Received: by 10.204.33.6 with SMTP id f6mr273535bkd.18.1257850201313;
        Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.33.6 with SMTP id f6mr273534bkd.18.1257850201285;
        Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <bia...@ukr.net>
Received: from fsm1.ukr.net (fsm1.ukr.net [195.214.192.23])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 17si33725bwz.0.2009.11.10.02.50.01;
        Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of bia...@ukr.net designates 195.214.192.23 as permitted sender) client-ip=195.214.192.23;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of bia...@ukr.net designates 195.214.192.23 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=bia...@ukr.net
Received: from 160-110-113-92.pool.ukrtel.net ([92.113.110.160] helo=[192.168.1.32])
	by fsm1.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1N7oIS-0008Kx-Uj
	for qbzr@googlegroups.com; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:50:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4AF94559.4070103@ukr.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:50:01 +0200
From: Alexander Belchenko <bia...@ukr.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: qbzr@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [qbzr] qshelve: anyone keen to work on it?
References: <4AF8C519.6010103@canonical.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AF8C519.6010103@canonical.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Ian Clatworthy пишет:
> 
> I'm excited to say that Explorer+QBzr is getting closer every week to 
> being good enough for me to stay off the command line altogether. The 
> biggest reason for me to fire up a terminal shell is shelve/unshelve 
> functionality.
> 
> Is anyone else in need of this?

I'd like to have GUI for shelve, yes.

> If so, Are you in need enough to write 
> it? :-)

No, I'm overloaded by other things. Once I'll get free time I'm planning 
to work over our long-standing merge proposals. And maybe over 
bzr-explorer merge proposals too. The recent thread about patches 
inclusion to bzr made me think about our situation which is very bad.

Manpower! Manpower! Come to us!

> It would be awesome to have this in the next release or two of 
> QBzr IMO.

My personal wishlist for QBzr is order of magnitude longer :-/