20 questions - Arvind (II)
TT Arvind
Let the questions begin
--
Arvind
Taemon
> Animal kingdom.
> Let the questions begin
1. Four legs?
T.
TT Arvind
> > Animal kingdom.
> > Let the questions begin
>
> 1. Four legs?
No.
--
Arvind
Öjevind Lång
news:39d7381f-ca00-4bc9...@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>> > Animal kingdom.
>> > Let the questions begin
>>
>> 1. Four legs?
> No.
2. Sentient?
�jevind
TT Arvind
> > Animal kingdom.
> > Let the questions begin
> 1. Four legs?
> > No.
> 2. Sentient?
No.
--
Arvind
Raven
news:463c76b0-dadc-4a66...@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> Animal kingdom.
> Let the questions begin
> 1. Four legs?
> No.
> 2. Sentient?
> No.
3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes of
this question, a corpse is not an item.
Raaf.
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> > Animal kingdom.
> > Let the questions begin
> > 1. Four legs?
> > No.
> > 2. Sentient?
> > No.
>
> 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes of
> this question, a corpse is not an item.
I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
organism.
--
Arvind
Raven
> Animal kingdom.
> Let the questions begin
> 1. Four legs?
> No.
> 2. Sentient?
> No.
> 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes of
> this question, a corpse is not an item.
> I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
> organism.
4. Breadbox question.
Voron.
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> "TT Arvind" <ttarv...@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelelsennews:75595cb3-2b29-47d3...@r19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Animal kingdom.
> > Let the questions begin
> > 1. Four legs?
> > No.
> > 2. Sentient?
> > No.
> > 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes of
> > this question, a corpse is not an item.
> > I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
> > organism.
>
> 4. Breadbox question.
Yes.
--
Arvind
Raven
> Animal kingdom.
> Let the questions begin
> 1. Four legs?
> No.
> 2. Sentient?
> No.
> 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes of
> this question, a corpse is not an item.
> I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
> organism.
> 4. Breadbox question.
> Yes.
5. Does it occur in Tolkien's general mythology?
Ravnur.
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> > Animal kingdom.
> > Let the questions begin
> > 1. Four legs?
> > No.
> > 2. Sentient?
> > No.
> > 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes of
> > this question, a corpse is not an item.
> > I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
> > organism.
> > 4. Breadbox question.
> > Yes.
>
> 5. Does it occur in Tolkien's general mythology?
Yes.
--
Arvind
Raven
> Animal kingdom.
> Let the questions begin
> 1. Four legs?
> No.
> 2. Sentient?
> No.
> 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes of
> this question, a corpse is not an item.
> I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
> organism.
> 4. Breadbox question.
> Yes.
> 5. Does it occur in Tolkien's general mythology?
> Yes.
6. Does one or more hobbits encounter it?
Holl�.
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> "TT Arvind" <ttarv...@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelelsennews:f24f2e69-0632-410f...@19g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Animal kingdom.
> > Let the questions begin
> > 1. Four legs?
> > No.
> > 2. Sentient?
> > No.
> > 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes of
> > this question, a corpse is not an item.
> > I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
> > organism.
> > 4. Breadbox question.
> > Yes.
> > 5. Does it occur in Tolkien's general mythology?
> > Yes.
>
> 6. Does one or more hobbits encounter it?
No.
--
Arvind
Raven
> Animal kingdom.
> Let the questions begin
> 1. Four legs?
> No.
> 2. Sentient?
> No.
> 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes of
> this question, a corpse is not an item.
> I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
> organism.
> 4. Breadbox question.
> Yes.
> 5. Does it occur in Tolkien's general mythology?
> Yes.
> 6. Does one or more hobbits encounter it?
> No.
This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think I'll
hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
Korpen.
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think I'll
> hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
group.
--
Arvind
Tamf Moo
> On Feb 4, 10:27 pm, "Raven" [...] wrote:
>> hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
>
> Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> group.
oh, not that old saw again.
tamf
Raven
> > This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think I'll
> > hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> group.
I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is natural
enough with this 20 questions-host ---
Ramn.
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> > > This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think I'll
> > > hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> > Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> > group.
> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is natural
> enough with this 20 questions-host ---
It would go against the grain if it didn't.
--
Arvind
Öjevind Lång
news:7bb5c806-7dbd-4389...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>> > > This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think
>> > > I'll
>> > > hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
>> > Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
>> > group.
>> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is natural
>> enough with this 20 questions-host ---
>
> It would go against the grain if it didn't.
I saw this coming.
�jevind
Öjevind Lång
news:1cf5a95f-17c0-4434...@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>> > Animal kingdom.
>> > Let the questions begin
>> > 1. Four legs?
>> > No.
>> > 2. Sentient?
>> > No.
>> > 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes
>> > of
>> > this question, a corpse is not an item.
>> > I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
>> > organism.
>> > 4. Breadbox question.
>> > Yes.
>> > 5. Does it occur in Tolkien's general mythology?
>> > Yes.
>> 6. Does one or more hobbits encounter it?
> No.
7. Of avian origin?
�jevind
TT Arvind
> >> > > This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think
> >> > > I'll
> >> > > hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> >> > Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> >> > group.
> >> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is natural
> >> enough with this 20 questions-host ---
> > It would go against the grain if it didn't.
> I saw this coming.
I thought you wood.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> oh, not that old saw again.
Well, you know the drill...
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> > Animal kingdom.
> > Let the questions begin
> > 1. Four legs?
> > No.
> > 2. Sentient?
> > No.
> > 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes
> > of this question, a corpse is not an item.
> > I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
> > organism.
> > 4. Breadbox question.
> > Yes.
> > 5. Does it occur in Tolkien's general mythology?
> > Yes.
> > 6. Does one or more hobbits encounter it?
> > No.
> 7. Of avian origin?
No.
--
Arvind
Öjevind Lång
You'd be a sap if you didn't.
�jevind
TT Arvind
> >> >> > > This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think
> >> >> > > I'll hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> >> >> > Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> >> >> > group.
> >> >> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
> >> >> natural
> >> >> enough with this 20 questions-host ---
> >> > It would go against the grain if it didn't.
> >> I saw this coming.
> > I thought you wood.
> You'd be a sap if you didn't.
Not to mention barking mad.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> > Animal kingdom.
> > Let the questions begin
> > 1. Four legs?
> > No.
> > 2. Sentient?
> > No.
> > 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes
> > of this question, a corpse is not an item.
> > I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
> > organism.
> > 4. Breadbox question.
> > Yes.
> > 5. Does it occur in Tolkien's general mythology?
> > Yes.
> > 6. Does one or more hobbits encounter it?
> > No.
> > 7. Of avian origin?
> > No.
>
No.
--
Arvind
Tamf Moo
i do, and it's rather boring.
tamf
Derek Broughton
Please leaf it bee. Maple leaf your not kids anymore. [ack! It's
contagious]
--
derek
Raven
news:0926a271-89f3-4000...@u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> |: This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think
> |: I'll hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> |: Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> |: group.
> |: I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
> |: natural enough with this 20 questions-host ---
> |: It would go against the grain if it didn't.
> |: I saw this coming.
> |: I thought you wood.
> |:You'd be a sap if you didn't.
> Not to mention barking mad.
Yew are both that and so am I.
Korppi.
Raven
news:1ee67b28-8195-44c4...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
9 Is it at any time in the possession of elves?
Korax.
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> "TT Arvind" <ttarv...@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelelsennews:1ee67b28-8195-44c4...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
Not directly, no.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
Unfortunately, getting Ojeving (or me) to stop punning is going to be
a hard cell.
> [ack! It's contagious]
Bwahahahaha
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> > |: This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think
> > |: I'll hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> > |: Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> > |: group.
> > |: I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
> > |: natural enough with this 20 questions-host ---
> > |: It would go against the grain if it didn't.
> > |: I saw this coming.
> > |: I thought you wood.
> > |:You'd be a sap if you didn't.
> > Not to mention barking mad.
