> Patching with 1.6.1 patch now fails. Is there a 1.6.4 patch ready?
I have attached my 1.6.4 patch, please try it.
> 1. What is the oldest GCC supported?
> 2. What is the oldest distro supported?
> 3. What revision of PythonOgre can you suggest to me which is working in
> stable manner on Linux?
I am sorry I can not answer these questions :-(
I am currently building on Debian Testing (AMD64) with boost 1.40, G++ 4.3
and 4.4. I will try with G++ 4.2 and see how it works. Unfortunately I
still have problems with script parsing when running any of the demos. I
had this problem with an earlier SVN revision before (cant remember which
one), then it was gone and now it is back :-(
Maybe we both should work together to get a working Linux build, Ivan?
Regards,
Enrico
Am Donnerstag, den 12.11.2009, 15:51 +0100 schrieb Andy Miller
<nzmi...@gmail.com>:
> I'm currently working on updating the Linux build and things are looking
OK
> -- only major issue is that you can't use the latest release Boost
(1.40)
> instead you have to use the boost SVN (or probably 1.39 would be OK)
Why is this?
Thanks,
Enrico
ah, okay. Just for reference: You are using boost svn, Python 2.6,
Microsoft Visual Studio 200x?
Thanks,
Enrico
just for reference: Python 2.6 with boost 1.38, 1.39 and 1.40 does not
work on Linux, too.
Regards,
Enrico
I've also updated generate_code.py to exclude the function that has an issue with the protected declaration..
Expect a couple of SVN updates over the next day or so to bring it up to date for Linux
I managed to get a linux 64bit build working. Attached is a new
ogre_1.6.4.patch as well as a small patch for python-ogre's environment.py and
setup.py
The new ogre_1.6.4.patch has a workaround for the endless parsing problem. I
will test further if this is really needed. I think the biggest change is the
Boost SVN version...
I can now run most of the demos provided with python-ogre. Demo_Compositor
currently crashes with a segmentation fault.
System: Debian testing AMD64, boost SVN, GCC 4.3.4, python 2.5, Ogre 1.6.4
Please test this patch and provide feedback :-)
Thanks,
Enrico
Am Samstag 14 November 2009 02:26:46 schrieb Andy Miller:
> Does the 'j' option on the tar extract cause an error or did you simply
> remove it because its's no longer needed on newer version of tar? -- if it
> doesn't cause an issue then I'm inclined to leave it in..
The 'j' is not needed when running tar and it causes no error to leave it in.
So leave it there .
> For the GroupManager patch would you be able to do some further debugging
> as it would seem that this is a fairly serious issue in Ogre and your
> patch is a little arbitrary in the way it works :)
Yeah, this patch is only intended for testing, not redistribution. I should
have made this clearer at the beginning...
> What is the actual size of 'su' when it returns from getScriptPatterns and
> which script loader it is being processed at that time as presumably there
> is a 32/64 bit bug in here somewhere..
2^31 patterns. I am not sure which script loader it is...
Regards,
Enrico
Am Sonntag, den 15.11.2009, 08:54 +0100 schrieb Andy Miller
<nzmi...@gmail.com>:
> Can you apply the following patch to your ogre source code and see if it
> solves the issue:
>
> Index: OgreBillboardChain.cpp
this does not change anything for me so far.
The change in the Ogre Resource Manager is still needed as of now. I will
continuuing debugging this...
One questions though: why have the Linux build commands for boost changed
so dramatically? Why are you still relying on bjam? Recent Boost (1.40 and
SVN) is self-contained, extra bjam is not needed. Oh, and these changes are
not using multi cores (again).
Thanks,
Enrico
One questions though: why have the Linux build commands for boost changed
so dramatically? Why are you still relying on bjam? Recent Boost (1.40 and
SVN) is self-contained, extra bjam is not needed. Oh, and these changes are
not using multi cores (again).
And where has the multi cores been removed ???Andy
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:26, Andy Miller <nzmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
--
Regards,
Ivan Vučica
Am Montag, den 16.11.2009, 11:36 +0100 schrieb Andy Miller
<nzmi...@gmail.com>:
> If one has been missed please add it to the sourceforge tracker...
Okay, will do :-)
Has anyone tried building python-ogre without building CEGUI and OIS
separately? This works for me quite well, I am using the libraries provided
by my distribution (Debian).
Regards,
Enrico
And his patches have been incorporated into the trunk (as far as I know)...If one has been missed please add it to the sourceforge tracker...
Hi,
Am Montag, den 16.11.2009, 11:36 +0100 schrieb Andy Miller
<nzmi...@gmail.com>:
> If one has been missed please add it to the sourceforge tracker...
Okay, will do :-)
Has anyone tried building python-ogre without building CEGUI and OIS
separately? This works for me quite well, I am using the libraries provided
by my distribution (Debian).
Am Montag, den 16.11.2009, 11:26 +0100 schrieb Andy Miller
<nzmi...@gmail.com>:
> The Boost build worked great for me under Ubuntu -- what problem are you
> having..
Ah, I was not having *build* problems, except using only one CPU core when
I have eight of them.
This line environment.py:568:
"[0, PREFIX + '/bin/bjam release install --with-python --with-thread
--with-date_time --prefix='+PREFIX, os.path.join(os.getcwd(),
'boost-trunk') ]"
will not use multiple cores, as e.g. ogre uses to compile:
"make -j%i" % NUMBER_OF_CORES"
> Is there an issue using bjam or are you simply pointing out that a
shelly
> script can be used? If so send me a patch...
Okay, I will resend my patch about building boost.
We can debate very long if bjam is really needed or not. I am just asking
why you want to use it, when it is not needed anymore. I have no problem
with leaving it in :-)
However, I have a very big problem with wasting my bandwidth and time: You
are downloading a stable boost version, boost SVN trunk and bjam when only
one of these is really needed. Either Boost 1.40 or Boost SVN. Boost SVN is
a ~600MiB download (depending on compression, etc.) whereas boost 1.40 is
only ~40MiB. I leave in a place where you pay for every GiB download, so I
think this definitely makes a difference.
> And where has the multi cores been removed ???
See above.
Regards,
Enrico
EnricoTo post to this group, send email to python-ogre...@googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Python Ogre Developers" group.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/python-ogre-developers?hl=.
Enrico
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Python Ogre Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to python-ogre...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to python-ogre-devel...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/python-ogre-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Enrico
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Python Ogre Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to python-ogre...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to python-ogre-devel...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/python-ogre-developers?hl=en.