Sa-Rah! Sa-RAH! How Dubya Gave Dummies a Bad Name.
Just Me
being some kind of dummy, but what kind of dummy is it they suppose to
see in her? Would it be the G.W. Bush style of Yale and Harvard
educated dummy, or the Southwest Texas State Teachers College brand
that distinguished the intellectual background of Lyndon Baines
Johnson? Or what of the grand style of Give 'Em Hell dumb-bell
credentials that were those of Harry S. Truman, the only Chief
Executive in the White House since Grover Cleveland who never
graduated from college?
Is it not about time we should ask just what sort of dummy we are
looking for in a president?
Clearly, you'd have to be a dummy who is a disgrace to every other
dummy on earth not to know the deep abyss of difference that yawns
between a dummy the like of G.W. Bush and the kind of alleged dummy so
many suppose to see in Sarah Palin. You can rightly say that the
glaring contrast consists in the difference between knowing what you
think and the opposite of that which was always the case with Bush.
From his first day on the campaign trail to his last in office, Bush
was being handled, molded, shaped and prepped by that clique of dumb
like a fox operatives who had promoted his candidacy from the
beginning. He was a completely malleable blob of silly putty without a
thought or conviction of his own, which of course accounted for
greatness of his appeal to the RNC.
Obviously, Sarah Palin is the direct opposite of G.W. Bush because she
knows what she thinks, and thinks that she knows what she thinks is
what she knows, and is worth knowing, worth putting out front and
running on as a political figure. The McCain campaign operatives had
a terrible time trying to manage Sarah, accusing her of having "gone
rogue, as she followed the inspiration of her own political lights.
People on the left are somehow convinced that whatever Sarah Palin
thinks, or knows, or supposes to know is all dummy stuff. She
champions energy independence by increased exploration and drilling of
oil. According to the Left, that is what a dummy wants to do. Those
not on the left are certain that liberals and progressives, being
lobotomized by their environmentalist ideology of solar pie in the sky
in the bye and bye, are so damned dumb about energy that not a one
among them would be qualified to run for the post of holding up a mud
fence.
So chalk off item #1 from the bullet points on Sarah Palin's alleged
dummy list.
According to all the "intelligence" on the pro-choice Left, a human
embryo is not a 'viable' (living) human organism, so far as killing it
should then rationally be viewed as homicide. Sarah Palin, from her
pro-life position says that a human embryo is human, and is alive. And
since nothing could be politically "dumber" than to speak an obscenity
like that to the horrified face of the Left; in the view of the Left,
bullet point #2 should remain on the dummy list for Sarah Palin. If
instead, not only do you think, but KNOW that "human" means human, and
'viable' means able to live, and "homicide" means "man-killing", then
the Left loses one more bullet point in the campaign to make a dummy
of Sarah Palin, as they must admit that her position is logical; while
that of the Left, were it not so dishonest, must otherwise appear to
be so dumb as it looks to any rational mind.
But it takes a lot of complicated brain work to justify dishonest
dogma, and for those who admire such stuff it is easily mistaken for a
sophistication of thought! And whether the sophistry comes of the
erudite vocabulary of pro-choice shibboleths on the left, or the plain
spoken monosyllabic anti-Darwin polemics on the Right, it all comes
off sounding like rhetoric of none but the holiest, most passionate
content at both ends of the spectrum. And that's what's so dumb about
it, emotion from the gut posing for brains.
On the subject of evolution, Sarah is strictly from the fundamentalist
pew, refusing to think people can be evolved from the apes. An
astonishing opinion for Sarah to hold as she stands there like Dorothy
clicking the heels of her ruby slippers in full close-up view of that
screaming, chattering horde of flying monkeys always descending upon
her on orders of the Wicked Witch of the Left. How can humans be
evolved from the monkeys? Sarah, dear? Truly, open your eyes and
see!
So, as to Bullet Point #3 on the Sarah Palin dummy list, it must alas
stay there, waiting upon the day that some wise and patient Catholic
or Episcopalian gets her sat down for a good talking to. I once
managed to perform such a miracle upon the mind of an evangelical gal
pal, without harm to a single hair of her faith. Indeed, if anything,
she found the more essential core of her beliefs quite somewhat
strengthened, now that her faith was no longer made so difficult to
maintain, as against so irrational and needless a strain. Also, she no
longer finds it necessary to look down her nose upon any monkeys, not
yet evolved into a Democrat.
In the end, nothing can be quite so clear as the truth that ideology
makes dummies of us all, whether it blinds the eye to the evidence and
proof of evolution, or the critical, immediate need for increased
domestic oil production and an expansion of nuclear power.
Environmentalists are fundamentalists of the Left no different than
the anti-Darwin bible thumping dummies on the right. It is the same
irrational mentality that makes sacrifice of common sense for sake of
a holy cause.
Good ol' Harry Truman who never got through any more than two years of
law school goes down in History as one of our greatest presidents,
praised and honored for his good, solid common sense. If there's one
thing American History goes to prove, it is not rocket science, being
President of the United States, and whatever it is that it does take
to make for an Eisenhower or a Harry Truman, there's just a whole lot
of people out there in the nation's heartland who are convinced that
Sarah's got it. They say, "She's like us." I can think of no higher
qualification than that.