> Yew are both that and so am I.
Are you trying to needle us?
--
Arvind
Raven
> |: This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think
> |: I'll hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> |: Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> |: group.
> |: I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
> |: natural enough with this 20 questions-host ---
> |: It would go against the grain if it didn't.
> |: I saw this coming.
> |: I thought you wood.
> |: You'd be a sap if you didn't.
> |: Not to mention barking mad.
> |: Yew are both that and so am I.
> Are you trying to needle us?
Perish the thought, I'd rather have a root canal.
Corbeau.
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> > |: This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think
> > |: I'll hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> > |: Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> > |: group.
> > |: I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
> > |: natural enough with this 20 questions-host ---
> > |: It would go against the grain if it didn't.
> > |: I saw this coming.
> > |: I thought you wood.
> > |: You'd be a sap if you didn't.
> > |: Not to mention barking mad.
> > |: Yew are both that and so am I.
> > Are you trying to needle us?
> Perish the thought, I'd rather have a root canal.
You're nuts.
(and 'canal'? Are you barging in with a second set of puns?)
--
Arvind
Öjevind Lång
news:6562e1bf-c8cc-4976...@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
Perhaps he is. He's berry fond of punning.
�jevind
Öjevind Lång
>> >> >> > > This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I
>> >> >> > > think
>> >> >> > > I'll
>> >> >> > > hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
>> >> >> > Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
>> >> >> > group.
>> >> >> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
>> >> >> natural
>> >> >> enough with this 20 questions-host ---
>> >> > It would go against the grain if it didn't.
>> >> I saw this coming.
>> > I thought you wood.
>> Please leaf it bee. Maple leaf your not kids anymore.
>
> Unfortunately, getting Ojeving (or me) to stop punning is going to be
> a hard cell.
>
>> [ack! It's contagious]
>
> Bwahahahaha
One day you'll larch from the other side of your mouth.
�jevind
Öjevind Lång
news:41b89d1e-0ff0-4346...@21g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
>> > Animal kingdom.
>> > Let the questions begin
>> > 1. Four legs?
>> > No.
>> > 2. Sentient?
>> > No.
>> > 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes
>> > of this question, a corpse is not an item.
>> > I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
>> > organism.
>> > 4. Breadbox question.
>> > Yes.
>> > 5. Does it occur in Tolkien's general mythology?
>> > Yes.
>> > 6. Does one or more hobbits encounter it?
>> > No.
>> > 7. Of avian origin?
>> > No.
>> > 8. But does it still exist in the Third Age?
>> > No.
>> 9 Is it at any time in the possession of elves?
> Not directly, no.
Is it mentioned in the Silmarillion?
�jevind
TT Arvind
> > Animal kingdom.
> > Let the questions begin
> > 1. Four legs?
> > No.
> > 2. Sentient?
> > No.
> > 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes
> > of this question, a corpse is not an item.
> > I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
> > organism.
> > 4. Breadbox question.
> > Yes.
> > 5. Does it occur in Tolkien's general mythology?
> > Yes.
> > 6. Does one or more hobbits encounter it?
> > No.
> > 7. Of avian origin?
> > No.
> > 8. But does it still exist in the Third Age?
> > No.
> > 9 Is it at any time in the possession of elves?
> > Not directly, no.
>
Yes.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> >> >> >> > > This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I
> >> >> >> > > think
> >> >> >> > > I'll
> >> >> >> > > hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> >> >> >> > Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> >> >> >> > group.
> >> >> >> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
> >> >> >> natural
> >> >> >> enough with this 20 questions-host ---
> >> >> > It would go against the grain if it didn't.
> >> >> I saw this coming.
> >> > I thought you wood.
> >> Please leaf it bee. Maple leaf your not kids anymore.
> > Unfortunately, getting Ojeving (or me) to stop punning is going to be
> > a hard cell.
> >> [ack! It's contagious]
> > Bwahahahaha
> One day you'll larch from the other side of your mouth.
Fir sure.
--
Arvind
Öjevind Lång
I bough beforte your superior punning.
