Three out of four doctors would prescribe medical marijuana to patients: Study

9 views
Skip to first unread message

selected by Rael

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 10:37:23 AM6/19/13
to rael-s...@googlegroups.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Raelian Movement
for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Three out of four doctors would prescribe medical marijuana to patients: Study

 

The results of the study, which were published recently in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that 76 percent of physicians polled would prescribe pot to patients who were experiencing pain from cancer. 

According to the Journal, a non-scientific survey held in "Clinical Decisions, an interactive feature in which experts discuss a controversial topic and readers vote and post comments," received 1,466 votes from 56 states and provinces in the U.S. and the Americas, as well as 72 countries. 

Participants were presented with the case of a 68-year-old woman named Marilyn who had been experiencing symptoms from metastatic breast cancer. Forum participants were asked to vote on whether physicians should prescribe medical marijuana to help her ease her symptoms. They were also given a pair of opinion pieces that were written for doctors arguing for and against the use of medical marijuana. 

'What's the downside?' 

In their report researchers said the results showed that "physicians in favor of medicinal marijuana often focused on [their] responsibility as caregivers to alleviate suffering." Continuing, they noted, "Many pointed out the known dangers of prescription narcotics, supported patient choice, or described personal experience with patients who benefited from the use of marijuana." 

Opponents of the use of marijuana for medical/pain relief symptoms, however, said they have not seen enough evidence to support its effectiveness. Also, they raised some concerns about dosages and potential side effects. 

"I think there's some context that needs to be considered," said Dr. Bradley Flansbaum, one physician who said he'd prescribe marijuana to the theoretical patient, in an interview with HealthDay. 

"This was a woman with stage 4 cancer who wasn't responding to [anti-nausea medications]," he said. "I'm not saying let's legalize marijuana, but this is a woman at the end of her life, so what's the downside, given that there might be a benefit. In a different situation, medical marijuana might not be so well embraced." 

According to researchers, the number of physicians supporting medical marijuana use "surprised" them: 
We were surprised by the outcome of polling and comments, with 76 percent of all votes in favor of the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes - even though marijuana use is illegal in most countries. ... Given that North America represents only a minority of the general online readership of the Journal, this skew in voting suggests that the subject of this particular Clinical Decisions stirs more passion among readers from North America than among those residing elsewhere.
The researchers noted that support for medical marijuana use was lowest in Utah (1 percent of 76 voters) and highest in Pennsylvania (96 percent of 107 voters). 

Science is sound 

More from the researcher's report: 
Physicians in favor of medicinal marijuana often focused on our responsibility as caregivers to alleviate suffering. Many pointed out the known dangers of prescription narcotics, supported patient choice, or described personal experience with patients who benefited from the use of marijuana. Those who opposed the use of medicinal marijuana targeted the lack of evidence, the lack of provenance, inconsistency of dosage, and concern about side effects, including psychosis.
The available evidence seems to suggest that supporters of medical marijuana use have science on their side. Several studies by the University of California Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research have examined the effects of medical marijuana for neuropathic use. 

"These studies have clearly shown the positive effects of using marijuana as a pain reliever and medicine for patients with such chronic conditions as HIV, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, spinal cord injury, and sleep disorders," Aaron Turpen wrote for NaturalNews in 2010. 

See all of our medical marijuana coverage here: http://www.naturalnews.com/medical_marijuana.html 

Sources for this article include: 

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMclde1305159#t=article 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com 
http://consumer.healthday.com 
http://www.naturalnews.com/029690_medical_marijuana_debate.html 

Source: NaturalNews.com - See more at: http://www.riseearth.com/2013/06/three-out-of-four-doctors-would.html#sthash.qjHTQU2C.dpuf


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their intelligence at its
full capacity, the label "selected by RAEL" on some articles does not
mean that I agree with their content or support it. "Selected by RAEL"
means that I believe it is important for the people of this planet to
know about what people think or do, even when what they think or do is
completely stupid and against our philosophy. When I selected articles
in the past about stupid Christian fundamentalists in America praying
for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader was stupid enough to believe
that I was supporting praying to change the weather. So, when I select
articles which are in favor of drugs, anti-Semitic, anti-Jewish, racist,
revisionist, or inciting hatred against any group or religion, or any
other stupid article, it does not mean that I support them. It just
means that it is important for all human beings to know about them.
Common sense, which is usually very good among our readers, is good
enough to understand that. When, like in the recent articles on drug
decriminalization, it is necessary to make it clearer, I add a comment,
which in this case was very clear: I support decriminalizing all drugs,
as it is stupid to throw depressed and sad people (as only depressed and
sad people use drugs) in prison and ruin their life with a criminal
record. That does not mean that there is any change to the Message which
says clearly that we must not use any drug except for medical purposes.
The same applies to the freedom of expression which must be absolute.
That does not mean again of course that I agree with anti-Jews,
anti-Semites, racists of any kind or anti-Raelians. But by knowing your
enemies or the enemies of your values, you are better equipped to fight
them. With love and respect of course, and with the wonderful sentence
of the French philosopher Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you
say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages