Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

fushigi yuugi...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

We Are Our Daughters' Mothers

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to
could barely stand 15 min of this insipid rot. tired, with nothings but
cliches recycled since ancient anime history, twerpy characters, shallow
female twits, featherweight plot, awful art designs all amounting to a big
zero.

and this is supposed to be one of 90s best? oh the pity...

Basara's News

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to

"We Are Our Daughters' Mothers" <ditas...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:obJq5.27094$ZI2.1...@news1.rdc1.il.home.com...

Congratulations - you watched the setup, and tuned yourself out before
execution. For example, the character development doesn't even get going
full-bore until the revelation of Noriko's secret, or Tamahome's money
motivation, or any of the rest.

Are you people so used to channel surfing on TV, that you are incapable of
waiting 3-5 episodes for the character to break out of "story-set-up mode",
anymore? It's an established fact that the longer a series is to be,
starting out, the less is revealed about the characters initially. And
without those revelations, the first 15 minutes of just about any show will
generally be "the same old thing" - or, if you look at 15 minutes of random
show, without context.

I'm no fan of Evangelion, myself, but how cliche would it look if all you
got to see was 15 minutes of the "synchronized combat" episode? Or, the
first 15 minutes of the first episode of Escaflowne, sans opening? Or
Macross, if all you saw was the big combat in Episode #27???

If you went in, expecting to be bowled over by 15 minutes, or not at all,
then you're in the wrong fandom, pal.

Stan

Anthony D. Baranyi

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to

"We Are Our Daughters' Mothers" <ditas...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:obJq5.27094$ZI2.1...@news1.rdc1.il.home.com...
> could barely stand 15 min of this insipid rot. tired, with nothings but
> cliches recycled since ancient anime history, twerpy characters, shallow
> female twits, featherweight plot, awful art designs all amounting to a big
> zero.
>
> and this is supposed to be one of 90s best? oh the pity...
>
>

Don't confuse "popular" with "best"...

Actually, a lot of people find recycled history, twerpy characters, shallow
female twits, and featherweight plots to be enormously satisfying - look at
the "historical novel" business. FY is essentially an animated "bodice
ripper"-style historical novel, which to an extent, is what allows the art
design to take second place to the "chase, capture, escape" plot and
"unrequited passion" characterization - both of which are standard in
"BR's".

You either "like the stuff" or you don't. ( I watched the entire series and
it remains one of my least favorite anime. )

Dave Baranyi

Robyn, Duke of Amber

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to We Are Our Daughters' Mothers
Jinkies...
this has got to be Gaza....
How could you do such a review- with comments on plot, characters etc and
only see 15 min.....?

pull the other one...it's got bells on

Neil

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, We Are Our Daughters' Mothers wrote:

> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 06:59:32 GMT
> From: We Are Our Daughters' Mothers <ditas...@hotmail.com>
> Newsgroups: rec.arts.anime.misc
> Subject: fushigi yuugi...


>
> could barely stand 15 min of this insipid rot. tired, with nothings but
> cliches recycled since ancient anime history, twerpy characters, shallow
> female twits, featherweight plot, awful art designs all amounting to a big
> zero.
>
> and this is supposed to be one of 90s best? oh the pity...
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________________________
_____________
Seraphim, the Restless Angel with a (borrowed) sword.
________

Nene, Ami,
Girls with glasses. girls with computers. Pink hair. blue hair
_______________________
Robyn, Duke of Amber. Agent of Chaos.
***************************************************************************

Robyn, Duke of Amber

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to Basara's News
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Basara's News wrote:

>
> Congratulations - you watched the setup, and tuned yourself out before
> execution. For example, the character development doesn't even get going
> full-bore until the revelation of Noriko's secret, or Tamahome's money
> motivation, or any of the rest.

This has got to be Gaza or one of the other Bridge-Dwellers....

>
> I'm no fan of Evangelion, myself, but how cliche would it look if all you
> got to see was 15 minutes of the "synchronized combat" episode?

You know just watching that with no warning would probably blow up my
brain.

N.