�jevind
Öjevind Lång
Ornamental?
�jevind
TT Arvind
> "TT Arvind" <ttarv...@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelandetnews:ed0f8afe-76ec-4c37...@d37g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 5 Feb, 16:44, Öjevind Lång <ojevind.l...@bredband.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > > This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I
> >> >> >> >> > > think
> >> >> >> >> > > I'll
> >> >> >> >> > > hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> >> >> >> >> > Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a
> >> >> >> >> > splinter
> >> >> >> >> > group.
> >> >> >> >> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
> >> >> >> >> natural
> >> >> >> >> enough with this 20 questions-host ---
> >> >> >> > It would go against the grain if it didn't.
> >> >> >> I saw this coming.
> >> >> > I thought you wood.
> >> >> Please leaf it bee. Maple leaf your not kids anymore.
> >> > Unfortunately, getting Ojeving (or me) to stop punning is going to be
> >> > a hard cell.
> >> >> [ack! It's contagious]
> >> > Bwahahahaha
> >> One day you'll larch from the other side of your mouth.
> > Fir sure.
> I bough beforte your superior punning.
It blossoms in good company.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> "TT Arvind" <ttarv...@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelandetnews:6562e1bf-c8cc-4976...@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
I thought he'd have been quite bushed by now.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
No.
--
Arvind
Tamf Moo
> On Feb 5, 5:35 pm, Öjevind Lång <ojevind.l...@bredband.net> wrote:
>> "TT Arvind" <ttarv...@hotmail.com> skrev i
>> >> >> >> >> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
>> >> >> >> >> natural
>> >> >> >> >> enough with this 20 questions-host ---
>> >> >> >> > It would go against the grain if it didn't.
>> >> >> >> I saw this coming.
>> >> >> > I thought you wood.
>> >> >> Please leaf it bee. Maple leaf your not kids anymore.
>> >> > Unfortunately, getting Ojeving (or me) to stop punning is going to be
>> >> > a hard cell.
>> >> >> [ack! It's contagious]
>> >> > Bwahahahaha
>> >> One day you'll larch from the other side of your mouth.
>> > Fir sure.
>> I bough beforte your superior punning.
>
> It blossoms in good company.
i still can't figure out how you can sprout all this nonsense.
tamf
Taemon
I'm not quite sure what to make of the "not an entire organism" tract. So,
to make sure:
12. Alive?
T.
TT Arvind
No.
--
Arvind
Öjevind Lång
news:PM00047ED...@laud.Belkin...
> [prune]
>>> >> >> >> >> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread
>>> >> >> >> >> is
>>> >> >> >> >> natural
>>> >> >> >> >> enough with this 20 questions-host ---
>>> >> >> >> > It would go against the grain if it didn't.
>>> >> >> >> I saw this coming.
>>> >> >> > I thought you wood.
>>> >> >> Please leaf it bee. Maple leaf your not kids anymore.
>>> >> > Unfortunately, getting Ojeving (or me) to stop punning is going to
>>> >> > be
>>> >> > a hard cell.
>>> >> >> [ack! It's contagious]
>>> >> > Bwahahahaha
>>> >> One day you'll larch from the other side of your mouth.
>>> > Fir sure.
>>> I bough beforte your superior punning.
>>>> It blossoms in good company.
>i still can't figure out how you can sprout all this nonsense.
It's your choice - teak it or leave it.
Öjevind
Taemon
>> 12. Alive?
> No.
13. An animal?
T.
Taemon
> "Tamf Moo" <liddle...@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet
> news:PM00047ED...@laud.Belkin...
>> [prune]
ROFL!
>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> natural
>>>>>>>>>>>> enough with this 20 questions-host ---
>>>>>>>>>>> It would go against the grain if it didn't.
>>>>>>>>>> I saw this coming.
>>>>>>>>> I thought you wood.
>>>>>>>> Please leaf it bee. Maple leaf your not kids anymore.
>>>>>>> Unfortunately, getting Ojeving (or me) to stop punning is going
>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>> a hard cell.
