Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Explaining to existing customers why you are developing with Rails now instead of .NET
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Robby Russell  
View profile
 More options Jul 29 2007, 10:07 pm
From: Robby Russell <ro...@planetargon.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:07:10 -0700
Local: Sun, Jul 29 2007 10:07 pm
Subject: Re: [rails-business] Re: Explaining to existing customers why you are developing with Rails now instead of .NET

On Jul 29, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Warren Seen wrote:

> On 30/07/2007, at 7:46 AM, Mitch Pirtle wrote:

>> Going through the same experience here, but in a white-hot PHP world.
>> As such my answers are fairly PHP-centric, but with modification
>> might be of some reuse ;-)

> The only occasional hiccup we seem to run into is at completion, in
> relation to the client finding competent Rails hosting within their
> budget, there can be a little bit of "sticker shock" when you compare
> to PHP hosting, which has really become a commodity market. I imagine
> however this will resolve itself in time as more budget hosting
> options become available.

I really hope that budget hosting isn't going to become more and more  
available. Why? Because it's very concerned that people will shell  
out tens/hundreds of thousands of dollars to design and develop their  
business web site and then want to stick it on a $10/month hosting  
plan to save money.

As someone who has been running a Rails hosting business for 2 1/2  
years... I've seen this sort of thing happen more than I'd like to  
admit. Even worse, I've had discussions with these people and have  
long conversations explaining that it's not a "short-coming" of Rails  
that they should pay at least 7x/month for reliable hosting compared  
to PHP. I tend to try and explain  that comparing PHP to hosting Ruby  
is like apples and oranges. A much more accurate comparison is  
hosting a Java/Tomcat app to Ruby/Rails or a .NET app.

In my opinion, budget hosting might work for the hobbyists, but  
businesses that rely on their website should be discouraged from even  
considering economy grade hosting, especially if the hosting company  
"just added" Rails support on top of their existing economy PHP  
hosting. If you guys are selling Rails to people, manage their  
expectations on hosting costs early on. Otherwise people like me have  
to explain it after they've gotten "sticker shock" and this isn't any  
good for the reputation of Rails. It's often an easy enough to  
discussion to explain, up front, "Rails will cost you a bit more to  
host, but you'll save so much money in development and maintenance  
costs." For many of us, I'd imagine a hour of our consulting/
development costs more than what a monthly expense would cost the  
projects we work on.

Just my two cents on this topic... :-)

Robby

--
Robby Russell
Founder and Executive Director

PLANET ARGON, LLC
Design, Development, and Hosting with Ruby on Rails

http://www.planetargon.com/
http://www.robbyonrails.com/

+1 503 445 2457
+1 877 55 ARGON [toll free]
+1 815 642 4068 [fax]


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google