MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.8.8 with SMTP id l8mr565353ybi.10.1234534525380; Fri, 13 
	Feb 2009 06:15:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:15:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8bf510930902121945i1633c8a2h5cfba69001928394@mail.gmail.com>
X-IP: 24.173.165.193
References: <8bf510930902121945i1633c8a2h5cfba69001928394@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; 
	rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009011912 Firefox/3.0.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <eabaff37-d8d7-481d-abfc-622eb4db95f8@q25g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Introducing RMM, the Rails Maturity Model
From: Robert Dempsey <robertonra...@gmail.com>
To: Ruby on Rails meets the business world <rails-business@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb 12, 10:45=A0pm, Obie Fernandez <obiefernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, you would have to pay handsomely to get this
> certification, and the result would not necessarily be what you
> expect.

This statement is quite worrisome, and sounds like it's trying to
limit competition in the Rails space

Obie - can you clarify what you mean by this?