--
JM http://whosenose.blogspot.com
http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
Uncle Al
>
> There are those, both liberal and conservative who see Sarah Palin as
> being some kind of dummy, but what kind of dummy is it they suppose to
> see in her? Would it be the G.W. Bush style of Yale and Harvard
> educated dummy, or the Southwest Texas State Teachers College brand
> that distinguished the intellectual background of Lyndon Baines
> Johnson? Or what of the grand style of Give 'Em Hell dumb-bell
> credentials that were those of Harry S. Truman, the only Chief
> Executive in the White House since Grover Cleveland who never
> graduated from college?
>
> Is it not about time we should ask just what sort of dummy we are
> looking for in a president?
Pater famlias Reagan: Consistent, forceful, inspiring; skilled at
successfully negotiating the most byzantine of Hollywood contracts;
lethaly real time vengeful. One doubts he had a single original
thought in his head over eight years. Those were eight good years
nevertheless.
Palin is a threadbare thumb puppet. Here is your ticket: Secretary
of State Clitler/Sara Palin: Vote with the stupid! How can so many
people be wrong?
> Clearly, you'd have to be a dummy who is a disgrace to every other
> dummy on earth not to know the deep abyss of difference that yawns
> between a dummy the like of G.W. Bush and the kind of alleged dummy so
> many suppose to see in Sarah Palin.
[snip]
The idiot gave a national press conference with turkeys being
slaughtered and bled out in the background. How stupid must one be to
pursue that paradigm for 20 minutes on video?
She birthed a Mongoloid idiot. Her christ-up-the-ass high school
daughter bred out of wedlock with a frank idiot. Her husband voluably
demands Alaska seceed from the Union.
Two words: "Tina Fey."
> Obviously, Sarah Palin is the direct opposite of G.W. Bush because she
> knows what she thinks, and thinks that she knows what she thinks is
> what she knows, and is worth knowing, worth putting out front and
> running on as a political figure.
[snip crap]
Stupid doesn't come in colors. Stupid is brown.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
Skipper
creep of a "liberal" persuasion is like. Now crawl back into hell.
In article <4B0ABC32...@hate.spam.net>, Uncle Al
David bin Lantern
vote _in alphabetical order_.
And those who praise Palin don't deserve any better.
D.
--
"Ne vestigium quidem ullum est reliquum nobis dignitatis."
.................................................................
(C) 2009 'TheDavid(TM)' | All Rights Reserved World-Wide Always
Piet de Arcilla
> Thanks for illustrating perfectly what a spitting blathering evil nasty
> creep of a "liberal" persuasion is like.
Whatever Uncle Al is, he's nobody's stereotype of a "liberal creep".
You haven't read enough of his bilious writings to realize that,
apparently.
Skipper
<fa0d1b45-40fd-4a69...@m11g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>,
Every time I see him he looks fatter and more evil. And as always with
liars, frauds, and profiteers, he's come a cropper -
Hacked Climate Emails Stoke Debate
https://science.slashdot.org/story/09/11/23/1716235/Hacked-Climate-Email
s-Stoke-Debate |
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that a series of [0]hacked emails
and documents that were recently [1]posted on Wikileaks are causing
quite a stir in the scientific community. All told, more than 1,000
emails and 2,000 documents were stolen from the Climate Research Unit
in East Anglia University in the U.K. "The emails include discussions
of apparent efforts to make sure that reports from the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a United Nations group that
monitors climate science, include their own views and exclude others.
In addition, emails show that climate scientists declined to make their
data available to scientists whose views they disagreed with. Phil
Jones, the director of the East Anglia climate center, suggested to
climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State University that skeptics'
research was unwelcome: We 'will keep them out somehow -- even if we
have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!' Neither man could
be reached for comment Sunday."
Discuss this story at:
http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=09/11/23/1716235
Links:
0. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html
1.
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_emails%2C_data%2C_model
s%2C_1996-2009
Alan Hope
<skipSP...@yahoo.not> wrote:
>Every time I see him he looks fatter and more evil.
Do you want me to post your photo, Lloyd?
Just say the word. I'll fucking do it.
No, I thought not.
Just Me
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:52:23 -0800, in misc.writing Skipper
>
> >Every time I see him he looks fatter and more evil.
>
> Do you want me to post your photo, Lloyd?
>
> Just say the word. I'll fucking do it.
>
> No, I thought not.
>
> --
> AHhttp://grapes2dot0.blogspot.com
Why wouldn't Skip want his photo posted? Last time I saw a pic of
Skip he looked nice enough, had a good haircut and clean shirt,
sitting there having a drink in a get-together with a bunch of other
denizens of MWS. But as to any pix of Alan Hope? Nope. Far as I've
seen, he has not allowed for any to exist and for the good reason that
it costs a whole lot of scratch to hire the backhoe driver to boost
Hopsey out of the sack long enough to set him up for the photographer.
Aside from which they probably don't make a wide-angle lens adequate
to that scale of portraiture. Alan and the rest of the world will have
to wait till they re-invent the Cinerama.
Alan Hope
<jpd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Why wouldn't Skip want his photo posted?
Ask him.