Received: by 10.227.202.84 with SMTP id fd20mr211843wbb.4.1322693619219; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:53:39 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: python-ogre-developers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.200.140 with SMTP id ew12ls5255128wbb.3.gmail; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:53:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.4.213 with SMTP id 63mr64320wej.3.1322693618143; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:53:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.46.208 with SMTP id r58msweb; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:36:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.127.148 with SMTP id ha20mr303926bkc.6.1322649394737; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:36:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.127.148 with SMTP id ha20mr303925bkc.6.1322649394714; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:36:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w8si1264829bkd.0.2011.11.30.02.36.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:36:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ivuc...@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.54; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ivuc...@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ivuc...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com Received: by mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com with SMTP id v2so172494lah.41 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:36:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=W8+GIcwaSHNXFzFoFpX40Xo+HZqT8uBUZwLSmIqXqsQ=; b=E2/vxiotCvqfDmNShkENWCE6w8LB/MILh+kf5y4MyFBFozUa/OhPKg6Mhxe31cglA4 nIRpcfpGa/s5YWZSBTwNwA2Ma/dMJGUd7kch+So3VWS5695Q7L5FgOy6rRj7a9V9FQUA 2I1W8aN6V6sgw3I3+JpQ++MXGc9NGWLYdKlUM= Received: by 10.152.109.199 with SMTP id hu7mr889754lab.16.1322649394500; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:36:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.122.176 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:36:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?B?SXZhbiBWdcSNaWNh?= Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:36:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [python-ogre] Python-Ogre Mercurial/Git To: python-ogre-developers@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54b4a5252553304b2f14f13 --bcaec54b4a5252553304b2f14f13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I definitely vote for Mercurial in any form, and BitBucket is offering excellent service for Mercurial. While GitHub is great for Git users, I really find Git harder to use. On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:31, andy miller wrote: > I'm all for it :) - I would suggest we use bitbucket to be consistent wit= h > the core Ogre code and had created an area some time back ( > https://bitbucket.org/andymiller/python-ogre) which we could use however > very much open to other suggestions.. > > Also would take any ideas on how best to organize etc as we might as well > do a full clean up.. > > Andy > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:57 PM, dermont wrote: > >> There were some discussions in the past regarding switching to a >> distributed source control model. >> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/python-ogre-developers/browse_thread/thre= ad/4ca4913de71067a3/c9b21400ef92c701?lnk=3Dgst&q=3Dmercurial# >> >> I didn't agree with that at the time but in retrospect I think that >> Andy was correct and perhaps now is the time to make the switch tagged >> to the Ogre branch versions. The code generators / demos etc. are >> becoming a bit messy and more difficult to maintain i.e. ensuring they >> run against various versions of Ogre. There is also now Python3 to >> consider. >> >> The media files would in a separate downloaded/and or obtained from >> the base libs. >> >> I realise that this would involve additional work but it may make it >> easier for others to contribute or to obtain additional developers. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group= s >> "Python Ogre Developers" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> python-ogre-developers@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> python-ogre-developers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/python-ogre-developers?hl=3Den. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Python Ogre Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to > python-ogre-developers@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > python-ogre-developers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/python-ogre-developers?hl=3Den. > --=20 Ivan Vu=C4=8Dica - i...@vucica.net --bcaec54b4a5252553304b2f14f13 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I definitely vote for Mercurial in any form, and BitBucket is offering exce= llent service for Mercurial.

While GitHub is great for G= it users, I really find Git harder to use.

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:31, andy miller <a...@kiwisoft.com> wrote:
I'm all for it :) - I would suggest we use bitbucket to be consistent w= ith the core Ogre code and had created an area some time back (https://bitb= ucket.org/andymiller/python-ogre) which we could use however very much = open to other suggestions..

Also would take any ideas on how best to organize etc as we = might as well do a full clean up..

Andy


On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 a= t 2:57 PM, dermont <dermontg...@gmail.com> wrote:
There were some discussions in the past rega= rding switching to a
distributed source control model.

http://groups.google.com/group/python-ogre-developers/bro= wse_thread/thread/4ca4913de71067a3/c9b21400ef92c701?lnk=3Dgst&q=3Dmercu= rial#

I didn't agree with that at the time but in retrospect I think that
Andy was correct and perhaps now is the time to make the switch tagged
to the Ogre branch versions. The code generators / demos etc. are
becoming a bit messy and more difficult to maintain i.e. ensuring they
run against various versions of Ogre. There is also now Python3 to
consider.

The media files would in a separate downloaded/and or obtained from
the base libs.

I realise that this would involve additional work but it may make it
easier for others to contribute or to obtain additional developers.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Python Ogre Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to python-ogre-developers@googlegroups.= com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to python-ogre-d= evelopers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google= .com/group/python-ogre-developers?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Python Ogre Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to python-ogre-developers@googlegroups.= com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to python-ogre-d= evelopers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google= .com/group/python-ogre-developers?hl=3Den.



--
= Ivan Vu=C4=8Dica -=C2=A0i...@vucica.net


--bcaec54b4a5252553304b2f14f13--