>>>>>>>> [ack! It's contagious]
>>>>>>> Bwahahahaha
>>>>>> One day you'll larch from the other side of your mouth.
>>>>> Fir sure.
>>>> I bough beforte your superior punning.
>>>>> It blossoms in good company.
>> i still can't figure out how you can sprout all this nonsense.
> It's your choice - teak it or leave it.
Shouldn't that be "leaf it"?
T.
TT Arvind
I'm not sure I quite understand the question - I did start off by
saying it was 'animal kingdom'. Could you be a bit more specific as
to what you're asking? Animal as opposed to...?
--
Arvind
> T.
Raven
news:65709d31-a118-43f5...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> |: This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think
> |: I'll hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> |: Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> |: group.
> |: I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
> |: natural enough with this 20 questions-host ---
> |: It would go against the grain if it didn't.
> |: I saw this coming.
> |: I thought you wood.
> |: You'd be a sap if you didn't.
> |: Not to mention barking mad.
> |: Yew are both that and so am I.
> |: Are you trying to needle us?
> |: Perish the thought, I'd rather have a root canal.
> |: You're nuts.
Always was the bad apple.
> |: (and 'canal'? Are you barging in with a second set of puns?)
> |: Perhaps he is. He's berry fond of punning.
> I thought he'd have been quite bushed by now.
Punning and punting are a letter apart.
Korpen.
Taemon
To parts of an animal or something made of them :-) Never mind, I retract
the question. It's my job to relieve my confusion, not yours. Let's see...
13. Manufactured?
T.
Öjevind Lång
meddelandet news:4b6c9536$0$56769$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk...
>> |: This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think
>> |: I'll hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
>> |: Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
>> |: group.
>> |: I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
>> |: natural enough with this 20 questions-host ---
>> |: It would go against the grain if it didn't.
>> |: I saw this coming.
>> |: I thought you wood.
>> |: You'd be a sap if you didn't.
>> |: Not to mention barking mad.
>> |: Yew are both that and so am I.
>> |: Are you trying to needle us?
>> |: Perish the thought, I'd rather have a root canal.
>> |: You're nuts.
>
> Always was the bad apple.
>
>> |: (and 'canal'? Are you barging in with a second set of puns?)
>> |: Perhaps he is. He's berry fond of punning.
>> I thought he'd have been quite bushed by now.
> Punning and punting are a letter apart.
And now you barge in with another distraction.
�jevind
Öjevind Lång
news:hki2e4$gf6$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
You are right. Teak it or leaf, it, lock, stock and bushel.
�jevind
TT Arvind
> To parts of an animal or something made of them :-) Never mind, I retract
> the question. It's my job to relieve my confusion, not yours. Let's see...
I've already answered that in question 3, so I wouldn't have counted
it as a question anyway. It's a part of an animal.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> 13. Manufactured?
No.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> > Punning and punting are a letter apart.
> And now you barge in with another distraction.
It's aboat time someone put a stop to it.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> > |: This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think
> > |: I'll hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> > |: Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> > |: group.
> > |: I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
> > |: natural enough with this 20 questions-host ---
> > |: It would go against the grain if it didn't.
> > |: I saw this coming.
> > |: I thought you wood.
> > |: You'd be a sap if you didn't.
> > |: Not to mention barking mad.
> > |: Yew are both that and so am I.
> > |: Are you trying to needle us?
> > |: Perish the thought, I'd rather have a root canal.
> > |: You're nuts.
> Always was the bad apple.
You'd be more effective if you found a like-minded person and formed a
pear.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is natural enough with this 20 questions-host ---
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It would go against the grain if it didn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>> I saw this coming.
> >>>>>>>>>> I thought you wood.
> >>>>>>>>> Please leaf it bee. Maple leaf your not kids anymore.
> >>>>>>>> Unfortunately, getting Ojeving (or me) to stop punning is going
> >>>>>>>> to be a hard cell.
> >>>>>>> One day you'll larch from the other side of your mouth.
> >>>>>> Fir sure.
