Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
party election broadcast
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
simon gray  
View profile  
 More options Apr 12 2012, 2:55 pm
From: simon gray <si...@star-one.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:55:22 +0100
Local: Thurs, Apr 12 2012 2:55 pm
Subject: party election broadcast
as many of us are preparing to vote in local elections in a couple of
weeks time, and some of us even have referendums to decide whether we
want directly elected mayors to run our cities, let's not forget this
party election broadcast for the 1994 european elections:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=438UKM1Av1g

--
www.star-one.org.uk ~ www.winterval.org.uk ~ www.birmingham-alive.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Andrew Hatton  
View profile  
 More options Apr 13 2012, 2:12 pm
From: Andrew Hatton <Andrew.Hat...@phonecoop.coop>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Apr 13 2012 2:12 pm
Subject: Re: party election broadcast
I doubt it is much less inappropriate than Lord Winston's one this
week about the N.H.S. despite it being LOCAL elections!

On Apr 12, 7:55 pm, simon gray <si...@star-one.org.uk> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alec  
View profile  
 More options Apr 19 2012, 7:05 pm
From: Alec <praisegdbareb...@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Apr 19 2012 7:05 pm
Subject: Re: party election broadcast

Would that it were, Andrew, that Ken Livingstone were limiting his
unobtainable promises in London to the NHS.  To name but one other, he's
vowing to re-instigate the EMA... although he would be able to force
London-based schools to provide it, there would be no replacement funds
from central government so the schools would have to cut expenditures in
other areas such as teaching kids.

In Scotland, the Holyrood Government just has announced that proposed cuts
to council tax and rent benefit (state benefits are not a Devolved issue)
will be deferred for a year; with the clear sub-text that this is a pitch
for the local elections.  Again, they can do this... it's just that they'll
need to shuffle money from somewhere else (maybe money which is ear-marked
for wind farms if Donald Trump manages to stymie the one in Aberdeen).

Yogic flying sounds much better than just another bunch of hacks on the
make.  I haven't been following the referendums in places like Brum
closely, but it'll be ghastly if an uninspiring percentage of the
electorate votes and still manages to approve yet another tier of
governance with superannuated salaries.

~alec


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »