Received: by 10.210.3.25 with SMTP id 25mr707695ebc.14.1256228984824;
        Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.210.3.25 with SMTP id 25mr707694ebc.14.1256228984741;
        Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <constant.b...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com (mail-ew0-f219.google.com [209.85.219.219])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 15si239765ewy.0.2009.10.22.09.29.43;
        Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of constant.b...@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.219 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.219;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of constant.b...@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.219 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=constant.b...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-ew0-f219.google.com with SMTP id 19so8205937ewy.4
        for <pythoscope@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=ihxWT/xPcBao8WKSINrUuaKPBpPikKvw55szAVzIuro=;
        b=p00ma0PomttzXClli1cqmzflic7ndy62rnnPUUu7j7l/iGfRpaN834qj/A6LXYeQa1
         43gcXLY0ZOCL0zJZcsXzw22IEAYiGY3wTgzhk5flf363YxMm2HrvtlMZG/EfQAwI3ZCg
         oyftN5vcjDQ01FP3Ws3hVLWOKyhUbkx3/TF6s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=UNJS2yG/Q4PW5/YckeH4RTAsb4U5OSZFhT2Gx9QhHwxrZWGcTy693ubL84iUA8qJ9q
         R3n8M1JqQjsgt8YBHg1doGsvHOlm93WsPf9FXTgI3wz7JzkCqkdFTp3xWWuV1EWvAgHX
         3z2qq7H125H6wAT7YesyzUuxhYkpE3ikPUvIE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.211.132.22 with SMTP id j22mr4755171ebn.24.1256228983552; Thu, 
	22 Oct 2009 09:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <318072440910220829ge534b0g72e49701ce7f9...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b98f5d1e-a281-481e-8ced-500557b44...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
	 <5e8b0f6b0910220730i2706d444ob8ecba397655f...@mail.gmail.com>
	 <318072440910220829ge534b0g72e49701ce7f9...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:29:43 +0200
Message-ID: <5e8b0f6b0910220929m7d47a2f1y2dfe3d2ffc09d...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Pythoscope] Re: Running Pythoscope against the stdlib
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Kwiatkowski?= <constant.b...@gmail.com>
To: pythoscope@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Ryan Freckleton
<ryan.freckle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Story of my life, "D'oh, that's a bug fixed in the latest version!"
> :-) I'll repeat my tests using latest trunk of Pythoscope. Thanks
> Micha=C5=82!

And thanks to you for testing Pythoscope! I really like your idea of
testing Pythoscope on Python's stdlib. Actually I think this is a
great candidate for one of the upcoming blueprints:

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/pythoscope/+spec/open-source-project-cover=
age

The idea is to use an open source project to track Pythoscope metrics
over time. It's still just a rough idea, but I think measuring memory
consumption and inspection time would be good starting points. I
already have some working code - if someone's interested look at the
benchmark scripts in Pythoscope's "tools" directory.

>> I think exclude option is a good idea - we can track that as a
>> blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/pythoscope/+addspec
>
> I'll add it later today or tomorrow.

Thanks again!

Cheers,
mk