curt, david, X
Ray Pearson
all sound like eventually it is going to become, yo momma, combat boots and
sticks and stones, you waste more time and band width, and say absolutely
nothing worthwhile. I know I will now get 3 punk answers, but what more
could i expect.
x
news:FNdQb.5408$6O4.1...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Actually, Ray, and of course, the other two would likely echo the
sentiments, (however unfounded their opinions of themselves are...) I do on
occasion say much worthwhile. granted, it may be less often then not, but
when I have valuable and valid information regarding a topic, that I feel
hasn't already been offered by someone perhaps more lerned on the subject
then me, by all means I offer it.
I have never sent an offending comment your way, and have generally found
that your input here to be maybe slightly more than moderately valuable
itself, although you've obviously been around longer (in life, and on
R.A.B...) and have valuablr insight into the insurance end of bodyart, while
I myself am simply a consumer of such. Now you, yourself must also admit
that you "sometimes" get a bit "ornary". On those occasions, as opposed to
twelve, I picture the old man on the porch rocking chair with a shotgun,
screaming "You yunguns git off'n muh lawn, dad-gummit!" But I digress.
I still haven't found any value or topical information in your "THESE WOMEN
OUGHT TO AGREE", and "GO COLTS" posts. And how about that "hey there E=MC2"
post? That had real intrinsic value in it, as well, didn't it?
As for high post counts? According to http://tinyurl.com/2psyx you're #s 13,
30 and 33 (what's with you and 3's, dude?) while I don't even register once
in the top 40.
So, take or leave my posts as you will, but lumping me in with David and
Curt? As for Curt, well, he certainly *looks* much older than me, and I only
saw a pic of David a number of years ago, and really don't care to try to
remember it. However, if you must know, I'm 30. Whatever the fuck that
counts for.
Oh, and other than attempting to provoke "3 punk answers", what was the
point and/or worth you were trying to promote by starting this thread?
Finally, it's "x", not "X".
Have a nice day, Ray.
--
x
"being the smartest window-licker on the shortbus doesn't make you a genius"
By the way, I'm petty and snide.
Dumbass Dentistry -
it's all fun and games until vegetation starts growing in someone's
pulmonary valved conduit.
x
news:MPG.1a7b7b346...@news.zen.co.uk...
> In article <FNdQb.5408$6O4.1...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
> tat...@worldnet.att.net says...
Hey look Ray, here's your first "Punk answer"!
Curt
re: Ray's
>tat...@worldnet.att.net says...
Hey, I post a lot. But your stats are not a consideration. I do like
that you post them, of course. Nice roundup of the links provided.
--
Curt
>So how old are you really, you all act like 12 yo in the school yard.
Please. You're leaving out the RABbit who instigated and fostered the
cartoon thread's spin away from the OP's initial query (elsewhere in
this ng). No surprise that you'd leave him off your list of
/offenders/.
>you all sound like eventually it is going to become, yo momma, combat boots
>sticks and stones,
Regarding childish name calling, Ray, someone with tin could probably
tell you that you're guiltier of that activity than others.
>you waste more time and band width, and say absolutely nothing worthwhile.
That's a matter of opinion, of course.
>I know I will now get 3 punk answers, but what more could i expect.
How about this: What prompted this thread? The cartoon thread,
correct? How many times did David and x post to that thread? No call
to include them, imo, but - like I've said before - it's all about the
post and reply. Thanks for your comments, however wrong they may be.
--
Curt
http://iam.bmezine.com/?curt
http://www.curtjames.com/
Ray Pearson
"x" <som...@somewhere.cxm> wrote in message
news:8LfQb.112048$7JB1....@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
>> I have never sent an offending comment your way, and have generally
isn't about sending anything MY way, you three piss and moan at each other
witbn 52 lines on quote and one line of "asshole"
>found
> that you "sometimes" get a bit "ornary". On those occasions, as opposed
You betcha first to admit it, but again not about onery, about childish so's
yer momma " comments
all the rest of your crap proves that you failed to comprehend the reason
for my post. Again I ask How old are all you, Like 12?
Ray Pearson
"Curt" <curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:t8e3105q6oj0gihp1...@4ax.com...
> Ray <tat...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >So how old are you really, you all act like 12 yo in the school yard.
>
> Please. You're leaving out the RABbit who instigated and fostered the
> cartoon thread's
was not referring to the cartoon, just your entire history of "me toos" and
yer momma insults'
never mind go on and play amongst yourselves. Never try to wrestle with a
hog, you get dirty and the hogs enjoy it
Curt
>"Curt" <curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote <snip>
>> Ray <tat...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>
>> >So how old are you really, you all act like 12 yo in the school yard.
>>
>> Please. You're leaving out the RABbit who instigated and fostered the
>><snip>
>
>was not referring to the cartoon, just your entire history of "me toos" and
>yer momma insults'
Find one momma insult. I challenge you. But, of course, I suspect
you'd respond with some nonresponse. Better to sidestep the question.
>never mind go on and play amongst yourselves. Never try to wrestle with a
>hog, you get dirty and the hogs enjoy it
Um, don't you have that backwards? You're intent was to state that I'm
the hog, I imagine, yet you're the one here rasslin'. Take your own
advice, I suppose, would be too much to expect, eh?
Keith Alexander®
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
> You're intent was to...
*** "Your."
Lame, huh?
---
k e i t h a l e x a n d e r
http://www.nootrope.net
http://www.modernamerican.com
aim: nootrope9 .|..
- - e n d t r a n s m i s s i o n - -
Curt
>On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:46:11 -0500, Curt
><curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>> You're intent was to...
>
>*** "Your."
>
>Lame, huh?
Sure. But fun, right?
Oh, wait. That should be "asshole!"
And:
I'd double my posting output if I commented on each of your typos. :p
--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
Keith Alexander®
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>I'd double my posting output if I commented on each of your typos.
*** Comment on content, cunt.
Curt
>On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:57:58 -0500, Curt
><curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I'd double my posting output if I commented on each of your typos.
>
>*** Comment on content, cunt.
Another typo! It's *Curt*. Wait. Cunt. Gotcha. Wow! You strung four
words together without misspelling any of 'em. Kudos! You even stuck a
comma in there! I'm. So. Proud. Of. Y O U!!!
And: Yeah, keep telling me what to do. That works. But I agree with
Ray so far as his idea of /wasting time and bandwidth/ applies to you.
Richard Hunter
<tat...@worldnet.att.net> coughed and sputtered, and managed to
choke out these words:
<snip>
i'm wasting less bandwidth in this post than you did in yours.
david
Keith Alexander®
<curt_...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>But I agree with Ray so far as his idea
>of /wasting time and bandwidth/ applies to you.
*** "*////*" "LOOK AT ME!" Think about what
should be italicized, dink.
No Curtis, I spend a minimal time on RAB, my
responses are light (k weight-wise) and my logic
trumps yours in a serious, serious way.
You spout, I present.
One day I'll grow up and just ignore you, but
until then, you're decent target practice.
I really wish pOok/cora hadn't convinced
me killfiles were for pussies, because if
anyone deserves a global plonk, it's you.
What was it that you contributed to the
BodMod discussion here, again?
Nina Baltes
tat...@worldnet.att.net says...
> never mind go on and play amongst yourselves. Never try to wrestle with a
> hog, you get dirty and the hogs enjoy it
Not if you turn them over on their back and stab their jugular with a
large needle.
Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net
x
>
> isn't about sending anything MY way, you three piss and moan at each other
> witbn 52 lines on quote and one line of "asshole"
Actually, I generally snip. I may have faltered on occassion, but no...
generally, I snip.
Unless, as here in, I'm posting responses to individual points, and cannot
snip as much as you may prefer.
> >found
> > that you "sometimes" get a bit "ornary". On those occasions, as opposed
>
> You betcha first to admit it, but again not about onery, about childish
so's
> yer momma " comments
And how often have I made "so's yer momma" comments? If Curt and or David
post something I find ignorant (which unfortunately does happen more often
than not in their posts) Yes, I have taken the opportunity to make my
opinion known, much like yourself with E-mc2. If then, they respond, I will
retort. You don't HAVE to download all the messages to wade through. You
could just look at the headers and senders, and decide to skip any banter
between us three, if you wish.
