Curt Check (for n00bs and sb's)
yttr...@gmail.com
smear shit all over his face is because it's fairly privvy, and exists
in a private forum that I have no intention of losing access to.
That said, a quick perusal of google came up with this:
http://www.flexforums.com/33568-Re-Why-Im-greatful-for-MFW.html
Aaaaahahahahaaaa...well curt, looks like you're just "obvious". Maybe
its your walk. And, I realize that the commenter is using the term
"scat" incorrectly, but it's just as amusing.
And heres something nice that I found while looking at some posts
regarding someone else..very pleasant to just run into curt like this,
and discover that pretty much everyone in the world thinks hes an
idiot:
http://www.cyclingforums.com/t-251725-15-2.html ---fifth post from
the bottom is the sweet one.
This one bothers me, but only because curt is hanging on so
pathetically to that screenshot he has of the one *alleged* time that
Keith was nice to him. This was the status quo otherwise, evidently
EVERYWHERE, not just RAB. Second post down:
http://www.groupsrv.com/hobby/about128925.html
And here's another group that thinks that curt is a complete idiot:
Wow curt, you make friends wherever you go. And in exactly the same
way.
-----yttrx
Curt James
I snipped all but the links, because, hey, it's all about ~*ME*~!
(Okay, actually, it seems it's all about Yit's preoccupation with me,
but, whatever.)
re http://www.flexforums.com/33568-Re-Why-Im-greatful-for-MFW.html
TBR as a source of information? His facts are as straight as yours, of
course, so I shouldn't be surprised.
re http://www.cyclingforums.com/t-251725-15-2.html (5th post from
bottom)
Can you count? Wait, can you *read*? Those are all posts by Charles
and David of MFW where they're slamming Will Brink. Reread, because
you - again - were apparently so eager to post a slam that you didn't
see what was in front of your face.
To wit:
David:
|"Actually I can't think of anything much sadder than if
|that 'thing' (Brinks) was teaching my kids - must be very
|hard to have zero sense of humour"
And Charles (again speaking about Brink):
|"He may be well suited as a teacher of special needs
|children, or those with learning difficulties, although he
|might also benefit from taking remedial classes for adults
|with such problems.
|
|Throughout all my time in this Group he appears to have
|learned nothing. He might also benefit from a few sessions
|at a Charm School, where he could perhaps learn to be
|less abrasive."
JMW took a feeble poke, of course. But, like you, he's simply a
disgruntled long-time poster who seems to feel threatened by my
presence in /his/ newsgroup.
It's okay. I appreciate zeal.
re http://www.groupsrv.com/hobby/about128925.html (2nd post down)
Again, can you count?
I mean just how does this help your cause? And what exactly is your
cause? Right. Pretentious somethingsomething and effing POS etc. I
will thank you, however, for pointing me to my own words which you'd
do well to take to heart:
When you really have nothing to say then stringing a bunch of insults
and curses together works just fine.
Hth! ;)
re
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.fitness.weights/browse_frm/thread/8d42a1a65d2086e8/a0cba77b74fb067f?lnk=st&q=%22curt+james%22+poo&rnum=1&hl=en#a0cba77b74fb067f
It's not /another/ group, Yit-Ricks, it's the same group you pointed
to initially - Misc.fitness.weights. And the thread/post you pointed
to specifically was written by David from Australia who would quite
possibly be laughing his ass off if he knew you were using him as an
example of one of my detractors. I'd go so far as to say that we are
often of a like mind.
Is this an early Christmas present or do you need a serious nap?
Please get some sleep and then try again.
--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
yttr...@gmail.com
tendencies, whatever they may be...that whenever I bring THEM up, you
categorically deny NONE OF THEM. In fact, you change the subject
quickly each time, without once correcting my grammar or anything.
I'm just sayin is all. Really, its nothing to be ashamed of, but I can
see how you'd really want to keep it *super* secret.