> >>>>> I bough beforte your superior punning.
> >>>> It blossoms in good company.
> >>> i still can't figure out how you can sprout all this nonsense.
> >> It's your choice - teak it or leave it.
> > Shouldn't that be "leaf it"?
> You are right. Teak it or leaf, it, lock, stock and bushel.
I'll teak it if it comes in pinets.
--
Arvind
Dirk Thierbach
14. Of mammalian origin (including humans, elves, etc.)?
- Dirk
Öjevind Lång
news:603bf46c-111e-4aa1...@3g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On 6 Feb, 09:52, �jevind L�ng <ojevind.l...@bredband.net> wrote:
>
>> > Punning and punting are a letter apart.
>> And now you barge in with another distraction.
> It's aboat time someone put a stop to it.
We're a pole apart about that.
�jevind
Öjevind Lång
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is natural enough with this 20 questions-host ---
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It would go against the grain if it didn't.
>> >>>>>>>>>>> I saw this coming.
>> >>>>>>>>>> I thought you wood.
>> >>>>>>>>> Please leaf it bee. Maple leaf your not kids anymore.
>> >>>>>>>> Unfortunately, getting Ojeving (or me) to stop punning is going
>> >>>>>>>> to be a hard cell.
>> >>>>>>> One day you'll larch from the other side of your mouth.
>> >>>>>> Fir sure.
>> >>>>> I bough before your superior punning.
>> >>>> It blossoms in good company.
>> >>> i still can't figure out how you can sprout all this nonsense.
>> >> It's your choice - teak it or leave it.
>> > Shouldn't that be "leaf it"?
>> You are right. Teak it or leaf, it, lock, stock and bushel.
> I'll teak it if it comes in pinets.
Aye, or in hoaksheads.
�jevind
TT Arvind
> >> > Punning and punting are a letter apart.
> >> And now you barge in with another distraction.
> > It's aboat time someone put a stop to it.
> We're a pole apart about that.
Well, in that case, I think you need a stern talking-to.
--
Arvind
Taemon
Thanks, you have relieved my confusion.
T.
TT Arvind
> "TT Arvind" <ttarv...@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelandetnews:b0f936fa-b8aa-4d53...@g29g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
That last comment should be treeted as a hoaks.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
Taemon
> "TT Arvind" <ttar...@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
> news:603bf46c-111e-4aa1...@3g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>> On 6 Feb, 09:52, �jevind L�ng <ojevind.l...@bredband.net> wrote:
>>>> Punning and punting are a letter apart.
>>> And now you barge in with another distraction.
>> It's aboat time someone put a stop to it.
> We're a pole apart about that.
And here comes another shipload of puns...
T.
Raven
> |: This is becoming an interrogation of you by me alone. :-) I think
> |: I'll hold back until some others have chipped in. :-)
> |: Yes, we wouldn't want people to think we were forming a splinter
> |: group.
> |: I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a pun-thread is
> |: natural enough with this 20 questions-host ---
> |: It would go against the grain if it didn't.
> |: I saw this coming.
> |: I thought you wood.
> |: You'd be a sap if you didn't.
> |: Not to mention barking mad.
> |: Yew are both that and so am I.
> |: Are you trying to needle us?
> |: Perish the thought, I'd rather have a root canal.
> |: You're nuts.
> |: Always was the bad apple.
> You'd be more effective if you found a like-minded person and formed a
> pear.
I don't quite sea what yew mean. Do yew want me to, oar something?
Hrafn.
Raven
15. Is it hard (like a tooth) as opposed to soft (like a hair)?
Rabe.
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> TT Arvind" <ttarv...@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelelsennews:e55e057b-53eb-4655...@m31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
No. I'm assuming you're asking how it feels to the touch, rather than
how flexible it is.
--
Arvind
Raven
Well, I was asking how flexible it is.
16. Is it from an evil creature?
Raaf.
Öjevind Lång
I'm afraid some of them are a bit shipsoiled.
�jevind
Öjevind Lång
>> >> > Punning and punting are a letter apart.
>> >> And now you barge in with another distraction.
>> > It's aboat time someone put a stop to it.
>> We're a pole apart about that.
> Well, in that case, I think you need a stern talking-to.
I'll steer a straight course both before and beaft that.
�jevind
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> "TT Arvind" <ttarv...@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelelsennews:58238f93-87ab-4067...@u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
Oh well, it doesn't really affect the answer, though I'd probably have
qualified the 'no' a little in relation to flexibility (i.e.,
'somewhat flexible').
> 16. Is it from an evil creature?
No.
--
Arvind
Raven
Last question from me until someone else has done some asking:
17. Is it composed primarily of cellular tissue, ie. could you look at it
with a microscope and mostly see one or more types of cells?
Corvo.
TT Arvind
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> "TT Arvind" <ttarv...@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelelsennews:574fcfc7-6360-43d4...@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> > 16. Is it from an evil creature?
> > No.
> with a microscope and mostly see one or more types of cells?
Yes.
--
Arvind
Clams Canino
"TT Arvind" <ttar...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e6dd62-fe1e-413c-8ad2-> > Animal kingdom.
>> Yes.
Is it Dwarven in origin?
TT Arvind
> >> >> > Punning and punting are a letter apart.
> >> >> And now you barge in with another distraction.
> >> > It's aboat time someone put a stop to it.
> >> We're a pole apart about that.
> > Well, in that case, I think you need a stern talking-to.
> I'll steer a straight course both before and beaft that.
If you mast.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> 18. Is it Dwarven in origin?
No.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> On Feb 3, 10:27 pm, "Raven"
>
> <jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:
> > "TT Arvind" <ttarv...@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelelsennews:75595cb3-2b29-47d3...@r19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > Animal kingdom.
> > > Let the questions begin
> > > 1. Four legs?
> > > No.
> > > 2. Sentient?
> > > No.
> > > 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the purposes of
> > > this question, a corpse is not an item.
> > > I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an entire
> > > organism.
>
> > 4. Breadbox question.
>
> Yes.
For the avoidance of doubt, this answer means "It will fit into a
breadbox."
--
Arvind
Taemon
19. Is it (generally considered) edible?
T.
TT Arvind
> > Animal kingdom.
> > Let the questions begin
> > 1. Four legs?
> > No.
> > 2. Sentient?
> > No.
> > 3. An item, as opposed to an organism dead or alive? For the
> > purposes of this question, a corpse is not an item.
> > I suppose it might be considered an item, in that it is not an
> > entire organism.
> > 4. Breadbox question.
The elvish answer. Not by humans, hobbits, dwarrows or elves, but
quite probably by orcs. Non-sapient carnivores would definitely
consider it edible.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> 20. Is it the hand Beren loses to Carcharoth?
Yes. Congratulations.
I wondered if my answer to question 19 gave too much away, but I don't
think it was possible to answer that question any differently without
being misleading.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> Answer 19 was indeed very helpful.
> You need not have continued after "the elvish answer" or you could have
> said "By some".
Ah well, it doesn't take away from the fact that yours was an
excellent guess anyway.
--
Arvind
Öjevind Lång
>> >> >> > Punning and punting are a letter apart.
>> >> >> And now you barge in with another distraction.
>> >> > It's aboat time someone put a stop to it.
>> >> We're a pole apart about that.
>> > Well, in that case, I think you need a stern talking-to.
>> I'll steer a straight course both before and beaft that.
> If you mast.
That's what I'd rudder do.
�jevind
Tamf Moo
>>> >> >> > Punning and punting are a letter apart.
>>> >> >> And now you barge in with another distraction.
>>> >> > It's aboat time someone put a stop to it.
>>> >> We're a pole apart about that.
>>> > Well, in that case, I think you need a stern talking-to.
>>> I'll steer a straight course both before and beaft that.
>> If you mast.
> That's what I'd rudder do.
in fact, it'sail you can do.
--
tamf
I see two Gandalfs and church bell. And two half lions chasing
a bull rat each over the lake. (Rorschach tests seen by "Illogic")
Öjevind Lång
news:7ta9tm...@mid.individual.net...
