Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

20 Questions - Öjevind (IV]

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 2:14:52 PM12/8/09
to
OK - animal kingdom again.

�jevind

Pseudonymus al-Faqha'ter III

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 5:24:53 PM12/8/09
to
On Dec 8, 2:14 pm, Öjevind Lång <bredband....@ojevind.lang> wrote:
> OK - animal kingdom again.

1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
doesn't matter for the moment.)

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 5:45:13 PM12/8/09
to
On 8 Dec, 23:24, "Pseudonymus al-Faqha'ter III"

Yes.

Raven

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 6:31:56 PM12/8/09
to
"�jevind L�ng" <ojevin...@bredband.net> skrev i meddelelsen
news:9b405745-aa68-415c...@s20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

> OK - animal kingdom again.

> 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> doesn't matter for the moment.)
> Yes.

2. One or more living creatures?

Korppi.

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 7:39:13 PM12/8/09
to
On 9 Dec, 00:31, "Raven"
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:

> > OK - animal kingdom again.
> > 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> > doesn't matter for the moment.)
> > Yes.
>
>    2. One or more living creatures?

One.

Öjevind

Raven

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 7:46:41 PM12/8/09
to
"�jevind L�ng" <ojevin...@bredband.net> skrev i meddelelsen
news:8c820dc1-7a64-4aab...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

> OK - animal kingdom again.
> 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> doesn't matter for the moment.)
> Yes.
> 2. One or more living creatures?
> One.

3. Speaking creature?

Br�n.

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 10:01:59 PM12/8/09
to
On 9 Dec, 01:46, "Raven"
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:

> > OK - animal kingdom again.
> > 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> > doesn't matter for the moment.)
> > Yes.
> > 2. One or more living creatures?
> > One.
>
> 3. Speaking creature?

Yes.

Öjevind

Nautilus

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 11:45:44 PM12/8/09
to
In article
<18eb5591-46e6-4f11...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,

4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 8:26:23 AM12/9/09
to
On 9 Dec, 05:45, Nautilus <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> > > > OK - animal kingdom again.
> > > > 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> > > > doesn't matter for the moment.)
> > > > Yes.
> > > > 2. One or more living creatures?
> > > > One.
> > > 3. Speaking creature?
> > Yes.
>
> 4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?

Yes.

Öjevind

Tamf Moo

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 9:05:55 AM12/9/09
to
On 09/12/09 13:26, �jevind L�ng wrote:
>>>>> OK - animal kingdom again.
>>>>> 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
>>>>> doesn't matter for the moment.)
>>>>> Yes.
>>>>> 2. One or more living creatures?
>>>>> One.
>>>> 3. Speaking creature?
>>> Yes.
>> 4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?
> Yes.

does it sing?

--
tamf

(trying to be a little original)

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 9:37:01 AM12/9/09
to
On 9 Dec, 15:05, Tamf Moo <liddlelel...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >>>>> OK - animal kingdom again.
> >>>>> 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> >>>>> doesn't matter for the moment.)
> >>>>> Yes.
> >>>>> 2. One or more living creatures?
> >>>>> One.
> >>>> 3. Speaking creature?
> >>> Yes.
> >> 4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?
> > Yes.
>

> 5. does it sing?

I think so.

Öjevind

Nautilus

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 9:44:09 AM12/9/09
to
In article
<a96c094b-2cb2-4228...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,

�jevind L�ng <ojevin...@bredband.net> wrote:

6. Does it travel a lot during LotR (let's say more than Saruman or
Tom Bombadil)?

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 10:55:27 AM12/9/09
to
On 9 Dec, 15:44, Nautilus <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> > > >>>>> OK - animal kingdom again.
> > > >>>>> 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> > > >>>>> doesn't matter for the moment.)
> > > >>>>> Yes.
> > > >>>>> 2. One or more living creatures?
> > > >>>>> One.
> > > >>>> 3. Speaking creature?
> > > >>> Yes.
> > > >> 4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?
> > > > Yes.
> > > 5. does it sing?
> > I think so.
>
> 6. Does it travel a lot during LotR (let's say more than Saruman or
> Tom Bombadil)?

No.

Öjevind

Raven

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 11:15:32 AM12/9/09
to
"�jevind L�ng" <ojevin...@bredband.net> skrev i meddelelsen
news:b805e8e4-26b5-4515...@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

> OK - animal kingdom again.
> 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> doesn't matter for the moment.)
> Yes.
> 2. One or more living creatures?
> One.
> 3. Speaking creature?
> Yes.
> 4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?
> Yes.
> 5. does it sing?
> I think so.
> 6. Does it travel a lot during LotR (let's say more than Saruman or
> Tom Bombadil)?
> No.

7. Is it among the Second-born of Il�vatar?

Cr�

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 12:14:27 PM12/9/09
to
On 9 Dec, 17:15, "Raven"
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:

> > OK - animal kingdom again.
> > 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> > doesn't matter for the moment.)
> > Yes.
> > 2. One or more living creatures?
> > One.
> > 3. Speaking creature?
> > Yes.
> > 4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?
> > Yes.
> > 5. does it sing?
> > I think so.
> > 6. Does it travel a lot during LotR (let's say more than Saruman or
> > Tom Bombadil)?
> > No.
>
>    7. Is it among the Second-born of Il vatar?

Yes.

Öjevind

Raven

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 12:17:52 PM12/9/09
to
"�jevind L�ng" <ojevin...@bredband.net> skrev i meddelelsen
news:a03d3198-697f-470c...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

> OK - animal kingdom again.
> 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> doesn't matter for the moment.)
> Yes.
> 2. One or more living creatures?
> One.
> 3. Speaking creature?
> Yes.
> 4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?
> Yes.
> 5. does it sing?
> I think so.
> 6. Does it travel a lot during LotR (let's say more than Saruman or
> Tom Bombadil)?
> No.
> 7. Is it among the Second-born of Il vatar?
> Yes.