Animeg3282

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to
Stan said:

>Are you people so used to channel surfing on TV, that you are incapable of
>waiting 3-5 episodes for the character to break out of "story-set-up mode",
>anymore? It's an established fact that the longer a series is to be,
>starting out, the less is revealed about the characters initially. And
>without those revelations, the first 15 minutes of just about any show will
>generally be "the same old thing" - or, if you look at 15 minutes of random
>show, without context.
>

Although, the first 4 episodes of a show must grab me because anime is so
expensive. You can't just buy tape after tape hoping that it'll be better, you
know?

Hana no Kaitou
Pledged to the Way of the Wimp
"Kero Kero!" Mimori, KeroKero Chime
http://members.fortunecity.com/animeg3282 <---Fancy Lala Club! All better now!
http://www.themestream.com/authors/71409.html<-- some of my writing

Animeg3282

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to
Dave Baranyi said:

>Don't confuse "popular" with "best"...

That's true. I think MTT! is better than DBZ but guess what's more popular?

>
>Actually, a lot of people find recycled history, twerpy characters, shallow
>female twits, and featherweight plots to be enormously satisfying - look at
>the "historical novel" business. FY is essentially an animated "bodice
>ripper"-style historical novel, which to an extent, is what allows the art
>design to take second place to the "chase, capture, escape" plot and
>"unrequited passion" characterization - both of which are standard in
>"BR's".
>
>You either "like the stuff" or you don't. ( I watched the entire series and
>it remains one of my least favorite anime. )

I watched it all and didn't like it enough to watch it again. If the main
chracter is annoying, there is very little the story can do because the main
chracter is always going toget the most screen time, and all the stories will
revolve around him/her.

Edwin Koshimoto

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to
Hey, is this the one everybody refers to as gaza?

Farix

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to
"Edwin Koshimoto" <ed...@qnet.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.BSI.4.05L.100082...@cello.qnet.com...

> Hey, is this the one everybody refers to as gaza?

I haven't looked at the headers, but I do recall him using that particular
name before.

Farix
--
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take
everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government
grows, liberty decreases." -- Thomas Jefferson

neo_zo...@hotmail.com

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to
In article <f1Mq5.39568$eR5.1...@news1.rdc1.on.wave.home.com>,

"Anthony D. Baranyi" <abar...@home.com> wrote:
>
> Don't confuse "popular" with "best"...
>
> Actually, a lot of people find recycled history, twerpy characters,
> shallow female twits, and featherweight plots to be enormously

> satisfying - look at the "historical novel" business. FY is
> essentially an animated "bodice ripper"-style historical novel, which
> to an extent, is what allows the art design to take second place to
> the "chase, capture, escape" plot and "unrequited passion"
> characterization - both of which are standard in "BR's".

I do think you're selling FY a bit short. I think it had too much
filler, and I think that filler undermined some really good material,
but there WAS a lot of good stuff in that series. I can't really see
how anyone could complain about the art either...

-ZFP


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Daniel McKay

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, We Are Our Daughters' Mothers wrote:

> could barely stand 15 min of this insipid rot. tired, with nothings but
> cliches recycled since ancient anime history, twerpy characters, shallow
> female twits, featherweight plot, awful art designs all amounting to a big
> zero.
>
> and this is supposed to be one of 90s best? oh the pity...
>

It's a hell of a lot better than Bubblegum Crisis.

From headers: news1.rdc1.il.home.com

Hello, Gaza.
-Dannymon


Sarah Davis

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to

Anthony D. Baranyi wrote in message ...

>
>"We Are Our Daughters' Mothers" <ditas...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:obJq5.27094$ZI2.1...@news1.rdc1.il.home.com...
>> could barely stand 15 min of this insipid rot. tired, with nothings but
>> cliches recycled since ancient anime history, twerpy characters, shallow
>> female twits, featherweight plot, awful art designs all amounting to a
big
>> zero.
>>
>> and this is supposed to be one of 90s best? oh the pity...
>>
>>
>
>Don't confuse "popular" with "best"...

This newsgroup is like one big nonstop twenty-four hour FY knock-a-thon. o.O
I don't expect Gaza to like anything not featuring Priss, but I'd hope
everyone else would keep in mind that FY was an escapist fantasy written for
girls of about the age of twelve. It's *not* going to meet standards set by
more mature series, nor was it intended to. I'm aware that some anime/manga
for the same audience meets with widespread critical acclaim, and that its
target audience is no excuse for FY's failings, but keeping things in
perspective helps.

