Auschwitz, Holocaust and what's always on the table, in a man like
Polanski.
Deniers like you and Ahmadinejad put Auschwitz on the table. People
like me were on the table, the one that slides into the oven. And YOU?
When you were being chased by the Nazis through the streets of Krakow--
is that when you got hip to what's on the table and what's not? Show
us your credentials from your days in the ditch, that we might accept
your fucking expertise on the subject as to what's on the table with
Polanski.
--
JM http://whosenose.blogspot.com
http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
john.ku...@sympatico.ca
When have I ever denied the Holocaust?
If you anything at all you would know I would never do that, not with
what my parents went through.
john.ku...@sympatico.ca
> On Sep 29, 5:32 am,
> "Koolchi...@smurfsareus.xxx-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------"
>
> <john.kulczy...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> > Hey, you put Auschwitz on the table as a crutch for Polanski to lean
> > on. No me.
>
> Yep, between you and Ahmadinejad there is no daylight to be seen,
> whether it's you talking "a crutch" or him with his "pretext". The
> Madman of Iran denies it ever happened, to the dead, while you deny it
> makes any difference to the living. Which denial is worse? God forbid
> you should have your day at the table of Sadie Mae Glutz. She would
> open your eyes for you, many bleeding little eyes through which to see
> Auschwitz, Holocaust and what's always on the table, in a man like
> Polanski.
>
> Deniers like you and Ahmadinejad put Auschwitz on the table. People
> like me were on the table, the one that slides into the oven. And
> YOU? When you were being chased by the Nazis through the streets of
> not? Show us your credentials from your days in the ditch, that we
> might accept your fucking expertise on the subject as to what's on the
> table with Polanski.
> --
> JMhttp://whosenose.blogspot.comhttp://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
"Deniers like you and Ahmadinejad"
You are such an ass.
My parents were there, asshole. I have first hand accounts about the
war. Upstais is a drawer full of medals from campaingns my father went
through. Upstairs are commendations from the Polish government to my
mother for her part in the uprising and various deeds done with the
underground.
Tell me about her train ride to that camp when she was capture and
only save by the idea that she was a combatant and ended up in a POW
camp.
I doubt you will have an honour guard of peers at your grave site who
are willing to burry you with honours and lay white gloves on your
coffin.
You have no idea what WW2 was like.
You were not there.
As far as I know your father never enlisted and your mother was baking
cookies.
You are the worst kind of people.
The kind who is smug about what he's read but has lived through none
of it and did not have to live with the outcomes.
More than that, is that you are too afraid to go to the place that you
supposedly support to fight on the walls while pontificating to no end
about what you know nothing about.
That's called a being a poser and an asshole.
Just Me
"Koolchi...@smurfsareus.xxx-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------"
English is not exactly your first language is it, there, Mahmoud?
Soon as I find a few minutes to waste, he'll get his reply, if he can
read something not written with a Polanski accent. His mother fought
for Polanski, but he won't?
That's what leftist political correctness will do for you. Turns you
to a real "champ".
--
JM http://whosenose.blogspot.com
http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
john.ku...@sympatico.ca
My mother fought for a free Poland, you asshole. So did my father.
Polanski is nothing more than a rapist of children.
The fact that you can't understand that and would give him the the
defensce of "Auschwitz, Holocaust survivor" is a slap in the face of
every Jew who lived through the war and lived after.
I hope that one of them takes you up on that defense and guts you
before your eyes. I'll love to read that you said it was justifiable
by "Auschwitz, Holocaust " and his/her survival.
You really are the worst sort of Idiot and asshole.
Just Me
We'll be getting to this brain-dead horseshit, soon as I'm bored
enough to indulge it. Meanwhile observe a mystery of history: where
were *his* parents when long before the "Warsaw Uprising" which
occurred when the Germans were already in retreat--where WERE they,
when the 30 day Warsaw Ghetto Uprising was going on? FACT OF HISTORY:
The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising lasted LONGER than did the Polish defense
of the whole state of Poland.
You are looking at a fool here, namely Kookchiki who thinks that hell
on earth in the life of a man will not affect the man. That's how
STUPID some people can get.
--
JM
john.ku...@sympatico.ca
63 days and the were sold out by the allies when the west decided to
go with Stalin's demands and not airlift supplies to them.
http://www.warsawuprising.com/
I've never seen such an asshole like you. You know nothing, absolutely
nothing.
My mother was 18 at the time and was a communications runner in the
1943 Ghetto uprising, but she never actually entered the ghetto.
She saw those Jews who wanted to go down fighting rather than be just
cattle in cattle cars. That was the thing wasn't it. They wanted to
die well and they knew they could not win: better to take a few with
you. Those were your "Inglorious Basterds" not that shit in the movie.
My father managed to get out of Poland through the south when the
Germans invaded and got to England through Dunkirk. He could have just
evacuated to Canada at the time but he chose to join the Free Polish
army and fighting his way back in through Normandy on that day, to
make his way back to Poland
How dare you, you pompus hunk of putrid hog shit.
You have nothing.
You can't even stand you face in the mirror in the moring.
It's a wonder you don't just pull that razor across your neck and do
yourself favor you pozer.
But then I'm sure you don't have the stomach for doing what needs to
be done.
You claimed yourself a Jew?
What the hell are you doing typing on a Friday night?
You are just a low value internet pozer.
Just Me
"Koolchi...@smurfsareus.xxx-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------"
<john.kulczy...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> My mother was 18 at the time and was a communications runner in the
> 1943 Ghetto uprising . . .
If that is really true, then God bless her, and how on earth did she
ever get cursed with a Jew-Killer of a son like you?
--
john.ku...@sympatico.ca
You doubt my word? And you call me a Jew Killer.
You just have no clue, no idea at.
64 years of wasted O2 is all that you are.
john.ku...@sympatico.ca
john.ku...@sympatico.ca
Just Me
"Koolchi...@smurfsareus.xxx-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------"
64! I thought it was 63. Don't FUCK with my delusions, Jack. They all
I got to make me mellow, for which reason I avoid mathematics.
Dig this . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLzUme1gN8c&feature=related
And SEE how once upon a time this earth was FREE, way fucking FREE,
jACK.
And like I said . . .
God Bless yo Mama!!!
--
jm
Rick N. Backer
s appropriate. Like a whore house washroom where it would be more suitable.news:9409bc0b-4852-4ca9...@x37g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
Just Me
> Or the two of you could just go fuck yourselves and take this where it'
> s appropriate.
Don't you just love these snot-holes who go around talking about
what's "appropriate"? If there's one word in the English language
worthy to be inserted into the asshole of an aardvark, there it is.
--
JM
Sara T
supposedly an intelligent man. He knew what he was doing, and that it
was very wrong. He deserves to pay for his crime(crimes?)