8. Is it on the good side?

Marghvran.

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 1:31:33 PM12/9/09
to
On 9 Dec, 18:17, "Raven"
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:

> > OK - animal kingdom again.
> > 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> > doesn't matter for the moment.)
> > Yes.
> > 2. One or more living creatures?
> > One.
> > 3. Speaking creature?
> > Yes.
> > 4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?
> > Yes.
> > 5. does it sing?
> > I think so.
> > 6. Does it travel a lot during LotR (let's say more than Saruman or
> > Tom Bombadil)?
> > No.
> > 7. Is it among the Second-born of Il vatar?
> > Yes.
>
>    8. Is it on the good side?

Yes.

Öjevind

Raven

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 1:53:49 PM12/9/09
to
"�jevind L�ng" <ojevin...@bredband.net> skrev i meddelelsen
news:8d5bb35d-6979-410e...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...

> OK - animal kingdom again.
> 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> doesn't matter for the moment.)
> Yes.
> 2. One or more living creatures?
> One.
> 3. Speaking creature?
> Yes.
> 4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?
> Yes.
> 5. does it sing?
> I think so.
> 6. Does it travel a lot during LotR (let's say more than Saruman or
> Tom Bombadil)?
> No.
> 7. Is it among the Second-born of Il vatar?
> Yes.
> 8. Is it on the good side?
> Yes.

9. Male?

Corb.

Message has been deleted

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 6:26:30 PM12/9/09
to
On 9 Dec, 19:52, Nautilus <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> > > > OK - animal kingdom again.
> > > > 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> > > > doesn't matter for the moment.)
> > > > Yes.
> > > > 2. One or more living creatures?
> > > > One.
> > > > 3. Speaking creature?
> > > > Yes.
> > > > 4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?
> > > > Yes.
> > > > 5. does it sing?
> > > > I think so.
> > > > 6. Does it travel a lot during LotR (let's say more than Saruman or
> > > > Tom Bombadil)?
> > > > No.
> > > > 7. Is it among the Second-born of Il vatar?
> > > > Yes.
> > >    8. Is it on the good side?
> > Yes.

(Raven asked:) 9. Male?

No.

10.. Would we find it in the Shire?

No

Öjevind

Raven

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 6:54:07 PM12/9/09
to
"�jevind L�ng" <ojevin...@bredband.net> skrev i meddelelsen
news:f482c8a2-50cf-40b2...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

> OK - animal kingdom again.
> 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> doesn't matter for the moment.)
> Yes.
> 2. One or more living creatures?
> One.
> 3. Speaking creature?
> Yes.
> 4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?
> Yes.
> 5. does it sing?
> I think so.
> 6. Does it travel a lot during LotR (let's say more than Saruman or
> Tom Bombadil)?
> No.
> 7. Is it among the Second-born of Il vatar?
> Yes.
> 8. Is it on the good side?
> Yes.

> 9. Male?
> No.
> 10.. Would we find it in the Shire?
> No

11. Was she alive on the day that the Ring was destroyed?

Voron.

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 10, 2009, 1:08:54 PM12/10/09
to
On 10 Dec, 00:54, "Raven"
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:

> > OK - animal kingdom again.
> > 1. Is it mentioned in LOTR? (Whether in a correct or incorrect edition
> > doesn't matter for the moment.)
> > Yes.
> > 2. One or more living creatures?
> > One.
> > 3. Speaking creature?
> > Yes.
> > 4. Does it have two legs (for walking)?
> > Yes.
> > 5. does it sing?
> > I think so.
> > 6. Does it travel a lot during LotR (let's say more than Saruman or
> > Tom Bombadil)?
> > No.

> > 7. Is it among the Second-born of Iluvatar?


> > Yes.
> > 8. Is it on the good side?
> > Yes.
> > 9. Male?
> > No.
> > 10.. Would we find it in the Shire?
> > No
>
> 11. Was she alive on the day that the Ring was destroyed?

Yes.

Öjevind

Raven

unread,
Dec 10, 2009, 1:30:19 PM12/10/09
to
"�jevind L�ng" <ojevin...@bredband.net> skrev i meddelelsen
news:4ed591a3-6734-4c86...@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...

12. Was she a Gondorian?

Hr�fn.

Message has been deleted

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 10, 2009, 4:38:00 PM12/10/09
to
On 10 Dec, 19:30, "Raven"
<jon.lennart.beck.its.my.n...@mail.its.in.danmark> wrote:

Yes.

Öjevind

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 10, 2009, 4:43:11 PM12/10/09
to

> > Yes.

12. Was she a Gondorian?

Yes.

13. Might she be Ioreth?

Yes! We have a winner! Over to you.

Öjevind

Message has been deleted

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 5:13:59 AM12/11/09
to
"Nautilus" <m...@privacy.net> skrev i meddelandet
news:me1-7E1E64.0...@news.t-online.de...
> In article
> <d99ad416-af1d-4fa9...@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,

> �jevind L�ng <ojevin...@bredband.net> wrote:

[snip]

>> Yes! We have a winner! Over to you.
>>

>> �jevind
>
> This time I tried a shot in the dark, instead of slowly approaching
> her ("Was she concerned with other people's health?" or "Was she
> talkative?"). There simply aren't too many women in LotR, and Ioreth
> is kind of memorable.
> I actually sent my posting before I saw Raven's question "Gondorian?"

Yes, once you had nailed down her sex it was easy going. The interesting
thing is how soon the question about her sex was asked. Meaning no
disrespect, the people here are most accomplished snuffflers.

�jevind

Message has been deleted
0 new messages