> On 07/02/10 17:26, �jevind L�ng wrote:
>
>>>> >> >> > Punning and punting are a letter apart.
>>>> >> >> And now you barge in with another distraction.
>>>> >> > It's aboat time someone put a stop to it.
>>>> >> We're a pole apart about that.
>>>> > Well, in that case, I think you need a stern talking-to.
>>>> I'll steer a straight course both before and beaft that.
>>> If you mast.
>> That's what I'd rudder do.
> in fact, it'sail you can do.
While navigating at this speed, anything else is of course knot possible.
�jevind
Öjevind Lång
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose a 20 question-thread branching into a
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> pun-thread
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is natural enough with this 20 questions-host ---
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It would go against the grain if it didn't.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I saw this coming.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I thought you wood.
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Please leaf it bee. Maple leaf your not kids anymore.
>> >> >>>>>>>> Unfortunately, getting Ojeving (or me) to stop punning is
>> >> >>>>>>>> going
>> >> >>>>>>>> to be a hard cell.
>> >> >>>>>>> One day you'll larch from the other side of your mouth.
>> >> >>>>>> Fir sure.
>> >> >>>>> I bough before your superior punning.
>> >> >>>> It blossoms in good company.
>> >> >>> i still can't figure out how you can sprout all this nonsense.
>> >> >> It's your choice - teak it or leave it.
>> >> > Shouldn't that be "leaf it"?
>> >> You are right. Teak it or leaf, it, lock, stock and bushel.
>> > I'll teak it if it comes in pinets.
>> Aye, or in hoaksheads.
> That last comment should be treeted as a hoaks.
It's far too neat and spruce for that.
�jevind
TT Arvind
> "TT Arvind" <ttarv...@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelandetnews:56ef830a-5ba1-431a...@d27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
If you think that, then all I can say is that you clearly can't cedar
wood for the trees.
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> >>>> >> >> > Punning and punting are a letter apart.
> >>>> >> >> And now you barge in with another distraction.
> >>>> >> > It's aboat time someone put a stop to it.
> >>>> >> We're a pole apart about that.
> >>>> > Well, in that case, I think you need a stern talking-to.
> >>>> I'll steer a straight course both before and beaft that.
> >>> If you mast.
> >> That's what I'd rudder do.
> > in fact, it'sail you can do.
> While navigating at this speed, anything else is of course knot possible.
Still, I have to admit it's ferry impressive.
--
Arvind
Tamf Moo
Olive him alone.
Tamf Moo
>>>>>>>>>>> Punning and punting are a letter apart.
>>>>>>>>>> And now you barge in with another distraction.
>>>>>>>>> It's aboat time someone put a stop to it.
>>>>>>>> We're a pole apart about that.
>>>>>>> Well, in that case, I think you need a stern talking-to.
>>>>>> I'll steer a straight course both before and beaft that.
>>>>> If you mast.
>>>> That's what I'd rudder do.
>>> in fact, it'sail you can do.
>> While navigating at this speed, anything else is of course knot possible.
> Still, I have to admit it's ferry impressive.
oar just distressing.
Öjevind Lång
I'll sail to Cypress and meditate over things there.
�jevind
TT Arvind
Can I appley to join you?
--
Arvind
TT Arvind
> >>>>>>>>>>> Punning and punting are a letter apart.
> >>>>>>>>>> And now you barge in with another distraction.
> >>>>>>>>> It's aboat time someone put a stop to it.
> >>>>>>>> We're a pole apart about that.
> >>>>>>> Well, in that case, I think you need a stern talking-to.
> >>>>>> I'll steer a straight course both before and beaft that.
> >>>>> If you mast.
> >>>> That's what I'd rudder do.
> >>> in fact, it'sail you can do.
> >> While navigating at this speed, anything else is of course knot possible.
> > Still, I have to admit it's ferry impressive.
> oar just distressing.
I don't think so, but I suppose I should bow to your superior
knowledge.
--
Arvind