Fourth potentially habitable planet discovered

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Dennis

unread,
Feb 4, 2012, 3:28:09 AM2/4/12
to rael-s...@googlegroups.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Raelian Movement
for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/9056979/Fourth-potentially-habitabl
e-planet-discovered.html

Fourth potentially habitable planet discovered

A fourth potentially habitable planet outside our solar system - about 22
light-years from Earth - with temperatures that could support water and
lifen has been discovered by international astronomers.


3:00PM GMT 02 Feb 2012


The team analysed data from the European Southern Observatory about a star
known as GJ 667C, which is known as an M-class dwarf star and puts out much
less heat than our Sun.

At least three planets are orbiting close to the star, and one of them
appears to be close enough that it likely absorbs about as much incoming
light and energy as Earth, has similar surface temperatures and perhaps
water.

The new rocky planet, GJ 667Cc, orbits its star every 28.15 days - meaning
its year equals about one Earth month - and has a mass at least 4.5 times
that of Earth, according to the research published in Astrophysical Journal
Letters.

"This planet is the new best candidate to support liquid water and, perhaps,
life as we know it," said Guillem Anglada-Escudi who was with the Carnegie
Institution for Science when he conducted the research but has since moved
on to the University of Gottingen in Germany.

The theory about water, however, cannot be confirmed until astronomers learn
more about the planet's atmosphere.

Other planets circling the same star - which is part of a three-star system
- could include a gas-giant and an additional super-Earth with an orbital
period of 75 days, but more observations are needed to confirm that.

Some experts have been sceptical that M-class dwarf stars could have planets
that support life because they are too dim and tend to have lots of solar
flare activity which could send off lethal radiation to nearby planets.

And even though this star, GJ 667C, has a much lower abundance of elements
heavier than helium, such as iron, carbon, and silicon - the building blocks
of terrestrial planets - than our Sun, astronomers are intrigued by the
possibilities.

"This was expected to be a rather unlikely star to host planets. Yet there
they are, around a very nearby, metal-poor example of the most common type
of star in our galaxy," said co-author Steven Vogt, a professor of astronomy
and astrophysics at University of California Santa Cruz.

"The detection of this planet, this nearby and this soon, implies that our
galaxy must be teeming with billions of potentially habitable rocky
planets."

French astronomers in May last year confirmed the first exoplanet, Gliese
581d, to meet key requirements for sustaining life. It is a rocky planet
about 20 light-years away.

Swiss astronomers reported in August that another planet, HD 85512 b, about
36 light-years away seemed to be in the habitable zone of its star.

The US space agency NASA confirmed its first such planet late last year,
Kepler 22b, about 600 light-years away.

Source: AFP

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their intelligence at its
full capacity, the label "selected by RAEL" on some articles does not
mean that I agree with their content or support it. "Selected by RAEL"
means that I believe it is important for the people of this planet to
know about what people think or do, even when what they think or do is
completely stupid and against our philosophy. When I selected articles
in the past about stupid Christian fundamentalists in America praying
for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader was stupid enough to
believe that I was supporting praying to change the weather. So, when
I select articles which are in favor of drugs, anti-semitic,
anti-Jewish, racist, revisionist, or inciting hatred against any group
or religion, or any other stupid article, it does not mean that I
support them. It just means that it is important for all human beings
to know about them. Common sense, which is usually very good among our
readers, is good enough to understand that. When, like in the recent
articles on drug decriminalization, it is necessary to make it
clearer, I add a comment, which in this case was very clear: I support
decriminalizing all drugs, as it is stupid to throw depressed and sad
people (as only depressed and sad people use drugs) in prison and ruin
their life with a criminal record. That does not mean that there is
any change to the Message which says clearly that we must not use any
drug except for medical purposes. The same applies to the freedom of
expression which must be absolute. That does not mean again of course
that I agree with anti-Jews, antisemites, racists of any kind or
anti-Raelians. But by knowing your enemies or the enemies of your
values, you are better equipped to fight them. With love and respect
of course, and with the wonderful sentence of the French philosopher
Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to
the death your right to say it".

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages