Marty
As for me, I agree that 26" is totally fine! Three of my four bikes
take them.
Good luck on your search.
Beth
Are you aware that the Surly Long Haul Trucker is now available in 26-
inch wheels for all sizes? I know it is not lugged, but it's a good
bike that has developed a loyal following with bike tourists. I know
several folks with the LHT here in town and have met many, many others
on tours and they've all been very happy with their bikes. The 60 and
62cm frames (or complete bikes) designed for 26-inch wheels can be
ordered by any bike shop.
Dave
Marty
List member Tim M will probably chime in soon - he has a 64 (62?) cm
All-Rounder with 26" wheels, and he's waxed enthusiastic about it on
the list many times. It's a beautiful bike, and that model is probably
your best bet for what you're looking for w/o going custom. Good luck!
--
Bill Connell
St. Paul, MN
On Jan 4, 9:28 am, Bill Connell <bconn...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 4, 9:43 am, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery <thill....@gmail.com>
wrote:
I've seen this too, to the extreme of a 5'2" rider refusing to buy a
road bike with anything but 700c wheels, with the idea that they
wouldn't be able to keep up on group rides if they used smaller wheels
(never mind that the gearing could easily be made the same). There is
a lot of value in trying different sizes for different applications (i
ride 64cm frames and have bikes of 3 different wheel sizes), but in
some cases the compromises involved get pretty questionable, and in
some cases it's downright unsafe.
Somewhat odd, all things considered. There are many quality 26" rims
available for nearly every type of riding.
With some skinny race tires excepted, most decent tires out there have
a perfectly acceptable 26" variant. And who buys an Atlantis or
similar bike with skinny race tires in mind?
On Jan 4, 9:57 am, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery <thill....@gmail.com>
> > > St. Paul, MN- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
marty
With some skinny race tires excepted, most decent tires out there have
a perfectly acceptable 26" variant. And who buys an Atlantis or
similar bike with skinny race tires in mind?
It'll never happen. 559 is not a size "I" has any interest in.
Will someone please, puh-leeeeze make a Grand Bois in a 559X28?It'll never happen. 559 is not a size "I" has any interest in.
The Tooth Fairy doesn't bring you teeth, she comes to take them away.
>
> Who is "I" and why is his er her er its opinion on the subject or role
> in the matter of any importance?
"I" is the proprietor of Grand Bois, who got into the tire business (and
the handlebar business) because he couldn't get the tires (and other
appropriate, classic looking parts) he wanted for his Grand Bois
bicycles -- which are very classical and AFAIK don't come with 559
wheels. http://www.cyclesgrandbois.com/
Everything Grand Bois exists because "I" is interested. I think it's
about as far as you can get from "market driven".
I think GEP is a lot more driven by market forces than "I" is.
When men lose height as they age, it is in the body (spine) rather
than the legs, so I don't think that should be a consideration(?)
The great gap in 559 and 571 tires is in the high quality 25-30 mm range. Will someone please, puh-leeeeze make a Grand Bois in a 559X28?
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:51 PM, PATRICK MOORE <bert...@gmail.com> wrote:The great gap in 559 and 571 tires is in the high quality 25-30 mm range. Will someone please, puh-leeeeze make a Grand Bois in a 559X28?
If you want them that badly, why don't you have them made.
A tire mold from Panaracer costs about $15,000
Figure in set up costs and the cost for the tire materials
and you could have 500 tires for about $25,000.
You will then have a lifetime supply of your perfect tire,
and if they are as great as you say,
people will line up
at your door to buy them.
Jay Hartman
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
I think GEP is a lot more driven by market forces than "I" is.
Unlike most, I actually like the wider tires and really enjoy having
options of either Marathon Supremes or Big Apples under the frame.
Cushy and don't find them to be any slower. The engine is the problem
on these bikes. Or the option of throwing on Marathon Cross tires and
riding unpaved trails in my area. And the wider rubber is much more
forgiving.
Also, my background is different from most. When getting "serious"
about bikes, it was at first old cruisers, then the new(ish) mountain
bike boom. Those bikes just spoke to me. And still do in a way even
great road bikes never have.
