Hi,
I thought I had implemented the same as pymorph except for some cases where I
thought that pymorph was actually not the best.
Still, can you just send me the image you have on the top left? So I can test
it better.
Tx
Luis
On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 01:03:35 PM jip wrote:
> Dear luis,
>
> When working with regional maxima implemented in mahotas 0.8, I realize
> that the result is different from the result obtained with pymorph.remax.
> For comparison, mahotas.regmax and skimage implementation yield similar
> images:
>
> <
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Mjqv0yktQ8I/T8Z5ZmUKpZI/AAAAAAAAAx8/lHut
> 521wuMk/s1600/Remax-Pymorph-mahotas_skimage.png>
>
> up left:original imagr
>
> up right: gaussian blur
>
> mid left: regmax on blured image with mahotas
>
> mid right: regmax with pymorph
>
> down:regmax with skimage
>
> Do pymorph and mahotas implement the same operator?.
>
> I didn't test it yet, but I suppose I can't use the labelled image from
> mahotas.regmax in the watershed algo without some pos-tprocessing to remove
> the concentric domains.
>
> Best regards
>
> Jean-Patrick
> <
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Mjqv0yktQ8I/T8Z5ZmUKpZI/AAAAAAAAAx8/lHut
> 521wuMk/s1600/Remax-Pymorph-mahotas_skimage.png>
--
Luis Pedro Coelho | Institute for Molecular Medicine |
http://luispedro.org
LxMLS 2012: Lisbon Machine Learning School
http://lxmls.it.pt