And, I don't really have a cause. I just don't like you.
-----yttrx
Curt James
> Actually, what it was was an object lesson
You're all about the object lesson, aren't you? At least you're
consistent.
Maybe.
> about your scatophilic
So, you started off with feces some time ago and now you're offering
scatophilic? Google (how I love thee) offers somethingsomething, "talks
sexually in a manner that he expects will be offensive or shocking to a
female listener who does not know him."
I've never made a decision to talk in a manner expected to be sexually
offensive or shocking to any listener, male or female, however Queen
stated that I said something in an email which upset her. She also
stated it wasn't directed at her, but whatever it was was apparently
offensive. It's in MFW somewhere. I mean, as long as you're into the
Curt search.
I stated there and possibly here that she is the one, however, who
initiated our email exchange. She, iirc, even used the term stalking in
one of her emails, but - although I remember what I took as the humor
of that statement - I have no idea what she considered offensive in my
email to her.
People are weird. You're people, right?
> tendencies,
There's one very cool word.
> whatever they may be...
Whaa? I thought you were the Curt expert? Now you're saying /may/? Did
you take that nap?
> that whenever I bring THEM up, you categorically
> deny NONE OF THEM.
Is that right? What's there to deny? You got bupkiss. Imo, you're just
an unhappy, seemingly anyway, individual who likes to piss and moan.
About me. Oh, and people who've pursued, what you call, FPS. And, I
assume a bunch of other stuff that makes you angry.
> In fact, you change the subject quickly each time,
Perhaps because your subjects are all too often... BOOORING. On the
other hand, I like the Subject title you selected above. Good on you.
(It's all about me, isn't it?)
> without once correcting my grammar or anything.
Well, I haven't really been paying strict attention, but you seem to
have a handle on spelling and grammar.
> I'm just sayin is all.
Is that right? Just a casual, just sayin' is all? heh
> Really, its nothing to be ashamed of,
I suspect neither is your obsession with yours truly. What's your deal?
You feeling left out? You mentioned your survival guide. Feeling
forgotten? Decide to use me and gastric bypass patients to deposit some
so-called venom and get back in the game so to speak?
> but I can see how you'd really want to keep it *super* secret.
Define _it_.
> And, I don't really have a cause.
Cool. You rebel.
> I just don't like you.
Well, there you have it. Pay attention, this is the gist of my post:
You don't like me. All the more reason to disregard your input as well
as to not deny whatever your opinions of me happen to be.
But I guess you missed that, too.
Regardless, enjoy your proclaimed hate. ;)
--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
yttr...@gmail.com
Curt James wrote:
> > In fact, you change the subject quickly each time,
>
> Perhaps because your subjects are all too often... BOOORING. On the
> other hand, I like the Subject title you selected above. Good on you.
> (It's all about me, isn't it?)
>
See, yet again, when the subject turns to the idea of you enjoying
rubbing
shit all over your face, you change it immediately.
Really curt, I think I'm being super nice in the face of it all.
>
> > I just don't like you.
>
> Well, there you have it. Pay attention, this is the gist of my post:
> You don't like me. All the more reason to disregard your input as well
> as to not deny whatever your opinions of me happen to be.
>
> But I guess you missed that, too.
>
> Regardless, enjoy your proclaimed hate. ;)
>
I wonder if you really understand WHY I don't like you. Though
understanding it won't make it any different I suppose. You don't
understand why you creep out women. You have no idea what sorts of
conversations are had about you when you declare that you're going to
attend an event.
It goes well beyond "Ew, is he going to wash his hands before he
touches a bowling ball?".
Maybe if you understood why so many people don't like you, you could
wipe a new slate and start again, and perhaps even get a girlfriend or
something. Maybe you could even find someone who wouldnt mind shitting
on you. The reasons are pretty easy to understand.
-----yttrx
Curt James
[...]
>See, yet again, when the subject turns to the idea
>of you enjoying rubbing shit all over your face, you
>change it immediately.
Actually, I think by not denying it, I must be thwarting or keeping
you from using some witty (for you) follow-up. Is that so?
[...]
>> > I just don't like you.
obvious bias. Fair reporting or enraged mud (or shit) slinging? I'll
trust the intelligence of those who actually matter to answer that
question.
Oh, yeah, may as well point you to this again:
>> Well, there you have it. Pay attention, this is the gist of my post:
>> You don't like me. All the more reason to disregard your input as well
>> as to not deny whatever your opinions of me happen to be.
[...]
>I wonder if you really understand WHY I don't like you.
And I really couldn't care less if you really understand that I don't
care to understand WHY you don't like me. Some of the reasons seem
obvious enough.
Apologize to Kate yet?
--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
yttr...@gmail.com
Curt James wrote:
> Apologize to Kate yet?
For what? Turns out I was right.
-----yttrx
Curt James
>Curt James wrote:
>
>> Apologize to Kate yet?
>
>For what?
For being rude, disrespectful, and not at all encouraging.
>Turns out I was right.
No, you were wrong.
Whether she's 150 or 550, you were - and ever shall be - wrong.
This, like many things in life, is dependent upon perspective, but I'm
going with it.
Oh, yeah, I guess I could have just gone with a slight variation of
your words. To wit:
See, yet again, when the subject turns to the idea of you enjoying
rubbing shit in your friend's face, you pursue it immediately.
>
>
>
>
>-----yttrx
--
Curt
jame...@gmail.com
> For being rude, disrespectful, and not at all encouraging.
>
I'm not a blow-sunshine-up-your-ass-cheerleader, curt. I have no
problem
telling someone that what theyre about to do is fucking stupid as fuck.
That you do says quite a lot about you.
> >Turns out I was right.
>
> No, you were wrong.
>
> Whether she's 150 or 550, you were - and ever shall be - wrong.
>
> This, like many things in life, is dependent upon perspective, but I'm
> going with it.
>
Actually I wasn't wrong. I said she'd never be happy in a million
years
over anything that the fat person surgery does. That she'd only be
happy
if she could manage to use some willpower to change the way she thinks
about food itself, then subsequently radically change her diet (which
is
what youre supposed to do after FPS anyhow), and THEN, only if she can
deal with liquid shit for the rest of her life.
Turns out I was right. But Kate can answer for that if she wants.
She's
a friend of yours, right? (I say that despite the hundred pages of
incredibly
insulting remarks shes made about you, curt, over the
years--unfortunately
hardly ever to your face. She is a midwesterner after all.)
> Oh, yeah, I guess I could have just gone with a slight variation of
> your words. To wit:
>
> See, yet again, when the subject turns to the idea of you enjoying
> rubbing shit in your friend's face, you pursue it immediately.
>
Wow curt, you have some problems. I haven't brought that up in a
little
while. Methinks thou dost protest too much.
-----yttrx.
Curt James
[...]
>Methinks thou dost protest too much.
"But I can demonstrate that you didn't killfile me after you said that
you did. Tee hee."
Is that what happens after you think? Because you had that one wrong,
too.
Uh, tee hee.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.bodyart/msg/87b402213b954dc9
--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
Cadmium
<yttr...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143392075.1...@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> Now, the reason I can't post much information about Curt liking to
> smear shit all over his face is because it's fairly privvy, and exists
> in a private forum that I have no intention of losing access to.
Yes I can imagine how anyone would want to maintain their membership in such
a forum.
> That said, a quick perusal of google came up with this[...]
Yawn.
> And here's another group that thinks that curt is a complete idiot[...]
For the record, here's a group where someone thinks you are from the shallow
end of the gene pool, a few bricks short of a load, a few sandwiches short
of a picnic...
How's the therapy going?
You might have been a big shot here once but you can crawl back into the
hole you came as far as I am concerned.