(eventually SOMEBODY'S gotta ask this)
> Which conservative-themed book DOES'NT have a "superior" tone by its
> Author?
Superior tone? Please elaborate.
> (eventually SOMEBODY'S gotta ask this)
Why?
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN be...@iphouse.com
Liars are EXPOSED:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:48:58 -0700 (PDT), Transition Zone
<mog...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >And Bam & Bush can both be sued by Afghan property owners in UN
>> >> >proceedings. Iraqi property owners probably can, too.
>> >> There are no such "UN proceedings." they don't exist.
>> >> No, there's no such thing.
>> >Says who ??
>> Feel free to CITE ANY so-called "UN proceedings" where individual
>> citizens
>Which one? How do they define "sue"? Even so, "individual" (singular)
>or "citizens" (plural)?
You said: "And Bam & Bush can both be sued by Afghan property owners
in UN proceedings."
You were ALLOWED 24 hours to PROVE your CLAIM or OWN the LIE.
>> I'm waiting....
>' Might as well keep waiting, too.
>> <crickets...>-
>(Enjoy the night)
Your 24 hours are GONE. You FAILED to PROVE your CLAIM, You OWN the
LIE.
YOU ARE A PROVEN LIAR.
===================================
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:06:17 -0700 (PDT), Transition Zone
<mog...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Mar 19, 3:17�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> STILL WAITING for your CITE of those UN Proceedings..........
>No need, because...
Thanks for ADMITTING YOU ARE A LIAR.
Case closed.
Game over.
Celine's "Nord".
Or, from what I remember of it, "Mein Kampf". Hitler presented
his ideas as natural ones that any ordinary Joe might have come
up with. "It's just common sense" or "let's be realistic" is
a standard rhetorical strategy for the far right, and it works
better if it's presented in a just-plain-folks manner.
Whereas if you genuinely do know something that not everybody
does - Marxist insights about the economic dynamic of capitalism
or scientific knowledge about the state of the environment - you
don't have this sort of folksiness as a rhetorical option. The
right are always going to be more convincing liars.
==== j a c k at c a m p i n . m e . u k === <http://www.campin.me.uk> ====
Jack Campin, 11 Third St, Newtongrange EH22 4PU, Scotland == mob 07800 739 557
CD-ROMs and free stuff: Scottish music, food intolerance, and Mac logic fonts
****** I killfile Google posts - email me if you want to be whitelisted ******
Conservative authors, malicious professors, those trying or instilling
mightier-than-thou overtones. Those who prioritize their own
Superiority Complexes above everything else. How many so-called
scholars like this have shown their stuff at international book fairs.
> > (eventually SOMEBODY'S gotta ask this)
>
> Why?
I suppose because no one has asked before.
Game?
Does "plain talk" include using local vernacular?
> Whereas if you genuinely do know something that not everybody
> does - Marxist insights about the economic dynamic of capitalism
> or scientific knowledge about the state of the environment - you
> don't have this sort of folksiness as a rhetorical option. The
> right are always going to be more convincing liars.
That's what could be disturbing. Why are they? Some people actually
WANT to
be told lies. Combine this with an author's superiority complex? That
could
be a terrible host-parasite-like relationship.
Putting aside the obsessive compulsive anger spilling forth
from your post, how does asking a question constitute a lie?
--
Francis A. Miniter
Oscuramente
libros, laminas, llaves
siguen mi suerte.
Jorge Luis Borges, La Cifra Haiku, 6
Yes, hunting down LIARS is a "game" to me, much like hunting deer or
bear is a "sport" to those so inclined.
The reward is both immediate and long-term. The immediate reward is
embarrassing and humiliating you in public. The long-term reward is
watching posters SHUN you once they are aware that you are a LIAR.
Its not my fault you're stupid.
Try again:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:48:58 -0700 (PDT), Transition Zone
<mog...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >And Bam & Bush can both be sued by Afghan property owners in UN
>> >> >proceedings. Iraqi property owners probably can, too.
>> >> There are no such "UN proceedings." they don't exist.
>> >> No, there's no such thing.
>> >Says who ??
>> Feel free to CITE ANY so-called "UN proceedings" where individual
>> citizens
>Which one? How do they define "sue"? Even so, "individual" (singular)
>or "citizens" (plural)?
You said: "And Bam & Bush can both be sued by Afghan property owners
in UN proceedings."
You were ALLOWED 24 hours to PROVE your CLAIM or OWN the LIE.
>> I'm waiting....
>' Might as well keep waiting, too.
>> <crickets...>-
>(Enjoy the night)
Your 24 hours are GONE. You FAILED to PROVE your CLAIM, You OWN the
LIE.
YOU ARE A PROVEN LIAR.
===================================