Groups
Groups
Sign in
Groups
Groups
RavenDB - an awesome database
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
Lucene.NET in Trouble
58 views
Skip to first unread message
Eric J. Smith
unread,
Oct 30, 2010, 1:55:01 PM
10/30/10
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to ravendb
It looks like the Lucene.NET project is in a bit of trouble. Just
wanted to make you guys aware of this and maybe get some contributors.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-user/201010.mbox/%3C083FF0A3-CE11-4EE...@apache.org%3E
Eric J. Smith
unread,
Oct 30, 2010, 2:42:32 PM
10/30/10
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to ravendb
Guess that link didn't work.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/201010.mbox/thread
On Oct 30, 12:55 pm, "Eric J. Smith" <
e...@codesmithtools.com
> wrote:
> It looks like the Lucene.NET project is in a bit of trouble. Just
> wanted to make you guys aware of this and maybe get some contributors.
>
>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-user/201010.mbox
/%
3C083FF0A3-CE11-4EE2-8EBA-1D62CE95C...@apache.org
%3E
Ayende Rahien
unread,
Oct 30, 2010, 4:13:59 PM
10/30/10
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to rav...@googlegroups.com
Noticed that, but not really worried.
More than anything, this is a reflection on internal Apache behavior.
The codebase itself is still workable, and worst case scenario, we can adapt it.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages