Just a few notes on heavy-hitter speakers...
* At conferences, speakers get in for free.
* Keynoters will likely have a hotel paid for as well, maybe flights
too.
* This means that it becomes much more viable for speakers to travel
longer distances to an event.
* Rails Camps, on the other hand, have a much more even playing field.
Anyone can speak. No one gets in for free.
* We've got some amazingly smart and creative people here in the
Australian Ruby community - do we need international 'heavy-hitters'? ;)
Not saying one approach is better than the other, but I just wanted to
highlight the differences in the types of events. I think if we could
position an Australian Ruby conference as something unique, especially
compared to Rails Camps and Rails Confs, then that could really be an
awesome event, and would be a great way to show off the aforementioned
local heavy-hitters!
Also: I'm pretty sure DHH hasn't registered for the upcoming Rails
Camp - but Geoffrey Grosenbach of Peepcode has :)
--
Pat
On 30/10/2009, at 4:24 PM, Daryl Manning wrote:
> I honestly think a conference is a good idea mostly for the reason
> that, as you say, not everyone wants to go to RailsCamp... also,
> it's much easier to get heavy hitter speakers in for a big
> conference than individual railscmaps (if DHH shows up at Melb
> Railscamp though, I will have egg on my face).
>
> Also, diversity of audience. Part of promoting Rails involves
> getting new people, project managers, business analysts, designers
> and non-hardcore programmers in to sort of complete the ecosystem
> that you need to deliver projects particularly if they're curious
> but aren't willing to go to a hack event (as I envision railscamp to
> be).
>
> Besides, I need an excuse to see more of Australia now that I'm
> here... =]
>
> ciao !
> Daryl.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Pat Allan <pat@freelancing-