Eric Platt
St. Paul, MN
On Jan 4, 9:57 am, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery <thill....@gmail.com>
I said a lot more driven by market forces than Grand Bois, and I still
believe it.
Exactly. That is exactly what "I" did, and what Kirk did too, with the
Pari Moto. For that matter, it's what La Confrerie des 650B did as
well.
I suppose nobody cares that much about 559.
Should have bought that 56cm Atlantis when I had the chance. If wishes
were horses....
Not to change the subject but on the offchance anyone have an idea of
where I can find a touring rim between Cartagena and Bogota?
On Jan 4, 3:58 pm, Steve Palincsar <palin...@his.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 13:41 -0700, PATRICK MOORE wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Steve Palincsar <palin...@his.com>
If you're going to ship a bike a lot, smaller wheels make the packing
easier. I've had times I wished I had 26" instead of 700 on my
Atlantis. FWIW one of our SoCal Riv group has an Atlantis with 26"
wheels with Schwalbe Marathon Expedition (?) tires, big honking
monsters (2"?) next to my 35mm Marathon Supremes. He has no problem
keeping up, and is kind enough to wait for me at the tops of hills.
dougP
> > believe it.- Hide quoted text -
Rob
On Jan 4, 9:51 am, PATRICK MOORE <bertin...@gmail.com> wrote:
It's actually a 59.5- from 1996- and about 4 cm too small by current
Riv standards. I doubt Grant would even sell me a frame that small
now. A 63.5 works well for me, but the Riv is very comfortable
albeit with lots of seatpost and stem showing. There's an old photo
on the first page of my very old "tour of Lake Pepin" report from 2000:
http://www2.bitstream.net/~timmcn/tour2000.html
Now it has reverted to DT shifters and has a Mini rack on the front
(with a Platrack and purty matched bag in the offing, thanks Santa).
The stem is different now, too, a Nitto Technomic Deluxe, putting the
bars 3-4 cm higher.
I had for years groused about the 26" wheels on this bike, but the
Panaracer Pasela 26 x 1.25 are so good that they have eliminated my
complaints of the bike being slow on the road (unfortunately my LBS
won't have tanwalls anymore, though, as QBP is dropping them in favor
of the blackwalls. Boo!). All things being equal, small wheels will
have higher rolling resistance and for a long time this bike felt
like molasses on the road. Good road tires for 26" wheels were
fairly hard to come by, most of them having thick rubber and weighing
a lot. I never liked any of the 26 x 1.0 tires I tried and the
Avocet and Specialized 26 x 1.5s were slow feeling. With the
Paselas, the A/R now rolls well, rides wonderfully and is my favorite
bike. As a bonus, I rode the bike for 13 years without ever having
to true the rear wheel thanks to the 10% greater strength of the
smaller diameter hoop and the near-dishless 135 mm OLN spacing with a
36 hole 7 speed Phil hub. I finally had to replace the rim in 2009
when I found some cracks around the spoke holes.
> Also, I'm not too put-off by the look of 26 wheels
> on a taller frame, which seems to be more of an issue than actual
> performance to some.
I've had people ask me if my A/R has 24" wheels. I've seen really
big frame bikes (64-65 cm+) on which 700 x 28s looked like 26"ers!
> You need to hunt down a set of the Primo Comet 26x1.5. I came into
> owning a set of these through the purchase of an ebay tandem. They
> are dirt cheap, about $25, and held in high regard by the recumbent
> set. I have moved them arond on a few bikes and they are fast and
> smooth as pillows, I dream of them in 700C at the 26"price.
I've used the Primo (spelled "Pr1mo" on the sidewall) 26 x 1.25 tires
quite a bit. Too fragile, lots of sidewall damage and punctures.
And too hard to find, only stocked locally by Calhoun Cycles
(recumbent shop) and usually out of stock.
>>I suppose nobody cares that much about 559.
Au contraire.
The number of real-world bike shops (i.e., those that focus on mass-
produced bicycles retailing for under $1,000) doing a roaring business
in 650b is VERY low. 650b, while it offers a lovely ride and a great
in-between wheel size that certainly fits a niche, is more likely to
be found through custom builders, and from mail-order houses
specializing in outfitting those custom frames.
At our shop, we do carry 650b rims and tires. We probably get asked to
build custom wheels in that size four or five times a year; and we've
sold exactly ten 650b tires to customers in the last 6 months.
We also carry 26"/559 wheels, rims and tubes. We sell them by the
hundreds.
The largest number of bikes I've ever seen with 650b wheels -- about
twelve of them -- were all in one room at the recent Oregon Manifest
bike show. All of those gorgeous bikes were custom built. Some were
available for sale and among those the cheapest one sold for around
$4,000. The winning bike at the show is currently for sale, for a cool
six grand. While these bikes represent some fantastic -- and even, in
many cases, truly sensible -- ideas in bicycle design, I do not
consider them to be real world bikes.
I consider a real-world bike to be a mass-produced, LBS-quality bike
that would retail for between $400 and $1000 complete. That is a bike
that the majority of hourly-wage workers in this country can afford,
even if they have to save up for it for several months (as a number of
our customers have had to do).
Based on that criteriae, there is not yet a real-world bike on the
market that is built around 650b wheels.
That's not to say it won't happen. I certainly could happen. But in
order for it to happen, 650b proponents would have to be willing to
accept a lower common standard in order to make the bike accessible to
many more people.
At present, 650b is still being sold on its performance, and in no
small part its hip, French coolness.
As an individual who loves hand-built bikes and beautiful components
that perform beautifully, I GET cool, I actually DIG cool and in fact
I am blessed enough to be able to RIDE cool to work every day.
But as a bicycle salesperson it is very hard for me to sell that kind
of cool to someone who rides daily for transportation, works in a
dicey neighborhood and has to lock their bike to the gas meter in an
apartment building basement every night. That level of cool is simply
too expensive to buy, and to risk, at the present time.
For my money, THE way to go for real-world bikes IS 26"/559. The wheel
size has been around for ages, offers zillions of tread choices and
price ranges, and can be cobbled together with a used frame and parts
to provide a VERY servicable, extremely rideable bike at a price that
an hourly wage worker can handle.
I love -- no, I ADORE -- the 26"/559 wheel size and I am sure I'm not
alone. That is why I worried when I heard that the Atlantis might go
away. The Atlantis is an absolute wet dream of a 559-dedicated bike
and it should live forever. I hope it will.
To be fair - it sounds a lot like what you may want is what Matthew
Grimm is doing with his goals for 559-sized kogswells. A reasonably
affordable frame/fork targeted for 26" wheels with its own amount of
"cool" seems like a rational market.
-sv
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
You need to hunt down a set of the Primo Comet 26x1.5. I came into
owning a set of these through the purchase of an ebay tandem. They
are dirt cheap, about $25, and held in high regard by the recumbent
set. I have moved them arond on a few bikes and they are fast and
smooth as pillows, I dream of them in 700C at the 26"price.
I never liked any of the 26 x 1.0 tires
I love -- no, I ADORE -- the 26"/559 wheel size and I am sure I'm not
alone. That is why I worried when I heard that the Atlantis might go
away. The Atlantis is an absolute wet dream of a 559-dedicated bike
and it should live forever. I hope it will.
I still kick myself for getting rid of the 58cm lugged 26" wheeled
frame I found on the side of the road in San Francisco. Had quite a
few nice rides with it built up with closet parts. Moving across the
country makes you part with the strangest things...
On Jan 4, 4:01 pm, Steve Palincsar <palin...@his.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Hartman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:51 PM, PATRICK MOORE <bertin...@gmail.com>
My 59cm All-Rounder has 26" wheels, the 64cm Atlantis has 700c.
Both work fine, at different times I have prefered one wheel size over
the other, to me the biggest difference is tire/rim selection. At the
moment the tire selection for both diameters is quite good in the
larger sizes I use on these bikes.
