Problem with case - Racket Users

The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Message from discussion Problem with case
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 129.10.115.116 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of users-boun...@racket-lang.org) client-ip=129.10.115.116;
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of zeppi...@gmail.com designates
	209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.175;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGZAPF4==vmfHisLPsHHMyXNKRAh8+e8EBDjMXw6RNEqiQG...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEEP09D39AMiTozxDCA5WUx4bkE0KtvRY=Ez-dxgpXESigu...@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKfDxxwJZwPGtejSXh-jGSUFYuj4jxO2eAoA7Wh8_7EE_Q5...@mail.gmail.com>
	<5057AF20.1090...@ccs.neu.edu>
	<CAKfDxxx2Z-UD+odPVYFcFvBJz4o1qUn84+23krVPGz9RLXt...@mail.gmail.com>
	<CB5BE78D-2FB0-403F-8DFE-B0A5E4D2C...@gmail.com>
	<CAAN-iVFFyHyD5uJFcx+F6oHvpJKyj6WdiSsMUAOr04SZw1r...@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGZAPF4==vmfHisLPsHHMyXNKRAh8+e8EBDjMXw6RNEqiQG...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:29:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKfDxxyGg3NQbVhEytW17puHADBLq7MomBZVgc3F65nkYEH...@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jon Zeppieri <zeppi...@gmail.com>
To: Joe Gilray <jgil...@gmail.com>
Cc: users <us...@racket-lang.org>
Subject: Re: [racket] Problem with case
Precedence: list
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: users-boun...@racket-lang.org
Errors-To: users-boun...@racket-lang.org

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Danny Yoo <d...@hashcollision.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'd like to see a discussion of the tradeoffs between cond & case & match
> > and how each is best used.

1. Use 'cond' where you would use 'if...else if...else' in a C-like
language. It's just a multi-way if:

(cond [(string? value)
           (write-string value out)]
          [(bytes? value)
           (write-bytes value out)]
          [(input-port? value)
           (copy-port value out)]
          [else
           (error "bad value")])

2. Use 'case' (roughly) where you would use 'switch' in C, namely,
when you're comparing the value of an expression against a set of
constants:

(case escape-char
  [(#\n) #\newline]
  [(#\r) #\return]
  [(#\t) #\tab]
  [(#\a) #\u0007]
  [(#\v) #\u000b]
  [(#\f) #\u000c]
  [(#\e) #\u001b]
  [else escape-char])

3. Use 'match' (roughly) where you would use 'case' in ML. I agree
with Danny: it's particularly nice for struct matching:

(: add (All (A) ((Braun A) A -> (Braun A))))
(define (add t a)
  (match t
    [(Braun-Empty)
     (Braun-Tree a t t)]
    [(Braun-Tree x l r)
     (Braun-Tree a (add r x) l)]))

>
>
> I think 'case' is supposed to have good performance compared to the
> other two, due to work by Jon Zeppieri
> (http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive//2012-July/010036.html).
>

The new case implementation isn't in 5.3 or the stable branch on
github. (I assume the nightly builds on racket-lang.org are from the
stable branch?) It's in the master branch.
____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Account Options