> all the rest of your crap proves that you failed to comprehend the reason
> for my post.
The reason for your post was to call me to task for a perceived infraction
of one of your dislikes. The fact that you snip my pointing out relative
equivelants in your posts, and dismiss them as "crap", rather than
responding, says much more about you than me.
> Again I ask How old are all you, Like 12?
Again, I told you, I'm 30. *read*. Old dude, put on your glasses or
something.
As well, how are all your "What are you, twelve?" comments, directed at
anyone whose postings you dislike (apparently myself, David, Curt, E=mc2,
for recent reference) any different than a "so's your momma" comment, if I
do make such? (I cannot be bothered to wade through my past posts to pick
out perhaps the few instances it may have happened) Please, Ray, explain the
difference. Aside from the obvious fact that one comes from you, and the
other does not.
intergalactic snitty princess
>You don't HAVE to download all the messages to wade through. You
>could just look at the headers and senders, and decide to skip any banter
>If Curt and or David
>post something I find ignorant (which unfortunately does happen more often
>than not in their posts)
I thought maybe in reverse order it might inspire someone (read: x) to
stop wading through what they believe is ignorant banter, commenting on
the banter, and inviting more ignorant banter. The term "downward
spiral" comes to mind.
just sayin'.
~christyn.
***yank me to reply***
x
news:a0qa105gs23umejpk...@4ax.com...
The point isn't me "wading through ...ignorant banter". I'm not complaining
to them about wasting my bandwidth, nor anyone else's. I was simply pointing
out to ray that he doesn't NEED to download the messages that he feels are
wasting his, and thereby avoid wasting it. Me, I've got bandwidth to spare
(well, work has), so I don't give a rat's ass.
Yes, perhaps at times "discretion is the better part of valour" and all
that, but, have you READ my sig? I spell it out right there, for all to see.
intergalactic snitty princess
>
>Yes, perhaps at times "discretion is the better part of valour" and all
>that, but, have you READ my sig? I spell it out right there, for all to see.
All eight lines of it?
No.
Suffice it to say, you don't have the Petty and Snide market cornered.
toodles,
~c.
***yank me to reply***
x
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 19:48:27 GMT, "x" <som...@somewhere.cxm> wrote:
>
> >
> >Yes, perhaps at times "discretion is the better part of valour" and all
> >that, but, have you READ my sig? I spell it out right there, for all to
see.
>
> All eight lines of it?
> No.
>
> Suffice it to say, you don't have the Petty and Snide market cornered.
>
Would never deign to say I do.
fr0glet
>
> I really wish pOok/cora hadn't convinced
> me killfiles were for pussies,
You haven't read _Idoru_, have you?
fr0glet
--
"You cannot be an objective scientist if you have an agenda."
~The Madman
Keith Alexander®
<fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
>You haven't read _Idoru_, have you?
*** Autographed hardcover...
fr0glet
>>> I really wish pOok/cora hadn't convinced
>>> me killfiles were for pussies
>
>
> *** Autographed hardcover...
I have a couple signed, all are first edition. A wedding gift from my
brother.
Walled City: killfiles aren't just for pussies, they're also for the aloof
elite. :P
fr0glet
> Ray wrote...
>
>> never mind go on and play amongst yourselves. Never try to wrestle
>> with a hog, you get dirty and the hogs enjoy it
>
> Not if you turn them over on their back and stab their jugular with a
> large needle.
>
> Nina
That's hot. Nina slaughters a pig, next on the XXX-RAB channel.
Keith Alexander®
<fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
>Walled City: killfiles aren't just for pussies, they're also for the aloof
>elite.
*** The elite hang out in fully encrypted IRC channels.
And fuck Gibson. Go Doctorow. :-)
http://www.nootrope.net/IM.html
fr0glet
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:51:32 -0800, "fr0glet"
> <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
>
>> Walled City: killfiles aren't just for pussies, they're also for the
>> aloof elite.
>
> *** The elite hang out in fully encrypted IRC channels.
>
> And fuck Gibson. Go Doctorow. :-)
>
> http://www.nootrope.net/IM.html
That was totally boring. I'm a *recovered* IRC junkie. I have Usenet now.