Running rack tests on Windows (both 1.9.3 and 2.0.0)
The group you are posting to is a
Usenet group . Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
From:
Luis Lavena <luislav... @gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 05:20:55 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 11 2012 8:20 am
Subject: Running rack tests on Windows (both 1.9.3 and 2.0.0)
Hello, I've started to look into Rack (and its tests) on Windows just to ensure
I found a few hardcoded values to temporary files (/tmp/rack_sendfile) that
Perhaps it will be good to use the system temporary directory instead?
Beyond that, and without installing any particular handlers, rack tests
ruby 1.9.3p327 (2012-11-10) [i386-mingw32]
ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [i386-mingw32]
ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [x64-mingw32]
See gist for full details:
https://gist.github.com/4054864
Do you think tests are incorrectly assuming details of the platform (test
How would you like to proceed? I wanted to get the conversation going
Thank you.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
From:
James Tucker <jftuc... @gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 10:59:40 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 11 2012 1:59 pm
Subject: Re: Running rack tests on Windows (both 1.9.3 and 2.0.0)
On Nov 11, 2012, at 5:20 AM, Luis Lavena <luislav... @gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I've started to look into Rack (and its tests) on Windows just to ensure things are running as much properly as possible.
> I found a few hardcoded values to temporary files (/tmp/rack_sendfile) that is blocking spec_sendfile.rb from executing.
Those sound easy, if you get an issue open I'll make sure to get it done before I roll the next release.
> Perhaps it will be good to use the system temporary directory instead?
Agreed.
> Beyond that, and without installing any particular handlers, rack tests results in:
> ruby 1.9.3p327 (2012-11-10) [i386-mingw32]
> ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [i386-mingw32]
> ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [x64-mingw32]
> See gist for full details:
> https://gist.github.com/4054864
> Do you think tests are incorrectly assuming details of the platform (test is not prepared to run on Windows) or do you think the failures are possible rack issues with Windows?
> How would you like to proceed? I wanted to get the conversation going before invest more time on this.
This is excellent feedback, if you have more time to prepare some patches, that's awesome, but if you just want to create some issues with this information, that's great too.
Many thanks
> Thank you.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
From:
Konstantin Haase <k.ha... @finn.de> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:25:45 +0200
Local: Sun, Nov 11 2012 6:25 pm
Subject: Re: Running rack tests on Windows (both 1.9.3 and 2.0.0)
In related news: Work on windows support for Travis CI has started. It might take a bit, though.
Konstantin
On Nov 11, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Luis Lavena <luislav... @gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I've started to look into Rack (and its tests) on Windows just to ensure things are running as much properly as possible.
> I found a few hardcoded values to temporary files (/tmp/rack_sendfile) that is blocking spec_sendfile.rb from executing.
> Perhaps it will be good to use the system temporary directory instead?
> Beyond that, and without installing any particular handlers, rack tests results in:
> ruby 1.9.3p327 (2012-11-10) [i386-mingw32]
> ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [i386-mingw32]
> ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [x64-mingw32]
> See gist for full details:
> https://gist.github.com/4054864
> Do you think tests are incorrectly assuming details of the platform (test is not prepared to run on Windows) or do you think the failures are possible rack issues with Windows?
> How would you like to proceed? I wanted to get the conversation going before invest more time on this.
> Thank you.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
From:
Luis Lavena <luislav... @gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 11:11 am
Subject: Re: Running rack tests on Windows (both 1.9.3 and 2.0.0)
On Sunday, November 11, 2012 8:25:54 PM UTC-3, Konstantin Haase wrote:
> In related news: Work on windows support for Travis CI has started. It
Really, I will do that.
:-D
--
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
From:
Tim Moore <timothy.m.mo... @gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Jan 31 2013 1:59 am
Subject: Re: Running rack tests on Windows (both 1.9.3 and 2.0.0)
Luis, I've submitted a pull request to rack that fixes a race condition when
https://github.com/rack/rack/pull/505
I don't have easy access to a Windows machine to make sure that the fix
Thanks,
On Monday, November 12, 2012 12:20:55 AM UTC+11, Luis Lavena wrote:
> Hello,
> I've started to look into Rack (and its tests) on Windows just to ensure
> I found a few hardcoded values to temporary files (/tmp/rack_sendfile)
> Perhaps it will be good to use the system temporary directory instead?
> Beyond that, and without installing any particular handlers, rack tests
> ruby 1.9.3p327 (2012-11-10) [i386-mingw32]
> ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [i386-mingw32]
> ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [x64-mingw32]
> See gist for full details:
> https://gist.github.com/4054864
> Do you think tests are incorrectly assuming details of the platform (test
> How would you like to proceed? I wanted to get the conversation going
> Thank you.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
From:
James Tucker <jftuc... @gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:02:11 -0800
Local: Wed, Feb 6 2013 9:02 pm
Subject: Re: Running rack tests on Windows (both 1.9.3 and 2.0.0)
Provided your git settings are not modifying file data, you should be close
On 11 November 2012 05:20, Luis Lavena <luislav... @gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I've started to look into Rack (and its tests) on Windows just to ensure
> I found a few hardcoded values to temporary files (/tmp/rack_sendfile)
> Perhaps it will be good to use the system temporary directory instead?
> Beyond that, and without installing any particular handlers, rack tests
> ruby 1.9.3p327 (2012-11-10) [i386-mingw32]
> ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [i386-mingw32]
> ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-10 trunk 37612) [x64-mingw32]
> See gist for full details:
> https://gist.github.com/4054864
> Do you think tests are incorrectly assuming details of the platform (test
> How would you like to proceed? I wanted to get the conversation going
> Thank you.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
