<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>rails-i18n Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n</link>
  <description>Discussing the upcoming Rails changes that will support internationalization (i18n).</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: File upload using form_remote tag</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/742b670cf7d303a6/046c251f34faed03?show_docid=046c251f34faed03</link>
  <description>
  sorry boss it&#39;s not possible in ajax call to upload files
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/742b670cf7d303a6/046c251f34faed03?show_docid=046c251f34faed03</guid>
  <author>
  li...@ruby-forum.com
  (Ravindra Singh)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:22:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [rails-i18n] Re: Globalize2 v0.2.0 upcoming</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/e544cd15085426e6/7be203a128ec4726?show_docid=7be203a128ec4726</link>
  <description>
  Whoops, I&#39;ve probably missed your last email. &lt;br&gt; Yeah, I&#39;ve renamed the association because people complained that :include =&amp;gt; :globalize_translations etc seems overly verbose. I should probably add that to the readme or something.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/e544cd15085426e6/7be203a128ec4726?show_docid=7be203a128ec4726</guid>
  <author>
  svenfu...@artweb-design.de
  (Sven Fuchs)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:01:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [rails-i18n] Re: Changing :activerecord to :models in Rails yml files</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/bdf82037be6843a8?show_docid=bdf82037be6843a8</link>
  <description>
  I agree. &lt;br&gt; But ... IMO that&#39;s another good argument to make things more pluggable. One could easily imagine having the defaults/scopes generation in a central method that could be overwritten by custom implementations. &lt;br&gt; I believe at some point we even have to have better support for that unless we want to be forced to work around BC forever.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/bdf82037be6843a8?show_docid=bdf82037be6843a8</guid>
  <author>
  svenfu...@artweb-design.de
  (Sven Fuchs)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:01:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Globalize2 v0.2.0 upcoming</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/e544cd15085426e6/06585e87bba6327a?show_docid=06585e87bba6327a</link>
  <description>
  Ah, never mind. I see now that the association has been renamed from &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;globalize_translations&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;translations&amp;quot; and this was causing the &lt;br&gt; problem!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/e544cd15085426e6/06585e87bba6327a?show_docid=06585e87bba6327a</guid>
  <author>
  jensbal...@gmail.com
  (jbalvig)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:10:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Changing :activerecord to :models in Rails yml files</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/82b0986a0f14c415?show_docid=82b0986a0f14c415</link>
  <description>
  Obviously I mean the most backward compatible possible. ;)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/82b0986a0f14c415?show_docid=82b0986a0f14c415</guid>
  <author>
  jose.va...@gmail.com
  (José Valim)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:54:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Changing :activerecord to :models in Rails yml files</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/21e0398377a8b3a4?show_docid=21e0398377a8b3a4</link>
  <description>
  Hey guys, &lt;br&gt; Thanks for the attention. I personally liked the direction token by &lt;br&gt; Clemens and Iain, but the change should be the smallest backward &lt;br&gt; compatible as possible. And the simplest way to achieve it is to &lt;br&gt; move :activerecord.errors to simply :errors. &lt;br&gt; Anyway, I will try to implement default attributes as Iain proposed,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/21e0398377a8b3a4?show_docid=21e0398377a8b3a4</guid>
  <author>
  jose.va...@gmail.com
  (José Valim)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:26:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>currency locale</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/a79dd5dbcfd9c6ad/a5d258345a9f8806?show_docid=a5d258345a9f8806</link>
  <description>
  Hi Andrey, &lt;br&gt; The API with t/translation methods is far better, thanks :) &lt;br&gt; Important thing is ability to localize currencies. Locales need to &lt;br&gt; convey informations about: &lt;br&gt; - number of digits after decimal separator (which the user can &lt;br&gt; overwrite if desired), &lt;br&gt; - where to put currency sign, &lt;br&gt; for example: &lt;br&gt; currency:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/a79dd5dbcfd9c6ad/a5d258345a9f8806?show_docid=a5d258345a9f8806</guid>
  <author>
  dmg2...@dmg.pl
  (dmg)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:44:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Changing :activerecord to :models in Rails yml files</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/2597fd84ef95c1d4?show_docid=2597fd84ef95c1d4</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;ve hacked together a small script to convert the current situation &lt;br&gt; to my proposed situation and tested it out on one of the bigger &lt;br&gt; projects I did recently. The results are: &lt;br&gt; Before: 899 lines, 33KB &lt;br&gt; After: 975 lines, 35KB &lt;br&gt; Not a big difference in verbosity. &lt;br&gt; The script is here: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://gist.github.com/269353&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/2597fd84ef95c1d4?show_docid=2597fd84ef95c1d4</guid>
  <author>
  i...@iain.nl
  (iain hecker)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:36:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Changing :activerecord to :models in Rails yml files</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/0c12670075599cc6?show_docid=0c12670075599cc6</link>
  <description>
  Nice! We should also try work with a real yml file, to see if it will &lt;br&gt; get more verbose or not with Iain proposal.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/0c12670075599cc6?show_docid=0c12670075599cc6</guid>
  <author>
  jose.va...@gmail.com
  (José Valim)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:12:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Changing :activerecord to :models in Rails yml files</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/6c7ca36c38376c78?show_docid=6c7ca36c38376c78</link>
  <description>
  Forked the gist and added 3.yml, which is Clemens&#39; proposal with some &lt;br&gt; more examples &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://gist.github.com/268815#file_3.yml&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Feedback please :)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/6c7ca36c38376c78?show_docid=6c7ca36c38376c78</guid>
  <author>
  i...@iain.nl
  (iain hecker)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:07:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Changing :activerecord to :models in Rails yml files</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/224f99bad7ff7400?show_docid=224f99bad7ff7400</link>
  <description>
  Yeah, we should definitely take this into account when working on this &lt;br&gt; new i18n yml format.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/224f99bad7ff7400?show_docid=224f99bad7ff7400</guid>
  <author>
  jose.va...@gmail.com
  (José Valim)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:55:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [rails-i18n] Re: Changing :activerecord to :models in Rails yml files</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/8ca753726874594c?show_docid=8ca753726874594c</link>
  <description>
  I think that feature is crucial. I can think of it being used with more &lt;br&gt; frequency than with a generic message. &lt;br&gt; Sven Fuchs escreveu: &lt;br&gt; ...
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/8ca753726874594c?show_docid=8ca753726874594c</guid>
  <author>
  rr.ro...@gmail.com
  (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:12:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [rails-i18n] Re: Changing :activerecord to :models in Rails yml files</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/64fe37150576d25d?show_docid=64fe37150576d25d</link>
  <description>
  also, what about full_messages per model or attribute? :)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/64fe37150576d25d?show_docid=64fe37150576d25d</guid>
  <author>
  svenfu...@artweb-design.de
  (Sven Fuchs)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:32:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Changing :activerecord to :models in Rails yml files</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/0c12970085dc7599?show_docid=0c12970085dc7599</link>
  <description>
  Good proposal Clemens! But would be odd to have &amp;quot;admin&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;errors&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; sharing the same keys level: &lt;br&gt; en: &lt;br&gt; models: &lt;br&gt; admin: &lt;br&gt; name: Admin &lt;br&gt; attributes: &lt;br&gt; name: Name &lt;br&gt; errors: &lt;br&gt; messages: &lt;br&gt; blank: &amp;quot;can&#39;t be blank&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; Unless we make errors a root key as well: &lt;br&gt; en:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/0c12970085dc7599?show_docid=0c12970085dc7599</guid>
  <author>
  jose.va...@gmail.com
  (José Valim)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:20:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Changing :activerecord to :models in Rails yml files</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/7bdd07a66536762e?show_docid=7bdd07a66536762e</link>
  <description>
  I find Clemens&#39; solution the most elegant I&#39;ve read so far. It keeps &lt;br&gt; all the translations of a model together, instead of splitting them &lt;br&gt; into two separate scopes. I do miss the global error message &lt;br&gt; translations. &lt;br&gt; About the transition, we could also make a configuration option, &lt;br&gt; making it possible to switch between old-style and new-style, but I
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n/browse_thread/thread/3085a78831ed8fae/7bdd07a66536762e?show_docid=7bdd07a66536762e</guid>
  <author>
  i...@iain.nl
  (iain hecker)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:17:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
