Draft outline planning for discussion

[Sander van der Waal]

As input for the discussion this afternoon I've attached a first
draft of the planning and a description of what is expected for
Work Package 2.1.

Sander

[Steve Lee]

FYI as we discussed it, I'm now signed up to the Usability-Learnability JISC mailing list

Steve

[Ross Gardler]

With respect to the breakdown between Steve and I the actual days
allocated should be considered fluid. We'll certainly be doing 40 days
between us. How those 40 days breakdown will vary with our other
commitments. The way things are looking Steve is going to be busy on
other things and thus I'll be doing more of the Dev work on this
project (Steve will be doing all the accessibility related stuff since
I don have those skills).

The key things is that we will deliver in the most efficient way possible.

Ross

Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)

On 13 Jun 2011, at 09:43, Sander van der Waal
<sander.v...@oucs.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

> <ProjectPlan.doc>

[Sander van der Waal]

> From: raveinco...@googlegroups.com [mailto:raveincontext-
> d...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ross Gardler
> Sent: 14 June 2011 11:53
> To: raveinco...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [raveincontext-dev] Draft outline planning for discussion

>
> With respect to the breakdown between Steve and I the actual days
> allocated should be considered fluid. We'll certainly be doing 40 days
> between us. How those 40 days breakdown will vary with our other
> commitments. The way things are looking Steve is going to be busy on
> other things and thus I'll be doing more of the Dev work on this
> project (Steve will be doing all the accessibility related stuff since
> I don have those skills).

I'm absolutely fine with you splitting up the dev work however it fits
best your other commitments.

> The key things is that we will deliver in the most efficient way
> possible.

I am confident you will. Thanks,

Sander

[Steve Lee]

On 14 June 2011 11:52, Ross Gardler <ross.g...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With respect to the breakdown between Steve and I the actual days
> allocated should be considered fluid. We'll certainly be doing 40 days
> between us. How those 40 days breakdown will vary with our other
> commitments. The way things are looking Steve is going to be busy on
> other things and thus I'll be doing more of the Dev work on this
> project (Steve will be doing all the accessibility related stuff since
> I don have those skills).

We refined the plan a little in the meeting and I'm sure we'll see the
update soon. I was happy with our overall commitment, though as you
suggest mentioned we'd need to check the finalised one against our
commitments.

Steve