http://www.onefamilyfund.org/Portals/0/dead%20sea/Man_Victim_Long.jpg
Here is the face of the Fourth Reich Jew butcher in charge, the
stateswoman, whose full title is Baroness Ashton of Upholland . . .
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1135787.html
Talk about the "picture worth a thousand words"?
Marat! Robespierre! St. Just! Where are you now that your lovely
tall machine in the Place de la Concorde could do so much good?
--
JM http://whosenose.blogspot.com
http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
she is in need of a good pranging by some farm yard animal..
Why the revised nym , Kook?
>Have you seen the face of the new European Union High Representative
>for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, who in her first speech is
>calling for the fall of the Israel security wall and a return to
>this . . .
>
>http://www.onefamilyfund.org/Portals/0/dead%20sea/Man_Victim_Long.jpg
>
>Here is the face of the Fourth Reich Jew butcher in charge, the
>stateswoman, whose full title is Baroness Ashton of Upholland . . .
>
>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1135787.html
>
>Talk about the "picture worth a thousand words"?
>
>Marat! Robespierre! St. Just! Where are you now that your lovely
>tall machine in the Place de la Concorde could do so much good?
It wasn't called Place de la Concorde until after the Revolution. At
the time you're referring to, it was known as Place de la R�volution.
People who violate every rule of decency by doing what you've done
right here, coming like a thief and a vandal interpolating your smelly
word into MY statement and leaving the attribution to me, you filthy,
unprincipled bastard? Scum like YOU have no business to be talking
about "decency". Thus you PROVE that it is nothing but indecency
which stands behind your entire position on this matter. Indecent
measures are not performed by decent men.
My hunch is that this piece of slime could be sued for attributing
that word to me. It amounts to fraud if nothing else. And it is
altogether so fraudulent as attributing that word to Israel's OBVIOUS
purpose for the fence, which is so BLATANTLY obvious it need not even
be stated. But the more glaringly obvious fraud is in the way they
contradict their own position to make it. They hold that the so-
called "West Bank" is "occupied Palestinian territory," in which case
anything on the east side of the fence is FOREIGN country. An
"apartheid wall" to be such must be a partition barrier between the
peoples of the SAME country. There are NO citizens of Israel being
kept out of Israel by that fence.
MY words as they appear falsified, indecently bowdlerized and
criminally misquoted above were and are these . . .
On Dec 17, 6:50 pm, Just Me <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Have you seen the face of the new European Union High Representative
> for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, who in her first speech is
> calling for the fall of the Israel security wall and a return to
> this . . .
>
> http://www.onefamilyfund.org/Portals/0/dead%20sea/Man_Victim_Long.jpg
>
> Here is the face of the Fourth Reich Jew butcher in charge, the
> stateswoman, whose full title is Baroness Ashton of Upholland . . .
>
> http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1135787.html
>
> Talk about the "picture worth a thousand words"?
>
> Marat! Robespierre! St. Just! Where are you now that your lovely
> tall machine in the Place de la Concorde could do so much good?
> --
> JMhttp://whosenose.blogspot.comhttp://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
As to the picky-picky contention about La Place de la Concorde -- the
Revolution is over, Alan. Get over it. The name NOW is "de la
Concorde" as it was once, "Place Louis XV". Try to get over that, as
well.
People who violate every rule of decency by doing what you've done
right here, coming like a thief and a vandal interpolating your smelly
word into MY statement and leaving the attribution to me, you filthy,
unprincipled bastard? Scum like YOU have no business to be talking
about "decency". Thus you PROVE that it is nothing but indecency which
stands behind your entire position on this matter. Indecent measures
are not performed by decent men.
My hunch is that this piece of slime could be sued for attributing
that word to me. It amounts to fraud if nothing else. And it is
altogether so fraudulent as attributing that word to Israel's OBVIOUS
purpose for the fence, which is so BLATANTLY obvious it need not even
be stated. But the more glaringly obvious fraud is in the way they
contradict their own position to make it. They hold that the so-
called "West Bank" is "occupied Palestinian territory," in which case
anything on the east side of the fence is FOREIGN country. An
"apartheid wall" to be such must be a partition barrier between the
peoples of the SAME country. There are NO citizens of Israel being
kept out of Israel by that fence.
MY words as they appear falsified, indecently bowdlerized and
criminally misquoted above were and are, as originally posted,
these . . .
On Dec 17, 6:50 pm, Just Me <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
> Have you seen the face of the new European Union High Representative
> for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, who in her first speech is
> calling for the fall of the Israel security wall and a return to
> this . . .
> http://www.onefamilyfund.org/Portals/0/dead%20sea/Man_Victim_Long.jpg
> Here is the face of the Fourth Reich Jew butcher in charge, the
> stateswoman, whose full title is Baroness Ashton of Upholland . . .
> http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1135787.html
> Talk about the "picture worth a thousand words"?
> Marat! Robespierre! St. Just! Where are you now that your lovely
> tall machine in the Place de la Concorde could do so much good?
> --
> JMhttp://whosenose.blogspot.comhttp://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
As to the picky-picky contention about La Place de la Concorde -- the
Revolution is over, Alan. Get over it. The name NOW is "de la
Concorde" as it was once, "Place Louis XV". Try to get over that, as
well.
***
Keep up the good work BU - it's always hilarious to watch a zionist meltdown