Joshua Peek <jo...@joshpeek.com> writes:
> I'd like to do a 1.0.1 maintenance soon of the rack-1.0 branch. Please
> test your apps and frameworks on that branch. It should be a fully
> compatible bug fix release.
This is a good idea. When you consider it ready, I can write an
announcement and do a formal release on Rubyforge and my servers.
> I went though most of the Lighthouse tickets and only found one that
> really concerned 1.0.
>
> "Rack::Utils.unescape problems in Ruby 1.9.1"
> http://rack.lighthouseapp.com/projects/22435/tickets/48-rackutilsunescape-problems-in-ruby-191
>
> http://rack.lighthouseapp.com/projects/22435-rack/milestones/current
>
> Please reassign any 1.1 milestones tickets to 1.0 or let me know of
> anything else master that you'd liked cherry-picked into rack-1.0.
>
> Looking forward to Rack 1.1.
I'm open for Rack 1.1 suggestions. 1.1-discussed things can be merged
into master now.
I have more time to do a release cycle in the next few weeks, so if we
merge quickly, we can push a 1.1 pretty soon.
blink, do you still want to split the openid parts? 1.1 would be a
good juncture.
Thanks to everyone,
--
Christian Neukirchen <chneuk...@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org
For 1.1, I want to pull parts of Bryan Helmkamp's Rack::Test lib into
core. Its been proven and widely accepted by many frameworks so far. I
want to start a separate thread for this and we can discuss whats
important, what belongs in core, etc. 1.1 will give us a chance to
improve Rack's testing support.
http://github.com/brynary/rack-test/
--
Joshua Peek
Can anyone report any failures on 1.9? I have some that are related to
a ruby regression (in 1.9.1-p152).
http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/browse_thread/thread/a2aab3a4720f34c4
Also, I'm trying to contact some people atm to setup a rack CI server for us.
--
Joshua Peek
Rails 2.3 is all systems go w/ rack 1.0.1.
Should wait on Ryan to test w/ Sinatra.
--
Joshua Peek
Sorry. I'm way behind on ML/lighthouse duties.
Sinatra looks good under the rack-1.0 branch. +1 for release.
The Sinatra test suite fails like crazy under 1.9 due to this
rack.input / external encoding Rack::Lint check:
http://github.com/rack/rack/commit/851782648fbbb141b1b56b73d8efc99efcac1b27#L0R240
The Sinatra test suite puts Rack::Lint in the middleware pipeline for
every test, though. I don't think that's a common practice. It passes
100% when I remove that check. The issue seems to be with the way
Rack::MockRequest wraps the :input string in an StringIO without any
encoding work. Or, maybe we should be setting the encoding on the
input string before passing it in. I should be able to work around
this in Sinatra somehow.
Thanks,
Ryan
Moving the openid stuff into rack-contrib for 1.1 sounds good. I am on a vacation till the end of next week so as soon as I finish some personal things I can do the migrations.
Additionally, as memcached ruby gem seems to be more stable with 0.17, I plan on evaluating using that rather the memcache-client, unless there are any objections.
--
stadik.net
On Aug 3, 2009 4:00 PM, "Christian Neukirchen" <chneuk...@gmail.com> wrote:
[Sorry for being rather inactive lately, my real life is too busy. ;)]
Joshua Peek <jo...@joshpeek.com> writes: > I'd like to do a 1.0.1 maintenance soon of the rack-1.0 ...
This is a good idea. When you consider it ready, I can write an
announcement and do a formal release on Rubyforge and my servers.
> I went though most of the Lighthouse tickets and only found one that > really concerned 1.0. > > ...
Alright!
Ok, everyone cherry-pick fixes for 1.0.1, and I can make a release
this week (Thu or Fri).
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Scytrin dai Kinthra <scy...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>> Moving the openid stuff into rack-contrib for 1.1 sounds good. I am
>> on a
>> vacation till the end of next week so as soon as I finish some
>> personal
>> things I can do the migrations.
>>
>> Additionally, as memcached ruby gem seems to be more stable with
>> 0.17, I
>> plan on evaluating using that rather the memcache-client, unless
>> there are
>> any objections.
>
> Alright!
>
> Ok, everyone cherry-pick fixes for 1.0.1, and I can make a release
> this week (Thu or Fri).
to rack-1.0?
I sent a patch to the list a couple of days ago. I have been looking
in the github page and it haven't been included. Does this mean that
it will not be included in 1.0.1?
Thanks.
Daniel Rodríguez Troitiño.
El 16/10/2009, a las 22:30, Christian Neukirchen
<chneuk...@gmail.com> escribió:
> Does this mean that
> it will not be included in 1.0.1?
I'll merge it.