>Actually, a lot of people find recycled history, twerpy characters, shallow


>female twits, and featherweight plots to be enormously satisfying - look at
>the "historical novel" business. FY is essentially an animated "bodice
>ripper"-style historical novel, which to an extent, is what allows the art
>design to take second place to the "chase, capture, escape" plot and
>"unrequited passion" characterization - both of which are standard in
>"BR's".

Right here is where you're selling its audience short, which is why I
bothered to respond. I love FY. It continues to be my favorite anime TV
series even though people tell me I've seen better. I don't consider myself
easy to please or of low expectations. I find in FY not only what it was
supposed to be -- the aforementioned escapist fantasy -- but also some
components that transcend the material. Anyone who says that FY has nothing
new or significant to offer to anime is, for want of a gentler word, WRONG.
Its faults may be hard to overlook, but it is *not* just "recycled history,
twerpy characters, shallow female twits, and featherweight plots" and poor
"art design." If it were, I wouldn't be defending it now.

Sarah

Sarah Davis

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to

Anthony D. Baranyi wrote in message ...
>
>"Sarah Davis" <sdavis...@mad-hatter.org> wrote in message
>news:39ac5...@huge.aa.net...
>>
>
>Sarah -
>
>My point about FY and "historical romances" is that they both have fans and
>defenders, both can be very successful, and both have very specific
>audiences. That doesn't make them "good" or "bad", but at the same time
>means that different audiences may not react well to them at all.

Er... Sorry for my previous over-reaction. It's just that with its current
popularity, and because it's been in the limelight, FY has been criticized
tremendously on newsgroups of late. My defensive tendencies are on
hyperdrive right now. ^^;;

Sarah

Daniel McKay

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/29/00
to

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Sarah Davis wrote:

>
> Anthony D. Baranyi wrote in message ...
> >

Testify! Fushigi Yuugi is indeed my favorite show, and though I admit it
has its shortcomings (choppy animation, a heroine that can be a little too
idiotic at times), it has more of an emotional effect on me than any other
anime, and it also is, IMO, one of the few anime TV series with a really
kickass ending.
-Dannymon


Louis Patterson

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 9:16:10 PM8/29/00
to
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Anthony D. Baranyi wrote:

>
> "We Are Our Daughters' Mothers" <ditas...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:obJq5.27094$ZI2.1...@news1.rdc1.il.home.com...
> > could barely stand 15 min of this insipid rot. tired, with nothings but
> > cliches recycled since ancient anime history, twerpy characters, shallow
> > female twits, featherweight plot, awful art designs all amounting to a big
> > zero.
> >
> > and this is supposed to be one of 90s best? oh the pity...
> >
> >
>
> Don't confuse "popular" with "best"...
>

> Actually, a lot of people find recycled history, twerpy characters, shallow
> female twits, and featherweight plots to be enormously satisfying - look at
> the "historical novel" business. FY is essentially an animated "bodice
> ripper"-style historical novel, which to an extent, is what allows the art
> design to take second place to the "chase, capture, escape" plot and
> "unrequited passion" characterization - both of which are standard in
> "BR's".
>

> You either "like the stuff" or you don't. ( I watched the entire series and
> it remains one of my least favorite anime. )

Um, surely *that's* a bit harsh?

Louis
--
Louis Patterson l.patt...@student.unimelb.edu.au

Louis Patterson

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 9:20:14 PM8/29/00
to
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, We Are Our Daughters' Mothers wrote:

> could barely stand 15 min of this insipid rot. tired, with nothings but
> cliches recycled since ancient anime history, twerpy characters, shallow
> female twits, featherweight plot, awful art designs all amounting to a big
> zero.

Strange; that's what we said. We still watch it though...

> and this is supposed to be one of 90s best? oh the pity...

Louis
--
Louis Patterson l.patt...@student.unimelb.edu.au

Anthony D. Baranyi

unread,
Aug 29, 2000, 10:19:06 PM8/29/00
to

"Sarah Davis" <sdavis...@mad-hatter.org> wrote in message
news:39ac5...@huge.aa.net...
>

Sarah -

My point about FY and "historical romances" is that they both have fans and
defenders, both can be very successful, and both have very specific
audiences. That doesn't make them "good" or "bad", but at the same time
means that different audiences may not react well to them at all.

Dave B


AUSSIE AND HARRIET

unread,
Aug 30, 2000, 1:04:01 AM8/30/00
to

"Basara's News" <bas...@kih.net> wrote in message
news:8oftpc$4tt$1...@news3.icx.net...

>
> "We Are Our Daughters' Mothers" <ditas...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:obJq5.27094$ZI2.1...@news1.rdc1.il.home.com...
> > could barely stand 15 min of this insipid rot. tired, with nothings but
> > cliches recycled since ancient anime history, twerpy characters, shallow
> > female twits, featherweight plot, awful art designs all amounting to a
big
> > zero.
> >
> > and this is supposed to be one of 90s best? oh the pity...
>
> Congratulations - you watched the setup, and tuned yourself out before
> execution. For example, the character development doesn't even get going
> full-bore until the revelation of Noriko's secret, or Tamahome's money
> motivation, or any of the rest.
>


look, fushigi yuugi is just a really pompous and dull sailor moon. at least
sailor moon can be appreciated as kiddie porn art which is what takeuchi's
subconscious had in mind. fushigi yuugi also shits all over chinese
culture, desecrating anything and everything in order to sell toys and
merchandise to semi-retarded girls hooked on sham romanticism of shoujo
manga and pipsqueaking to anime karaoke.


Jorge R. Frank

unread,
Aug 30, 2000, 1:50:37 AM8/30/00
to
AUSSIE AND HARRIET wrote:
>

<snip crap>

Gaza, how many sockpuppets you gonna pull out of your ass tonight?

--

JRF

Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" and think one step ahead of IBM.

Miki no Miko

unread,
Aug 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/30/00
to

AUSSIE AND HARRIET <AUS...@HARRIET.COM> wrote in message
news:5B0r5.30665$ZI2.1...@news1.rdc1.il.home.com...
*snip*

He's reusing handles now? x.x;;;
I coulda sworn I've seen this one before.

--
Jen

Bogey

unread,
Aug 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/30/00
to

Sarah Davis wrote in message <39ac5...@huge.aa.net>...

>
>This newsgroup is like one big nonstop twenty-four hour FY knock-a-thon. o.O
>I don't expect Gaza to like anything not featuring Priss, but I'd hope
>everyone else would keep in mind that FY was an escapist fantasy written for
>girls of about the age of twelve. It's *not* going to meet standards set by
>more mature series, nor was it intended to. I'm aware that some anime/manga
>for the same audience meets with widespread critical acclaim, and that its
>target audience is no excuse for FY's failings, but keeping things in
>perspective helps.
>

Easy, Sarah. Don't take it so personal. FY has its problems and a lot of people dislike
it. What's wrong with that? Even you admit that the show has no excuse for its
shortcomings. So what if it's an easy target? We knock other anime too.

Don't get me wrong. FY is not the worst anime in the world. It's just very easy to hate
upon a little reflection. I compare it with junk food. Tastes great when I first start
eating it, but leaves a horrible aftertaste.

- Bogey

Sarah Davis

unread,
Aug 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/30/00
to

Bogey wrote in message <39ada...@news1.prserv.net>...

>Easy, Sarah. Don't take it so personal.

I already admitted that I was overreacting. ^^;;

>FY has its problems and a lot of people dislike
>it. What's wrong with that? Even you admit that the show has no excuse for
its
>shortcomings. So what if it's an easy target? We knock other anime too.

I think the horror of it all for my thin-skinned self is that from the
moment FY became popular among the general anime-viewing public, it became
almost *trendy* to attack it.

>Don't get me wrong. FY is not the worst anime in the world. It's just very
easy to hate
>upon a little reflection. I compare it with junk food. Tastes great when I
first start
>eating it, but leaves a horrible aftertaste.

Well, yeah. FY has many problems, not the least of which is the oft noted
lack of replay value. But as soon as I saw FY's follies being traced to its
audience, I took what I think was rightful offense. I couldn't care less if
someone doesn't like "Fushigi Yuugi," but I'll gladly speak my mind in
defense of its fandom.

Sarah

Amalfia

unread,
Aug 31, 2000, 7:20:52 AM8/31/00
to

Sarah Davis <sdavis...@mad-hatter.org> wrote in message
news:39ac5...@huge.aa.net...

{delete, delete}

Who cares? It's got luscious boys in it. Isn't that a good enough reason?
(at least to sappy idiots like me...)

A.


0 new messages