Angus
On Jan 4, 5:45 am, Marty <mgie...@mac.com> wrote:
> I threw in a bid on an All-Rounder that ended up in someone else's
> hands yesterday via Ebay. Went for a little over 600, which I thought
> was a great deal - but a few bucks past my limit. Hopefully someone
> here snatched it up, and can report on the coming build. Guess I'll
> upgrade my MTB conversion and wait for the next one. It's tough to
> find a tall-frame 26"-wheel lugged steel ride, (my Trek is a 61cm, and
> I'm running 1.75 Pasella's) and I happen to like the feel, not that
> there's anything wrong with 700c or 650b... If I'm ever in the
> position to have a custom built, I'd be tempted to build it around 26"
> wheels. I know the prevailing winds whisper 700c for anything over
> 60cm,, but having ridden both styles, it's kind of a toss up to me.
> The trick is finding that elusive tall-lugged-steel frame.
>
> Marty
>> I never liked any of the 26 x 1.0 tires
>
>
>
> Did you ever try the old 559 X 1 Turbos that measure a real 23 mm,
> or 22 on my skinny rims? Wonderful tires, only too skinny: smooth,
> roll fast, and, very odd, far fewer flats than Paselas. I just pro-
> actively replaced the rear at 1,700 miles although there was still
> a bit of tread left and I was not getting flats. (Thanks, Ryan!)
No, they were too hard to find locally; I only found one. I don't
care for using tires I have to mail order, I want to just go to the
bike shop when I need one. I think I may still have that foldable
Turbo I bought to stick in a saddlebag as a spare.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:50 PM, beth h <periwi...@yahoo.com> wrote:I love -- no, I ADORE -- the 26"/559 wheel size and I am sure I'm not
alone. That is why I worried when I heard that the Atlantis might go
away. The Atlantis is an absolute wet dream of a 559-dedicated bike
and it should live forever. I hope it will.Beth: is there any way someone could come up with a real, Grand Bois quality 28 mm tire?
I sent a message earlier today saying exactly what it would take for such a tire to happen.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Marty
> I sent a message earlier today saying exactly what it would take for
> such a tire to happen.
> It's not magic.
> Rivendell has a bunch of different tire models.
> Grand Bois is run by one person.
> It just takes some money and time.
And the will to be a Champion.
Yes, as I recall what he said, he's concentrating on a market that has
junk MTBs laying around with recyclable wheels, aiming to sell them on a
frame that's more suited to practical tasks than the MTB frames those
wheels came on.
That's almost an operational definition of "bottom feeder," isn't it?
And it's hardly a narrative to inspire.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
cyclotourist wrote:-------
A 26" wheeled Ram with two sets of wheels (light go fast/heavy trail use) sounds like an awesome bike! Rivendell has been so invested in 650B I forget they have 26" bikes also.
I rode with an RBW listmember a couple of weeks ago, Sean O’Bryan. He rode a smaller-framed, 26”-wheeled Rambouillet that looked perfectly proportioned, to my eye. He likes it pretty well, as I recall. Also, he had no problem wielding it to wax my ass on every uphill. He and his randonneuring buddy Jeff graciously waited for me at every crest, it seemed.
Happy New Year!
--
Jon “Tandem-weight on a Single” Grant
I keep building "grocery bikes" mostly out of parts I have lying
around, because I'm not comfortable locking my nice bikes up at the
supermarkets in my area. Inevitably, these grocery bikes end up with
cool stuff on them and it becomes apparent that they are no less
likely to be ripped off. Just easier to replace. That just seems
hopelessly silly, but I can't help it.
Perhaps unfortunately so beyond the reach of some, but not
outrageously. There is nothing outrageous about paying a fair price
for quality built by people expert in their craft.
On Jan 4, 9:08 pm, Swashbuckling Dandy <swashbuckling.da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > and it should live forever. I hope it will.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
> Even at that price, a good many of the folks for whom it would be an ideal bike consider itPerhaps unfortunately so beyond the reach of some, but not
> beyond their reach or even outrageously expensive.
outrageously. There is nothing outrageous about paying a fair price
for quality built by people expert in their craft.